Coil Embolization versus Clipping for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Controlled Published Studies

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Haley EC Jr.,
   2. Kassell NF,
   3. Torner JC

   . The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery: the North American experience. Stroke 1992;23:205–14

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Rabinstein AA,
   2. Lanzino G,
   3. Wijdicks EF

   . Multidisciplinary management and emerging therapeutic strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:504–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Leake CB,
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. et al

   . Increasing treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms at high-volume centers in the United States. J Neurosurg 2011;115:1179–83

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Vanninen R,
   2. Koivisto T,
   3. Saari T,
   4. et al

   . Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: acute endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils—a prospective randomized study. Radiology 1999;211:325–36

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Koivisto T,
   2. Vanninen R,
   3. Hurskainen H,
   4. et al

   . Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. Stroke 2000;31:2369–77

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. McDougall CG,
   2. Spetzler RF,
   3. Zabramski JM,
   4. et al

   . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. van der Schaaf I,
   2. Algra A,
   3. Wermer M,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;CD003085
9. 9.↵
   1. DerSimonian R,
   2. Laird N

   . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Higgins JP,
    2. Thompson SG,
    3. Deeks JJ,
    4. et al

    . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Yu LM,
    4. et al

    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Dorhout Mees SM,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Rinkel GJ,
    4. et al

    . Occurrence and impact of delayed cerebral ischemia after coiling and after clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). J Neurol 2011;259:679–83

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bendel P,
    2. Koivisto T,
    3. Kononen M,
    4. et al

    . MR imaging of the brain 1 year after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: randomized study comparing surgical with endovascular treatment. Radiology 2008;246:543–52

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Vergouwen MD,
    2. Fang J,
    3. Casaubon LK,
    4. et al

    . Higher incidence of in-hospital complications in patients with clipped versus coiled ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2011;42:3093–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Scott RB,
    2. Eccles F,
    3. Molyneux AJ,
    4. et al

    . Improved cognitive outcomes with endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: neuropsychological outcomes from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2010;41:1743–47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Campi A,
    2. Ramzi N,
    3. Molyneux AJ,
    4. et al

    . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Birks J,
    4. et al

    . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Mitchell P,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Mendelow AD,
    4. et al

    . Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial? J Neurosurg 2008;108:437–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Coley S,
    2. Sneade M,
    3. Clarke A,
    4. et al

    . Cerecyte Coil Trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:474–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis. Stroke 2010;41:116–21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Lanzino G,
    2. Fraser K,
    3. Kanaan Y,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms since the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial: practice utilizing clip ligation and coil embolization as individual or complementary therapies. J Neurosurg 2006;104:344–49

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Lanzino G

    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:133–34

    CrossRefPubMed