Cortical Activation Through Passive-Motion Functional MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Berger MS,
   3. Ojemann GA

   . Intraoperative brain mapping techniques in neuro-oncology. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1992;58:153–61 doi:10.1159/000098989 pmid:1439333

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Pillai J,
   3. Zaca D,
   4. Choudhri A

   . Clinical impact of integrated physiologic brain tumor imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2010;9:359–80 doi:10.1177/153303461000900406 pmid:20626202

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Wada J,
   3. Rasmussen T

   . Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1117–33 doi:10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1117 pmid:17564192

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Papanicolaou AC,
   3. Rezaie R,
   4. Narayana S, et al

   . Is it time to replace the Wada test and put awake craniotomy to sleep? Epilepsia 2014;55:629–32 doi:10.1111/epi.12569 pmid:24815532

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Bonelli SB,
   3. Powell RH,
   4. Yogarajah M, et al

   . Imaging memory in temporal lobe epilepsy: predicting the effects of temporal lobe resection. Brain 2010;133:1186–99 doi:10.1093/brain/awq006 pmid:20157009

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Binder JR,
   3. Swanson SJ,
   4. Hammeke TA, et al

   . Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Neurology 1996;46:978–84 doi:10.1212/WNL.46.4.978 pmid:8780076

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Binder JR,
   3. Sabsevitz DS,
   4. Swanson SJ, et al

   . Use of preoperative functional MRI to predict verbal memory decline after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 2008;49:1377–94 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01625.x pmid:18435753

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Cohen-Gadol AA,
   3. Westerveld M,
   4. Alvarez-Carilles J, et al

   . Intracarotid amytal memory test and hippocampal magnetic resonance imaging volumetry: validity of the Wada test as an indicator of hippocampal integrity among candidates for epilepsy surgery. J Neurosurg 2004;101:926–31 doi:10.3171/jns.2004.101.6.0926 pmid:15597752

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Yetkin FZ,
   3. Hammeke TA,
   4. Swanson SJ, et al

   . A comparison of functional MR activation patterns during silent and audible language tasks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1087–92 pmid:7639132

   Abstract
10. 10.↵
    2. Roux FE,
    3. Boulanouar K,
    4. Ranjeva JP, et al

    . Cortical intraoperative stimulation in brain tumors as a tool to evaluate spatial data from motor functional MRI. Invest Radiol 1999;34:225–29 doi:10.1097/00004424-199903000-00012 pmid:10084668

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Roux FE,
    3. Boulanouar K,
    4. Ranjeva JP, et al

    . Usefulness of motor functional MRI correlated to cortical mapping in Rolandic low-grade astrocytomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:71–79 doi:10.1007/s007010050268 pmid:10071689

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Hirsch J,
    3. Ruge MI,
    4. Kim KH, et al

    . An integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging procedure for preoperative mapping of cortical areas associated with tactile, motor, language, and visual functions. Neurosurgery 2000;47:711–21; discussion 721–22 doi:10.1097/00006123-200009000-00037 pmid:10981759

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Binder JR,
    3. Swanson SJ,
    4. Sabsevitz DS, et al

    . A comparison of two fMRI methods for predicting verbal memory decline after left temporal lobectomy: language lateralization versus hippocampal activation asymmetry. Epilepsia 2010;51:618–26 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02340.x pmid:19817807

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Genetti M,
    3. Tyrand R,
    4. Grouiller F, et al

    . Comparison of high gamma electrocorticography and fMRI with electrocortical stimulation for localization of somatosensory and language cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2015;126:121–30 doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.04.007 pmid:24845600

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Rosazza C,
    3. Aquino D,
    4. D'Incerti L, et al

    . Preoperative mapping of the sensorimotor cortex: comparative assessment of task-based and resting-state FMRI. PLoS One 2014:9:e98860 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098860 pmid:24914775

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Breier JI,
    3. Simos PG,
    4. Zouridakis G, et al

    . Language dominance determined by magnetic source imaging: a comparison with the Wada procedure. Neurology 1999;53:938–45 doi:10.1212/WNL.53.5.938 pmid:10496250

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Xie J,
    3. Chen XZ,
    4. Jiang T, et al

    . Preoperative blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with gliomas involving the motor cortical areas. Chin Med J 2008;121:631–35 pmid:18466684

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Hanakawa T,
    3. Ikeda A,
    4. Sadato N, et al

    . Functional mapping of human medial frontal motor areas: the combined use of functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2001;138:403–09 doi:10.1007/s002210100727 pmid:11465737

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Choudhri AF,
    3. Narayana S,
    4. Rezaie R, et al

    . Same day tri-modality functional brain mapping prior to resection of a lesion involving eloquent cortex: technical feasibility. Neuroradiol J 2013;26:548–54 doi:10.1177/197140091302600508 pmid:24199815

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Chaudhary K,
    3. Kumaran SS,
    4. Chandra SP, et al

    . Mapping of cognitive functions in chronic intractable epilepsy: role of fMRI. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2014;24:51–56 doi:10.4103/0971-3026.130694 pmid:24851005

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Petrella JR,
    3. Shah LM,
    4. Harris KM, et al

    . Preoperative functional MR imaging localization of language and motor areas: effect on therapeutic decision making in patients with potentially resectable brain tumors. Radiology 2006;240:793–802 doi:10.1148/radiol.2403051153 pmid:16857981

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Peck KK,
    3. Bradbury M,
    4. Petrovich N, et al

    . Presurgical evaluation of language using functional magnetic resonance imaging in brain tumor patients with previous surgery. Neurosurgery 2009;64:644–53; discussion 652–53 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000339122.01957.0A pmid:19197223

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Li W,
    3. Wait SD,
    4. Ogg RJ, et al

    . Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the visual cortex performed in children under sedation to assist in presurgical planning. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013;11:543–46 doi:10.3171/2013.1.PEDS12401 pmid:23473057

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Ogg RJ,
    3. Laningham FH,
    4. Clarke D, et al

    . Passive range of motion functional magnetic resonance imaging localizing sensorimotor cortex in sedated children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009;4:317–22 doi:10.3171/2009.4.PEDS08402 pmid:19795962

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Bigler ED

    . Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cognitive function. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:1724–28 doi:10.1002/pbc.25110 pmid:24920351

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Yerys BE,
    3. Jankowski KF,
    4. Shook D, et al

    . The fMRI success rate of children and adolescents: typical development, epilepsy, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorders. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:3426–35 doi:10.1002/hbm.20767 pmid:19384887

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Rajagopal A,
    3. Byars A,
    4. Schapiro M, et al

    . Success rates for functional MR imaging in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2319–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4062 pmid:25082823

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Guzzetta A,
    3. Staudt M,
    4. Petacchi E, et al

    . Brain representation of active and passive hand movements in children. Pediatr Res 2007;61:485–90 doi:10.1203/pdr.0b013e3180332c2e pmid:17515876

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Weiller C,
    3. Jüptner M,
    4. Fellows S, et al

    . Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage 1996;4:105–10 doi:10.1006/nimg.1996.0034 pmid:9345502

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Kocak M,
    3. Ulmer JL,
    4. Sahin Ugurel M, et al

    . Motor homunculus: passive mapping in healthy volunteers by using functional MR imaging–initial results. Radiology 2009;251:485–92 doi:10.1148/radiol.2512080231 pmid:19261925

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Mima T,
    3. Sadato N,
    4. Yazawa S, et al

    . Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Brain 1999;122:1989–97 doi:10.1093/brain/122.10.1989 pmid:10506099

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Lee CC,
    3. Jack CR Jr.,
    4. Riederer SJ

    . Mapping of the central sulcus with functional MR: active versus passive activation tasks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:847–52 pmid:9613498

    Abstract
33. 33.↵
    2. Holloway V,
    3. Gadian DG,
    4. Vargha-Khadem F, et al

    . The reorganization of sensorimotor function in children after hemispherectomy: a functional MRI and somatosensory evoked potential study. Brain 2000;123:2432–44 doi:10.1093/brain/123.12.2432 pmid:11099446

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Bernal B,
    3. Grossman S,
    4. Gonzalez R, et al

    . FMRI under sedation: what is the best choice in children? J Clin Med Res 2012;4:363–70 doi:10.4021/jocmr1047w pmid:23226168

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Picht T,
    3. Schmidt S,
    4. Brandt S, et al

    . Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 2011;69:581–88; discussion 588 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181b89 pmid:21430587

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Krieg SM,
    3. Sabih J,
    4. Bulubasova L, et al

    . Preoperative motor mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation improves outcome for motor eloquent lesions. Neuro-Oncology 2014;16:1274–82 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou007 pmid:24516237

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Krieg SM,
    3. Sollmann N,
    4. Hauck T, et al

    . Repeated mapping of cortical language sites by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation compared to repeated intraoperative DCS mapping in awake craniotomy. BMC Neurosci 2014;15:20 doi:10.1186/1471-2202-15-20 pmid:24479694

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Narayana S,
    3. Rezaie R,
    4. McAfee SS, et al

    . Assessing motor function in young children with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Pediatr Neurol 2015;52:94–103 doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.08.031 pmid:25439485

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Meinzer M,
    3. Lindenberg R,
    4. Darkow R, et al

    . Transcranial direct current stimulation and simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Vis Exp 2014;(86) doi:10.3791/51730 pmid:24796646

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Shriver S,
    3. Knierim KE,
    4. O'Shea JP, et al

    . Pneumatically driven finger movement: a novel passive functional MR imaging technique for presurgical motor and sensory mapping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:E5–7 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2626 pmid:21778242

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Krings T,
    3. Schreckenberger M,
    4. Rohde V, et al

    . Functional MRI and 18F FDG-positron emission tomography for presurgical planning: comparison with electrical cortical stimulation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:889–99; discussion 899 doi:10.1007/s00701-002-0992-8 pmid:12376770

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Holodny AI,
    3. Schulder M,
    4. Liu WC, et al

    . The effect of brain tumors on BOLD functional MR imaging activation in the adjacent motor cortex: implications for image-guided neurosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1415–22 pmid:11003273

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    2. Pillai JJ,
    3. Mikulis DJ

    . Cerebrovascular reactivity mapping: an evolving standard for clinical functional imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:7–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3941 pmid:24788129

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    2. Roessler K,
    3. Donat M,
    4. Lanzenberger R, et al

    . Evaluation of preoperative high magnetic field motor functional MRI (3 Tesla) in glioma patients by navigated electrocortical stimulation and postoperative outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1152–57 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.050286 pmid:16024896

    Abstract/FREE Full Text