Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement in Scoring Angiographic Results of Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy

References

1. 1.↵
   Penumbra Stroke Trial Investigators. The Penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 2009;40:2761–68

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Mourand I,
   2. Brunel H,
   3. Costalat V,
   4. et al

   . Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: catch device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1381–85

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Smith WS,
   2. Sung G,
   3. Saver J,
   4. et al

   . Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the multi Merci trial. Stroke 2008;39:1205–12

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Costalat V,
   2. Machi P,
   3. Lobotesis K,
   4. et al

   . Rescue, combined, and stand-alone thrombectomy in the management of large vessel occlusion stroke using the Solitaire device: a prospective 50-patient single-center study: timing, safety, and efficacy. Stroke 2011;42:1929–35

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Kent TA,
   2. Mandava P

   . Recanalization rates can be misleading. Stroke 2007;38:e103, author reply e104

   FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Felten RP,
   2. Ogden NR,
   3. Pena C,
   4. et al

   . The Food and Drug Administration medical device review process: clearance of a clot retriever for use in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2005;36:404–06

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Higashida RT,
   2. Furlan AJ,
   3. Roberts H,
   4. et al

   . Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:e109–137

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Khatri P,
   2. Hill MD,
   3. Palesch YY,
   4. et al

   . Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III trial. Int J Stroke 2008;3:130–37

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Rha JH,
   2. Saver JL

   . The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967–73

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Goyal M,
    2. Fargen KM,
    3. Turk AS,
    4. et al

    . 2c or not 2c: defining an improved revascularization grading scale and the need for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:83–86

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Almekhlafi MA,
    2. Menon BK,
    3. Freiheit EA,
    4. et al

    . A meta-analysis of observational intra-arterial stroke therapy studies using the Merci device, Penumbra system, and retrievable stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:140–45

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Jauch EC,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Adams HP Jr.,
    4. et al

    . Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:870–947

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Kallmes DF

    . TICI: if you are not confused, then you are not paying attention. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:975–76

    FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Tomsick T

    . TIMI, TIBI, TICI: I came, I saw, I got confused. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:382–84

    FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Bar M,
    2. Mikulik R,
    3. Jonszta T,
    4. et al

    . Diagnosis of recanalization of the intracranial artery has poor inter-rater reliability. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:972–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Qureshi AI

    . New grading system for angiographic evaluation of arterial occlusions and recanalization response to intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 2002;50:1405–14, discussion 1414–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Khatri P,
    2. Neff J,
    3. Broderick JP,
    4. et al

    . Revascularization end points in stroke interventional trials: recanalization versus reperfusion in IMS I. Stroke 2005;36:2400–03

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Broderick JP,
    2. Palesch YY,
    3. Demchuk AM,
    4. et al.

    , for the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903.

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Kidwell CS,
    2. Jahan R,
    3. Gornbein J,
    4. et al

    . MR RESCUE Investigators: a trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Broderick JP,
    2. Schroth G

    . What the SWIFT and TREVO II trials tell us about the role of endovascular therapy for acute stroke. Stroke 2013;44:1761–64

    FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Feinstein AR,
    2. Cicchetti DV

    . High agreement but low kappa. I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    IMS II Trial Investigators. The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II study. Stroke 2007;38:2127–35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Castaño C,
    2. Dorado L,
    3. Guerrero C,
    4. et al

    . Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire AB device in large artery occlusions of the anterior circulation: a pilot study. Stroke 2010;41:1836–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Roth C,
    2. Papanagiotou P,
    3. Behnke S,
    4. et al

    . Stent-assisted mechanical recanalization for treatment of acute intracerebral artery occlusions. Stroke 2010;41:2559–67

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Stampfl S,
    2. Hartmann M,
    3. Ringleb PA,
    4. et al

    . Stent placement for flow restoration in acute ischemic stroke: a single-center experience with the Solitaire stent system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1245–48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.
    1. Fleiss J,
    2. Levin B,
    3. Paik M

    . Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley & Sons; 2003
27. 27.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Saver JL,
    2. Liebeskind DS,
    3. Nogueira RG,
    4. et al

    . Need to clarify thrombolysis in myocardial ischemia (TIMI) scale scoring method in the Penumbra pivotal stroke trial. Stroke 2010;41:e115–16

    FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Cohen J

    . A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:27–46
30. 30.↵
    1. Hulley SB,
    2. Cummings SR,
    3. Browner WS,
    4. et al.

    1. Newman TB,
    2. Browner WS,
    3. Cummings SR

    . Designing studies of medical tests. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, et al., eds. Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001:175–93
31. 31.↵
    1. Chesebro JH,
    2. Knatterud G,
    3. Roberts R,
    4. et al

    . Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial, phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase—clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987;76:142–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Furlan A,
    2. Higashida R,
    3. Wechsler L,
    4. et al

    . Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II study—a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999;282:2003–11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Bankier AA,
    2. Levine D,
    3. Halpern EF,
    4. et al

    . Consensus interpretation in imaging research: is there a better way? Radiology 2010;257:14–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Maclure M,
    2. Willett WC

    . Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:161–69

    FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Noser EA,
    2. Shaltoni HM,
    3. Hall CE,
    4. et al

    . Aggressive mechanical clot disruption: a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke? Stroke 2005;36:292–96

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Khatri P,
    4. et al

    . Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63

    FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Suh SH,
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Fugate JE,
    4. et al

    . Clarifying differences among thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale variants: is the artery half open or half closed? Stroke 2013;44:1166–1168

    Abstract/FREE Full Text