Reply:

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bradley WG

   . Intracranial pressure versus phase-contrast MRI for normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. In press
2. 2.↵
   2. Ringstad G,
   3. Emblem KE,
   4. Geier O, et al

   . Aqueductal stroke volume: comparisons with intracranial pressure scores in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015 May 14. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4340 pmid:25977480

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Bradley WG Jr.

   . MR prediction of shunt response in NPH: CSF morphology versus physiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1285–86 pmid:9726468

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Greitz D

   . Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: new theories and implications for therapy. Neurosurg Rev 2004;27:145–65; discussion 166–67 doi:10.1007/s10143-004-0326-9 pmid:15164255

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Bottan S,
   3. Poulikakos D,
   4. Kurtcuoglu V

   . Phantom model of physiologic intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59:1532–38 doi:10.1109/TBME.2012.2187448 pmid:22333981

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Wagshul ME,
   3. Eide PK,
   4. Madsen JR

   . The pulsating brain: a review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility. Fluids Barriers CNS 2011;8:5 doi:10.1186/2045-8118-8-5 pmid:21349153

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Tain RW,
   3. Alperin N

   . Intracranial pressure dynamics are not linked to aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid stroke volume. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2013;114:1645 doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00357.2013 pmid:23729634

   FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Bradley WG Jr.,
   3. Scalzo D,
   4. Queralt J, et al

   . Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523–29 doi:10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596861 pmid:8596861

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Al-Zain FT,
   3. Rademacher G,
   4. Meier U, et al

   . The role of cerebrospinal fluid flow study using phase contrast MR imaging in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008;102:119–23 doi:10.1007/978-3-211-85578-2-24 pmid:19388301

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Luetmer PH,
    3. Huston J,
    4. Friedman JA, et al

    . Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid flow at the cerebral aqueduct by use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: technique validation and utility in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2002;50:534–43; discussion 543–44 pmid:11841721

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Sharma AK,
    3. Gaikwad S,
    4. Gupta V, et al

    . Measurement of peak CSF flow velocity at cerebral aqueduct, before and after lumbar CSF drainage, by use of phase-contrast MRI: utility in the management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008;110:363–68 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.12.021 pmid:18282655

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. El Sankari S,
    3. Fichten A,
    4. Gondry-Jouet C, et al

    . Correlation between tap test and CSF aqueductal stroke volume in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2012;113:43–46 doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0923-6-9 pmid:22116421

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Abbey P,
    3. Singh P,
    4. Khandelwal N, et al

    . Shunt surgery effects on cerebrospinal fluid flow across the aqueduct of Sylvius in patients with communicating hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 2009;16:514–18 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2008.05.009 pmid:19195891

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Scollato A,
    3. Gallina P,
    4. Gautam B, et al

    . Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume in shunted patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1580–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1616 pmid:19461060

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Algin O,
    3. Hakyemez B,
    4. Parlak M

    . The efficiency of PC-MRI in diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and prediction of shunt response. Acad Radiol 2010;17:181–87 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.08.011 pmid:19910214

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Kahlon B,
    3. Annertz M,
    4. Ståhlberg F, et al

    . Is aqueductal stroke volume, measured with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging scans useful in predicting outcome of shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus? Neurosurgery 2007;60:124–29; discussion 129–30 pmid:17228260

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Bateman GA,
    3. Loiselle AM

    . Can MR measurement of intracranial hydrodynamics and compliance differentiate which patient with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus will improve following shunt insertion? Acta Neurochir 2007;149:455–62; discussion 462 doi:10.1007/s00701-007-1142-0 pmid:17406777

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Dixon GR,
    3. Friedman JA,
    4. Luetmer PH, et al

    . Use of cerebrospinal fluid flow rates measured by phase-contrast MR to predict outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clinic Proc 2002;77:509–14 doi:10.4065/77.6.509 pmid:12059119

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Bateman GA,
    3. Levi CR,
    4. Schofield P, et al

    . The pathophysiology of the aqueduct stroke volume in normal pressure hydrocephalus: can co-morbidity with other forms of dementia be excluded? Neuroradiology 2005;47:741–48 doi:10.1007/s00234-005-1418-0 pmid:16021440

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Chiang WW,
    3. Takoudis CG,
    4. Lee SH, et al

    . Relationship between ventricular morphology and aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid flow in healthy and communicating hydrocephalus. Invest Radiol 2009;44:192–99 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31819a640b pmid:19300098

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Hebb AO,
    3. Cusimano MD

    . Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery 2001;49:1166–84; discussion 1184–86 pmid:11846911

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Eide PK,
    3. Sorteberg W

    . Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6-year review of 214 patients. Neurosurgery 2010;66:80–91 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000363408.69856.B8 pmid:20023540

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Stranjalis G,
    3. Kalamatianos T,
    4. Koutsarnakis C, et al

    . Twelve-year hospital outcomes in patients with idiopathic hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2012;113:115–17 doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0923-6-23 pmid:22116435

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Hommelstad J,
    3. Madsø A,
    4. Eide PK

    . Significant reduction of shunt infection rate in children below 1 year of age after implementation of a perioperative protocol. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:523–31 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1574-z pmid:23224578

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Tisell M,
    3. Hellström P,
    4. Ahl-Börjesson G, et al

    . Long-term outcome in 109 adult patients operated on for hydrocephalus. Br J Neurosurg 2006;20:214–21 doi:10.1080/02688690600852324 pmid:16954071

    CrossRefPubMed