Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Article CommentaryExtracranial Vascular

Phlebographic Study between Patients with MS and Control Subjects: The Ethical Profile

M. G. Marciani
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2014, 35 (6) 1180-1181; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3805
M. G. Marciani
aProfessor of Neurology and President of Ethical Committee of the Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The term and the concept of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) were coined by the Italian vascular surgeon Paolo Zamboni, who proposed compromised blood drainage from the central nervous system in patients with MS, caused by strictures and valves in the major veins of the neck.

Very soon after the description in 2009 of CCSVI as the major, if not unique, causal factor of MS,1 uncontrolled angioplastic or stent placement procedures in the jugular veins, initially termed “liberation therapies,” were increasingly offered to patients with the disease. The “CCSVI community” grew rapidly on the Web and gained the attention of the media and of the general public. As a result of misunderstanding and oversimplification, not only patients with MS but also patients with other neurodegenerative disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis decided to undergo the angioplastic procedure, even if discouraged by their doctors.

In their first publication, Zamboni et al1 described venous abnormalities, identified through combined transcranial and extracranial color Doppler high-resolution examination (TCCS-ECD) and confirmed by selective venography of the azygous and jugular venous system, to be dramatically associated with MS only because they were never detectable in healthy individuals or in subjects with other neurologic diseases. In response to criticisms coming from other research groups who failed to replicate the TCCS-ECD findings of Zamboni et al (including the authors of the study published in this issue of the American Journal of Neuroradiology and Centonze et al2), the CCSVI community proposed the argument that CCSVI detection through TCCS-ECD is a very tough task, requiring appropriate training and specific equipment. In the absence of specific training, operator abilities, and the proper TCCS-ECD machine, only objective venographic evaluations were claimed by Zamboni et al1 to be suitable to detect CCSVI.

In this atmosphere, the proposal coming from the authors of this study to perform selective venography in patients with MS appeared to me and to the other members of the ethical committee of my institution crucial to provide a final answer to the CCSVI scientific debate, but only if combined with blind venographic studies in the appropriate control subjects. Proper controls were not investigated by Zamboni et al or by others, and in fact the 2009 study of Zamboni et al1 only reported unblinded results in control subjects who underwent the phlebographic procedure but were not matched with the patients with MS.

In general terms, experimental science cannot do without experimentation due to intrinsic epistemologic requirements. In particular, experimentation is essential for the progress of medical science. As stated in Human Rights and Biomedicine3, medical progress is based on research, an essential part of which is the realization of studies that include human subjects. In these studies, however, the interests and welfare of the human being will prevail over the sole interest of society or science.

The ethical values regarding experimentation on human beings are, in hierarchical order: the defense of life and of the person, which is the key point of ethics; the validity of the therapeutic principle; and the social theme connected to scientific progress. In accordance with the principle of social solidarity, it is legitimate to ask an individual to share in the risk for the good of the entire society of which he or she is a member, keeping in mind, however, that there is, in the individual, the global value and fundamental reason of existence of society itself.

In experimentation on healthy volunteers, such a principle is applied that legitimizes experimentation on the basis of the following conditions:

  • The first condition is that the consensus must be free, explicitly informed, and personal and regard a healthy (not presumed to be) individual who is not connected by work or position to the person conducting the experiment;

  • The risk that the volunteer is subjected to must not exceed the limit of the defense of the life and integrity of that person. Within these limits, the principle of proportionality between risks and benefits is always in force: clinical studies of insufficient or doubtful scientific validity cannot be ethically accepted. The experimenter must always be ready to interrupt the experiment in the event that the informed consensus is withdrawn or unforeseen risks arise.

The invasiveness of the phlebographic procedure for patients and healthy individuals was well taken into account when the clinical research plan was approved by our institutional ethical committee. Nonetheless, the advancements in knowledge stemming from well-designed and conducted research on CCSVI were finally judged to beneficially affect the lives of thousands of patients with MS and of their doctors, who rely on scientific evidence to make their decisions.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zamboni P,
    2. Galeotti R,
    3. Menegatti E,
    4. et al
    . Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:392–99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Centonze D,
    2. Floris R,
    3. Stefanini M,
    4. et al
    . Proposed chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency criteria do not predict multiple sclerosis risk or severity. Ann Neurol 2011;70:51–58
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Oviedo, Spain, April 4, 1997. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm
  • © 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 6
1 Jun 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phlebographic Study between Patients with MS and Control Subjects: The Ethical Profile
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M. G. Marciani
Phlebographic Study between Patients with MS and Control Subjects: The Ethical Profile
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2014, 35 (6) 1180-1181; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3805

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Phlebographic Study between Patients with MS and Control Subjects: The Ethical Profile
M. G. Marciani
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2014, 35 (6) 1180-1181; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3805
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more Extracranial Vascular

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire