Temporal Correlation between Wall Shear Stress and In-Stent Stenosis after Wingspan Stent in Swine Model

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Bose A,
   2. Hartmann M,
   3. Henkes H,
   4. et al

   . A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study. Stroke 2007;38:1531–37

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Chimowitz MI,
   2. Lynn MJ,
   3. Derdeyn CP,
   4. et al

   . Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:993–1003

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Li J,
   2. Zhao ZW,
   3. Gao GD,
   4. et al

   . Wingspan stenting with modified predilation for symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:286–93

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Jiang WJ,
   2. Yu W,
   3. Du B,
   4. et al

   . Outcome of patients with >/=70% symptomatic intracranial stenosis after Wingspan stenting. Stroke 2011;42:1971–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Costalat V,
   2. Maldonado IL,
   3. Vendrell JF,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of symptomatic intracranial stenosis with the Wingspan stent system and Gateway PTA balloon: a multicenter series of 60 patients with acute and midterm results. J Neurosurg 2011;115:686–93

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Yu SC,
   2. Leung TW,
   3. Lee KT,
   4. et al

   . Angioplasty and stenting of atherosclerotic middle cerebral arteries with Wingspan: evaluation of clinical outcome, restenosis, and procedure outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:753–58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Fiorella DJ,
   2. Turk AS,
   3. Levy EI,
   4. et al

   . U.S. Wingspan Registry: 12-month follow-up results. Stroke 2011;42:1976–81

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Levy EI,
   2. Turk AS,
   3. Albuquerque FC,
   4. et al

   . Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management. Neurosurgery 2007;61:644–50; discussion 650–51

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Albuquerque FC,
   2. Levy EI,
   3. Turk AS,
   4. et al

   . Angiographic patterns of Wingspan in-stent restenosis. Neurosurgery 2008;63:23–27; discussion 27–28

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. et al

    . Influence of patient age and stenosis location on Wingspan in-stent restenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:23–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Fiorella DJ,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Turk AS,
    4. et al

    . Target lesion revascularization after Wingspan: assessment of safety and durability. Stroke 2009;40:106–10

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Kibos A,
    2. Campeanu A,
    3. Tintoiu I

    . Pathophysiology of coronary artery in-stent restenosis. Acute Card Care 2007;9:111–19

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Farb A,
    2. Weber DK,
    3. Kolodgie FD,
    4. et al

    . Morphological predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in humans. Circulation 2002;105:2974–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Welt FG,
    2. Rogers C

    . Inflammation and restenosis in the stent era. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22:1769–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Wentzel JJ,
    2. Krams R,
    3. Schuurbiers JC,
    4. et al

    . Relationship between neointimal thickness and shear stress after Wallstent implantation in human coronary arteries. Circulation 2001;103:1740–45

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. LaDisa JF Jr.,
    2. Olson LE,
    3. Molthen RC,
    4. et al

    . Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005;288:H2465–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Papafaklis MI,
    2. Bourantas CV,
    3. Theodorakis PE,
    4. et al

    . The effect of shear stress on neointimal response following sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare-metal stents in humans. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:1181–89

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Morlacchi S,
    2. Keller B,
    3. Arcangeli P,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamics and in-stent restenosis: micro-CT images, histology, and computer simulations. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:2615–26

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Chen HY,
    2. Sinha AK,
    3. Choy JS,
    4. et al

    . Mis-sizing of stent promotes intimal hyperplasia: impact of endothelial shear and intramural stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011;301:H2254–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Gundert TJ,
    2. Marsden AL,
    3. Yang W,
    4. et al

    . Optimization of cardiovascular stent design using computational fluid dynamics. J Biomech Eng 2012;134:011002

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Fujimoto M,
    2. Shobayashi Y,
    3. Tateshima S,
    4. et al

    . Biomechanical responses after Wingspan stent deployment in swine ascending pharyngeal artery. Neurol Res 2013;35:90–94

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. Takao H,
    2. Murayama Y,
    3. Otsuka S,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke 2012;43:1436–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Ford MD,
    2. Alperin N,
    3. Lee SH,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2005;26:477–88

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Samady H,
    2. Eshtehardi P,
    3. McDaniel MC,
    4. et al

    . Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2011;124:779–88

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Eshtehardi P,
    2. McDaniel MC,
    3. Suo J,
    4. et al

    . Association of coronary wall shear stress with atherosclerotic plaque burden, composition, and distribution in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2012;1:e002543

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Chatzizisis YS,
    2. Coskun AU,
    3. Jonas M,
    4. et al

    . Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2379–93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Ueba H,
    2. Kawakami M,
    3. Yaginuma T

    . Shear stress as an inhibitor of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Role of transforming growth factor-beta 1 and tissue-type plasminogen activator. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:1512–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Sheikh S,
    2. Rainger GE,
    3. Gale Z,
    4. et al

    . Exposure to fluid shear stress modulates the ability of endothelial cells to recruit neutrophils in response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha: a basis for local variations in vascular sensitivity to inflammation. Blood 2003;102:2828–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Carlier SG,
    2. van Damme LC,
    3. Blommerde CP,
    4. et al

    . Augmentation of wall shear stress inhibits neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation: inhibition through reduction of inflammation? Circulation 2003;107:2741–46

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Wentzel JJ,
    2. Gijsen FJ,
    3. Stergiopulos N,
    4. et al

    . Shear stress, vascular remodeling and neointimal formation. J Biomech 2003;36:681–88

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Mattsson EJ,
    2. Kohler TR,
    3. Vergel SM,
    4. et al

    . Increased blood flow induces regression of intimal hyperplasia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:2245–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Brown KE,
    2. Usman A,
    3. Kibbe MR,
    4. et al

    . Carotid stenting using tapered and nontapered stents: associated neurological complications and restenosis rates. Ann Vasc Surg 2009;23:439–45

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Auricchio F,
    2. Conti M,
    3. De Beule M,
    4. et al

    . Carotid artery stenting simulation: from patient-specific images to finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys 2011;33:281–89

    CrossRefPubMed