Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLETTER

Expediting Care and Improving Patient Experience: Imaging after Subdural Contrast Injection during Myelography

M.U. Antonucci and M. Yazdani
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2021, 42 (7) E43-E44; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7114
M.U. Antonucci
aDepartment of Radiology & Radiological Science Medical University of South CarolinaCharleston, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.U. Antonucci
M. Yazdani
aDepartment of Radiology & Radiological Science Medical University of South CarolinaCharleston, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Yazdani
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We read the recent publication by Shlapak et al,1 “Time to Resolution of Inadvertent Subdural Contrast Injection during a Myelogram: When Can the Study Be Reattempted?” with interest. The extrathecal injection of contrast during a spinal myelography generates frustration for the neuroradiologist, and more importantly, the patient. The authors provide much needed insight into the rapid physiologic “washout” of contrast and suggest that a repeat study can be performed as soon as the next day.

Unfortunately, even the proposed “next day” study requires a repeat invasive procedure. For outpatient procedures, there are additional inconveniences, including: the time and expense of travel; the need for additional time away from work and family; and for some patients, prolonged time off anticoagulation medication. These concerns may be amplified during the current pandemic, and we should strive to minimize the unnecessary burden on patients and on an already-strained health care system.

With these factors in mind, we wish to supplement the article with our experience imaging subdural contrast after a recent myelogram. As the patient had already traveled several hours for an evaluation of back pain, and with the aim of generating an expeditious diagnosis, we performed a repeat CT 1 hour after the first. The initial and follow-up CT images (Figure) demonstrate that the contrast rapidly exited the subdural space, with enough passing into the thecal sac to produce diagnostic imaging.

FIGURE.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE.

Following fluoroscopically guided lumbar puncture for thoracic myelogram, initial CT demonstrates contrast within the subdural space (A, blue arrow) with insufficient thoracic thecal sac enhancement (B, blue dashed arrow). One hour later, a repeat CT reveals contrast movement across the thecal sac (C, green arrow) with excellent thoracic myelography (D, green dashed arrow).

This obviated the need for a repeat procedure and suggests that even without an initially successful injection, there may be enough membranous disruption to allow effective contrast passage into the thecal sac. This type of contrast motion may not occur in every case. Indeed, the precise localization of contrast after its initial nontarget injection likely depends on multiple factors. These factors include the following: the specific site of the initial injection (eg, subdural, extradural, or split); the technical factors (eg, patient positioning or timing of imaging); and the underlying diagnosis. With respect to the latter, pressure within the CSF space may define the path of least resistance for contrast and produce a gradient across which movement into the thecal sac is precluded.

Regardless of the specifics, our case illustrates 2 points. First, there is a need to better understand the dynamic physiology across the thecal sac. Second, and more importantly, we have an opportunity to facilitate patient care in frustrating scenarios. A same-day repeat CT may produce diagnostic information and facilitate expedient patient management. At worst, the presence of persistent subdural contrast would require a repeat procedure the next day. At best, sufficient intrathecal contrast would help to avoid an additional invasive procedure and would minimize the patient inconvenience.

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    1. Shlapak DP,
    2. Kim DK,
    3. Diehn FE, et al
    . Time to resolution of inadvertent subdural contrast injection during a myelogram: when can the study be reattempted? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1958–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6725 pmid:32855185
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • © 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 42 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 42, Issue 7
1 Jul 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expediting Care and Improving Patient Experience: Imaging after Subdural Contrast Injection during Myelography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Expediting Care and Improving Patient Experience: Imaging after Subdural Contrast Injection during Myelography
M.U. Antonucci, M. Yazdani
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2021, 42 (7) E43-E44; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Expediting Care and Improving Patient Experience: Imaging after Subdural Contrast Injection during Myelography
M.U. Antonucci, M. Yazdani
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2021, 42 (7) E43-E44; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7114
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fair Performance of CT in Diagnosing Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Reply:
  • Regarding “Altered Blood Flow in the Ophthalmic and Internal Carotid Arteries in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Measured Using Noncontrast MR Angiography at 7T”
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire