Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleInterventional
Open Access

Stent-Assisted Coiling versus Coiling Alone in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science Trial: Safety, Efficacy, and Mid-Term Outcomes

S.W. Hetts, A. Turk, J.D. English, C.F. Dowd, J. Mocco, C. Prestigiacomo, G. Nesbit, S.G. Ge, J.N. Jin, K. Carroll, Y. Murayama, A. Gholkar, S. Barnwell, D. Lopes, S.C. Johnston and C. McDougall on behalf of the Matrix and Platinum Science Trial Investigators
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2014, 35 (4) 698-705; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3755
S.W. Hetts
aFrom the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (S.W.H., C.F.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Turk
cDepartment of Radiology (A.T.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.D. English
dDepartments of Neurology and Radiology (J.D.E.), California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.F. Dowd
aFrom the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (S.W.H., C.F.D.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Mocco
eDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Prestigiacomo
fDepartment of Neurosurgery (C.P.), University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Nesbit
gDepartment of Radiology (G.N., S.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.G. Ge
hDepartment of Biostatistics (S.G.G., J.N.J.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.N. Jin
hDepartment of Biostatistics (S.G.G., J.N.J.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Carroll
iStryker Neurovascular (K.C.), Fremont, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Murayama
jDepartment of Neurosurgery (Y.M.), Jikei University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Gholkar
kDepartment of Neuroradiology (A.G.), Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Barnwell
gDepartment of Radiology (G.N., S.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Lopes
lDepartment of Neurosurgery (D.L.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.C. Johnston
bNeurology (S.C.J.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. McDougall
mDepartment of Neurosurgery (C.M.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Patient flow for MAPS stent substudy. FU indicates follow-up; UIA, unruptured intracranial aneurysm; SAC, stent-assisted coiling; CA, coiling alone; WNA, wide-neck aneurysm.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Stent use by enrolling site. SAC indicates stent-assisted coiling, CA, coiling alone, NF, Neuroform stent.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Baseline patient demographics

    All Unruptured AneurysmsWide-Neck Aneurysms
    Stent-Coil (n = 137)Coil Alone (n = 224)P ValueStent-Coil (n = 85)Coil Alone (n = 73)P Value
    North American88.3%65.6%.000189.4%61.6%<.0001
    Age, y56.556.7.9058.457.7.68
    Female76.676.8.9872.979.5.34
    Coronary artery disease19.0%13.1%.1422.4%5.6%.003
    ≥2 Cerebrovascular risk factorsa32.1%25.9%.2034.1%26.0%.27
    Prior CVA16.9%14.5%.5417.9%8.3%.08
    Preprocedure mRS
        080.3%84.4%>.9980.0%90.4%NA
        115.3%11.6%14.1%9.6%
        24.4%3.6%5.9%0.0%
        30.0%0.4%>.990.0%0.0%NA
    • Note:—CVA indicates cerebrovascular accident; NA, not applicable.

    • ↵a Cerebrovascular risk factors include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Aneurysm characteristics

    All Unruptured AneurysmsWide-Neck Aneurysms
    Stent-Coil (n = 137)Coil Alone (n = 224)P ValueStent-Coil (n = 85)Coil Alone (n = 73)P Value
    Maximum dimension7.67.8.468.910.1.007
    Height is max43.8%54.9%.0442.4%50.7%.30
    Width is max29.9%21.4%.0730.6%23.3%.30
    Depth is max26.3%23.7%.5827.1%26.0%.88
    Max dimension >10 mm19.7%21.0%.7730.6%47.9%.03
    Neck ≥4 mm62.0%32.6%<.0001100%100%NA
    Average neck4.73.5<.00015.65.0.004
    Dome/neck radio1.31.8<.00011.21.6<.0001
    Dome/parent artery ratio2.02.1.332.22.6.01
    Circle of Willis location44.5%64.7%.000248.2%72.6%.002
    • Note:—Max indicates maximum.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Procedural Characteristics

    All Unruptured AneurysmsWide-Neck Aneurysms
    Stent-Coil (n = 137)Coil Alone (n = 224)P ValueStent-Coil (n = 85)Coil Alone (n = 73)P Value
    Aspirin alone8.0%23.2%.00024.7%28.8%<.0001
    Clopidogrel alone5.1%4.5%.783.5%1.4%0.62
    Aspirin + clopidogrel78.1%37.1%<.000182.4%37.0%<.0001
    Antiplatelet use not recordeda8.8%35.3%<.00019.4%32.9%.0003
    Procedure time, min134.2117.8.02147.5135.2.30
    No. of coils6.97.1.708.510.1.07
    Bare metal coils49.6%50.9%.8248.2%53.4%.52
    Matrix coils50.4%49.1%.8251.8%46.6%.52
    Packing density26.2%24.0%.0726.4%21.1%.002
    Technical success97.8%100%.05497.6%100%.50
    Occlusion assessment
        Raymond 121.1%33.9%.02b18.6%27.1%.25c
        Raymond 225.4%25.6%.98b27.1%30.5%.67c
        Raymond 353.5%40.6%.03b54.3%42.4%.18c
    • ↵a No antiplatelet use recorded in these subjects: for an individual subject, this could mean no aspirin or clopidogrel was used or that data are missing.

    • ↵b Core lab occlusion assessment for the 81% of patients who had assessable angiograms after the procedure.

    • ↵c Core lab occlusion assessment for the 82% of patients who had assessable angiograms after the procedure.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Safety: Stroke and Other Significant Adverse Events

    All Unruptured AneurysmsWide-Neck Aneurysms
    Stent-Coil (n = 137)Coil Alone (n = 224)P ValueStent-Coil (n = 85)Coil Alone (n = 73)P Value
    Periprocedural significant adverse event rate6.6%4.5%.393.7%0.89%.11
    1-Year hemorrhagic stroke rate2.9%0.4%.072.4%0.0%.50
    1-Year ischemic stroke rate8.8%2.2%.00511.8%4.1%.08
        if problem site is excludeda
    1-Year ischemic stroke rate6.2%2.2%.118.8%4.1%.31
    • ↵a One enrolling site accounted for 5 of 12 subjects with ischemic stroke in the unruptured aneurysm group. All ischemic strokes at that site occurred ≥7 days after the procedure.

    • View popup
    Table 5:

    Safety: mRS at baseline and 1 year after the procedure

    12-Month mRSaAll Unruptured AneurysmsWide-Neck Aneurysms
    Stent-CoilCoil AloneStent-CoilCoil Alone
    Base (n = 137)1 Year (n = 128)Base (n = 224)1 Year (n = 202)P ValueBase (n = 85)1 Year (n = 81)Base (n = 73)1 Year (n = 66)P Value
    080.3%80.5%84.4%87.6%80.0%80.2%90.4%92.4%
    115.3%14.1%11.6%6.9%14.1%12.3%9.6%6.1%
    24.4%1.6%3.6%1.0%5.9%2.5%0.0%0.0%
    30.0%1.6%0.4%2.5%0.0%2.5%0.0%1.5%
    60.0%2.3%0.0%2.0%0.0%2.5%0.0%0.0%
    mRS worse than base12.5%8.4%.2313.6%4.5%.06
    • ↵a Twelve-month mRS scores were available for 128, 202, 81, and 66 patients, respectively, across all subsets.

    • View popup
    Table 6:

    Clinical outcomes 1 year after the procedure

    All Unruptured AneurysmsWide-Neck Aneurysms
    Stent-Coil (n = 137)Coil Alone (n = 224)P ValueStent-Coil (n = 85)Coil Alone (n = 73)P Value
    TAR8.8%8.5%.9314.1%13.7%.94
    Delayed bleed0.0%0.4%<.990.0%1.4%.46
    Retreatment8.8%8.5%.9314.1%13.7%.94
    • View popup
    Table 7:

    Angiographic outcomes 1 year after the procedure

    All Unruptured AneurysmsWide-Neck Aneurysms
    Stent-Coil (n = 114)Coil Alone (n = 180)P ValueStent-Coil (n = 70)Coil Alone (n = 59)P Value
    Occlusion assessment
        Raymond 151.8%44.4%.2245.7%27.1%.03
        Raymond 221.1%23.9%.5717.1%30.5%.07
        Raymond 327.2%31.7%.4137.1%42.4%.55
    Change assessment
        Better51.8%31.1%.000445.7%20.3%.003
        Same31.6%35.6%.4832.9%28.8%.62
        Worse16.7%33.3%.00221.4%50.8%.0005
    • Note:—81% of subjects in the “all unruptured aneurysms” group and 82% of subjects in the “wide-neck aneurysms” subgroup had angiograms assessable by the core lab at 1-year follow-up.

    • View popup
    Table 8:

    Multivariate predictors of ischemic stroke at 1 year and 2 years

    Parameter1-Year OR (95% CI)1-Year P Value2-Year OR (95% CI)2-Year P Value
    Prior cerebrovascular accident3.84 (1.29–11.4).01594.71 (1.47–15.0).0089
    Aneurysm neck size ≥4 mm3.70 (1.09–12.5).03594.51 (1.27–16.0).0196
    Stent used1.85 (0.61–5.59).27321.05 (0.34–3.27).9351
    • Note:—Complete data on ischemic stroke rates were included in predictor analysis, including data from all enrolling centers.

    • View popup
    Table 9:

    Multivariate predictors of target aneurysm recurrence at 1 year and 2 years

    Parameter1-Year OR (95% CI)1-Year P Value2-Year OR (95% CI)2-Year P Value
    Aneurysm dome size ≥10 mm10.1 (4.06–24.9)<.00019.94 (4.12–24.0)<.0001
    Aneurysm neck size ≥4 mm2.34 (0.94–5.81).06642.17 (0.93–5.06).0729
    Stent used0.89 (0.38–2.10).78550.83 (0.36–1.88).6505
    • Note:—Complete data on target aneurysm recurrence rates were included in predictor analysis, including data from all enrolling centers.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 4
1 Apr 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stent-Assisted Coiling versus Coiling Alone in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science Trial: Safety, Efficacy, and Mid-Term Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S.W. Hetts, A. Turk, J.D. English, C.F. Dowd, J. Mocco, C. Prestigiacomo, G. Nesbit, S.G. Ge, J.N. Jin, K. Carroll, Y. Murayama, A. Gholkar, S. Barnwell, D. Lopes, S.C. Johnston, C. McDougall
Stent-Assisted Coiling versus Coiling Alone in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science Trial: Safety, Efficacy, and Mid-Term Outcomes
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2014, 35 (4) 698-705; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3755

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Stent-Assisted Coiling versus Coiling Alone in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science Trial: Safety, Efficacy, and Mid-Term Outcomes
S.W. Hetts, A. Turk, J.D. English, C.F. Dowd, J. Mocco, C. Prestigiacomo, G. Nesbit, S.G. Ge, J.N. Jin, K. Carroll, Y. Murayama, A. Gholkar, S. Barnwell, D. Lopes, S.C. Johnston, C. McDougall
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2014, 35 (4) 698-705; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3755
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 5 year results of the pivotal WEB Intra-saccular Therapy study (WEB-IT)
  • Aneurysm treatment with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device in the combined population of two prospective, multicenter series: 5-year follow-up
  • Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Safety and efficacy of the eCLIPs bifurcation remodelling system for the treatment of wide necked bifurcation aneurysms: 1 year results from the European eCLIPs Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy Study (EESIS)
  • Aneurysm treatment with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device in the combined population of two prospective, multicenter series: 5-year follow-up
  • The Safety and Efficacy of Flow Diversion versus Conventional Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-analysis of Real-world Cohort Studies from the Past 10 Years
  • Pivotal trial of the Neuroform Atlas stent for treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms: one-year outcomes
  • Five-year results of randomized bioactive versus bare metal coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the Matrix and Platinum Science (MAPS) Trial
  • eCLIPs bifurcation remodeling system for treatment of wide neck bifurcation aneurysms with extremely low dome-to-neck and aspect ratios: a multicenter experience
  • Wide neck bifurcation aneurysms: what is the optimal endovascular treatment?
  • Aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of two prospective, multicenter series: 3-year follow-up
  • Advances in endovascular aneurysm management: flow modulation techniques with braided mesh devices
  • The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study
  • WEB embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: comparison of complication rates and angiographic outcomes
  • Neuroform Atlas Stent System for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm: primary results of the Atlas Humanitarian Device Exemption cohort
  • Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center clinical and angiographic analysis
  • Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series
  • An Update on the Adjunctive Neurovascular Support of Wide-Neck Aneurysm Embolization and Reconstruction Trial: 1-Year Safety and Angiographic Results
  • Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: mid term and long term results
  • Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT)
  • How safe and effective are existing treatments for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms? Literature-based objective performance criteria for safety and effectiveness
  • Initial and mid-term results from 108 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the WEB device
  • Geographic Differences in Endovascular Treatment and Retreatment of Cerebral Aneurysms
  • Fate of Coiled Aneurysms with Minor Recanalization at 6 Months: Rate of Progression to Further Recanalization and Related Risk Factors
  • Use of flow-diverting stents as salvage treatment following failed stent-assisted embolization of intracranial aneurysms
  • WEB Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Clinical and Anatomic Results in the French Observatory
  • Periprocedural safety of aneurysm embolization with the Medina Coil System: the early human experience
  • Assisted coiling of saccular wide-necked unruptured intracranial aneurysms: stent versus balloon
  • LEO Baby Stent Use following Balloon-Assisted Coiling: Single- and Dual-Stent Technique--Immediate and Midterm Results of 29 Consecutive Patients
  • Complications in Stent-Assisted Endovascular Therapy of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Relevance to Antiplatelet Administration: A Systematic Review
  • Crossref (128)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study
    Adam S Arthur, Andy Molyneux, Alexander L Coon, Isil Saatci, Istvan Szikora, Feyyaz Baltacioglu, Ali Sultan, Daniel Hoit, Josser E Delgado Almandoz, Lucas Elijovich, Saru Cekirge, James V Byrne, David Fiorella
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2019 11 9
  • Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series
    Laurent Pierot, Jacques Moret, Xavier Barreau, Istvan Szikora, Denis Herbreteau, Francis Turjman, Markus Holtmannspötter, Anne-Christine Januel, Vincent Costalat, Jens Fiehler, Joachim Klisch, Jean-Yves Gauvrit, Werner Weber, Hubert Desal, Stéphane Velasco, Thomas Liebig, Luc Stockx, Joachim Berkefeld, Andrew Molyneux, James Byrne, Laurent Spelle
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2018 10 6
  • Procedural Clinical Complications, Case-Fatality Risks, and Risk Factors in Endovascular and Neurosurgical Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Annemijn M. Algra, Antti Lindgren, Mervyn D. I. Vergouwen, Jacoba P. Greving, Irene C. van der Schaaf, Tristan P. C. van Doormaal, Gabriel J. E. Rinkel
    JAMA Neurology 2019 76 3
  • Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study
    Laurent Pierot, Vincent Costalat, Jacques Moret, Istvan Szikora, Joachim Klisch, Denis Herbreteau, Markus Holtmannspötter, Werner Weber, Anne-Christine Januel, Thomas Liebig, Vojtech Sychra, Christoph Strasilla, Christophe Cognard, Alain Bonafé, Andrew Molyneux, James V. Byrne, Laurent Spelle
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2016 124 5
  • Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT)
    David Fiorella, Andrew Molyneux, Alexander Coon, Istvan Szikora, Isil Saatci, Feyyaz Baltacioglu, Ali Sultan, Adam Arthur
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017 9 12
  • WEB Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Clinical and Anatomic Results in the French Observatory
    L. Pierot, J. Moret, F. Turjman, D. Herbreteau, H. Raoult, X. Barreau, S. Velasco, H. Desal, A.-C. Januel, P. Courtheoux, J.-Y. Gauvrit, C. Cognard, A. Molyneux, J. Byrne, L. Spelle
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 37 4
  • Meta-analysis of stent-assisted coiling versus coiling-only for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
    Kevin Phan, Ya R. Huo, Fangzhi Jia, Steven Phan, Prashanth J. Rao, Ralph J. Mobbs, Alex M. Mortimer
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2016 31
  • Complications in Stent-Assisted Endovascular Therapy of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Relevance to Antiplatelet Administration: A Systematic Review
    C.-W. Ryu, S. Park, H.S. Shin, J.S. Koh
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015 36 9
  • How safe and effective are existing treatments for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms? Literature-based objective performance criteria for safety and effectiveness
    David Fiorella, Adam S Arthur, Richard Chiacchierini, Evelyne Emery, Andy Molyneux, Laurent Pierot
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017 9 12
  • Endovascular techniques for the management of wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: A critical review of the literature
    Laurent Pierot, Alessandra Biondi
    Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 43 3

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire