Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–87 doi:10.1056/NEJM199512143332401 pmid:7477192

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Mozaffarian D,
   3. Benjamin EJ,
   4. Go AS, et al

   ; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;131:e29–322 doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152 pmid:25520374

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Gibson CM,
   3. Pride YB,
   4. Frederick PD, et al

   . Trends in reperfusion strategies, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J 2008;156:1035–44 doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.07.029 pmid:19032997

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Sacks D,
   3. Black CM,
   4. Cognard C, et al

   ; American Society of Neuroradiology, Canadian Interventional Radiology Association, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy, Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. Multisociety consensus quality improvement guidelines for intraarterial catheter-directed treatment of acute ischemic stroke, from the American Society of Neuroradiology, Canadian Interventional Radiology Association, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy, and Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013;24:151–63 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2012.11.028 pmid:23369552

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. White PM,
   3. Bhalla A,
   4. Dinsmore J, et al

   . Standards for providing safe acute ischaemic stroke thrombectomy services (September 2015). Clin Radiol 2017;72:175.e1–9 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2016.11.008 pmid:27974152

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Badhiwala JH,
   3. Nassiri F,
   4. Alhazzani W, et al

   . Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2015;314:1832–43 doi:10.1001/jama.2015.13767 pmid:26529161

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Berkhemer OA,
   3. Fransen PS,
   4. Beumer D, et al

   . A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Bracard S,
   3. Ducrocq X,
   4. Mas JL, et al

   ; THRACE investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1138–47 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6 pmid:27567239

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Broderick JP,
   3. Palesch YY,
   4. Demchuk AM, et al

   ; Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214300 pmid:23390923

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Hill MD,
    4. Rubiera M, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of Solitaire stent thrombectomy: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Stroke 2016;47:798–806 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012360 pmid:26888532

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Mitchell PJ,
    4. Kleinig TJ, et al

    ; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Ciccone A,
    3. Valvassori L,
    4. Nichelatti M, et al

    ; SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:904–13 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1213701 pmid:23387822

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Demchuk AM,
    4. Menon BK, et al

    ; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Menon BK,
    4. van Zwam WH, et al

    ; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X pmid:26898852

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Jovin TG,
    3. Chamorro A,
    4. Cobo E, et al

    ; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Kennedy SA,
    3. Baerlocher MO,
    4. Baerlocher F, et al

    . Meta-analysis of local endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;27:307–21.e2 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2015.11.053 pmid:26803573

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kidwell CS,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. Gornbein J, et al

    ; MR RESCUE Investigators. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1212793 pmid:23394476

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Mocco J,
    3. Zaidat OO,
    4. von Kummer R, et al

    ; THERAPY Trial Investigators. Aspiration thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus intravenous alteplase alone. Stroke 2016;47:2331–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013372 pmid:27486173

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Prabhakaran S,
    3. Ruff I,
    4. Bernstein RA

    . Acute stroke intervention: a systematic review. JAMA 2015;313:1451–62 doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3058 pmid:25871671

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Goyal M,
    4. Bonafe A, et al

    ; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance. Mechanical clot retrieval for treating acute ischaemic stroke. Interventional procedures guidance (IPG548), February 2016. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg548. Accessed April 10, 2016.
22. 22.↵
    2. Powers WJ,
    3. Derdeyn CP,
    4. Biller J, et al

    ; American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46:3020–35 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000074 pmid:26123479

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Wahlgren N,
    3. Moreira T,
    4. Michel P, et al

    ; ESO-KSU, ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: consensus statement by ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update 2014/2015, supported by ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN. Int J Stroke 2016;11:134–47 doi:10.1177/1747493015609778 pmid:26763029

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Connors JJ 3rd.,
    3. Sacks D,
    4. Black CM, et al

    ; Society of Interventional Radiology. Training guidelines for intra-arterial catheter-directed treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a statement from a special writing group of the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:1507–22 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.005 pmid:19944980

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Lavine SD,
    3. Cockroft K,
    4. Hoh B, et al

    . Training Guidelines for Endovascular Ischemic Stroke Intervention: An International Multi-Society Consensus Document. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:E31–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4766 pmid:26892982

    FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Jovin TG,
    3. Albers GW,
    4. Liebeskind DS

    ; STAIR IX Consortium. Stroke treatment academic industry roundtable: the next generation of endovascular trials. Stroke 2016;47:2656–65 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013578 pmid:27586682

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Fink A,
    3. Kosecoff J,
    4. Chassin M, et al

    . Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984;74:979–83 doi:10.2105/AJPH.74.9.979 pmid:6380323

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Graham R,
    2. Mancher M,
    3. Wolman DM, et al.

    Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, et al., eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011: xxxiv
29. 29.↵
    2. Sacco RL,
    3. Kasner SE,
    4. Broderick JP, et al

    ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:2064–89 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca pmid:23652265

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Albers GW,
    4. Broderick JP, et al

    . Acute stroke imaging research roadmap II. Stroke 2013;44:2628–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002015 pmid:23860298

    FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Zaidat OO,
    3. Yoo AJ,
    4. Khatri P, et al

    ; Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading (CARG) Collaborators, STIR Revascularization working group, STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 pmid:23920012

    FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Wahlgren N,
    3. Ahmed N,
    4. Eriksson N, et al

    ; Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-MOnitoring STudy Investigators. Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome results to baseline data profile in randomized controlled trials: Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST). Stroke 2008;39:3316–22 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510768 pmid:18927461

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Wahlgren N,
    3. Ahmed N,
    4. Davalos A, et al

    ; SITS-MOST investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 2007;369:275–82 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4 pmid:17258667

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. von Kummer R,
    3. Broderick JP,
    4. Campbell BC, et al

    . The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification: classification of bleeding events after ischemic stroke and reperfusion therapy. Stroke 2015;46:2981–86 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049 pmid:26330447

    FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. van Swieten JC,
    3. Koudstaal PJ,
    4. Visser MC, et al

    . Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–07 doi:10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604 pmid:3363593

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Casaubon LK,
    3. Boulanger JM,
    4. Blacquiere D, et al

    ; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Canadian Stroke Best Practices Advisory Committee. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Hyperacute Stroke Care Guidelines, Update 2015. Int J Stroke 2015;10:924–40 doi:10.1111/ijs.12551 pmid:26148019

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Donnan GA,
    4. Lees KR, et al

    . Endovascular stent thrombectomy: the new standard of care for large vessel ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:846–54 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00140-4 pmid:26119323

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Coutts SB,
    3. Modi J,
    4. Patel SK, et al

    ; Calgary Stroke Program. CT/CT angiography and MRI findings predict recurrent stroke after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: results of the prospective CATCH study. Stroke 2012;43:1013–17 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.637421 pmid:22302109

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. Furlan A,
    3. Higashida R,
    4. Wechsler L, et al

    . Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II study—a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999;282:2003–11 doi:10.1001/jama.282.21.2003 pmid:10591382

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators. Penumbra pivotal stroke trial: the penumbra pivotal stroke trial—safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 2009;40:2761–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544957 pmid:19590057

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Smith WS,
    3. Sung G,
    4. Saver J, et al

    ; Multi MERCI Investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke 2008;39:1205–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.497115 pmid:18309168

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    2. Tarr R,
    3. Hsu D,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . The POST trial: initial post-market experience of the Penumbra system: revascularization of large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke in the United States and Europe. J Neurointerv Surg 2010;2:341–44 doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.002600 pmid:21990642

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    2. Fransen PS,
    3. Berkhemer OA,
    4. Lingsma HF, et al

    . Time to Reperfusion and Treatment Effect for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:190–96 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3886 pmid:26716735

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Jadhav AP,
    4. Bonafe A, et al

    ; SWIFT PRIME investigators. Analysis of workflow and time to treatment and the effects on outcome in endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: results from the SWIFT PRIME randomized controlled trial. Radiology 2016;279:888–97 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016160204 pmid:27092472

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    2. Khatri P,
    3. Abruzzo T,
    4. Yeatts SD, et al

    ; IMS I and II Investigators. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology 2009;73:1066–72 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b9c847 pmid:19786699

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Goyal M,
    4. van der Lugt A, et al

    ; HERMES Collaborators. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2016;316:1279–88 doi:10.1001/jama.2016.13647 pmid:27673305

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Lansberg MG,
    3. Cereda CW,
    4. Mlynash M, et al

    ; Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 (DEFUSE 2) Study Investigators. Response to endovascular reperfusion is not time-dependent in patients with salvageable tissue. Neurology 2015;85:708–14 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001853 pmid:26224727

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    2. Nogueira R,
    3. Jovin T

    . Clinical mismatch in the triage of wake up and late presenting strokes undergoing neurointervention with Trevo (DAWN). N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21
49. 49.↵
    POSITIVE Stroke Clinical Trial. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01852201?term=positive+stroke+trial&rank=1. Accessed February 12, 2016.
50. 50.↵
    Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3 (DEFUSE 3). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02586415. Accessed February 12, 2016.
51. 51.↵
    2. Brandt T,
    3. von Kummer R,
    4. Müller-Küppers M, et al

    . Thrombolytic therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion: variables affecting recanalization and outcome. Stroke 1996;27:875–81 doi:10.1161/01.STR.27.5.875 pmid:8623107

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    2. Lin DD,
    3. Gailloud P,
    4. Beauchamp NJ, et al

    . Combined stent placement and thrombolysis in acute vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1827–33 pmid:14561611

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
53. 53.↵
    2. Schonewille WJ,
    3. Wijman CA,
    4. Michel P, et al

    ; BASICS study group. Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:724–30 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70173-5 pmid:19577962

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
54. 54.↵
    Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01717755?term=basics+stroke+trial&rank=1. Accessed April 11, 2017.
55. 55.↵
    Basilar Artery Occlusion Chinese Endovascular Trial. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02737189?term=best+stroke+trial&rank=2. Accessed April 11, 2017.
56. 56.↵
    2. Hacke W,
    3. Kaste M,
    4. Fieschi C, et al

    . Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II): Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet 1998;352:1245–51 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08020-9 pmid:9788453

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
57. 57.↵
    2. Barber PA,
    3. Demchuk AM,
    4. Zhang J, et al

    . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy: ASPECTS Study Group—Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02237-6 pmid:10905241

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. 58.↵
    2. Pexman JH,
    3. Barber PA,
    4. Hill MD, et al

    . Use of the Alberta Stroke Program early CT score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1534–42 pmid:11559501

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. 59.↵
    Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy in Stroke with Extended Lesion and Extended Time Window (Tension). https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03094715. Accessed April 11, 2017.
60. 60.↵
    2. Riedel CH,
    3. Zoubie J,
    4. Ulmer S, et al

    . Thin-slice reconstructions of nonenhanced CT images allow for detection of thrombus in acute stroke. Stroke 2012;43:2319–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.649921 pmid:22723458

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
61. 61.↵
    2. Riedel CH,
    3. Zimmermann P,
    4. Jensen-Kondering U, et al

    . The importance of size: successful recanalization by intravenous thrombolysis in acute anterior stroke depends on thrombus length. Stroke 2011;42:1775–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609693 pmid:21474810

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
62. 62.↵
    2. Rohan V,
    3. Baxa J,
    4. Tupy R, et al

    . Length of occlusion predicts recanalization and outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke 2014;45:2010–17 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005731 pmid:24916912

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
63. 63.↵
    2. Ahn SH,
    3. d'Esterre CD,
    4. Qazi EM, et al

    . Occult anterograde flow is an under-recognized but crucial predictor of early recanalization with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator. Stroke 2015;46:968–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008648 pmid:25700286

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
64. 64.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. d'Esterre CD,
    4. Qazi EM, et al

    . Multiphase CT angiography: a new tool for the imaging triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Radiology 2015;275:510–20 doi:10.1148/radiol.15142256 pmid:25633505

    CrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    2. Gilgen MD,
    3. Klimek D,
    4. Liesirova KT, et al

    . Younger stroke patients with large pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging lesions may benefit from endovascular treatment. Stroke 2015;46:2510–16 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010250 pmid:26251252

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
66. 66.↵
    2. Borst J,
    3. Berkhemer OA,
    4. Roos YB, et al

    ; MR CLEAN investigators. Value of computed tomographic perfusion-based patient selection for intra-arterial acute ischemic stroke treatment. Stroke 2015;46:3375–82 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010564 pmid:26542698

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
67. 67.↵
    2. d'Esterre CD,
    3. Boesen ME,
    4. Ahn SH, et al

    . Time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2015;46:3390–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009250 pmid:26514186

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
68. 68.↵
    2. Barreto AD,
    3. Albright KC,
    4. Hallevi H, et al

    . Thrombus burden is associated with clinical outcome after intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2008;39:3231–35 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521054 pmid:18772444

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
69. 69.↵
    2. Lin R,
    3. Vora N,
    4. Zaidi S, et al

    . Mechanical approaches combined with intra-arterial pharmacological therapy are associated with higher recanalization rates than either intervention alone in revascularization of acute carotid terminus occlusion. Stroke 2009;40:2092–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544783 pmid:19390066

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
70. 70.↵
    2. Shi ZS,
    3. Loh Y,
    4. Walker G, et al

    ; MERCI and Multi-MERCI Investigators. Clinical outcomes in middle cerebral artery trunk occlusions versus secondary division occlusions after mechanical thrombectomy: pooled analysis of the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and multi MERCI trials. Stroke 2010;41:953–60 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571943 pmid:20378867

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
71. 71.↵
    2. Coutinho JM,
    3. Liebeskind DS,
    4. Slater LA, et al

    . Mechanical thrombectomy for isolated M2 occlusions: a post hoc analysis of the STAR, SWIFT, and SWIFT PRIME studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:667–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4591 pmid:26564442

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
72. 72.↵
    2. Busl KM,
    3. Nogueira RG,
    4. Yoo AJ, et al

    . Prestroke dementia is associated with poor outcomes after reperfusion therapy among elderly stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:718–24 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.11.005 pmid:22182760

    CrossRefPubMed
73. 73.↵
    2. Khatri P,
    3. Hill MD,
    4. Palesch YY, et al

    ; Interventional Management of Stroke III Investigators. Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Int J Stroke 2008;3:130–37 doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2008.00151.x pmid:18706007

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
74. 74.↵
    2. Bhole R,
    3. Goyal N,
    4. Nearing K, et al

    . Implications of limiting mechanical thrombectomy to patients with emergent large vessel occlusion meeting top tier evidence criteria. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:225–28 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012206 pmid:26932801

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
75. 75.↵
    2. Goyal N,
    3. Tsivgoulis G,
    4. Frei D, et al

    . A multicenter study of the safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for patients with acute ischemic stroke not meeting top-tier evidence criteria. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:10–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012905 pmid:28143898

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
76. 76.↵
    2. Leifer D,
    3. Bravata DM,
    4. Connors JJ 3rd., et al

    ; American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42:849–77 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318208eb99 pmid:21233469

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
77. 77.↵
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Gornbein J

    . Treatment effects for which shift or binary analyses are advantageous in acute stroke trials. Neurology 2009;72:1310–15 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000341308.73506.b7 pmid:19092107

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
78. 78.↵
    Interventional Stroke Therapy Outcomes Registry (INSTOR). http://www.strokeregistry.org. Accessed July 19, 2016.
79. 79.↵
    2. Meyers PM,
    3. Schumacher HC,
    4. Alexander MJ, et al

    ; Wrting Group for American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons Cerebrovascular Section, Society of Neurointerventional Surgery and Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. Performance and training standards for endovascular ischemic stroke treatment. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;18:411–15 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.08.001 pmid:19900641

    CrossRefPubMed
80. 80.↵
    2. Schwamm LH,
    3. Fonarow GC,
    4. Reeves MJ, et al

    . Get With the Guideline: Stroke is associated with sustained improvement in care for patients hospitalized with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. Circulation 2009;119:107–15 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.783688 pmid:19075103

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
81. 81.↵
    SITS-Thrombectomy registry. http://www.sitsinternational.org/registries/sits-thrombectomy/. Accessed August 12, 2016.
82. 82.↵
    MR CLEAN-R Registry. http://www.mrclean-trial.org. Accessed August 12, 2016.
83. 83.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. Saver JL,
    4. Goyal M, et al

    . Trends in endovascular therapy and clinical outcomes within the nationwide Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry. Stroke 2015;46:989–95 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007542 pmid:25681065

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
84. 84.↵
    2. Hacke W,
    3. Donnan G,
    4. Fieschi C, et al

    ; ATLANTIS Trials Investigators, ECASS Trials Investigators, NINDS rt-PA Study Group Investigators. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet 2004;363:768–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15692-4 pmid:15016487

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
85. 85.↵
    2. Lansberg MG,
    3. Schrooten M,
    4. Bluhmki E, et al

    . Treatment time-specific number needed to treat estimates for tissue plasminogen activator therapy in acute stroke based on shifts over the entire range of the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 2009;40:2079–84 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540708 pmid:19372447

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
86. 86.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. Sajobi TT,
    4. Zhang Y, et al

    . Analysis of workflow and time to treatment on thrombectomy outcome in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2016;133:2279–86 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019983 pmid:27076599

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
87. 87.↵
    2. Ribo M,
    3. Molina CA,
    4. Cobo E, et al

    ; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Association between time to reperfusion and outcome is primarily driven by the time from imaging to reperfusion. Stroke 2016;47:999–1004 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011721 pmid:26956258

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
88. 88.↵
    2. Bradley EH,
    3. Curry LA,
    4. Webster TR, et al

    . Achieving rapid door-to-balloon times: how top hospitals improve complex clinical systems. Circulation 2006;113:1079–85 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.590133 pmid:16490818

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
89. 89.↵
    2. Krumholz HM,
    3. Bradley EH,
    4. Nallamothu BK, et al

    . A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Door-to-Balloon—An Alliance for Quality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:97–104 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2007.10.006 pmid:19393152

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
90. 90.↵
    2. Fonarow GC,
    3. Smith EE,
    4. Saver JL, et al

    . Improving door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: the design and rationale for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association's target—stroke initiative. Stroke 2011;42:2983–89 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621342 pmid:21885841

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
91. 91.↵
    2. Mitka M

    . Reducing door-to-needle time for tPA use remains an elusive goal in stroke care. JAMA 2011;305:1288–89 doi:10.1001/jama.2011.378 pmid:21467278

    CrossRefPubMed
92. 92.↵
    2. Meretoja A,
    3. Strbian D,
    4. Mustanoja S, et al

    . Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology 2012;79:306–13 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825d6011 pmid:22622858

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
93. 93.↵
    2. Rai AT,
    3. Smith MS,
    4. Boo S, et al

    . The ‘pit-crew’ model for improving door-to-needle times in endovascular stroke therapy: a Six-Sigma project. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:447–52 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012219 pmid:26863106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
94. 94.↵
    2. Costalat V,
    3. Machi P,
    4. Lobotesis K, et al

    . Rescue, combined, and stand-alone thrombectomy in the management of large vessel occlusion stroke using the Solitaire device: a prospective 50-patient single-center study: timing, safety, and efficacy. Stroke 2011;42:1929–35 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608976 pmid:21597019

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
95. 95.↵
    2. Miley JT,
    3. Memon MZ,
    4. Hussein HM, et al

    . A multicenter analysis of “time to microcatheter” for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2011;21:159–64 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00432.x pmid:19811609

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
96. 96.↵
    2. Sun CH,
    3. Ribo M,
    4. Goyal M, et al

    . Door-to-puncture: a practical metric for capturing and enhancing system processes associated with endovascular stroke care, preliminary results from the rapid reperfusion registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000859 doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.000859 pmid:24772523

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
97. 97.↵
    2. Zaidat OO,
    3. Castonguay AC,
    4. Gupta R, et al

    . North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke Registry: post-marketing revascularization and clinical outcome results. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:584–88 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010895 pmid:24062252

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
98. 98.↵
    2. Nogueira RG,
    3. Lutsep HL,
    4. Gupta R, et al

    ; TREVO 2 Trialists. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet 2012;380:1231–40 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61299-9 pmid:22932714

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
99. 99.↵
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. Levy EI, et al

    . Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012;380:1241–49 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61384-1 pmid:22932715

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
100. 100.↵
     2. Abilleira S,
     3. Ribera A,
     4. Dávalos A, et al

     ; Catalan Stroke Code and Reperfusion Consortium. Functional outcome after primary endovascular therapy or IV thrombolysis alone for stroke: an observational, comparative effectiveness study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;38:328–36 doi:10.1159/000368433 pmid:25428822

     CrossRefPubMed
101. 101.↵
     2. Goyal M,
     3. Almekhlafi MA,
     4. Fan L, et al

     . Evaluation of interval times from onset to reperfusion in patients undergoing endovascular therapy in the Interventional Management of Stroke III trial. Circulation 2014;130:265–72 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007826 pmid:24815501

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
102. 102.↵
     2. van Heerden J,
     3. Yan B,
     4. Churilov L, et al

     . Picture-to-puncture time in acute stroke endovascular intervention: are we getting faster? J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:564–68 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011177 pmid:24968880

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
103. 103.↵
     2. Nikoubashman O,
     3. Probst T,
     4. Schürmann K, et al

     . Weekend effect in endovascular stroke treatment: do treatment decisions, procedural times, and outcome depend on time of admission? J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:336–39 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012220 pmid:26992412

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
104. 104.↵
     2. Latchaw RE,
     3. Alberts MJ,
     4. Lev MH, et al

     ; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Stroke Council, and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009;40:3646–78 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.192616 pmid:19797189

     FREE Full Text
105. 105.↵
     2. McTaggart RA,
     3. Ansari SA,
     4. Goyal M, et al

     ; Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS). Initial hospital management of patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the standards and guidelines committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:316–23 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011984 pmid:26323793

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
106. 106.↵
     2. Cho TH,
     3. Nighoghossian N,
     4. Mikkelsen IK, et al

     . Reperfusion within 6 hours outperforms recanalization in predicting penumbra salvage, lesion growth, final infarct, and clinical outcome. Stroke 2015;46:1582–89 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007964 pmid:25908463

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
107. 107.↵
     2. Struffert T,
     3. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
     4. Engelhorn T, et al

     . Feasibility of cerebral blood volume mapping by flat panel detector CT in the angiography suite: first experience in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:618–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2839 pmid:22207301

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
108. 108.↵
     2. Higashida RT,
     3. Furlan AJ,
     4. Roberts H, et al

     ; Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:e109–37 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09 pmid:12869717

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
109. 109.↵
     TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial: Phase I findings. N Engl J Med 1985;312:932–36 pmid:4038784

     PubMed
110. 110.↵
     2. Chesebro JH,
     3. Knatterud G,
     4. Roberts R, et al

     . Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase—clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987;76:142–54 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.76.1.142 pmid:3109764

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
111. 111.↵
     2. Mori E,
     3. Yoneda Y,
     4. Tabuchi M, et al

     . Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute carotid artery territory stroke. Neurology 1992;42:976–82 doi:10.1212/WNL.42.5.976 pmid:1579252

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
112. 112.↵
     2. Qureshi AI

     . New grading system for angiographic evaluation of arterial occlusions and recanalization response to intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 2002;50:1405–14; discussion 1414–15 pmid:12015866

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
113. 113.↵
     2. Khatri P,
     3. Neff J,
     4. Broderick JP, et al

     ; IMS-I Investigators. Revascularization end points in stroke interventional trials: recanalization versus reperfusion in IMS-I. Stroke 2005;36:2400–03 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000185698.45720.58 pmid:16224088

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
114. 114.↵
     2. Gerber JC,
     3. Miaux YJ,
     4. von Kummer R

     . Scoring flow restoration in cerebral angiograms after endovascular revascularization in acute ischemic stroke patients. Neuroradiology 2015;57:227–40 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1460-x pmid:25407716

     CrossRefPubMed
115. 115.↵
     2. Zaidat OO,
     3. Lazzaro MA,
     4. Liebeskind DS, et al

     . Revascularization grading in endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy. Neurology 2012;79(13 Suppl 1):S110–16 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182695916 pmid:23008384

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
116. 116.↵
     2. Almekhlafi MA,
     3. Mishra S,
     4. Desai JA, et al

     . Not all “successful” angiographic reperfusion patients are an equal validation of a modified TICI scoring system. Interv Neuroradiol 2014;20:21–27 doi:10.15274/INR-2014-10004 pmid:24556296

     CrossRefPubMed
117. 117.↵
     2. Kleine JF,
     3. Wunderlich S,
     4. Zimmer C, et al

     . Time to redefine success? TICI 3 versus TICI 2b recanalization in middle cerebral artery occlusion treated with thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:117–21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012218 pmid:26888952

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
118. 118.↵
     2. Abilleira S,
     3. Cardona P,
     4. Ribo M, et al

     ; Catalan Stroke Code and Reperfusion Consortium. Outcomes of a contemporary cohort of 536 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Stroke 2014;45:1046–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003489 pmid:24595590

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
119. 119.↵
     2. Gratz PP,
     3. Jung S,
     4. Schroth G, et al

     . Outcome of standard and high-risk patients with acute anterior circulation stroke after stent retriever thrombectomy. Stroke 2014;45:152–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002591 pmid:24262328

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
120. 120.↵
     2. Gaha M,
     3. Roy C,
     4. Estrade L, et al

     . Inter- and intraobserver agreement in scoring angiographic results of intra-arterial stroke therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1163–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3828 pmid:24481332

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
121. 121.↵
     2. Fiehler J,
     3. Cognard C,
     4. Gallitelli M, et al

     . European Recommendations on Organisation Of Interventional Care in Acute Stroke (EROICAS). Int J Stroke 2016;11:701–16 doi:10.1177/1747493016647735 pmid:27462090

     CrossRefPubMed
122. 122.↵
     2. Ogawa A,
     3. Mori E,
     4. Minematsu K, et al

     ; MELT Japan Study Group. Randomized trial of intraarterial infusion of urokinase within 6 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: the middle cerebral artery embolism local fibrinolytic intervention trial (MELT) Japan. Stroke 2007;38:2633–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488551 pmid:17702958

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
123. 123.↵
     2. Yoon W,
     3. Jung MY,
     4. Jung SH, et al

     . Subarachnoid hemorrhage in a multimodal approach heavily weighted toward mechanical thrombectomy with Solitaire stent in acute stroke. Stroke 2013;44:414–19 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.675546 pmid:23287788

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
124. 124.↵
     2. Herial N,
     3. Qureshi M,
     4. Khan A, et al

     . Arterial reocclusion and distal embolization during endovascular treatment using new generation stent retrievers in acute ischemic stroke patients. Neurology 2015;84(14 Suppl P4):299
125. 125.↵
     2. Janjua N,
     3. Alkawi A,
     4. Suri MF, et al

     . Impact of arterial reocclusion and distal fragmentation during thrombolysis among patients with acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:253–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0825 pmid:18024576

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
126. 126.↵
     2. Kerr DM,
     3. Fulton RL,
     4. Lees KR

     ; VISTA Collaborators. Seven-day NIHSS is a sensitive outcome measure for exploratory clinical trials in acute stroke: evidence from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. Stroke 2012;43:1401–03 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.644484 pmid:22308254

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
127. 127.↵
     2. Sajobi TT,
     3. Menon BK,
     4. Wang M, et al

     ; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Early trajectory of stroke severity predicts long-term functional outcomes in ischemic stroke subjects: results from the ESCAPE trial (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion with Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times). Stroke 2017;48:105–10 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014456 pmid:27924049

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
128. 128.↵
     2. Janssen PM,
     3. Visser NA,
     4. Dorhout Mees SM, et al

     . Comparison of telephone and face-to-face assessment of the modified Rankin Scale. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:137–39 doi:10.1159/000262309 pmid:19955737

     CrossRefPubMed
129. 129.↵
     2. Muir KW,
     3. Ford GA,
     4. Messow CM, et al

     ; PISTE Investigators. Endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: the Pragmatic Ischaemic Stroke Thrombectomy Evaluation (PISTE) randomised, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2017;88:38–44 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-314117 pmid:27756804

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
130. 130.↵
     2. Khan M,
     3. Goddeau RP Jr.,
     4. Zhang J, et al

     . Predictors of outcome following stroke due to isolated M2 occlusions. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2014;4:52–60 doi:10.1159/000360075 pmid:24715898

     CrossRefPubMed
131. 131.↵
     2. Alonso de Leciñana M,
     3. Kawiorski MM,
     4. Ximénez-Carrillo Á, et al

     ; Madrid Stroke Network. Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery thrombosis: a comparison of outcomes with anterior circulation occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1173–78 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012797 pmid:27998956

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
132. 132.↵
     2. Minnerup J,
     3. Wersching H,
     4. Teuber A, et al

     ; REVASK Investigators. Outcome after thrombectomy and intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a prospective observational study. Stroke 2016;47:1584–92 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012619 pmid:27217508

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
133. 133.↵
     2. Nogueira RG,
     3. Zaidat OO,
     4. Castonguay AC, et al

     . Rescue thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion strokes leads to better outcomes than intravenous thrombolysis alone: a ‘real world’ applicability of the recent trials. Interv Neurol 2016;5:101–10 doi:10.1159/000445809 pmid:27781037

     CrossRefPubMed
134. 134.↵
     2. Jansen I,
     3. Mulder M,
     4. Goldhoorn RJ, et al

     ; on behalf of the MRCLEAN-Registry investigators (www.mrclean-trial.org). MR CLEAN registry: a post-trial multicenter registry of intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the International Stroke Conference, February 21–24, 2017; Houston, Texas
135. 135.↵
     Direct Transfer to an Endovascular Center Compared to Transfer to the Closest Stroke Center in Acute Stroke Patients with Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion (RACECAT). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02795962. Accessed April 11, 2017.
136. 136.↵
     Legal Protections for Peer Review H-375.962: American Medical Association. https://searchpf.ama-assn.org/SearchML/searchDetails.action?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-3167.xml. Accessed May 31, 2012.
137. 137.↵
     The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA), 42 USC §11101 et seq.
138. 138.↵
     1. Henriksen K,
     2. Battles JB,
     3. Marks ES,
     4. Lewin DI

     2. Suydam S,
     3. Liang BA,
     4. Anderson S, et al

     . Patient safety data sharing and protection from legal discovery. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, eds. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 3: Implementation Issues). Advances in Patient Safety. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20558/. Accessed January 20, 2018.
139. 139.↵
     2. Willner RB

     . Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) of 1986. What is it? Why was it established? Is it working? http://www.peerreview.org/articles/HCQIQ.htm. Accessed May 31, 2012.
140. 140.↵
     H. R. 2—114th Congress: Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015. http://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2. Accessed April 24, 2017.
141. 141.↵
     2. Hirsch JA,
     3. Harvey HB,
     4. Barr RM, et al

     . Sustainable growth rate repealed, MACRA revealed: historical context and analysis of recent changes in Medicare physician payment methodologies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:210–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4522 pmid:26585253

     FREE Full Text
142. 142.↵
     2. Hirsch JA,
     3. Leslie-Mazwi TM,
     4. Patel AB, et al

     . MACRA: background, opportunities and challenges for the neurointerventional specialist. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:868–74 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011952 pmid:26220409

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
143. 143.↵
     2. Berkhemer OA,
     3. Jansen IG,
     4. Beumer D, et al

     ; MR CLEAN Investigators. Collateral status on baseline computed tomographic angiography and intra-arterial treatment effect in patients with proximal anterior circulation stroke. Stroke 2016;47:768–76 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011788 pmid:26903582

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
144. 144.↵
     2. Hussein HM,
     3. Georgiadis AL,
     4. Vazquez G, et al

     . Occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:454–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2006 pmid:20075087

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
145. 145.↵
     2. Kim JT,
     3. Jahan R,
     4. Saver JL

     ; SWIFT Investigators. Impact of glucose on outcomes in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy: a post hoc analysis of the Solitaire flow restoration with the intention for thrombectomy study. Stroke 2016;47:120–27 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010753 pmid:26658447

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
146. 146.↵
     1. Kohn LT,
     2. Corrigan JM,
     3. Donaldson MS

     Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America; Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2000