Factors Influencing Confidence in Diagnostic Ratings and Retreatment Recommendations in Coiled Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Cloft HJ,
   3. Kaufmann T,
   4. Kallmes DF

   . Observer agreement in the assessment of endovascular aneurysm therapy and aneurysm recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:497–500 pmid:17353321

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Tollard É,
   3. Darsaut TE,
   4. Bing F, et al

   . Outcomes of endovascular treatments of aneurysms: observer variability and implications for interpreting case series and planning randomized trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:626–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2848 pmid:22194386

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Ernst M,
   3. Yoo AJ,
   4. Kriston L, et al

   . Is visual evaluation of aneurysm coiling a reliable study end point? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2015;46:1574–81 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008513 pmid:25944331

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. McDougall CG,
   3. Johnston SC,
   4. Gholkar A, et al

   ; MAPS Investigators. Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:935–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3857 pmid:24481333

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Daugherty WP,
   3. Rad AE,
   4. White JB, et al

   . Observer agreement regarding the necessity of retreatment of previously coiled recurrent cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:566–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2336 pmid:21252043

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. McDonald JS,
   3. Carter RE,
   4. Layton KF, et al

   . Interobserver variability in retreatment decisions of recurrent and residual aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1035–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3326 pmid:23099500

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Bornstein BH,
   3. Emler AC

   . Rationality in medical decision making: a review of the literature on doctors' decision-making biases. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7:97–107 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00284.x pmid:11489035

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Ernst M,
   3. Kriston L,
   4. Romero JM, et al

   . Quantitative evaluation of performance in interventional neuroradiology: an integrated curriculum featuring theoretical and practical challenges. PLoS One 2016;11:e0148694 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148694 pmid:26848840

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Shrout PE,
   3. Fleiss JL

   . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–28 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 pmid:18839484

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Landis JR,
    3. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Fiehler J,
    4. White P

    . Point-TAR: a useful index to follow-up coiled intracranial aneurysms? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2–4 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4119 pmid:25300983

    FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Gentric JC,
    4. McDougall CM, et al

    . Uncertainty and agreement regarding the role of flow diversion in the management of difficult aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:930–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4201 pmid:25593206

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Studdert DM,
    3. Mello MM,
    4. Sage WM, et al

    . Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 2005;293:2609–17 pmid:15928282

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Hatzoglou V,
    3. Omuro AM,
    4. Haque S, et al

    . Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care. Cancer 2016;122:2708–14 doi:10.1002/cncr.30083 pmid:27219108

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Ernst M,
    3. Buchholz A,
    4. Bourcier R, et al

    . Voxel based analysis of recurrence dynamics in intracranial aneurysms after coiling. J Neurointerv Surg 2017 Oct 31. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013311 pmid:29089416

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Schönfeld MH,
    3. Schlotfeldt V,
    4. Forkert ND, et al

    . Aneurysm recurrence volumetry is more sensitive than visual evaluation of aneurysm recurrences. Clin Neuroradiol 2016;26:57–64 doi:10.1007/s00062-014-0330-6 pmid:25159038

    CrossRefPubMed