Safety of the Pipeline Embolization Device in Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lylyk P,
   2. Miranda C,
   3. Ceratto R,
   4. et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Szikora I,
   2. Berentei Z,
   3. Kulcsar Z,
   4. et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Fischer S,
   2. Vajda Z,
   3. Aguilar Perez M,
   4. et al

   . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Lubicz B,
   2. Collignon L,
   3. Raphaeli GØ,
   4. et al

   . Pipeline flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary experience in 20 patients with 27 aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2011;76:114–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. McAuliffe W,
   2. Wycoco V,
   3. Rice H,
   4. et al

   . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Nelson PK,
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Szikora I,
   4. et al

   . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. McAuliffe W,
   2. Wenderoth JD

   . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:487–93

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Piotin M,
   2. Blanc R,
   3. Spelle L,
   4. et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:110–15

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Fiorella D,
   2. Albuquerque FC,
   3. Woo H,
   4. et al

   . Neuroform stent assisted aneurysm treatment: evolving treatment strategies, complications and results of long term follow-up. J NeuroInterv Surg 2010;2:16–22

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. de Barros Faria M,
    2. Castro RN,
    3. Lundquist J,
    4. et al

    . The role of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2192–95

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Martin AR,
    2. Pablo Cruz J,
    3. Matouk CC,
    4. et al

    . The Pipeline flow-diverting stent for exclusion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with difficult morphologies. Neurosurgery 2012;70 (1 suppl operative): 21–28 discussion 28

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Hampton T,
    2. Walsh D,
    3. Tolias C,
    4. et al

    . Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J NeuroInterv Surg 2011;3:167–71

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Chow M,
    2. McDougall C,
    3. O'Kelly C,
    4. et al

    . Delayed spontaneous rupture of a posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm following treatment with flow diversion: a clinicopathologic study of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:E46–51

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Hsu D,
    3. Woo HH,
    4. et al

    . Very late thrombosis of a Pipeline embolization device construct: case report. Neurosurgery 2010;67: onsE313–14, discussion onsE314
15. 15.↵
    1. Klisch J,
    2. Turk A,
    3. Turner R,
    4. et al

    . Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:627–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Turowski B,
    2. Macht S,
    3. Kulcsar Z,
    4. et al

    . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (Silk-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Houdart E,
    3. Bonafe A,
    4. et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Cloft HJ

    . Flow diversion for cerebral aneurysms: a cautionary tale of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32: 26
19. 19.↵
    Medical Device Alert: Intracranial Stent Manufactured by Balt Extrusion (MDA/2010/023). http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Publications/Safetywarnings/MedicalDeviceAlerts/CON076289. Accessed on 3 March, 2012.
20. 20.↵
    1. Byrne JV,
    2. Beltechi R,
    3. Yarnold JA,
    4. et al

    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e12492

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Collignon L,
    3. Raphaeli G,
    4. et al

    . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Tahtinen OI,
    2. Manninen HI,
    3. Vanninen RL,
    4. et al

    . The Silk flow diverting stent in the endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: technical aspects and mid-term results in 24 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2012;70:617–23, discussion 623–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Ernemann U,
    3. Wetzel SG,
    4. et al

    . High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 2010;41:1690–96

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Raphaeli G,
    2. Collignon L,
    3. Bruneau M,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation fusiform aneurysms: single-centre experience in 31 patients. Neurosurgery 2011 Mar 23. [Epub ahead of print]
25. 25.↵
    1. Charles R

    . Normal and abnormal embryology and development of the intracranial vascular system. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2010;21:399–426

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. van Rooij WJ,
    2. Sluzewski M

    . Perforator infarction after placement of a Pipeline flow-diverting stent for an unruptured A1 aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:E43–44

    FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Pistocchi S,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Bartolini B,
    4. et al

    . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Mocco J,
    2. Snyder KV,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Enterprise stent: a multicenter registry. J Neurosurg 2009;110:35–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Spiotta AM,
    2. Gupta R,
    3. Fiorella D,
    4. et al

    . Mid-term results of endovascular coiling of wide-necked aneurysms using double stents in a Y configuration. Neurosurgery 2011;69: 421