Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Letter
Open Access

The Clinical Outcome of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome

B. Gao, A. Lerner and M. Law
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2016, 37 (9) E55-E56; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4853
B. Gao
aDepartment of Radiology Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Qingdao University Yantai, Shandong, China
bDepartment of Radiology Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Gao
A. Lerner
cDepartment of Radiology Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Lerner
M. Law
cDepartment of Radiology Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Law
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We read with great interest the article by Karia et al1 on posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) evaluating the association between the presence of enhancement in PRES and various clinical factors in a large series of 176 patients with PRES. They found that the presence or pattern of enhancement in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome was not associated with any of the tested variables. However, they found a statistical association between MR imaging severity and outcomes, confirming that the grading of MR imaging severity may aid in determining the prognosis of patients with PRES. While we agree with the conclusions of the study, prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with PRES remains a challenging and controversial subject. The purpose of this correspondence is to discuss the current ideas regarding prognosis of PRES, which is still uncertain and open to discussion.

Although PRES is increasingly being recognized and successfully treated, the most important factors affecting its outcomes, such as permanent neurologic deficits, discharge status, and mortality, have not yet been well characterized.2 In our study including 70 patients with PRES, we found that there was no significant correlation between imaging patterns and clinical risk factors. Cytotoxic edema, intracranial hemorrhage, and abnormal enhancement did not show correlation with blood pressure, but correlated with higher edema scores. Furthermore, our recent study demonstrated that cytotoxic edema in PRES is frequently found in association with a larger area of vasogenic edema, which is probably related to regional decreased perfusion and vasculopathy. Presence of atypical neuroimaging appearances, such as cytotoxic edema, intracranial hemorrhage, and abnormal enhancement, are useful for prognosis in PRES because these findings may reflect intrinsic endothelial injury or BBB disruption.3 Based on the results of these studies, severity of brain edema in patients with PRES should be considered as one of the most significant risk factors in the clinical prognosis of this disorder. The specific etiology of PRES and biochemical parameters may represent the other important factors for its prognosis.4 Physicians should be aware of the various etiologies of PRES to allow for rapid diagnosis and treatment and to reduce morbidity of PRES. Prospective exploration is warranted to establish the imaging biomarker associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in PRES.

The most widely used outcome measure of the degree of disability or dependence in patients with stroke is mRS score. Some investigators have used mRS score as a prognostic index during clinical follow-up of patients with acute illness at 1- and 3-month intervals after discharge. Clinical outcome was assessed as degree of disability or death by using mRS score. In this original research, the authors adopted a similar 5-category clinical outcome evaluation based on one of their prior studies of PRES and acute toxic leukoencephalopathy: grade 0, return to baseline clinical condition; grade 1, minimal residual cognitive deficit; grade 2, mild persistent neurologic deficit; grade 3, moderate persistent neurologic deficit; and grade 4, severe outcome, including no improvement, seizures, coma, or death. Glasgow Outcome Scale score on day 90 (67 days after onset of severe PRES) was also adopted as the primary evaluation criterion by some investigators, which may better reflect both mortality and morbidity, especially in critically ill patients or fatal cases.5

The diagnosis of PRES relies mainly on clinical symptoms and radiologic findings. We do agree with Fugate and Rabinstein's6 statement that “the diagnosis of PRES is not mainly radiological; the clinical context and the judgment of the clinician are crucial to making the correct diagnosis.” Clinical symptoms are the prerequisite in the diagnosis of PRES, and imaging findings are the essential condition. Neuroimaging is critical for prompt recognition of this entity and differentiation from other diseases. Though conventional MR imaging protocol is considered to be the criterion standard for the diagnosis or evaluation of PRES, DWI combined with ADC maps is sensitive for differentiating cytotoxic edema from vasogenic edema. Therefore, it is preferable to include DWI and ADC maps in work-up. In practice, ADC mapping is also helpful in some cases in which clinical diagnosis is unclear or difficult to determine.

In conclusion, the roles of imaging findings, clinical symptoms, and biochemical parameters in predicting prognosis of PRES warrant further investigation. A unified diagnostic algorithm should be sought to standardize the diagnosis of PRES and description of clinical outcomes, which will facilitate future research in exploring the role of neuroimaging for this disorder.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: We declare no competing interests. Bo Gao reports a research grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81471645). Meng Law reports grant support from Toshiba American Medical,* a consulting fee/honorarium from Bracco Diagnostics, and travel support from Guerbet. *Money paid to the institution.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Karia SJ,
    2. Rykken JB,
    3. McKinney ZJ, et al
    . Utility and significance of gadolinium-based contrast enhancement in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:415–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4563 pmid:26564441
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lv C,
    2. Gao B
    . Can clinical and MRI findings predict the prognosis of variant and classical type of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)? Still a challenge. Acta Radiol 2015;56:NP3–4 doi:10.1177/0284185114545152 pmid:25168021
    FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Junewar V,
    2. Verma R,
    3. Sankhwar PL, et al
    . Neuroimaging features and predictors of outcome in eclamptic encephalopathy: a prospective observational study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1728–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3923 pmid:24722310
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Alhilali LM,
    2. Reynolds AR,
    3. Fakhran S
    . A multi-disciplinary model of risk factors for fatal outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol Sci 2014;347:59–65 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2014.09.019 pmid:25271189
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Legriel S,
    2. Schraub O,
    3. Azoulay E, et al
    . Determinants of recovery from severe posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. PLoS One 2012;7:e44534 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044534 pmid:23024751
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fugate JE,
    2. Rabinstein AA
    . Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical and radiological manifestations, pathophysiology, and outstanding questions. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:914–25 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00111-8 pmid:26184985
    CrossRefPubMed
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 9
1 Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Clinical Outcome of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
B. Gao, A. Lerner, M. Law
The Clinical Outcome of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016, 37 (9) E55-E56; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4853

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
The Clinical Outcome of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome
B. Gao, A. Lerner, M. Law
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016, 37 (9) E55-E56; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4853
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Reply:
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Controversy of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: what have we learnt in the last 20 years?
  • Crossref (5)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Controversy of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: what have we learnt in the last 20 years?
    Bo Gao, Cui Lyu, Alexander Lerner, Alexander M McKinney
    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2018 89 1
  • Imaging characteristics associated with clinical outcomes in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome
    Andrew D Schweitzer, Neal S Parikh, Gulce Askin, Ajay Nemade, John Lyo, Sasan Karimi, Anna Knobel, Babak B Navi, Robert J Young, Ajay Gupta
    Neuroradiology 2017 59 4
  • Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with a special focus on seizures
    Xin Chen, Jun-guo Zhao, Bo Gao, Hui Yu, Yun-li Yu, Gui-quan Shen, Alexander M. McKinney
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2022 95
  • Evaluation of Clinical Manifestations, Radiological Features, and Outcomes of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)
    Tuba AKDAĞ, Bülent GÜVEN
    Genel Tıp Dergisi 2023 33 1
  • Simulation in Acute Neurology
    Sara E. Hocker, Eelco F.M. Wijdicks
    2019

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire