Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleHead and Neck

Visualization of Internal Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients: A Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound

S. Yoshimura, M. Kawasaki, K. Yamada, Y. Enomoto, Y. Egashira, A. Hattori, K. Nishigaki, S. Minatoguchi and T. Iwama
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2012, 33 (2) 308-313; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2740
S. Yoshimura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Kawasaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Yamada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Enomoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Egashira
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Hattori
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Nishigaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Minatoguchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Iwama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: OCT has been reported as a high-resolution imaging tool for characterizing plaque in the coronary arteries. The present study aimed to evaluate the ability of OCT to visualize carotid artery plaques compared with that of IVUS in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: OCT was performed for 34 plaques (17 symptomatic, 17 asymptomatic) in 30 patients during CAS under a proximal cerebral protection method. OCT was performed before balloon angioplasty and after stent placement. IVUS was also performed just after OCT.

RESULTS: No technical or neurologic complications were encountered by using OCT. An inner catheter was used in 12 of 34 procedures (35.3%) for advancing the OCT image wire beyond the site of stenosis. OCT clearly visualized intraluminal thrombus in 15 of 34 plaques (44.1%), whereas IVUS detected a thrombus in 1 plaque (2.9%, P < .001). Neovascularization was demonstrated in 13 of 34 plaques (38.2%) by OCT, but not by IVUS (0%, P < .001). Intraluminal thrombus was more frequently observed in symptomatic plaques (13 of 17, 76.5%) than in asymptomatic plaques (2 of 17, 11.8%; P < .001). Interobserver and intraobserver variability with OCT diagnosis was excellent for thrombus, ulceration, neovascularization, and lipid pool.

CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that OCT can safely and precisely visualize human carotid plaques during CAS and that intraluminal thrombus and neovascularization are more frequently detected in symptomatic plaques.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CAS
carotid artery stenting
HDL
high-density lipoprotein
IVUS
intravascular ultrasound
LDL
low-density lipoprotein
OCT
optical coherence tomography
SAPPHIRE
Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy
VH
virtual histology-intravascular

One of the mechanisms underlying acute stroke is the disruption of atherosclerotic plaques in major cerebral vessels, including the carotid arteries. However, visualizing arterial wall changes is sometimes difficult by using conventional imaging techniques such as angiography, MR imaging, or duplex sonography.1 In particular, intraluminal thrombus is difficult to detect clearly during catheter interventions such as CAS, even with use of IVUS.2

Intravascular OCT has recently been proposed as a high-resolution imaging tool for plaque characterization. OCT is a noncontact light-based imaging method using newly developed fiber-optic technology. The typical OCT image has an axial resolution of 10 μm, approximately 10 times higher than that of any other clinically available diagnostic imaging technique such as IVUS, with a resolution of 80 μm.3 Therefore, despite the need for removing blood from the FOV, in vivo application of OCT has been reported for the coronary arteries4–7 and, more recently, in the carotid artery.8,9 The present study evaluated the ability of OCT to visualize structures of the carotid artery wall in comparison with IVUS and to evaluate differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 70.1 ± 9.4 years (range, 41–83 years) undergoing CAS at our facility were enrolled between November 2009 and December 2010. OCT and IVUS were performed for 34 lesions in 30 patients during the CAS procedure, with 4 patients undergoing bilateral CAS. We defined carotid plaques as “symptomatic” if they were associated with transient ischemic attack or cerebral infarction within the past 180 days. Plaques were defined as “asymptomatic” if they did not cause truly ipsilateral ischemic lesions or had not caused ipsilateral ischemic lesions within the past 180 days.10 Grade of carotid stenosis was assessed by using angiography,11 and indications for CAS were based on the SAPPHIRE trial.12 OCT examination was performed only when CAS was planned under proximal protection methods, due to the need for continuous injection of saline through the guiding catheter to remove blood from the FOV. Because OCT is approved only for coronary arteries, the application to human carotid arteries was approved by our institutional ethics committee (No. 21-108), and the study protocol was submitted to an open-access data base (University Hospital Medical Information Network; the trial number is UMIN 000002808). Informed consent was obtained from all patients before participation.

Procedures and Data Acquisition of OCT and IVUS

A 9F guiding catheter with an occlusion balloon was navigated into the common carotid artery, and a guidewire with an occlusion balloon (GuardWire; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) was introduced into the external carotid artery. An OCT (M2 OCT Imaging system; LightLab Imaging, Westford, Massachusetts) imaging wire (ImageWire, LightLab Imaging) was advanced into the carotid artery beyond the stenotic site, which was scanned by using a built-in automatic pullback system from the distal portion at 1 mm/s while both common and external carotid arteries were occluded by using the balloons. During scanning, saline was infused continuously into the carotid arteries from the guiding catheter at a rate of 3 mL/s by using a motor-driven injector. All images were recorded digitally and analyzed by 2 readers. The “lipid component” was defined as a homogeneous diffusely bordered signal-intensity-poor region with an overlying signal-intensity-rich band corresponding to a fibrous cap.4 “Calcification” was defined as a heterogeneous sharply delineated signal-intensity-poor or signal-intensity-rich region or alternating signal-intensity-poor and signal-intensity-rich regions.4 “Thrombus” was defined as a backscattering protrusion into the carotid lumen with signal-intensity-free shadowing.13 “Ulceration” was defined as a cavity with a lacerated superficial intimal layer. A “lipid-rich plaque” was defined when a lipid pool was present in ≥2 quadrants in the lesions. “Neovascularization” was defined as a no-signal-intensity microchannel structure without a connection to the vessel lumen that was present in >3 continuous cross-sections of OCT images.14 Tissue characterization of carotid lesions was performed according to the consensus decision of 2 readers.

After OCT examination, occlusion balloons were deflated and the stenotic site was again scanned by VH-IVUS with a 2.9F 20-MHz phased-array IVUS catheter (Eagle Eye Gold; Volcano Therapeutics, Rancho Cordova, California) in a regular blood flow. After OCT and IVUS, CAS was performed by using a Precise stent (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida) or carotid Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts); then the lesion was scanned again by using OCT and IVUS. To match the images obtained with OCT and those with IVUS, we selected IVUS images first and selected the same segments of OCT by using the distance from the bifurcation between the internal and external carotid arteries because imaging construction was possible at every 0.03 mm in both IVUS and OCT by using an auto-pullback device. Calcification was used as a reference marker to ensure that the sites of IVUS and OCT were the same.

Interobserver variability of OCT and IVUS diagnosis was determined in 40 randomly selected recordings that were assessed by 2 observers in a blinded fashion. Likewise, intraobserver variability of OCT and IVUS diagnosis was determined in 40 randomly selected recordings that were assessed twice by the same observer within a 7-day interval.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous values are expressed as the mean ± SD. Categoric data are summarized as percentages and were compared by using the Fisher exact test. Comparisons of continuous variables between cohorts were performed with unpaired Student t tests, because variances between cohorts did not differ significantly. Values of P < .05 were indicative of statistically significant differences. Inter- and intraobserver variabilities were quantified by using Cohen κ test of concordance. A κ value of 0.61–0.80 indicated good agreement, and 0.81–1.0 indicated excellent agreement.15 Statistical analyses were performed by using StatView software, Version 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Results

Patient Characteristics and OCT Procedures

The clinical characteristics of patients are provided in Table 1. Among the 34 lesions, 17 were symptomatic and 17 were asymptomatic. OCT examination was performed in all 34 procedures. CAS was successfully performed in 33 procedures, but carotid endarterectomy was performed in 1 patient instead of CAS after a large thrombus occupying more than half of the carotid lumen was clearly detected on OCT. Among the 34 OCT procedures, a 3.3F inner catheter was used in 12 procedures (35.3%) for advancing the OCT image wire beyond the site of stenosis. The longitudinal length of OCT images with good quality that were adequate for tissue characterization was 22 ± 5 mm. No technical or neurologic complications were encountered during or after OCT, though transient carotid artery occlusion and continuous infusion of saline were necessary during the time required for imaging (mean duration, 25 ± 6 seconds; range, 17–34 seconds).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Patient characteristics (N = 30)

