Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Outpatient Head CT Scans in an Academic Neuroradiology Practice

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Soffa DJ,
   3. Lewis RS,
   4. Sunshine JH, et al

   . Disagreement in interpretation: a method for the development of benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:212–17

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Wu MZ,
   3. McInnes MD,
   4. Blair Macdonald D, et al

   . CT in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of interpretation discrepancy rates. Radiology 2014;270:717–35

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Babiarz LS,
   3. Yousem DM

   . Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:37–42

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. McCoubrie P,
   3. FitzGerald R

   . Commentary on discrepancies in discrepancy meetings. Clin Radiol 2014;69:11–12

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Bender LC,
   3. Linnau KF,
   4. Meier EN, et al

   . Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the Radpeer system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:1320–27

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Larson DB,
   3. Nance JJ

   . Rethinking peer review: what aviation can teach radiology about performance improvement. Radiology 2011;259:626–32

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Mucci B,
   3. Murray H,
   4. Downie A, et al

   . Interrater variation in scoring radiological discrepancies. Br J Radiol 2013;86:20130245

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Garland LH

   . Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1959;82:25–38

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Berlin L

   . Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past five decades? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1173–78

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Abujudeh HH,
    3. Boland GW,
    4. Kaewlai R, et al

    . Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1952–57

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Agrawal A,
    3. Pandit M,
    4. Kalyanpur A

    . Systematic survey of discrepancy rates in an international teleradiology service. Emerg Radiol 2011;18:23–29

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Chung JH,
    3. Strigel RM,
    4. Chew AR, et al

    . Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2009;16:1155–60

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Goddard P,
    3. Leslie A,
    4. Jones A, et al

    . Error in radiology. Br J Radiol 2001;74:949–51

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Loevner LA,
    3. Sonners AI,
    4. Schulman BJ, et al

    . Reinterpretation of cross-sectional images in patients with head and neck cancer in the setting of a multidisciplinary cancer center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1622–26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Borgstede JP,
    3. Lewis RS,
    4. Bhargavan M, et al

    . RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:59–65

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Siegle RL,
    3. Baram EM,
    4. Reuter SR, et al

    . Rates of disagreement in imaging interpretation in a group of community hospitals. Acad Radiol 1998;5:148–54

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Berlin L

    . Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:517–22

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Kottner J,
    3. Audige L,
    4. Brorson S, et al

    . Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:96–106

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Landis JR,
    3. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Robinson PJ,
    3. Wilson D,
    4. Coral A, et al

    . Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs. Br J Radiol 1999;72:323–30

    Abstract
21. 21.↵
    2. Herman PG,
    3. Gerson DE,
    4. Hessel SJ, et al

    . Disagreements in chest roentgen interpretation. Chest 1975;68:278–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. O'Keeffe MM,
    3. Piche S,
    4. Mason AC

    . The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Guide to Peer Review Systems. Approved September 10, 2011; Amended July 16, 2012. http://www.car.ca/uploads/standards%20guidelines/20120831_en_peer-review.pdf. Accessed November 21, 2013.
23. 23.↵
    The Royal College of Radiologists. Standards for radiology discrepancy meetings. London ETRCoR, 2007. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/Stand_radiol_discrepancy.pdf. Accessed November 21, 2013.
24. 24.↵
    2. Prowse SJ,
    3. Pinkey B,
    4. Etherington R

    . Discrepancies in discrepancy meetings: results of the UK national discrepancy meeting survey. Clin Radiol 2014;69:18–22

    CrossRefPubMed