Comprehensive Analysis of Post-Pipeline Endothelialization and Remodeling

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Becske T,
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Becske T,
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Potts MB, et al

   . Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following Pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial. Neurosurgery 2017;80:40–48 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 pmid:28362885

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Fiorella D,
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Szikora I, et al

   . Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2009;1:56–65 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000083 pmid:21994109

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Shapiro M,
   2. Raz E,
   3. Becske T, et al

   . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Ravindran K,
   2. Salem MM,
   3. Alturki AY, et al

   . Endothelialization following flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:295–301 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5955 pmid:30679207

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Ravindran K,
   2. Casabella AM,
   3. Cebral J, et al

   . Mechanism of action and biology of flow diverters in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2020;86:S13–19 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz324 pmid:31838528

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Cortese J,
   2. Rasser C,
   3. Even G, et al

   . CD31 mimetic coating enhances flow diverting stent integration into the arterial wall promoting aneurysm healing. Stroke 2021;52:677–86 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030624 pmid:33412905

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Girdhar G,
   2. Andersen A,
   3. Pangerl E, et al

   . Thrombogenicity assessment of Pipeline Flex, Pipeline Shield, and FRED flow diverters in an in vitro human blood physiological flow loop model. J Biomed Mater Res A 2018;106:3195–202 doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36514 pmid:30242950

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Shapiro M,
   2. Raz E,
   3. Becske T, et al

   . Building multidevice Pipeline constructs of favorable metal coverage: a practical guide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1556–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3902 pmid:24676003

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Makoyeva A,
    2. Bing F,
    3. Darsaut TE, et al

    . The varying porosity of braided self-expanding stents and flow diverters: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:596–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3234 pmid:22878007

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Aurboonyawat T,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Schmidt P, et al

    . An in vitro study of Silk stent morphology. Neuroradiology 2011;53:659–67 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0784-4 pmid:20981414

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. You W,
    2. Lv J,
    3. Li Z, et al

    . The incidence and predictors of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline flow-diverter stenting for intracranial aneurysm treatment. Front Neurol 2023;14:1140497 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1140497 pmid:37181557

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Flores-Milan G,
    2. Pressman E,
    3. Peto I, et al

    . Factors associated with in-stent stenosis after cerebral aneurysm embolization using a Pipeline Embolization Device. Interv Neuroradiol 2022;28:731–36 doi:10.1177/15910199211066368 pmid:34894820

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. John S,
    2. Bain MD,
    3. Hui FK, et al

    . Long-term follow-up of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2016;78:862–67 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001146 pmid:26600281

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Wang T,
    2. Richard SA,
    3. Jiao H, et al

    . Institutional experience of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline flow diverter implantation: a retrospective analysis of 6 isolated cases out of 118 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:e25149 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000025149 pmid:33725998

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Ravindran K,
    2. Salem MM,
    3. Enriquez-Marulanda A, et al

    . Quantitative assessment of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a single-institution series and systematic review. World Neurosurg 2018;120:e1031–40 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.225 pmid:30201581

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Litao MS,
    2. Burkhardt JK,
    3. Tanweer O, et al

    . Remodeling of the posterior cerebral artery P1-segment after Pipeline flow diverter treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurol Int 2021;13:195–201 doi:10.3390/neurolint13020020 pmid:34066972

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Yavuz K,
    2. Geyik S,
    3. Saatci I, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:529–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3692 pmid:24072620

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Diestro JD,
    2. Adeeb N,
    3. Dibas M, et al

    . Flow diversion for middle cerebral artery aneurysms: an international cohort study. Neurosurgery 2021;89:1112–21 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyab365 pmid:34624100

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Pagiola I,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Caroff J, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment of aneurysms of the complex region of the anterior communicating artery: which stent placement strategy should “I” use? A single center experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1118–22 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014858 pmid:30975737

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Sorenson TJ,
    2. Mendes Pereira V,
    3. Rangel Castilla L, et al

    . Treatment of anterior cerebral artery and anterior communicating artery aneurysms with flow-diversion devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Sci 2020;64:200–05 doi:10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04633-7 pmid:30620164

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Guerrero BP,
    2. Pacheco CD,
    3. Saied A, et al

    . First human evaluation of endothelial healing after a Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology implanted in posterior circulation using optical coherence tomography. Neurointervention 2018;13:129–32 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2018.01032 pmid:30196685

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Ghasemi A,
    2. Zahediasl S

    . Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2012;10:486–89 doi:10.5812/ijem.3505 pmid:23843808

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Ward MR,
    2. Pasterkamp G,
    3. Yeung AC, et al

    . Arterial remodeling: mechanisms and clinical implications. Circulation 2000;102:1186–91 doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1186 pmid:10973850

    FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Albuquerque FC, et al

    . Influence of patient age and stenosis location on Wingspan in-stent restenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:23–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0869 pmid:17989366

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Tong X,
    2. Han M,
    3. Wu Z, et al

    . Effects of different stent size selection on Pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2023;16:17562864231151475 doi:10.1177/17562864231151475 pmid:36776531

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Polifka A,
    3. Daou B, et al

    . In-Pipeline stenosis: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery 2015;77:875–79; discussion 879 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000908 pmid:26200770

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Turhon M,
    2. Kang H,
    3. Liu J, et al

    . In-stent stenosis after Pipeline Embolization Device in intracranial aneurysms: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery 2022;91:943–51 doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000002142 pmid:36129281

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Monteiro A,
    2. Lopes DK,
    3. Aghaebrahim A, et al

    . Optical coherence tomography for elucidation of flow-diversion phenomena: the concept of endothelized mural thrombus behind reversible in-stent stenosis in flow-diverters. Interv Neuroradiol 2021;27:774–80 doi:10.1177/15910199211003432 pmid:33752477

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Shapiro M,
    2. Becske T,
    3. Nelson PK

    . Learning from failure: persistence of aneurysms following Pipeline embolization. J Neurosurg 2017;126:578–85 doi:10.3171/2015.12.JNS152065 pmid:27153168

    CrossRefPubMed