Quantification of Internal Carotid Artery Flow with Digital Subtraction Angiography: Validation of an Optical Flow Approach with Doppler Ultrasound

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Pereira VM,
   2. Bonnefous O,
   3. Ouared R,
   4. et al

   . A DSA-based method using contrast-motion estimation for the assessment of the intra-aneurysmal flow changes induced by flow-diverter stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:808–15

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Jou LD,
   2. Mawad ME

   . Analysis of intra-aneurysmal flow for cerebral aneurysms with cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1679–84

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Lieber BB,
   2. Siebes M,
   3. Yamaguchi T

   . Correlation of hemodynamic events with clinical and pathological observations. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:1695–1703

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Shpilfoygel SD,
   2. Close RA,
   3. Valentino DJ,
   4. et al

   . X-ray videodensitometric methods for blood flow and velocity measurement: a critical review of literature. Med Phys 2000;27:2008–23

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Sarry L,
   2. Peng YJ,
   3. Boire JY

   . Blood flow velocity estimation from x-ray densitometric data: an efficient numerical scheme for the inverse advection problem. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:62
6. 6.↵
   1. Bogunović H,
   2. Loncarić S

   . Blood flow and velocity estimation based on vessel transit time by combining 2D and 3D X-ray angiography. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006;9(pt 2):117–24
7. 7.↵
   1. Rhode KS,
   2. Lambrou T,
   3. Hawkes DJ,
   4. et al

   . Novel approaches to the measurement of arterial blood flow from dynamic digital x-ray images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:500–13

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Imbed B,
   2. Meunier J,
   3. Mongrain R,
   4. et al

   . Optical flow assessment of parabolic velocity profile in cineangiography: a simulation study. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Montreal, Canada, September 20–25, 1995
9. 9.↵
   1. Imbed B,
   2. Meunier J,
   3. Mongrain R,
   4. et al

   . Blood flow assessment from optical flow in cineangiography. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Montreal, Canada, September 20–25, 1995
10. 10.↵
    1. Waechter I,
    2. Bredno J,
    3. Barratt DC,
    4. et al

    . Quantification of blood flow from rotational angiography. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007;10(pt 1):634–41

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Bonnefous O,
    2. Pereira VM,
    3. Ouared R,
    4. et al

    . Quantification of arterial flow with digital subtracted angiography (DSA). Med Phys 2012;39:6264–75

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Waechter I,
    2. Bredno J,
    3. Hermans R,
    4. et al

    . Model-based blood flow quantification from rotational angiography. Medical Image Anal 2008;12:586–602

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Lieber BB,
    2. Sadasivan C,
    3. Hao Q,
    4. et al

    . The mixability of angiographic contrast with arterial blood. Med Phys 2009;36:5064–78

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Ouared R,
    2. Brina O,
    3. Bonnefous O,
    4. Groth A,
    5. Brunjs T,
    6. Babic D,
    7. Bijlenga P,
    8. Schaller K,
    9. Lovblad KO,
    10. Pereira VM

    . Intracranial aneurysms: study of x-rays time-intensity-curves (TIC) pulsatility. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Mathematical and Computational Biomedical Engineering, Washington DC. March 30-April 1, 2011
15. 15.↵
    1. Babikian VL,
    2. Wechsler L,
    3. Higashida RT

    1. Forteza AM,
    2. Krejza J,
    3. Koch S,
    4. et al

    . Ultrasound imaging of cerebrovascular disease. In: Babikian VL, Wechsler L, Higashida RT [eds.]. Imaging Cerebrovascular Disease. Philadelphia: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003, pp. 3–35.5
16. 16.↵
    1. Holland PW,
    2. Welsch RE

    . Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares: theory and methods. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 1977;6:813–27

    CrossRefWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Street JO,
    2. Carroll RJ,
    3. Ruppert D

    . A note on computing robust regression estimates via iteratively reweighted least squares. The American Statistician 1988;42:152–54

    CrossRefWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Mulder G,
    2. Bogaerds AC,
    3. Rongen P,
    4. et al

    . The influence of contrast agent injection on physiological flow in the circle of Willis. Med Eng Phys 2011;33:195–203

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Tenjin H,
    2. Asakura F,
    3. Nakahara Y,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of intra-aneurysmal blood velocity by time-density curve analysis and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1303–07

    Abstract
20. 20.↵
    1. Sadasivan C,
    2. Cesar L,
    3. Seong J,
    4. et al

    . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Sadasivan C,
    2. Cesar L,
    3. Seong J,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of rabbit elastase-induced aneurysm models by flow diverters: development of quantifiable indexes of device performance using digital subtraction angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:1117–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Sadasivan C,
    2. Lieber BB,
    3. Cesar L,
    4. et al

    . Angiographic assessment of the performance of flow diverters to treat cerebral aneurysms. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, New York. August 31-September 3, 2006;3210–13
23. 23.↵
    1. Hoskins PR

    . Accuracy of maximum velocity estimates made using Doppler ultrasound systems. Br J Radiol 1996;69:172–77

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Burns PN

    . Measuring volume flow with Doppler ultrasound: an old nut. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:238–41

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Holland CK,
    2. Clancy MJ,
    3. Taylor KJ,
    4. et al

    . Volumetric flow estimation in vivo and in vitro using pulsed-Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:591–603

    CrossRefPubMed