Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleInterventional

Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement in Scoring Angiographic Results of Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy

M. Gaha, C. Roy, L. Estrade, G. Gevry, A. Weill, D. Roy, M. Chagnon and J. Raymond
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2014, 35 (6) 1163-1169; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3828
M. Gaha
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.G., C.R., G.G., A.W., D.R., M.C., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Roy
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.G., C.R., G.G., A.W., D.R., M.C., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Estrade
bService de Radiologie (L.E.), Hôpital Maison Blanche, CHU Reims, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Gevry
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.G., C.R., G.G., A.W., D.R., M.C., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Weill
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.G., C.R., G.G., A.W., D.R., M.C., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Roy
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.G., C.R., G.G., A.W., D.R., M.C., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Chagnon
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.G., C.R., G.G., A.W., D.R., M.C., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
cDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics (M.C.), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Raymond
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.G., C.R., G.G., A.W., D.R., M.C., J.R.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    Penumbra Stroke Trial Investigators. The Penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 2009;40:2761–68
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mourand I,
    2. Brunel H,
    3. Costalat V,
    4. et al
    . Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: catch device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1381–85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Smith WS,
    2. Sung G,
    3. Saver J,
    4. et al
    . Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the multi Merci trial. Stroke 2008;39:1205–12
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Costalat V,
    2. Machi P,
    3. Lobotesis K,
    4. et al
    . Rescue, combined, and stand-alone thrombectomy in the management of large vessel occlusion stroke using the Solitaire device: a prospective 50-patient single-center study: timing, safety, and efficacy. Stroke 2011;42:1929–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kent TA,
    2. Mandava P
    . Recanalization rates can be misleading. Stroke 2007;38:e103, author reply e104
    FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Felten RP,
    2. Ogden NR,
    3. Pena C,
    4. et al
    . The Food and Drug Administration medical device review process: clearance of a clot retriever for use in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2005;36:404–06
    FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Higashida RT,
    2. Furlan AJ,
    3. Roberts H,
    4. et al
    . Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:e109–137
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Khatri P,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Palesch YY,
    4. et al
    . Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III trial. Int J Stroke 2008;3:130–37
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rha JH,
    2. Saver JL
    . The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Goyal M,
    2. Fargen KM,
    3. Turk AS,
    4. et al
    . 2c or not 2c: defining an improved revascularization grading scale and the need for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:83–86
    FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Almekhlafi MA,
    2. Menon BK,
    3. Freiheit EA,
    4. et al
    . A meta-analysis of observational intra-arterial stroke therapy studies using the Merci device, Penumbra system, and retrievable stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:140–45
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Jauch EC,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Adams HP Jr.,
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:870–947
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kallmes DF
    . TICI: if you are not confused, then you are not paying attention. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:975–76
    FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tomsick T
    . TIMI, TIBI, TICI: I came, I saw, I got confused. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:382–84
    FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bar M,
    2. Mikulik R,
    3. Jonszta T,
    4. et al
    . Diagnosis of recanalization of the intracranial artery has poor inter-rater reliability. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:972–74
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Qureshi AI
    . New grading system for angiographic evaluation of arterial occlusions and recanalization response to intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 2002;50:1405–14, discussion 1414–15
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Khatri P,
    2. Neff J,
    3. Broderick JP,
    4. et al
    . Revascularization end points in stroke interventional trials: recanalization versus reperfusion in IMS I. Stroke 2005;36:2400–03
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Broderick JP,
    2. Palesch YY,
    3. Demchuk AM,
    4. et al.
    , for the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903.
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kidwell CS,
    2. Jahan R,
    3. Gornbein J,
    4. et al
    . MR RESCUE Investigators: a trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Broderick JP,
    2. Schroth G
    . What the SWIFT and TREVO II trials tell us about the role of endovascular therapy for acute stroke. Stroke 2013;44:1761–64
    FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Feinstein AR,
    2. Cicchetti DV
    . High agreement but low kappa. I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543–49
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    IMS II Trial Investigators. The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II study. Stroke 2007;38:2127–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Castaño C,
    2. Dorado L,
    3. Guerrero C,
    4. et al
    . Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire AB device in large artery occlusions of the anterior circulation: a pilot study. Stroke 2010;41:1836–40
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Roth C,
    2. Papanagiotou P,
    3. Behnke S,
    4. et al
    . Stent-assisted mechanical recanalization for treatment of acute intracerebral artery occlusions. Stroke 2010;41:2559–67
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Stampfl S,
    2. Hartmann M,
    3. Ringleb PA,
    4. et al
    . Stent placement for flow restoration in acute ischemic stroke: a single-center experience with the Solitaire stent system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1245–48
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.
    1. Fleiss J,
    2. Levin B,
    3. Paik M
    . Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley & Sons; 2003
  27. 27.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG
    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Saver JL,
    2. Liebeskind DS,
    3. Nogueira RG,
    4. et al
    . Need to clarify thrombolysis in myocardial ischemia (TIMI) scale scoring method in the Penumbra pivotal stroke trial. Stroke 2010;41:e115–16
    FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Cohen J
    . A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:27–46
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hulley SB,
    2. Cummings SR,
    3. Browner WS,
    4. et al.
    1. Newman TB,
    2. Browner WS,
    3. Cummings SR
    . Designing studies of medical tests. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, et al., eds. Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001:175–93
  31. 31.↵
    1. Chesebro JH,
    2. Knatterud G,
    3. Roberts R,
    4. et al
    . Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial, phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase—clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987;76:142–54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Furlan A,
    2. Higashida R,
    3. Wechsler L,
    4. et al
    . Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II study—a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999;282:2003–11
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Bankier AA,
    2. Levine D,
    3. Halpern EF,
    4. et al
    . Consensus interpretation in imaging research: is there a better way? Radiology 2010;257:14–17
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Maclure M,
    2. Willett WC
    . Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:161–69
    FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Noser EA,
    2. Shaltoni HM,
    3. Hall CE,
    4. et al
    . Aggressive mechanical clot disruption: a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke? Stroke 2005;36:292–96
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Khatri P,
    4. et al
    . Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63
    FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Suh SH,
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Fugate JE,
    4. et al
    . Clarifying differences among thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale variants: is the artery half open or half closed? Stroke 2013;44:1166–1168
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 6
1 Jun 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement in Scoring Angiographic Results of Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement in Scoring Angiographic Results of Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy
M. Gaha, C. Roy, L. Estrade, G. Gevry, A. Weill, D. Roy, M. Chagnon, J. Raymond
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2014, 35 (6) 1163-1169; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3828

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement in Scoring Angiographic Results of Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy
M. Gaha, C. Roy, L. Estrade, G. Gevry, A. Weill, D. Roy, M. Chagnon, J. Raymond
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2014, 35 (6) 1163-1169; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3828
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Interobserver Agreement in Scoring Angiographic Results of Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke Therapy
  • Reliability of the Modified TICI Score among Endovascular Neurosurgeons
  • Agreement between core laboratory and study investigators for imaging scores in a thrombectomy trial
  • Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • The Revascularization Scales Dilemma: Is It Right to Apply the Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia Scale in Posterior Circulation Stroke?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Performance of High-Resolution Vessel Wall MR Imaging Combined with TOF-MRA in the Follow-up of Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms after Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment
  • Outcomes with Endovascular Treatment of Patients with M2 Segment MCA Occlusion in the Late Time Window
  • Direct Aspiration versus Combined Technique for Distal Medium-Vessel Occlusions: Comparison on a Human Placenta Model
Show more INTERVENTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire