Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using the WEB Device: A Retrospective Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Sorenson T,
   3. Lanzino G

   . Trials and tribulations: an evidence-based approach to aneurysm treatment. J Neurosurg Sci 2016;60:22–26 pmid:27102908

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Falk Delgado A,
   3. Andersson T,
   4. Falk Delgado A

   . Clinical outcome after surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysms: a pragmatic meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials with short- and long-term follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:264–77 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012292 pmid:27053705

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Henkes H,
   3. Fischer S,
   4. Weber W, et al

   . Endovascular coil occlusion of 1811 intracranial aneurysms: early angiographic and clinical results. Neurosurgery 2004;54:268–80; discussion 280–85 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000103221.16671.F0 pmid:14744273

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Zhao B,
   3. Yin R,
   4. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular coiling of wide-neck and wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1700–05 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4834 pmid:27256850

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Biondi A

   . Endovascular techniques for the management of wide-neck intracaranial bifurcation aneurysms: a critical review of the literature. J Neuroradiol 2016;43:167–75 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2016.02.001 pmid:26976346

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Henkes H,
   3. Weber W

   . The past, present and future of endovascular aneurysm treatment. Clin Neuroradiol 2015;25(suppl 2):317–22 doi:10.1007/s00062-015-0403-1 pmid:26031430

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Zhao B,
   3. Tan X,
   4. Yang H, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone of poor-grade ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study. J Neurointervent Surg 2017;9:165–68 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012259 pmid:26951385

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Piotin M,
   3. Blanc R,
   4. Spelle L, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:110–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558114 pmid:19959540

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Yavuz K,
   3. Geyik S,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:529–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3692 pmid:24072620

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Armoiry X,
    3. Turjman F,
    4. Hartmann DJ, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the WEB device: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:868–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4611 pmid:26585260

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Lescher S,
    3. du Mensil de Rochemont R,
    4. Berkefeld J

    . Woven Endobridge (WEB) device for endovascular treatment of complex unruptured aneurysms: a single center experience. Neuroradiology 2016;58:883–90 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1641-x pmid:26767527

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Mihalea C,
    4. Klisch C, et al

    . Single-layer WEBs: intrasaccular flow disrupters for aneurysm treatment—feasibility results from a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1942–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4369 pmid:26159516

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Morales-Valero SF,
    4. Murad MH, et al

    . Rescue treatment of thromboembolic complications during endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:121–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4066 pmid:25082819

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Costalat V,
    4. Moret J, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 2016;214:1250–56 doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634 pmid:26381253

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Lawson A,
    3. Goddard T,
    4. Ross S, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using the Woven Endo Bridge technique in a single center: preliminary results. J Neurosurg 2017;126:17–28 doi:10.3171/2015.4.JNS142456 pmid:26381253

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Asnafi S,
    3. Rouchaud A,
    4. Pierot L, et al

    . Efficacy and safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2287–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4900 pmid:27516237

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Gubucz I,
    4. Buhk JH, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1151–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5178 pmid:28450432

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Molineux A,
    4. Coon A, et al

    . Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT). J Neurointerv Surg 2017 Jan 17. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012841 pmid:28096478

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Clajus C,
    3. Strasilla C,
    4. Fiebig T, et al

    . Initial and mid-term results from 108 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the WEB device. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:411–47 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012276 pmid:27075486

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Mihaela C,
    4. Dargento F, et al

    . Woven Endobridge (WEB) device for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial wide-neck aneurysms: a single center experience. Neuroradiology 2014;56:755–61 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1390-7 pmid:24930127

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. van Rooj WJ,
    3. Peluso JP,
    4. Bechan RS, et al

    . WEB treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1679–83 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4811 pmid:27102307

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Nishido H,
    3. Piotin M,
    4. Bartolini B, et al

    . Analysis of complications and recurrences of aneurysm coiling with special emphasis on the stent-assisted technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:339–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3658 pmid:23907240

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Adeeb N,
    3. Grissenauer C,
    4. Patel A, et al

    . The use of single stent-assisted coiling in treatment of bifurcation aneurysms: a multicenter cohort study with proposal of a scoring system to predict complete occlusion. Neurosurgery 2017 Jun 8. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx310 pmid:28595331

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. Molyneux A, et al

    . Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and French Observatory). Neurosurgery 2016;78:133–41 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001106 pmid:26552042

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Orrù E,
    3. Roccatagliata L,
    4. Cester G, et al

    . Complications of endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1653–58 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.011 pmid:23332977

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Arthur A,
    4. Byrne J, et al

    . Interobserver variability in the assessment of aneurysm occlusion with the WEB aneurysm embolization system. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:591–95 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011251 pmid:24984707

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Mine B,
    3. Goutte A,
    4. Brisbois D, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: mid term and long term results. J Neurointerv Surg 2017 Feb 20. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012964 pmid:28219938

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Rezek I,
    3. Mousan G,
    4. Wang Z, et al

    . Effect of core laboratory and multiple reader interpretation of angiographic images on follow-up outcomes of coiled cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1380–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3398 pmid:23370480

    Abstract/FREE Full Text