Reduced Patient Radiation Exposure during Neurodiagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Angiography with a New Imaging Platform

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Yu LM, et al

   ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5 pmid:16139655

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Grigoryan M,
   3. Chaudhry SA,
   4. Hassan AE, et al

   . Neurointerventional procedural volume per hospital in United States: implications for comprehensive stroke center designation. Stroke 2012;43:1309–14 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636076 pmid:22382160

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Stecker MS,
   3. Balter S,
   4. Towbin RB, et al

   ; SIR Safety and Health Committee; CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20(suppl):S263–73 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.037 pmid:19560006

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Sánchez RM,
   3. Vano E,
   4. Fernández JM, et al

   . Staff doses in interventional radiology: a national survey. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;23:1496–501 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2012.05.056 pmid:22832138

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Söderman M,
   3. Mauti M,
   4. Boon S, et al

   . Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1365–72 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1276-0 pmid:24005833

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Pitton MB,
   3. Kloeckner R,
   4. Schneider J, et al

   . Radiation exposure in vascular angiographic procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;23:1487–95 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2012.05.048 pmid:22840684

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Söderman M,
   3. Holmin S,
   4. Andersson T, et al

   . Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology 2013;269:553–60 doi:10.1148/radiol.13121262 pmid:23737536

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Nakamura S,
   3. Kobayashi T,
   4. Funatsu A, et al

   . Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention. Heart Vessels 2016;31:655–63 doi:10.1007/s00380-015-0667-z pmid:25840815

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. van Strijen MJ,
   3. Grünhagen T,
   4. Mauti M, et al

   . Evaluation of a noise reduction imaging technology in iliac digital subtraction angiography: noninferior clinical image quality with lower patient and scatter dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015;26:642–50.e1 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2015.01.007 pmid:25770373

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. van den Haak RF,
    3. Hamans BC,
    4. Zuurmond K, et al

    . Significant radiation dose reduction in the hybrid operating room using a novel x-ray imaging technology. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015;50:480–86 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.06.025 pmid:26286386

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Ten Cate T,
    3. van Wely M,
    4. Gehlmann H, et al

    . Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patient radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography. Neth Heart J 2015;23:525–30 doi:10.1007/s12471-015-0742-1 pmid:26369914

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Eloot L,
    3. Thierens H,
    4. Taeymans Y, et al

    . Novel X-ray imaging technology enables significant patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology while maintaining diagnostic image quality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:E205–12 doi:10.1002/ccd.25913 pmid:25754018

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Haas NA,
    3. Happel CM,
    4. Mauti M, et al

    . Substantial radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease interventions with a novel X-ray imaging technology. IJC Heart & Vasculature 2015;6:101–09 doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.01.007

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    2. Lin PJ,
    3. Schueler BA,
    4. Balter S, et al

    . Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: a report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190. Med Phys 2015;42:6815–29 doi:10.1118/1.4934831 pmid:26632039

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Hurvich CM,
    3. Tsai CL

    . Regression and time-series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 1989;76:297–307 doi:10.1093/biomet/76.2.297

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Balter S,
    3. Hopewell JW,
    4. Miller DL, et al

    . Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. Radiology 2010;254:326–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.2542082312 pmid:20093507

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Faulkner K,
    3. Vañó E

    . Deterministic effects in interventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2001;94:95–98 doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006489 pmid:11487852

    Abstract
18. 18.↵
    2. Brink JA,
    3. Amis ES Jr.

    . Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. Radiology 2010;257:601–02 doi:10.1148/radiol.10101335 pmid:21084410

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Sidhu M,
    3. Goske MJ,
    4. Connolly B, et al

    . Image Gently, Step Lightly: promoting radiation safety in pediatric interventional radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:W299–301 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3938 pmid:20858793

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Norbash AM,
    3. Busick D,
    4. Marks MP

    . Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiologic skin dose: tube position rotation and supplemental beam filtration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:41–49 pmid:8770248

    Abstract
21. 21.↵
    2. Miller DL,
    3. Balter S,
    4. Cole PE, et al

    ; RAD-IR study. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study, part I: overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:711–27 doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000079980.80153.4B pmid:12817038

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Vano E,
    3. Järvinen H,
    4. Kosunen A, et al

    . Patient dose in interventional radiology: a European survey. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;129:39–45 doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn024 pmid:18287189

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Kien N,
    3. Rehel JL,
    4. Etard C, et al

    . Patient dose during interventional neuroradiology procedures: results from a multi-center study [in French]. J Radiol 2011;92:1101–12 doi:10.1016/j.jradio.2011.08.005 pmid:22153042

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. D'Ercole L,
    3. Thyrion FZ,
    4. Bocchiola M, et al

    . Proposed local diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional neuroradiology and a preliminary analysis according to the complexity of the procedures. Phys Med 2012;28:61–70 doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.10.008 pmid:21074469

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Alexander MD,
    3. Oliff MC,
    4. Olorunsola OG, et al

    . Patient radiation exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic interventional neuroradiology procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 2010;2:6–10 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000802 pmid:21990551

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Chohan MO,
    3. Sandoval D,
    4. Buchan A, et al

    . Cranial radiation exposure during cerebral catheter angiography. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:633–36 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010909 pmid:24062257

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Vano E,
    3. Fernandez JM,
    4. Sanchez RM, et al

    . Patient radiation dose management in the follow-up of potential skin injuries in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:277–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3211 pmid:22859286

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. D'Ercole L,
    3. Mantovani L,
    4. Thyrion FZ, et al

    . A study on maximum skin dose in cerebral embolization procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:503–07 pmid:17353323

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Velat GJ,
    3. Reavey-Cantwell JF,
    4. Sistrom C, et al

    . Comparison of N-butyl cyanoacrylate and Onyx for the embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: analysis of fluoroscopy and procedure times. Neurosurgery 2008;63:ONS73–78; discussion ONS78–80 pmid:18728607

    PubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Khodadadegan Y,
    3. Zhang M,
    4. Pavlicek W, et al

    . Validation and initial clinical use of automatic peak skin dose localization with fluoroscopic and interventional procedures. Radiology 2013;266:246–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.12112295 pmid:23143024

    CrossRefPubMed