Long-Term Outcomes of the WEB Device for Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Chalouhi N,
   2. Jabbour P,
   3. Singhal S, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000641 pmid:23512976

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Blackburn SL,
   2. Abdelazim AM,
   3. Cutler AB, et al

   . Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured MCA aneurysms: meta-analysis and review of the literature. Stroke Res Treat 2014;2014:1–11 doi:10.1155/2014/348147

   CrossRef
3. 3.↵
   1. De Leacy RA,
   2. Fargen KM,
   3. Mascitelli JR, et al

   . Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery and basilar apex treated by endovascular techniques: a multicentre, core lab adjudicated study evaluating safety and durability of occlusion (BRANCH). J NeuroIntervent Surg 2019;11:31–36 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013771

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Lylyk P,
   2. Chudyk J,
   3. Bleise C, et al

   . Treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: initial results with the pCANvas neck bridging device. Clin Neuroradiol 2019;29:467–77 doi:10.1007/s00062-018-0680-6 pmid:29556668

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Costalat V,
   3. Moret J, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1250–56 doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634 pmid:26381253

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Moret J,
   3. Turjman F, et al

   . WEB treatment of intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, complications, and 1-month safety results with the WEB DL and WEB SL/SLS in the French observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:922–97 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4230

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Klisch J,
   3. Liebig T, et al

   . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: long-term results in a European series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2314–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4445 pmid:26228882

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Roy D,
   2. Milot G,
   3. Raymond J

   . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Weisscher N,
   2. Vermeulen M,
   3. Roos YB, et al

   . What should be defined as good outcome in stroke trials; a modified Rankin score of 0-1 or 0-2? J Neurol 2008;255:867–74 doi:10.1007/s00415-008-0796-8 pmid:18338195

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Gubucz I,
    3. Buhk JH, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1151–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5178 pmid:28450432

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.
    1. Sivan-Hoffmann R,
    2. Gory B,
    3. Riva R, et al

    . One-year angiographic follow-up after WEB-SL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2320–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4457 pmid:26294645

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Armoiry X,
    2. Turjman F,
    3. Hartmann DJ, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the WEB device: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:868–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4611 pmid:26585260

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Mine B,
    3. Collignon L, et al

    . WEB device for endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1209–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3387 pmid:23292529

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Mine B,
    2. Goutte A,
    3. Brisbois D, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: mid term and long term results. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:127–32 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012964 pmid:28219938

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Zhao B,
    2. Yin R,
    3. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular coiling of wide-neck and wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1700–05 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4834 pmid:27256850

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. van Rooij SBT,
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Peluso JP, et al

    . WEB treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 100 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2282–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5371 pmid:28882858

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Soeda A,
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Sakai H, et al

    . Thromboembolic events associated with Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysms: evaluation of 66 consecutive cases with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:127–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Doerfler A,
    2. Wanke I,
    3. Goericke SL, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with electrolytically detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:513–20 pmid:16551986

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Vitry F; ATENA Investigators

    . Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke 2008;39:2497–2504 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512756 pmid:18617659

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.
    1. Vendrell JF,
    2. Costalat V,
    3. Riquelme C, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms: initial and midterm results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:259–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2272 pmid:20966055

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Anxionnat R, for the CLARITY Investigators

    . Factors affecting the rate and outcome of endovascular treatment complications in a series of 782 patients (CLARITY study). Radiology 2010;256:916–23 doi:10.1148/radiol.10092209

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Papagiannaki C,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Januel AC, et al

    . WEB intrasaccular flow disruptor—prospective, multicenter experience in 83 patients with 85 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2106–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4028 pmid:24994823

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Zhang SM,
    2. Liu LX,
    3. Ren PW, et al

    . Effectiveness, safety and risk factors of Woven EndoBridge device in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2019Aug 13. Pii: S1878-8750(19)32175-8 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.023

    CrossRef
24. 24.↵
    1. Herbreteau D,
    2. Bibi R,
    3. Narata AP, et al

    . Are anatomic results influenced by web shape modification? analysis in a prospective, single-center series of 39 patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2280–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4918 pmid:27538903

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Moret J,
    3. Barreau X, et al

    . Aneurysm treatment with Woven Endobridge in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series: 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery 2020 Jan 20. Pii:nyz557 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz557

    CrossRef