Correlation of Flow Diverter Malapposition at the Aneurysm Neck with Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion in Patients with Small Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Potts MB, et al

   . Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following Pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery 2017;80:40–48 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 pmid:28362885

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Bender MT,
   3. Colby GP,
   4. Lin LM, et al

   . Predictors of cerebral aneurysm persistence and occlusion after flow diversion: a single-institution series of 445 cases with angiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg 2018;130:259–67 doi:10.3171/2017.11.JNS171738 pmid:29600915

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Kang H,
   3. Zhou Y,
   4. Luo B, et al

   . Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: complication risk factor analysis. Neurotherapeutics 2021;18:1198–206 doi:10.1007/s13311-020-00990-8 pmid:33447904

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Lee KS,
   3. Zhang JJ,
   4. Nguyen V, et al

   . The evolution of intracranial aneurysm treatment techniques and future directions. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45:1–25 doi:10.1007/s10143-021-01543-z pmid:33891216

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Shapiro M,
   3. Becske T,
   4. Nelson PK

   . Learning from failure: persistence of aneurysms following Pipeline embolization. J Neurosurg 2017;126:578–85 doi:10.3171/2015.12.JNS152065 pmid:27153168

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Kwon MY,
   3. Ko YS,
   4. Kwon SM, et al

   . Evaluation of stent apposition in the LVIS blue stent-assisted coiling of distal internal carotid artery aneurysms: correlation with clinical and angiographic outcomes. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2022;65:801–15 doi:10.3340/jkns.2022.0021 pmid:35728979

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Räber L,
   3. Mintz GS,
   4. Koskinas KC

   , ESC Scientific Document Group, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging: 1. Guidance and optimization of coronary interventions: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3281–300 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy285 pmid:29790954

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Aquarius R,
   3. de Korte A,
   4. Smits D, et al

   . The importance of wall apposition in flow diverters. Neurosurgery 2019;84:804–10 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy092 pmid:29659995

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. King RM,
   3. Brooks OW,
   4. Langan ET, et al

   . Communicating malapposition of flow diverters assessed with optical coherence tomography correlates with delayed aneurysm occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:693–97 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013502 pmid:29127197

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. King RM,
    3. Peker A,
    4. Anagnostakou V, et al

    . High-frequency optical coherence tomography predictors of aneurysm occlusion following flow diverter treatment in a preclinical model. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:919–23 doi:10.1136/jnis-2022-019275 pmid:36002288

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Li TF,
    3. Ma J,
    4. Han XW, et al

    . Application of high-resolution C-arm CT combined with streak metal artifact removal technology for the stent-assisted embolization of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1752–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Raz E,
    3. Sharashidze V,
    4. Nossek E, et al

    . SuperDyna: unlocking the potential of post-treatment device evaluation. J Neurointerv Surg 2023. Advance online publication. Retrieved Jun 14, 2023. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020357

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Miller TR,
    3. Kole MJ,
    4. Le EJ, et al

    . Pipeline diameter significantly impacts the long-term fate of jailed side branches during treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:2270–77 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5863 pmid:30385475

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. O'Kelly CJ,
    3. Krings T,
    4. Fiorella D, et al

    . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Kato N,
    3. Yuki I,
    4. Ishibashi T, et al

    . Visualization of stent apposition after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms using high resolution 3D fusion images acquired by C-arm CT. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:192–96 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014966 pmid:31405991

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Brasiliense LB,
    3. Aguilar-Salinas P,
    4. Miller DA, et al

    . Analysis of predictors and probability of aneurysm occlusion in the internal carotid artery after treatment with Pipeline embolization device. World Neurosurg 2017;107:641–48 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.099 pmid:28844913

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Guédon A,
    3. Thépenier C,
    4. Shotar E, et al

    . Predictive score for complete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow-diverter stents using machine learning. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13:341–46 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016748 pmid:33219150

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Meng H,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. Kim M, et al

    . Saccular aneurysms on straight and curved vessels are subject to different hemodynamics: implications of intravascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1861–65.

    PubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Bonney PA,
    3. Connor M,
    4. Fujii T, et al

    . Failure of flow diverter therapy: predictors and management strategies. Neurosurgery 2020;86:S64–S73 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz305 pmid:31838530

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Paliwal N,
    3. Tutino VM,
    4. Shallwani H, et al

    . Ostium ratio and neck ratio could predict the outcome of sidewall intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:288–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5953 pmid:30679216

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Raschi M, et al

    . Analysis of hemodynamics and aneurysm occlusion after flow-diverting treatment in rabbit models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1567–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3913 pmid:24722302

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Abdelkhalek H,
    3. Abdelhameed EA,
    4. Zakarea A, et al

    . Predictors of flow diverter stent in large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms, single-center experience. Neurol Sci 2022;43:6399–405 doi:10.1007/s10072-022-06336-w pmid:35984605

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Hussein AE,
    3. Shownkeen M,
    4. Thomas A, et al

    . 2D parametric contrast time-density analysis for the prediction of complete aneurysm occlusion at six months' post-flow diversion stent. Interv Neuroradiol 2020;26:468–75 doi:10.1177/1591019920908205 pmid:32102574

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Janot K,
    3. Fahed R,
    4. Rouchaud A, et al

    . Parent artery straightening after flow-diverter stenting improves the odds of aneurysm occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:87–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7350 pmid:34794946

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Zetchi MA,
    3. Dmytriw AA,
    4. Chiu AH, et al

    . Entry remnants in flow-diverted aneurysms: does branch geometry influence aneurysm closure? Interv Neuroradiol 2018;24:624–30 doi:10.1177/1591019918779229 pmid:29871561

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Bouthillier A,
    3. van Loveren HR,
    4. Keller JT

    . Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 1996;38:425–33; discussion 32–33 doi:10.1227/00006123-199603000-00001

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Li T,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Ma J, et al

    . Application of high-resolution flat detector computed tomography in stent implantation for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Front Neurosci 2021;15:655594 doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.655594 pmid:34512235

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Kadirvel R,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology 2014;270:394–99 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130796 pmid:24086073

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Zhang H,
    3. Gao X,
    4. Liang H, et al

    . Incomplete stent apposition of low-profile visualized intraluminal support stents in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:591–97 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015505 pmid:31818969

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Benaissa A,
    3. Barbe C,
    4. Pierot L

    . Analysis of recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm (ARETA trial): presentation of a prospective multicenter study. J Neuroradiol 2015;42:80–85 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2014.04.003 pmid:25012816

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Gong W,
    4. You W, et al

    . Efficacy and safety of flow diverter combined with coil embolization and evidence-based antithrombotic regimen in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2023;54:E3 doi:10.3171/2023.2.FOCUS22647 pmid:37127037

    CrossRefPubMed