On Flow Diversion: The Changing Landscape of Intracerebral Aneurysm Management

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Walcott BP,
   3. Stapleton CJ,
   4. Choudhri O, et al

   . Flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:1002–08 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0609 pmid:27294446

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Al-Mufti F,
   3. Amuluru K,
   4. Gandhi CD, et al

   . Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysm management: a new standard of care. Neurotherapeutics 2016;13:582–89 doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0436-4 pmid:27160270

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Thompson BG,
   3. Brown RD Jr.,
   4. Amin-Hanjani S, et al

   ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: a Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46:2368–400 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000070 pmid:26089327

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Briganti F,
   3. Leone G,
   4. Cirillo L, et al

   . Postprocedural, midterm, and long-term results of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverter devices: 7-year experience at a single center. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E3 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1732 pmid:28565988

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Sadasivan C,
   3. Cesar L,
   4. Seong J, et al

   . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533760 pmid:19150864

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Shapiro M,
   3. Raz E,
   4. Becske T, et al

   . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Jou LD,
   3. Chintalapani G,
   4. Mawad ME

   . Metal coverage ratio of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of unruptured aneurysms: reality check. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:42–48 doi:10.1177/1591019915617315 pmid:26628457

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Tjoumakaris S,
   4. Phillips JL, et al

   . A single Pipeline embolization device is sufficient for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1562–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3957 pmid:24788125

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Moshayedi H,
   3. Omofoye OA,
   4. Yap E, et al

   . Factors affecting the obliteration rate of intracranial aneurysms treated with a single Pipeline embolization device. World Neurosurg 2017;104:205–12 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.111 pmid:28457931

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Iosif C,
    3. Mounayer C,
    4. Yavuz K, et al

    . Middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms treated by extrasaccular flow diverters: midterm angiographic evolution and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:3 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5022 pmid:27979794

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Leone G,
    4. Ugga L, et al

    . Mid-term and long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by the p64 Flow Modulation Device: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:70–76 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012502 pmid:27439887

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Pereira VM,
    3. Kelly M,
    4. Vega P, et al

    . New Pipeline Flex device: initial experience and technical nuances. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:920–25 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011347 pmid:25280568

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Martinez-Galdámez M,
    3. Gil A,
    4. Caniego JL, et al

    . Preliminary experience with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device: technical note. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:748–51 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011385 pmid:25165385

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Martinez-Galdámez M,
    3. Lamin SM,
    4. Lagios KG, et al

    . Periprocedural outcomes and early safety with the use of the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: preliminary results from a prospective clinical study. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:772–76 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012896 pmid:28223428

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Hanel RA,
    3. Aguilar-Salinas P,
    4. Brasiliense LB, et al

    . First US experience with Pipeline Flex with Shield Technology using aspirin as antiplatelet monotherapy. BMJ Case Rep 2017;2017 doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-219406 pmid:28473431

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Nelson PK,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. Szikora I, et al

    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Potts MB, et al

    . Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery 2017;80:40–48 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 pmid:28362885

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Potts MB,
    4. Shapiro M, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2017;127:81–88 doi:10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311 pmid:27739944

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Boccardi E, et al

    . Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe). Interv Neurol 2016;5:89–99 doi:10.1159/000446503 pmid:27610126

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Risk factors for ischemic complications following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from the IntrePED Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1673–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4807 pmid:27102308

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Risk factors for hemorrhagic complications following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from the international retrospective study of the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2308–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4443 pmid:26251427

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Age-related outcomes following intracranial aneurysm treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: a subgroup analysis of the IntrePED registry. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1726–30 doi:10.3171/2015.5.JNS15327 pmid:26544776

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Lopes DK,
    3. Jang DK,
    4. Cekirge S, et al

    . Morbidity and mortality in patients with posterior circulation aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device: a subgroup analysis of the international retrospective study of the Pipeline Embolization device. Neurosurgery 2018;83:488–500 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx467 pmid:28945879

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Liang F,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Guo F, et al

    . Use of Pipeline Embolization Device for posterior circulation aneurysms: single-center experiences with comparison with anterior circulation aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2018;112:e683–90 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.129 pmid:29410337

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Wang CB,
    3. Shi WW,
    4. Zhang GX, et al

    . Flow diverter treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2016;58:391–400 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1649-2 pmid:26801480

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Dmytriw AA,
    3. Adeeb N,
    4. Kumar A, et al

    . Flow diversion for the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2018;83:1298–1305 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx628 pmid:29529233

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Patel PD,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Atallah E, et al

    . Off-label uses of the Pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E4 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1742 pmid:28565978

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Cagnazzo F,
    3. Mantilla D,
    4. Lefevre PH, et al

    . Treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2289–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5388 pmid:28982785

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Cagnazzo F,
    3. di Carlo DT,
    4. Cappucci M, et al

    . Acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1669–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5730 pmid:30049721

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Yan Y,
    3. Zhu D,
    4. Tang H, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of flow diverter treatment for aneurysm in small cerebral vessels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018;115:54–64 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.009 pmid:29653275

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Fang YB,
    3. Lin A,
    4. Kostynskyy A, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery dissecting aneurysms: parent artery occlusion versus flow diverter. Eur J Radiol 2018;99:68–75 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.009 pmid:29362153

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Yilmaz H, et al

    . Virtual-versus-real implantation of flow diverters: clinical potential and influence of vascular geometry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2079–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4845 pmid:27365325

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Geometrical deployment for braided stent. Med Image Anal 2016;30:85–94 doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.01.006 pmid:26891065

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Aguilar-Salinas P,
    3. Brasiliense LB,
    4. Gonsales D, et al

    . Evaluation of Pipeline Flex delivery system for the treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Expert Rev Med Device 2016;13:885–97 doi:10.1080/17434440.2016.1231573 pmid:27647130

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Colby GP,
    3. Lin LM,
    4. Caplan JM, et al

    . Immediate procedural outcomes in 44 consecutive Pipeline Flex cases: the first North American single-center series. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:702–09 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011894 pmid:26136500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Martinez-Galdámez M,
    3. Pérez S,
    4. Vega A, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline Flex embolization device: a case series of 30 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:396–401 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011669 pmid:25770120

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. Le EJ,
    3. Miller T,
    4. Serulle Y, et al

    . Use of Pipeline Flex is associated with reduced fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and technical failure compared with the first-generation Pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Mar 9. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012261 pmid:26962044

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Leone G,
    4. Ugga L, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a single center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016;158:1745–55 doi:10.1007/s00701-016-2875-4 pmid:27357157

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Murthy SB,
    3. Shah S,
    4. Shastri A, et al

    . The Silk flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:203–06 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.006 pmid:24128768

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Alghamdi F,
    3. Morais R,
    4. Scillia P, et al

    . The Silk flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Expert Rev Med Devices 2015;12:753–62 doi:10.1586/17434440.2015.1093413 pmid:26415045

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Aurboonyawat T,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Schmidt P, et al

    . An in vitro study of Silk stent morphology. Neuroradiology 2011;53:659–67 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0784-4 pmid:20981414

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Collignon L,
    4. Raphaeli G, et al

    . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589911 pmid:20798369

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. 45.↵
    2. Byrne JV,
    3. Beltechi R,
    4. Yarnold JA, et al

    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012492 pmid:20824070

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    2. Pumar JM,
    3. Banguero A,
    4. Cuellar H, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Silk Embolization Device in a multicenter study. a retrospective data analysis. Neurosurgery 2017;81:595–601 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw123 pmid:28327963

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Shankar JJ,
    3. Tampieri D,
    4. Iancu D, et al

    . Silk flow diverter for complex intracranial aneurysms: a Canadian registry. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:273–78 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011708 pmid:25987591

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2907 pmid:22300924

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. 49.↵
    2. Velioglu M,
    3. Kizilkilic O,
    4. Selcuk H, et al

    . Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1355–65 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1051-7 pmid:22695740

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Augsburger L,
    4. Reymond P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1827–34 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1482-2 pmid:22926629

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Computational fluid dynamics with stents: quantitative comparison with particle image velocimetry for three commercial off the shelf intracranial stents. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:309–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011468 pmid:25603807

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Hemodynamic transition driven by stent porosity in sidewall aneurysms. J Biomech 2015;48:1300–09 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.020 pmid:25798761

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    2. Pereira VM,
    3. Bonnefous O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . A DSA-based method using contrast-motion estimation for the assessment of the intra-aneurysmal flow changes induced by flow-diverter stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:808–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3322 pmid:23124641

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    2. Bhogal P,
    3. Martinez Moreno R,
    4. Ganslandt O, et al

    . Use of flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:283–89 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012648 pmid:27789789

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    2. Luecking H,
    3. Engelhorn T,
    4. Lang S, et al

    . FRED Flow Diverter: a study on safety and efficacy in a consecutive group of 50 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:596–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5052 pmid:28104636

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
56. 56.↵
    2. Gentric JC,
    3. Darsaut TE,
    4. Makoyeva A, et al

    . The success of flow diversion in large and giant sidewall aneurysms may depend on the size of the defect in the parent artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2119–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4010 pmid:24970546

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
57. 57.↵
    2. Killer-Oberpfalzer M,
    3. Kocer N,
    4. Griessenauer CJ, et al

    . European multicenter study for the evaluation of a dual-layer flow-diverting stent for treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: the European Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:841–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5592 pmid:29545252

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    2. Drescher F,
    3. Weber W,
    4. Berlis A, et al

    . Treatment of intra- and extracranial aneurysms using the Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device: multicenter experience and follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:105–12 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4964 pmid:27811135

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. 59.↵
    2. Möhlenbruch MA,
    3. Herweh C,
    4. Jestaedt L, et al

    . The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1155–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4251 pmid:25721079

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
60. 60.↵
    2. Kocer N,
    3. Islak C,
    4. Kizilkilic O, et al

    . Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: initial experience with short-term follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1158–71 doi:10.3171/2014.1.JNS131442 pmid:24628615

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
61. 61.↵
    2. Colby GP,
    3. Lin LM,
    4. Caplan JM, et al

    . Flow diversion of large internal carotid artery aneurysms with the Surpass device: impressions and technical nuance from the initial North American experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:279–86 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011769 pmid:25987590

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
62. 62.↵
    2. De Vries J,
    3. Boogaarts J,
    4. Van Norden A, et al

    . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434 pmid:23686973

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
63. 63.↵
    2. Taschner CA,
    3. Vedantham S,
    4. de Vries J, et al

    . Surpass flow diverter for treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:582–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5029 pmid:28007769

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
64. 64.↵
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Yang PF,
    4. Fang YB, et al

    . A novel flow-diverting device (Tubridge) for the treatment of 28 large or giant intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2326–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3925 pmid:24722307

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
65. 65.↵
    2. Liu JM,
    3. Zhou Y,
    4. Li Y, et al

    ; PARAT investigators. Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using the Tubridge Flow Diverter: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial (PARAT). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:807–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5619 pmid:29599173

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
66. 66.↵
    2. Fahed R,
    3. Raymond J,
    4. Ducroux C, et al

    . Testing flow diversion in animal models: a systematic review. Neuroradiology 2016;58:375–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1635-0 pmid:26747181

    CrossRefPubMed
67. 67.↵
    2. Akgul E,
    3. Onan HB,
    4. Akpinar S, et al

    . The DERIVO Embolization Device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: short- and midterm results. World Neurosurg 2016;95:229–40 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.101 pmid:27514698

    CrossRefPubMed
68. 68.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Particle imaging velocimetry evaluation of intracranial stents in sidewall aneurysm: hemodynamic transition related to the stent design. PLoS One 2014;9:e11376 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113762 pmid:25470724

    CrossRefPubMed
69. 69.↵
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Aguilar-Pérez M,
    4. Henkes E, et al

    . Initial experience with p64: a novel mechanically detachable flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial saccular sidewall aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2082–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4420 pmid:26272970

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
70. 70.↵
    2. Morais R,
    3. Mine B,
    4. Bruyère PJ, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the p64 flow diverter stent: mid-term results in 35 patients with 41 intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2017;59:263–69 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1786-2 pmid:28236050

    CrossRefPubMed
71. 71.↵
    2. Chiu AH,
    3. De Vries J,
    4. O'Kelly CJ, et al

    . The second-generation eCLIPs endovascular clip system: initial experience. J Neurosurg 2018;128:482–89 doi:10.3171/2016.10.JNS161731 pmid:28304190

    CrossRefPubMed
72. 72.↵
    2. Peach T,
    3. Cornhill JF,
    4. Nguyen A, et al

    . The ‘Sphere’: a dedicated bifurcation aneurysm flow-diverter device. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2014;5:334–47 doi:10.1007/s13239-014-0188-4 pmid:25400707

    CrossRefPubMed
73. 73.
    2. Griessenauer CJ,
    3. Ogilvy CS,
    4. Adeeb N, et al

    . Pipeline embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter study of 131 aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018 Apr 1:1–13 doi:10.3171/2017.9.jns171376 pmid:29726768

    CrossRefPubMed