Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIG 1.
Plots of significant nodal network measurements of MS at different time points. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.
- FIG 2.
Three-dimensional graphs showed regions representing significant association with EDSS. A, Nodal degree. B, Nodal clustering coefficient. C, Nodal efficiency. D, Nodal path length. Brain region corresponding to the anatomical labels can be found in Automated Anatomical Labeling template.
- FIG 3.
Plots of the stepwise linear regression between the nodal path length of superior frontal gyrus, medial orbital part (ORBsupmed), and baseline EDSS.
Tables
MS P Value Baseline 6 Months 12 Months Sample size 18 18 18 NA Female:male 13:5 13:5 13:5 NA Age (yr) 39.11 ± 13.03 39.61 ± 13.03 40.11 ± 13.03 NA Duration (yr) 12.78 ± 8.53 13.28 ± 8.53 13.78 ± 8.53 NA EDSS 3.94 ± 2.25 3.94 ± 2.25 4.03 ± 2.18 .633 Note:—NA indicates not applicable. The continuous measurements are presented as mean ± standard deviation. EDSS did not show significant changes during the follow-up period. Duration: the time since initial diagnosis of MS.
Dependent Variable R2 Adjusted R2 Regression Coefficient 95% CI P Value Model EDSS(t1) 0.366 0.327 — — — Constant — — — −46.625 [−81.89, −11.35] .013 Nodal path length of ORBsupmed — — — 34.231 [10.36, 58.10] .008 Note:—The en dash indicates not applicable.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.