Systematic Review of Methods for Assessing Leptomeningeal Collateral Flow

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Brozici M,
   2. van der Zwan A,
   3. Hillen B

   . Anatomy and functionality of leptomeningeal anastomoses: a review. Stroke 2003; 34: 2750– 62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Muller M,
   2. Schimrigk K

   . Vasomotor reactivity and pattern of collateral blood flow in severe occlusive carotid artery disease. Stroke 1996; 27: 296– 99

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Liebeskind DS

   . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003; 34: 2279– 84

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Bang OY,
   2. Saver JL,
   3. Buck BH,
   4. et al

   . Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 625– 29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Miteff F,
   2. Levi CR,
   3. Bateman GA,
   4. et al

   . The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2009; 132: 2231– 38

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Christoforidis GA,
   2. Karakasis C,
   3. Mohammad Y,
   4. et al

   . Predictors of hemorrhage following intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: the role of pial collateral formation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 165– 70

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Brandt T

   . Survival with basilar artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 1995; 5: 182– 87

   CrossRefWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Arnold M,
   2. Nedeltchev K,
   3. Schroth G,
   4. et al

   . Clinical and radiological predictors of recanalisation and outcome of 40 patients with acute basilar artery occlusion treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 857– 62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. von Kummer R

   . Effects of recanalization and collateral blood supply on infarct extent and brain edema after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 1993; 3: 252– 55

   CrossRef
10. 10.↵
    1. Bozzao L,
    2. Fantozzi LM,
    3. Bastianello S,
    4. et al

    . Early collateral blood supply and late parenchymal brain damage in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 1989; 20: 735– 40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Bozzao L,
    2. Bastianello S,
    3. Fantozzi LM,
    4. et al

    . Correlation of angiographic and sequential CT findings in patients with evolving cerebral infarction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 1215– 22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Toni D,
    2. Fiorelli M,
    3. De Michele M,
    4. et al

    . Clinical and prognostic correlates of stroke subtype misdiagnosis within 12 hours from onset. Stroke 1995; 26: 1837– 40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Wu B,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Guo J,
    4. et al

    . Collateral circulation imaging: MR perfusion territory arterial spin-labeling at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1855– 60

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Christoforidis GA,
    2. Mohammad Y,
    3. Kehagias D,
    4. et al

    . Angiographic assessment of pial collaterals as a prognostic indicator following intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26: 1789– 97

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Derdeyn CP,
    2. Shaibani A,
    3. Moran CJ,
    4. et al

    . Lack of correlation between pattern of collateralization and misery perfusion in patients with carotid occlusion. Stroke 1999; 30: 1025– 32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Higashida RT,
    2. Furlan AJ,
    3. Roberts H,
    4. et al

    . Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: e109– 37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Bang OY,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Alger JR,
    4. et al

    . Determinants of the distribution and severity of hypoperfusion in patients with ischemic stroke. Neurology 2008; 71: 1804– 11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Ovbiagele B,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Starkman S,
    4. et al

    . Statin enhancement of collateralization in acute stroke. Neurology 2007; 68: 2129– 31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Sanossian N,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Alger JR,
    4. et al

    . Angiography reveals that fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities are due to slow flow, not thrombus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 564– 68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS

    . Angiographic collaterals and outcome in mechanical thrombolysis. Stroke 2005; 36: 449
21. 21.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS

    . Clinical predictors of angiographic collaterals in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005; 36: 450
22. 22.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS

    . Benign oligemia reflects collateral perfusion: MRI and angiography of low perfusion hyperemia in humans. Stroke 2008; 39: 577
23. 23.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Sanossian N,
    3. Alger JR,
    4. et al

    . Gradient echo MRI phase mismapping reveals angiographic correlated in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 637
24. 24.↵
    1. Powers WJ,
    2. Press GA,
    3. Grubb RL Jr.,
    4. et al

    . The effect of hemodynamically significant carotid artery disease on the hemodynamic status of the cerebral circulation. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 27– 34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Klijn CJ,
    2. Kappelle LJ,
    3. van Huffelen AC,
    4. et al

    . Recurrent ischemia in symptomatic carotid occlusion: prognostic value of hemodynamic factors. Neurology 2000; 55: 1806– 12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Essig M,
    2. von Kummer R,
    3. Egelhof T,
    4. et al

    . Vascular MR contrast enhancement in cerebrovascular disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17: 887– 94

    Abstract
27. 27.↵
    1. Kamran S,
    2. Bates V,
    3. Bakshi R,
    4. et al

    . Significance of hyperintense vessels on FLAIR MRI in acute stroke. Neurology 2000; 55: 265– 69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Ozgur HT,
    2. Kent Walsh T,
    3. Masaryk A,
    4. et al

    . Correlation of cerebrovascular reserve as measured by acetazolamide-challenged SPECT with angiographic flow patterns and intra- or extracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 928– 36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Rutgers DR,
    2. Klijn CJ,
    3. Kappelle LJ,
    4. et al

    . Recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion is associated with high-volume flow to the brain and increased collateral circulation. Stroke 2004; 35: 1345– 49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Zappe L,
    2. Juhasz J,
    3. Vidovszky T

    . Relationship of collateral circulation and prognosis in cerebral arterial occlusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1966; 14: 225– 37

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Noguchi K,
    2. Ogawa T,
    3. Inugami A,
    4. et al

    . MRI of acute cerebral infarction: a comparison of FLAIR and T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging. Neuroradiology 1997; 39: 406– 10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Grubb RL Jr.,
    2. Derdeyn CP,
    3. Fritsch SM,
    4. et al

    . Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA 1998; 280: 1055– 60

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Fukuyama H,
    2. Akiguchi I,
    3. Kameyama M,
    4. et al

    . Krypton-81m single photon emission tomography and the collateral circulation in carotid occlusion: the role of the circle of Willis and leptomeningeal anastomoses. J Neurol 1983; 230: 7– 17

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Lee KH,
    2. Cho SJ,
    3. Byun HS,
    4. et al

    . Triphasic perfusion computed tomography in acute middle cerebral artery stroke: a correlation with angiographic findings. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 990– 99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Kim Y,
    2. Sin DS,
    3. Park HY,
    4. et al

    . Relationship between flow diversion on transcranial Doppler sonography and leptomeningeal collateral circulation in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusive disorder. J Neuroimaging 2009; 19: 23– 26

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Kinoshita T,
    2. Ogawa T,
    3. Kado H,
    4. et al

    . CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial occlusive disease with collateral circulation: comparison with MR angiography. Clin Imaging 2005; 29: 303– 06

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. van Laar PJ,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. Klijn CJ,
    4. et al

    . Symptomatic carotid artery occlusion: flow territories of major brain-feeding arteries. Radiology 2007; 242: 526– 34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Yamauchi H,
    2. Kudoh T,
    3. Sugimoto K,
    4. et al

    . Pattern of collaterals, type of Infarcts, and haemodynamic impairment in carotid artery occlusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 1697– 701

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Uemura A,
    2. O'Uchi T,
    3. Kikuchi Y,
    4. et al

    . Prominent laterality of the posterior cerebral artery at three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in m1-segment middle cerebral artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 88– 91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Qureshi AI

    . New grading system for angiographic evaluation of arterial occlusions and recanalization response to intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 2002; 50: 1405– 14, discussion 1414–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Mohammad Y,
    2. Xavier AR,
    3. Christoforidis G,
    4. et al

    . Qureshi grading scheme for angiographic occlusions strongly correlates with the initial severity and in-hospital outcome of acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging. 2004; 14: 235– 41

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Mohammad YM,
    2. Christoforidis GA,
    3. Bourekas EC,
    4. et al

    . Qureshi grading scheme predicts subsequent volume of brain infarction following intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2008; 18: 262– 67

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Kucinski T,
    2. Koch C,
    3. Eckert B,
    4. et al

    . Collateral circulation is an independent radiological predictor of outcome after thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2003; 45: 11– 18

    PubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Gasparotti R,
    2. Grassi M,
    3. Mardighian D,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion CT in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: predictive value of infarct core size on clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 722– 27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. 45.↵
    1. Russell SM,
    2. Woo HH,
    3. Siller K,
    4. et al

    . Evaluating middle cerebral artery collateral blood flow reserve using acetazolamide transcranial Doppler ultrasound in patients with carotid occlusive disease. Surg Neurol 2008; 70: 466– 70, discussion 470

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Bisschops RH,
    2. Klijn CJ,
    3. Kappelle LJ,
    4. et al

    . Collateral flow and ischemic brain lesions in patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion. Neurology 2003; 60: 1435– 41

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    1. Cross DT 3rd.,
    2. Moran CJ,
    3. Akins PT,
    4. et al

    . Collateral circulation and outcome after basilar artery thrombolysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 1557– 63

    Abstract
48. 48.↵
    1. Bokkers RP,
    2. van Laar PJ,
    3. van de Ven KC,
    4. et al

    . Arterial spin-labeling MR imaging measurements of timing parameters in patients with a carotid artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1698– 703

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. 49.↵
    1. Derdeyn CP,
    2. Powers WJ,
    3. Grubb RL Jr.

    . Hemodynamic effects of middle cerebral artery stenosis and occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 1463– 69

    Abstract
50. 50.↵
    1. Smith HA,
    2. Thompson-Dobkin J,
    3. Yonas H,
    4. et al

    . Correlation of xenon-enhanced computed tomography-defined cerebral blood flow reactivity and collateral flow patterns. Stroke 1994; 25: 1784– 87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. 51.↵
    1. Chng SM,
    2. Petersen ET,
    3. Zimine I,
    4. et al

    . Territorial arterial spin labeling in the assessment of collateral circulation: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 2008; 39: 3248– 54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    1. von Kummer R,
    2. Holle R,
    3. Rosin L,
    4. et al

    . Does arterial recanalization improve outcome in carotid territory stroke? Stroke 1995; 26: 581– 87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
53. 53.↵
    1. von Kummer R,
    2. Hacke W

    . Safety and efficacy of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and heparin in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke 1992; 23: 646– 52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    1. Roberts HC,
    2. Dillon WP,
    3. Furlan AJ,
    4. et al

    . Computed tomographic findings in patients undergoing intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion: results from the PROACT II trial. Stroke 2002; 33: 1557– 65

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    1. Kim JJ,
    2. Fischbein NJ,
    3. Lu Y,
    4. et al

    . Regional angiographic grading system for collateral flow: correlation with cerebral infarction in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2004; 35: 1340– 44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
56. 56.↵
    1. Ringelstein EB,
    2. Biniek R,
    3. Weiller C,
    4. et al

    . Type and extent of hemispheric brain infarctions and clinical outcome in early and delayed middle cerebral artery recanalization. Neurology 1992; 42: 289– 98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
57. 57.↵
    1. Weidner W,
    2. Hanafeewmarkham CH

    . Intracranial collateral circulation via leptomeningeal and rete mirabile anastomoses. Neurology 1965; 15: 39– 48

    FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    1. Hofmeijer J,
    2. Klijn CJ,
    3. Kappelle LJ,
    4. et al

    . Collateral circulation via the ophthalmic artery or leptomeningeal vessels is associated with impaired cerebral vasoreactivity in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002; 14: 22– 26

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
59. 59.↵
    1. Arnold M,
    2. Schroth G,
    3. Nedeltchev K,
    4. et al

    . Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 100 patients with acute stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2002; 33: 1828– 33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
60. 60.↵
    1. Meier N,
    2. Nedeltchev K,
    3. Brekenfeld C,
    4. et al

    . Prior statin use, intracranial hemorrhage, and outcome after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009; 40: 1729– 37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
61. 61.↵
    1. Gonner F,
    2. Remonda L,
    3. Mattle H,
    4. et al

    . Local intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 1894– 900

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
62. 62.↵
    1. Brekenfeld C,
    2. Remonda L,
    3. Nedeltchev K,
    4. et al

    . Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage after intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: assessment of 294 patients treated with urokinase. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 280– 85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
63. 63.↵
    1. Toni D,
    2. Fiorelli M,
    3. Bastianello S,
    4. et al

    . Acute ischemic strokes improving during the first 48 hours of onset: predictability, outcome, and possible mechanisms—a comparison with early deteriorating strokes. Stroke 1997; 28: 10– 14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
64. 64.↵
    1. Liebeskind D

    . A novel CT angiography scale for assessment of collaterals in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 265
65. 65.↵
    1. Rosenthal ES,
    2. Schwamm LH,
    3. Roccatagliata L,
    4. et al

    . Role of recanalization in acute stroke outcome: rationale for a CT angiogram-based “benefit of recanalization” model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1471– 75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
66. 66.↵
    1. Maas MB,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Ay H,
    4. et al

    . Collateral vessels on CT angiography predict outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009; 40: 3001– 05

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
67. 67.↵
    1. Lima FO,
    2. Furie KL,
    3. Silva GS,
    4. et al

    . The pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography is a strong predictor of long-term functional outcome in stroke patients with large vessel intracranial occlusion. Stroke 41: 2316– 22
68. 68.↵
    1. Schramm P,
    2. Schellinger PD,
    3. Fiebach JB,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke 2002; 33: 2426– 32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
69. 69.↵
    1. Tan JC,
    2. Dillon WP,
    3. Liu S,
    4. et al

    . Systematic comparison of perfusion-CT and CT-angiography in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2007; 61: 533– 43

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
70. 70.↵
    1. Wildermuth S,
    2. Knauth M,
    3. Brandt T,
    4. et al

    . Role of CT angiography in patient selection for thrombolytic therapy in acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 935– 38

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
71. 71.↵
    1. Knauth M,
    2. von Kummer R,
    3. Jansen O,
    4. et al

    . Potential of CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18: 1001– 10

    Abstract
72. 72.↵
    1. Tan IY,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Hopyan J,
    4. et al

    . CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 525– 31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
73. 73.↵
    1. Soares BP,
    2. Tong E,
    3. Hom J,
    4. et al

    . Reperfusion is a more accurate predictor of follow-up infarct volume than recanalization: a proof of concept using CT in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke 2010; 41: e34– 40. Epub 2009 Nov 12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
74. 74.↵
    1. Kaps M,
    2. Damian MS,
    3. Teschendorf U,
    4. et al

    . Transcranial Doppler ultrasound findings in middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 1990; 21: 532– 37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
75. 75.↵
    1. Reinhard M,
    2. Muller T,
    3. Guschlbauer B,
    4. et al

    . Dynamic cerebral autoregulation and collateral flow patterns in patients with severe carotid stenosis or occlusion. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1105– 13

    CrossRefPubMed
76. 76.↵
    1. Reinhard M,
    2. Muller T,
    3. Roth M,
    4. et al

    . Bilateral severe carotid artery stenosis or occlusion: cerebral autoregulation dynamics and collateral flow patterns. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003; 145: 1053– 59, discussion 1059–60

    CrossRefPubMed
77. 77.↵
    1. Zanette EM,
    2. Roberti C,
    3. Mancini G,
    4. et al

    . Spontaneous middle cerebral artery reperfusion in ischemic stroke: a follow-up study with transcranial Doppler. Stroke 1995; 26: 430– 33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
78. 78.↵
    1. Chalela JA,
    2. Alsop DC,
    3. Gonzalez-Atavales JB,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000; 31: 680– 87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
79. 79.↵
    1. Hermier M,
    2. Ibrahim AS,
    3. Wiart M,
    4. et al

    . The delayed perfusion sign at MRI. J Neuroradiol 2003; 30: 172– 79

    PubMedWeb of Science
80. 80.↵
    1. Hermier M,
    2. Nighoghossian N,
    3. Derex L,
    4. et al

    . Hypointense leptomeningeal vessels at T2*-weighted MRI in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005; 65: 652– 53

    FREE Full Text
81. 81.↵
    1. Lee KY,
    2. Latour LL,
    3. Luby M,
    4. et al

    . Distal hyperintense vessels on flair: an MRI marker for collateral circulation in acute stroke? Neurology 2009; 72: 1134– 39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
82. 82.↵
    1. Schomer DF,
    2. Marks MP,
    3. Steinberg GK,
    4. et al

    . The anatomy of the posterior communicating artery as a risk factor for ischemic cerebral infarction. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1565– 70

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
83. 83.↵
    1. Ruland S,
    2. Ahmed A,
    3. Thomas K,
    4. et al

    . Leptomeningeal collateral volume flow assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in large-vessel cerebrovascular disease. J Neuroimaging 2009; 19: 27– 30

    CrossRefPubMed
84. 84.↵
    1. Martel AL,
    2. Allder SJ,
    3. Delay GS,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion MRI of infarcted and noninfarcted brain tissue in stroke: a comparison of conventional hemodynamic imaging and factor analysis of dynamic studies. Invest Radiol 2001; 36: 378– 85

    CrossRefPubMed
85. 85.↵
    1. Liebeskind D

    . Intravascular deoxygenation of leptomeningeal collaterals detected with gradient-echo MRI. Stroke 2004; 35: 266
86. 86.↵
    1. Hennerici M,
    2. Rautenberg W,
    3. Schwartz A

    . Transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the assessment of intracranial arterial flow velocity. Part 2. Evaluation of intracranial arterial disease. Surg Neurol 1987; 27: 523– 32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
87. 87.↵
    The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial phase I findings: TIMI study group. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 932– 36

    PubMed
88. 88.↵
    1. Saito I,
    2. Segawa H,
    3. Shiokawa Y,
    4. et al

    . Middle cerebral artery occlusion: correlation of computed tomography and angiography with clinical outcome. Stroke 1987; 18: 863– 68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
89. 89.↵
    1. Siebert E,
    2. Bohner G,
    3. Dewey M,
    4. et al

    . 320-slice CT neuroimaging: initial clinical experience and image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 561– 70. Epub 2009 Feb 16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
90. 90.↵
    1. Marinoni M,
    2. Ginanneschi A,
    3. Forleo P,
    4. et al

    . Technical limits in transcranial Doppler recording: on adequate acoustic windows. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 1275– 77

    CrossRefPubMed