Findings of OCT in Comparison with IVUS

OCT and VH-IVUS findings for corresponding lesions are summarized in Table 2. Among prestenting findings, intraluminal thrombus and neovascularization were significantly more frequently detected by OCT than by VH-IVUS (P < .001, Figs 1 and 2). Ulceration also tended to be more frequently detected by OCT than by IVUS, but the difference was not significant (Table 2 and Fig 2). Conversely, calcification was less frequently detected by OCT than by IVUS (P < .001, Table 2 and Fig 3). No difference in the frequency of the lipid component was seen between OCT and IVUS (Table 2 and Fig 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

OCT and VH-IVUS findings for corresponding lesions

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Thrombus in the carotid lumen detected by OCT. A, Carotid angiography shows severe cervical carotid artery stenosis in a patient who presented with sudden left hemiparesis (arrow). B, Intraluminal thrombus is clearly detected by OCT as a backscattering protrusion into the carotid lumen with signal-intensity-free shadowing (arrow). C, Corresponding images from IVUS show an eccentric low-echoic plaque but do not discriminate the thrombus from other tissue components. Bar = 1 mm.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Representative images of neovascularization and ulceration of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis before CAS. A, OCT demonstrates neovascularization as a no-signal-intensity microchannel structure without connection to the vessel lumen that was present in >3 continuous cross-sections of OCT images (arrow). B, The corresponding image from IVUS does not show these findings. C, OCT demonstrates a small ulceration as a cavity with a lacerated superficial intimal layer (arrow). D, The corresponding image from IVUS does not depict this lesion. Bar = 1 mm.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Representative images of a calcification and lipid-rich component before stent placement. A, OCT demonstrates calcification as a heterogeneous, sharply delineated mixed-signal-intensity region (arrowheads). B, The corresponding image from IVUS shows calcification (arrowheads) as an echo-bright area with acoustic shadowing, but unclear borders. C, Corresponding VH-IVUS reveals white calcifications (arrows). D, OCT demonstrates a large lipid pool (arrow) as a homogeneous diffusely bordered signal-intensity-poor region with an overlying signal-intensity-rich band corresponding to a fibrous cap. However, OCT does not demonstrate the entire arterial wall due to the limited penetration depth. E, Corresponding IVUS shows the plaque as heterogeneous with an echolucent core (arrow). F, Corresponding VH-IVUS reveals a large light-green lipid core (arrow). Bar = 1 mm.

Regarding differences in OCT findings between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques (Table 3), intraluminal thrombus was more frequently observed in symptomatic plaques (76.5%) than in asymptomatic plaques (11.8%, P < .001). Neovascularization was also more often observed in symptomatic plaques (58.8%) than in asymptomatic plaques (17.6%, P = .03). In contrast, no significant differences were seen in the incidence of other findings such as calcification, lipid-rich component, ulceration, and plaque protrusion after stent placement between groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Laboratory and OCT findings of symptomatic and asymptomatic lesions

Findings after CAS

Plaque protrusion after stent placement was clearly demonstrated by OCT, but not by IVUS with ChromaFlo (Volcano Therapeutics) (Fig 4).16 Plaque protrusion was observed in 4 of 17 symptomatic (23.5%) and in 2 of 17 asymptomatic lesions (11.8%, Table 3).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Representative images of plaque protrusion in a patient with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis after CAS. A, OCT demonstrates tissue protrusion from the spaces between stent struts (arrows). B, Corresponding image from IVUS with Chromaflo does not clearly show this finding. Bar = 1 mm.

Inter- and Intraobserver Variability

Interobserver variability with OCT diagnosis was excellent for ulceration (κ = 1.00), thrombus (κ = 0.88), lipid pool (κ = 0.86), and neovascularization (κ = 0.84) and good for calcification (κ = 0.79). Interobserver variability with IVUS for calcification and lipid-rich component were 0.83 and 0.68, respectively. Intraobserver variability with OCT was excellent for ulceration (κ = 1.00), calcification (κ = 1.00), neovascularization (κ = 0.92), thrombus (κ = 0.88), and lipid pool (κ = 0.88). Interobserver variability with IVUS for calcification and lipid-rich component were 0.93 and 0.86, respectively.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that intravascular OCT imaging allowed safe visualization of tissue components of carotid plaques. Intraluminal thrombus and neovascularization were detected more frequently by OCT than by IVUS. Symptomatic carotid plaques showed intraluminal thrombus more frequently than asymptomatic plaques. To date, limited information has been available regarding the tissue characteristics of human carotid arteries on OCT.8 The present study provides important information on the findings of carotid plaques by using OCT in relation to ischemic symptoms.

MR imaging reportedly identified more ischemic brain lesions after CAS in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients.17 This finding may have been attributable to a high prevalence of thrombogenic plaques in symptomatic patients.18 Thus, preoperative information about an intraluminal thrombus should be important to avoid a distal embolism during CAS. In the SAPPHIRE trial, the presence of intraluminal thrombus was defined as an exclusion criterion.12 However, it has often been reported that neither angiography nor IVUS can reliably demonstrate the presence of a thrombus. Appropriate methods to detect intraluminal thrombus before and during CAS have yet to be established. In the present study, OCT demonstrated intraluminal thrombi more clearly than IVUS or angiography without any complications. Furthermore, it was reported that red and white coronary arterial thrombi could be differentiated by using OCT.11 OCT images of red thrombi are characterized as highly backscattered protrusions with signal-intensity-free shadowing. OCT thus offers significant information for evaluating intraluminal thrombi, which are at high risk for CAS. In the present study, plaque protrusion after stent placement was clearly demonstrated by OCT but was overlooked by IVUS. This finding may also be important for preventing embolic complications after CAS.

In the present study, the incidence of thrombus was significantly higher in symptomatic plaques (76.5%) than in asymptomatic plaques (11.8%; P < .001). This finding suggests that the presence of thrombus is related to ischemic symptoms, similar to the mechanism underlying acute coronary syndrome. An angioscopic study in coronary arteries found a gradual disappearance of thrombus during the follow-up period, and several thrombi were still found on the ruptured plaque after 12 months of follow-up.19 Knowing how long a carotid thrombus takes to disappear would represent interesting and potentially useful information. OCT may allow investigation of time-dependent changes.

Neovascularization was also more frequently detected in symptomatic plaques (Table 3). This finding is interesting because carotid plaque neovascularization has also been evaluated by contrast-enhanced sonography and has recently been regarded as a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis due to associations with plaque echolucency and ischemic symptoms.20–22 Comparing findings of neovascularization between contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and OCT would be important in future examinations.

Regarding the potential of OCT to characterize the plaque morphology of fibrous or fatty components, a postmortem study on coronary arteries demonstrated that OCT image criteria for differentiating lipid-rich plaques achieved a high sensitivity (90%–94%) and specificity (90%–92%).5 However, there might be false-negative diagnoses for lipid-rich plaques due to the limited penetration depth of OCT, and some thick-capped large lipid pools could be misinterpreted as fibrous.5 Extrapolation of data from coronary arteries to carotid arteries is not always pertinent because the OCT criteria were developed for coronary arteries. We should be aware that criteria of coronary plaques that cause acute coronary syndrome are different from those of carotid plaques that cause cerebral infarction.

The current limitations of OCT compared with those of IVUS are the interference by blood flow and the degree of tissue penetration. To obtain a bloodless FOV, the proximal protection method by using occlusion balloons for the common carotid and external carotid arteries is required for the application of OCT to the cervical carotid artery. Also, the scanning length of OCT is 3.25–3.4 mm in normal saline. The diameter of the carotid arteries is normally larger than that of the coronary arteries. Therefore, plaque components located on the far side of the luminal surface are sometimes not visualized by OCT due to its limited penetration depth. In contrast, 1 advantage of OCT is the ability to visualize the near side of the vessel luminal surface with a high resolution. The axial resolution in OCT ranges from 12 to 18 μm, compared with 150–200 μm for VH-IVUS (Eagle Eye Gold), and the lateral resolution in OCT is typically 20–90 μm compared with 150–300 μm for VH-IVUS. As shown in the present study, even a small thrombus or a plaque protrusion through the stent struts can be visualized clearly by OCT. Thus, use of both OCT and IVUS would be helpful to assess total plaque morphology.

Several limitations to the present study should be considered. First, the findings obtained by OCT were not confirmed by histopathologic analysis. Although plaque characterization has been performed by using coronary and postmortem carotid plaques in the past, the relationship between in vivo OCT observation of the carotid plaque and pathologic analysis should be performed in the next study. Second, because the proximal protection method is essential for the application of OCT to the cervical carotid artery, OCT is only applicable during CAS. A new generation of OCT devices requiring less time for scanning may resolve this limitation in the near future.

Conclusions

The present findings suggest that OCT allows safe and precise visualization of human carotid plaques during CAS and that intraluminal thrombus and neovascularization are more frequently detected in symptomatic plaques.

Acknowledgments

We thank Motoki Hayano for his excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by a research grant program of Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lee RT,
    2. Libby P
    . The unstable atheroma. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17: 1859– 67
    FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nissen SE,
    2. Yock P
    . Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insight and current clinical applications. Circulation 2001; 103: 604– 16
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mintz GS,
    2. Nissen SE,
    3. Anderson WD,
    4. et al
    . American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS): a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1478– 92
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jang IK,
    2. Bouma BE,
    3. Kang DH,
    4. et al
    . Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 604– 09
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yabushita H,
    2. Bouma BE,
    3. Houser SL,
    4. et al
    . Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 2002; 106: 1640– 45
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jang IK,
    2. Tearney GJ,
    3. MacNeill B,
    4. et al
    . In vivo characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by use of optical coherence tomography. Circulation 2005; 111: 1551– 55
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kawasaki M,
    2. Bouma BE,
    3. Bressner J,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound images for tissue characterization of human coronary plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 81– 88
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Yoshimura S,
    2. Kawasaki M,
    3. Yamada K,
    4. et al
    . Demonstration of intraluminal thrombus in the carotid artery by optical coherence tomography. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3 suppl operative): onsE305.
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yoshimura S,
    2. Kawasaki M,
    3. Yamada K,
    4. et al
    . OCT of human carotid arterial plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 432– 36
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Howarth SP,
    2. Tang TY,
    3. Trivedi R,
    4. et al
    . Utility of SPIO-enhanced MR imaging to identify inflammation and fibrous cap: a comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70: 555– 60
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445– 53
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yadav JS,
    2. Wholey MH,
    3. Kuntz RE,
    4. et al
    . Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy investigators: protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493– 501
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kume T,
    2. Akasaka T,
    3. Kawamoto T,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of coronary arterial thrombus by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1713– 17
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kitabata H,
    2. Tanaka A,
    3. Kubo T,
    4. et al
    . Relation of microchannel structure identified by optical coherence tomography to plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105: 1673– 78
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fleiss JL
    . Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Son; 1981
  16. 16.↵
    1. Irshad K,
    2. Reid DB,
    3. Miller PH,
    4. et al
    . Early clinical experience with color three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound in peripheral interventions. J Endovasc Ther 2001; 8: 329– 38
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yamada K,
    2. Kawasaki M,
    3. Yoshimura S,
    4. et al
    . Prediction of silent ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting using integrated backscatter ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis 2010; 208: 161– 66
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Spagnoli LG,
    2. Mauriello A,
    3. Sangiorgi G,
    4. et al
    . Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. JAMA 2004; 292: 1845– 52
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Takano M,
    2. Inami S,
    3. Ishibashi F,
    4. et al
    . Angioscopic follow-up study of coronary ruptured plaques in nonculprit lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 652– 58
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Coli S,
    2. Magnoni M,
    3. Sangiorgi G,
    4. et al
    . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 223– 30
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Xiong L,
    2. Deng YB,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. et al
    . Correlation of carotid plaque neovascularization detected by using contrast-enhanced US with clinical symptoms. Radiology 2009; 251: 583– 89
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Shah F,
    2. Balan P,
    3. Weinberg M,
    4. et al
    . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis? Vasc Med 2007; 12: 291– 97
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received February 17, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision May 2, 2011.
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 2
1 Feb 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Visualization of Internal Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients: A Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Yoshimura, M. Kawasaki, K. Yamada, Y. Enomoto, Y. Egashira, A. Hattori, K. Nishigaki, S. Minatoguchi, T. Iwama
Visualization of Internal Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients: A Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2012, 33 (2) 308-313; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2740

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Visualization of Internal Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients: A Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound
S. Yoshimura, M. Kawasaki, K. Yamada, Y. Enomoto, Y. Egashira, A. Hattori, K. Nishigaki, S. Minatoguchi, T. Iwama
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2012, 33 (2) 308-313; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2740
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Optical coherence tomography evaluation of tissue prolapse after carotid artery stenting using closed cell design stents for unstable plaque
  • Intraluminal Thrombus, Intraplaque Hemorrhage, Plaque Thickness, and Current Smoking Optimally Predict Carotid Stroke
  • Intravascular Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients
  • Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Human Carotid Atherosclerosis Using Saline Flush for Blood Clearance without Balloon Occlusion
  • New Frontiers in the Feasibility of Optical Coherence Tomography in Carotid Arteries
  • Crossref (46)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Optical Coherence Tomography after Carotid Stenting: Rate of Stent Malapposition, Plaque Prolapse and Fibrous Cap Rupture According to Stent Design
    G. de Donato, F. Setacci, P. Sirignano, G. Galzerano, A. Cappelli, C. Setacci
    European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2013 45 6
  • Intraluminal Thrombus, Intraplaque Hemorrhage, Plaque Thickness, and Current Smoking Optimally Predict Carotid Stroke
    J. Scott McNally, Michael S. McLaughlin, Peter J. Hinckley, Scott M. Treiman, Gregory J. Stoddard, Dennis L. Parker, Gerald S. Treiman
    Stroke 2015 46 1
  • Potential of New-Generation Double-Layer Micromesh Stent for Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Unstable Plaque: A Preliminary Result Using OFDI Analysis
    Kiyofumi Yamada, Shinichi Yoshimura, Masatomo Miura, Takuya Kanamaru, Seigo Shindo, Kazutaka Uchida, Manabu Shirakawa, Masahiko Shibuya, Takahiro Imanaka, Masaharu Ishihara, Tohru Masuyama, Reiichi Ishikura, Masanori Kawasaki
    World Neurosurgery 2017 105
  • Intravascular Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients
    Michael R. Jones, Guilherme F. Attizzani, Curtis A. Given, William H. Brooks, Stephen J. Ganocy, Christian N. Ramsey, Yusuke Fujino, Hiram G. Bezerra, Marco A. Costa
    JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2014 7 6
  • Intravascular Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Atherosclerosis and Stent-Vessel Interactions in Human Carotid Arteries
    M.R. Jones, G.F. Attizzani, C.A. Given, W.H. Brooks, M.A. Costa, H.G. Bezerra
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012 33 8
  • Optical coherence tomography assessment of newgeneration mesh-covered stents after carotid stenting
    Tomoyuki Umemoto, Gianmarco de Donato, Andrea Pacchioni, Bernhard Reimers, Giuseppe Ferrante, Mitsuaki Isobe, Carlo Setacci
    EuroIntervention 2017 13 11
  • Optical coherence tomography evaluation of tissue prolapse after carotid artery stenting using closed cell design stents for unstable plaque
    Kei Harada, Shogo Oshikata, Masahito Kajihara
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2018 10 3
  • Safety and Feasibility of Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Using a Nonocclusive Technique to Evaluate Carotid Plaques Before and After Stent Deployment
    Carlo Setacci, Gianmarco de Donato, Francesco Setacci, Giuseppe Galzerano, Pasqualino Sirignano, Alessandro Cappelli, Giancarlo Palasciano
    Journal of Endovascular Therapy 2012 19 3
  • Detection of in-stent protrusion (ISP) by intravascular ultrasound during carotid stenting: Usefulness of stent-in-stent placement for ISP
    T. Okazaki, S. Sakamoto, K. Shinagawa, N. Ichinose, D. Ishii, T. Matsushige, Y. Kiura, K. Kurisu
    European Radiology 2019 29 1
  • Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Human Carotid Atherosclerosis Using Saline Flush for Blood Clearance without Balloon Occlusion
    C.A. Given, G.F. Attizzani, M.R. Jones, C.N. Ramsey, W.H. Brooks, M.A. Costa, H.G. Bezerra
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2013 34 7

More in this TOC Section

  • Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3T with Prognostic Parameters of Retinoblastoma
  • Parathyroid Lesions: Characterization with Dual-Phase Arterial and Venous Enhanced CT of the Neck
  • Efficacy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Differentiation between Lymphomas and Carcinomas of the Nasopharynx and Oropharynx: Correlations of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and Histologic Features
Show more HEAD AND NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire