Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleHEAD & NECK
Open Access

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI–Derived Intracellular Water Lifetime (τi): A Prognostic Marker for Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

S. Chawla, L.A. Loevner, S.G. Kim, W.-T. Hwang, S. Wang, G. Verma, S. Mohan, V. LiVolsi, H. Quon and H. Poptani
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5440
S. Chawla
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.C., L.A.L., S.G.K., S.W., G.V., S.M., H.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Chawla
L.A. Loevner
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.C., L.A.L., S.G.K., S.W., G.V., S.M., H.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L.A. Loevner
S.G. Kim
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.C., L.A.L., S.G.K., S.W., G.V., S.M., H.P.)
eDepartment of Radiology (S.G.K.), New York University, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.G. Kim
W.-T. Hwang
cBiostatistics and Epidemiology (W.-T.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W.-T. Hwang
S. Wang
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.C., L.A.L., S.G.K., S.W., G.V., S.M., H.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Wang
G. Verma
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.C., L.A.L., S.G.K., S.W., G.V., S.M., H.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Verma
S. Mohan
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.C., L.A.L., S.G.K., S.W., G.V., S.M., H.P.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Mohan
V. LiVolsi
dPathology and Lab Medicine (V.L.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V. LiVolsi
H. Quon
bRadiation Oncology (H.Q.)
fDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences (H.Q.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Quon
H. Poptani
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.C., L.A.L., S.G.K., S.W., G.V., S.M., H.P.)
gDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology (H.P.), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Poptani
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Shutter-speed model analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging allows estimation of mean intracellular water molecule lifetime (a measure of cellular energy metabolism) and volume transfer constant (a measure of hemodynamics). The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic utility of pretreatment mean intracellular water molecule lifetime and volume transfer constant in predicting overall survival in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck and to stratify p16-positive patients based upon survival outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 60 patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging before treatment. Median, mean intracellular water molecule lifetime and volume transfer constant values from metastatic nodes were computed from each patient. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to associate mean intracellular water molecule lifetime and volume transfer constant and their combination with overall survival for the first 2 years, 5 years, and beyond (median duration, >7 years).

RESULTS: By the last date of observation, 18 patients had died, and median follow-up for surviving patients (n = 42) was 8.32 years. Patients with high mean intracellular water molecule lifetime (4 deaths) had significantly (P = .01) prolonged overall survival by 5 years compared with those with low mean intracellular water molecule lifetime (13 deaths). Similarly, patients with high mean intracellular water molecule lifetime (4 deaths) had significantly (P = .006) longer overall survival at long-term duration than those with low mean intracellular water molecule lifetime (14 deaths). However, volume transfer constant was a significant predictor for only the 5-year follow-up period. There was some evidence (P < .10) to suggest that mean intracellular water molecule lifetime and volume transfer constant were associated with overall survival for the first 2 years. Patients with high mean intracellular water molecule lifetime and high volume transfer constant were associated with significantly (P < .01) longer overall survival compared with other groups for all follow-up periods. In addition, p16-positive patients with high mean intracellular water molecule lifetime and high volume transfer constant demonstrated a trend toward the longest overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS: A combined analysis of mean intracellular water molecule lifetime and volume transfer constant provided the best model to predict overall survival in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CRT
chemoradiation therapy
DCE-MRI
dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
HNSCC
squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck
HPV
human papillomavirus
HR
hazard ratio
Ktrans
volume transfer constant
OS
overall survival
τi
mean intracellular water molecule lifetime

Patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNSCC) are usually associated with a poor prognosis, and the presence of metastatic lymph nodes is considered a negative prognostic indicator.1 Consequently, there is an unmet need to understand the tumor biology to improve clinical management.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) allows estimation of volume transfer constant (Ktrans),2,3 an efflux rate constant of gadolinium-based contrast agent from the intravascular compartment to tumor interstitium. The potential of pretreatment Ktrans in predicting short-term response4⇓⇓–7 as well as overall survival (OS) in patients with HNSCC has been reported.8,9 Patients treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and with high baseline Ktrans from metastatic nodes were associated with an improved prognosis compared with patients with low baseline Ktrans.8,9 In addition to Ktrans, shutter-speed model analysis of DCE-MRI derives a novel imaging biomarker known as mean intracellular water lifetime (τi),10⇓–12 which has been suggested to be a metabolic marker.12 The unique strength of τi lies in the fact that it is less sensitive to arterial input function scaling variations than Ktrans,13 indicating that τi is a more reproducible and reliable marker. The parameter τi has been used to characterize breast,14 prostate,15,16 esophageal,17 and hepatocellular cancer.18 A recent study19 also demonstrated the prognostic utility of τi in predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas.

Although Ktrans reflects tumor perfusion and vascular permeability,3 τi provides unique information related to tumor cell characteristics such as cell size, cell membrane permeability, and cellular metabolic activity.12 Given that Ktrans and τi provide complementary information about the tumor microenvironment, we believe that a combined analysis may be more useful than individual parameters in predicting prognosis in patients with HNSCC.

Thus, the purpose of the present study was to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment τi and Ktrans in predicting OS in patients with HNSCC. In addition, in a subset of patients, we explored the prognostic potential of τi and Ktrans in p16-associated HNSCC given the fundamental differences in tumor biology and prognosis of these patients.20⇓–22

Materials and Methods

Patients

This retrospective analysis of pre-existing imaging and clinical data was institutional review board–approved and was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. On the basis of previous CT/MR imaging reports, all patients were assessed for the presence of at least 1 metastatic cervical lymph node measuring >1 cm3 and biopsy-proved histopathologic diagnosis of HNSCC. The exclusion criteria included prior CRT or a history of cancer other than HNSCC. A total of 72 patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC met the inclusion criteria and were recruited between January 2005 and August 2009. TNM staging was used to determine the disease status. Each patient received appropriate therapy to deliver the maximum clinical benefit, which included upfront neck dissection (n = 3), concurrent CRT (n = 46), or induction chemotherapy followed by CRT (n = 23). Three patients who underwent upfront neck dissection and 9 patients who had either corrupted MR imaging data or insufficient clinical data were excluded from the data analysis. Therefore, OS analyses were performed on the remaining 60 patients (mean age ± SD, 62.34 ± 9.18 years; 49 men, 11 women). Tumor location and staging from these patients at the initial presentation are summarized in the Table.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Patient characteristics and treatment modalities

Data Acquisition

All patients underwent MR imaging before surgery and CRT on a 1.5T Sonata scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; n = 37) or on a 3T Magnetom Trio scanner (Siemens; n = 35). Structural imaging included axial T2-weighted and T1-weighted images with standard parameters. Inversion-recovery–prepared T1-weighted images were acquired by using TIs of 60, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 ms before the acquisition of DCE-MRI data for T1 quantification.

As described previously,5 DCE-MRI was performed by using a rapid 3D-spoiled gradient-echo sequence modified to acquire 8 angle-interleaved subaperture images from the full-echo radial data.23 Imaging parameters were: TR, 5.0 ms; TE, 4.2 ms; 256 readout points per view; 256 views (32 views per subaperture, 8 subapertures); field of view, 260 × 260 mm2; number of sections, 8; section thickness, 5 mm. Fat saturation was applied once every 8 excitations. Spatial saturation was applied once every 32 excitations to minimize the flow effect while minimizing acquisition time. This scheme resulted in a temporal resolution of 2.5 seconds for each subaperture image with full spatial resolution of 256 × 256 by using a dynamic k-space–weighted image reconstruction contrast algorithm.

Image Processing

All images (T2, T1, postcontrast T1-weighted, and DCE-MRI) were coregistered by using a 2-step nonrigid image registration technique.5 The ROIs were drawn on the solid portion of the largest nodal mass by using anatomic images. Care was taken to avoid necrotic/cystic or hemorrhagic parts as well as surrounding blood vessels. Pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data was performed for each voxel in the selected ROIs by using a shutter-speed model.5,10 Estimation of arterial input function was performed semiautomatically from an ROI on one of the carotid arteries located near the metastatic lymph node.5,10 Median pretreatment τi and Ktrans were computed by using only the central 4 sections to avoid erroneous results from wraparound artifacts in the edge sections.

Clinical Follow-Up and Data Analysis

The clinical follow-up period was measured from the end date of CRT to the date of death for deceased patients or to the date of last observation for surviving patients.

Median pretreatment τi and Ktrans values were 0.125 seconds and 0.409 minutes−1, respectively, and were used as thresholds to divide patients into 2 groups (at or above and below the threshold value). Patients in the high τi group had a mean ± SD τi of 0.276 ± 0.086 seconds and a median of 0.269 seconds. Patients in the low τi group had a mean ± SD τi of 0.070 ± 0.028 seconds and a median of 0.071 seconds. Similarly, patients in the high Ktrans group had a mean ± SD Ktrans of 0.90 ± 0.54 minutes−1 with a median of 0.88 minutes−1, whereas patients in the low Ktrans group had a mean ± SD Ktrans of 0.188 ± 0.108 minutes−1 and a median of 0.196 minutes−1.

Using the 2-year (short-term), 5-year (intermediate-term), and all available follow-up (long-term [median, 7.83 years; range, 0.07–10.7 years]) as clinical end points, OS was analyzed. In addition to using τi and Ktrans as independent predictors, combinations of these parameters (high τi/high Ktrans, high τi/low Ktrans, low τi/high Ktrans, and low τi/low Ktrans) were used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared by using log-rank tests. Using a Cox regression model, hazard ratios (HRs) of deaths and associated 95% CI were estimated for τi and Ktrans first separately, and then for the different combinations of these parameters (high τi/high Ktrans, high τi/low Ktrans, low τi/high Ktrans, and low τi/low Ktrans). In addition, a Wald test was performed to evaluate the joint effect of these combinations. A P value <.05 was considered significant. All data analyses were performed by using SPSS for Windows version 18.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York).

Stratifying HPV/p16-Positive and p16-Negative Patients

Human papillomavirus (HPV) status was determined from tissue specimens by immunohistochemical evaluation of p16 expression by using a commercially available monoclonal antibody. Tissue samples were available from only 32 patients, and these were divided into 2 groups: positive (n = 21) or negative (n = 11) for p16 expression.24 There were no significant differences (P > .05) in age, treatment regimen, τi, and Ktrans between patients who had and those who did not have tissue specimens for p16 expression. Using p16 as an independent variable, OS analyses were performed from these 32 patients. To further stratify p16-positive and p16-negative patients, separate OS analyses were performed by using τi and Ktrans as independent variables and by using combinations of these parameters.

Results

Representative anatomic images and τi and Ktrans maps from a patient who was alive by the last date of observation with a follow-up duration of 8.19 years and from a patient who died 2.12 years after the end of CRT are shown in Figs 1 and 2, respectively. In the first 2-year follow-up period, 13 of 60 patients died of the disease. In 5 years, the number of deceased patients was 17, whereas a total of 18 patients died by the last date of observation. The median follow-up for surviving patients (n = 42) was 8.32 years (range, 5.42–10.7 years).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Representative images from a patient exhibiting long survival (follow-up duration of 8.19 years). Axial T2-weighted image (A) demonstrates an enlarged heterogeneous hyperintense metastatic left level IIa lymph node (arrow). This appears hypointense on a coregistered T1-weighted image (B), with heterogeneous enhancement on the corresponding postcontrast T1-weighted image (C). DCE-MRI–derived τi (0.136 seconds [D]) and Ktrans (0.882 minutes−1 [E]) maps are shown as color images overlaid on postcontrast T1-weighted images.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Representative images from a patient who died 2.12 years after the end of CRT. Axial T2-weighted image (A) demonstrates a heterogeneous hyperintense metastatic left level IIb lymph node (arrow). It appears hypointense on a coregistered T1-weighted image (B) with heterogeneous enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted image (C). DCE-MRI–derived τi (0.031 seconds; [D]) and Ktrans (0.135 minutes−1 [E]) maps overlaid on postcontrast T1-weighted images demonstrating lower τi and Ktrans values from the node compared with the patient with longer survival as shown in Fig 1.

Prognostic Utility of τi

In the first 2 years, a trend toward longer OS was noted for patients with higher τi (4 deaths) compared with those with lower τi (9 deaths; log-rank P = .09). The probability for survival in patients with high τi was 86.7% (95% CI, 68.3%–94.8%), whereas it was 70% (95% CI, 60.3%–83.1%) for patients with low τi.

Interestingly, by 5 years, significantly longer OS was observed for patients with higher τi (4 deaths) compared with those with lower τi (13 deaths; log-rank P = .01). Similarly, patients with higher τi (4 deaths) had significantly prolonged OS compared with those with lower τi (14 deaths; log-rank P = .006; Fig 3) when long-term follow-up duration was considered (median duration, >7 years). At 5 years, survival probability for patients with high τi was 86.7% (95% CI, 68.3%– 94.8%), and for patients with low τi, it was 56.8% (95% CI, 37.4%–72.1%).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Kaplan-Meier plot for τi. Patients with higher pretreatment τi (solid curves) demonstrate longer OS compared with patients with lower τi (broken curves) for first 2-year (solid vertical line, P = .09), 5-year (dotted vertical line, P = .01), and long-term (median duration, >7 years; P = .006) follow-up periods.

Cox regression analysis demonstrated a nonsignificant difference (P = .13) in OS between the 2 groups for the 2-year follow-up period, with an HR of 2.43 (95% CI, 0.75–7.92). However, a P value of .02 with HR of 3.71 (95% CI, 1.20–11.39) for 5 years and a P value of .01 with HR of 4.24 (95% CI, 1.38–12.97) were observed in predicting long-term OS.

Prognostic Utility of Ktrans

At 2 years, patients with higher Ktrans (4 deaths) had longer but nonsignificant OS compared with those with lower Ktrans (9 deaths; log-rank P = .07). At 2 years, survival probability was 87.1% (95% CI, 69.2%–95.0%) for patients with high Ktrans and 69.0% (95% CI, 48.8%–82.5%) for patients with low Ktrans.

By 5 years, significantly prolonged OS for patients with higher Ktrans (5 deaths) was noted compared with those with lower Ktrans (12 deaths; log-rank P = .03). Survival probability for patients with high Ktrans was 83.9% (95% CI, 65.5%–93.0%) and for patients with low Ktrans was 58.6% (95% CI, 38.8%–74.0%). However, only a trend toward prolonged OS was observed for patients with higher Ktrans (6 deaths) compared with those with lower Ktrans (12 deaths; log-rank P = .06) when long-term OS was evaluated (Fig 4).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Kaplan-Meier plots for Ktrans. Patients with higher pretreatment Ktrans (solid curves) demonstrate longer OS compared with patients with lower Ktrans (broken curves) at the 2-year (solid vertical line; P = .07), 5-year (dotted vertical line; P = .028), and long-term (median duration, >7 years; P = .06) follow-up periods.

Cox regression analyses showed nonsignificant differences between the 2 groups for 2 years (P = .09) with HR of 2.78 (95% CI, 0.85–9.05) and for long-term periods (P = .06) with HR of 2.52 (95% CI, 0.94–6.72). However, a P value of .04 with HR of 3.04 (95% CI, 1.07–8.64) was observed in predicting 5-year OS.

Prognostic Utility of Combined Analysis Involving τi and Ktrans

By 2 years, the longest OS was observed for patients with high τi/high Ktrans (n = 15, 2 deaths). On the other hand, patients with low τi/low Ktrans (n = 14, 7 deaths) had the shortest OS (log-rank P = .02). In the group of patients (n = 31) who had either high τi/low Ktrans or low τi/high Ktrans, 4 patients died. Moreover, patients with high τi/low Ktrans had longer OS than patients with low τi/high Ktrans. Similarly, at 5 years, patients with high τi/high Ktrans (n = 15, 2 deaths) had the longest OS, whereas patients with low τi/low Ktrans (n = 14, 10 deaths) had the shortest OS (log-rank P < .0001). Of the remaining 31 patients, 5 patients were deceased and patients with high τi/low Ktrans had longer OS than patients with low τi/high Ktrans.

A similar pattern was observed for long-term analysis. Patients with high τi/high Ktrans (n = 15, 2 deaths) had the longest OS, and patients with low τi/low Ktrans (n = 14, 10 deaths) had the shortest OS (log-rank P < .0001). Of the remaining 31 patients, 6 died, and again, patients with high τi/low Ktrans had longer OS than patients with low τi/high Ktrans (Fig 5).

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Kaplan-Meier plots for combinations of τi and Ktrans. Patients with high τi/Ktrans (thick broken curve) had the longest OS, and patients with low τi/Ktrans (thin broken curve) had the shortest OS for the first 2-year (solid vertical line; P = .02), 5-year (dotted vertical line; P < .0001), and long-term (median duration, >7 years; P < .0001) follow-up periods. In addition, patients with high τi/low Ktrans (thick solid curve) exhibited longer OS than patients with low τi/high Ktrans (thin solid curve) at all clinical end points.

For the first 2-year follow-up period, multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed a P value of .048 with HRs of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.04–1.00; P = .05), 0.22 (95% CI, 0.05–1.07; P = .06), and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.04–0.95; P = .04) for patients with high τi/high Ktrans, high τi/low Ktrans, and low τi/high Ktrans, respectively, with respect to patients with low τi/low Ktrans. Similarly, a P value of .003 with HRs of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.03–0.60; P = .009), 0.14 (95% CI, 0.03–0.63; P = .01), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.05–0.69; P = .01) for the first 5 years, and P value of .003 with HRs of 0.12 (95% CI, 0.03–0.58; P = .007), 0.13 (95% CI, 0.03–0.61; P = .01), and 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08–0.82; P = .02) for long-term OS were observed.

When all the combinations of variables (high τi/high Ktrans, high τi/low Ktrans, low τi/high Ktrans) were considered together, HRs of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.05–3.23; P = .03), 2.32 (95% CI, 1.35–3.97; P = .002), and 2.31 (95% CI, 1.38–3.87; P = .001) for the first 2 years, 5 years, and long-term OS, respectively, were observed. Overall, combination of the τi and Ktrans groups demonstrated differential OS (Wald test, P = .003).

Stratifying HPV/p16-Positive and p16-Negative Patients

Of 32 patients with the availability of p16 status, 13 died by the date of last observation. Patients with p16-positive status had significantly longer OS than p16-negative patients (P = .05; Fig 6A). Noticeably, no significant difference (P = .17) in OS was observed between patients in whom p16-expression data were or were not available.

Fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6.

Kaplan-Meier plots for p16 expression. (A) Patients with p16-positive expression (solid curve) exhibited significantly longer long-term (median duration, >7 years) OS (P < .05) than patients with p16-negative expression (broken curve) (B). Patients with positive p16 expression and high τi/high Ktrans (thick broken curve) had longer OS than p16-positive patients with low τi/low Ktrans (thin broken curve). In addition, patients with high τi/low Ktrans (gray solid curve) exhibited longer OS than patients with low τi/high Ktrans (black solid curve) at all clinical end points. However, these differences were not significant (P > .05).

Patients with p16-positive status with higher τi demonstrated nonsignificantly longer OS (P = .20) than patients with lower τi. Similarly, nonsignificant (P = .61) differences were observed for Ktrans. Moreover, p16-positive patients with high τi/high Ktrans had the longest OS, and patients with low τi/low Ktrans had the shortest OS. However, these findings were also not significant (Fig 6B; P > .05). In addition, patients with p16-negative status and higher τi demonstrated nonsignificantly (P = .12) longer OS than those with lower τi. We could not compare OS by using Ktrans because all patients in this subgroup had Ktrans higher than the median value.

Discussion

Our observations suggest that patients with higher pretreatment τi and Ktrans from metastatic nodes exhibit longer OS. These results are particularly encouraging given the adverse prognosis associated with nodal metastases and offer potential opportunities to develop alternative therapeutic approaches in the poor prognosis cohort.

Earlier studies12,25,26 have reported that τi is inversely correlated with cell membrane ion-pump activity, a measure of mitochondrial metabolism suggesting that τi might be a sensitive indicator of cellular energy turnover. Similarly, some studies have reported that increased metabolic activity is associated with lower τi (median, 0.16–1.03 seconds) in regions of prostrate15,16 and esophageal cancer17 compared with normal tissues. In yet another study,18 lower τi (0.11 ± 0.02 seconds versus 0.29 ± 0.53 seconds) was observed from normal liver parenchyma (a metabolically more active region) compared with hepatocellular carcinomas. The inverse correlation between τi and tumor metabolism was corroborated when higher τi was observed in complete responders compared with poor responders with breast carcinomas.12,14 Taken together, these studies imply that malignant cells from tumors with high τi have reduced metabolic energy available for their growth relative to malignant cells from tumors with low τi.

In the present study, patients with HNSCC with higher pretreatment τi from the metastatic nodes were associated with prolonged OS measured at 3 different clinical end points, suggesting that malignant cells were associated with reduced metabolic energy. An inverse correlation of τi with EF5, a marker of hypoxia, and direct correlation of elevated τi regions with high blood flow have been reported.27 An earlier study28 reported that tumors with relatively higher blood flow and reduced hypoxia are associated with increased oxygenation, resulting in better access to chemotherapeutic drugs and radiosensitivity. Taken together, these studies and our observations suggest that tumors with higher τi may harbor a favorable microenvironment for CRT. We postulate that the combined effect of lower hypoxia and reduced metabolic activity of the tumor cells might have contributed to higher pretreatment τi that led to better treatment response and prolonged OS in patients with HNSCC. This notion is supported by a HR of 4.24 that was observed at the long-term follow-up period, implying a 4-fold higher risk of death in patients with low τi than in patients with high τi.

Pretreatment Ktrans (median value, 0.19–0.64 minutes−1) has been reported to predict treatment response to CRT,4⇓–6 induction therapy,7 and short-term survival in patients with HNSCC.8,9 We also observed that higher pretreatment Ktrans was associated with better OS. Because Ktrans reflects a combination of tumor perfusion and microvascular permeability, our results and those of earlier published reports support the notion that tumor vascularity might be an important predictor of disease control in HNSCC. The fact that Ktrans predicted only 5-year OS while τi was useful in predicting both 5-year and long-term OS suggests that τi is a more robust prognostic imaging biomarker in evaluating HNSCC.

When τi and Ktrans were combined, significantly longer OS was observed for patients with high τi/high Ktrans for all clinical end points. We believe that synergistic interaction between these 2 parameters in predicting OS was greater than what would be expected from an individual parameter. The fact that patients with high τi/high Ktrans demonstrated the longest OS agrees with the hypothesis that these patients may have had the most favorable conditions such as elevated tumor blood flow, lower hypoxia, and lower cellular metabolic energy for optimal therapeutic benefit of CRT. Another interesting finding was that patients with high τi/low Ktrans exhibited longer OS than patients with low τi/high Ktrans at all clinical end points. This indicates that τi was a more dominant factor than Ktrans in the synergistic interaction leading to longer OS, further substantiating that τi is a robust prognostic indicator in HNSCC.

We performed an exploratory analysis to investigate if τi and Ktrans could predict OS in HPV/p16 patients because HPV/p16 is a key etiological factor in HNSCC, with distinct epidemiologic, clinical, and molecular characteristics.21,22 Patients harboring the p16 gene are generally more sensitive to CRT and are associated with improved prognosis and prolonged survival.20 The favorable outcome in p16-positive patients may be attributed to fewer and distinct somatic genetic alterations and positive immunologic response.21,22 In agreement with prior studies,20,21 significantly longer OS was observed for p16-positive patients compared with p16-negative patients in our study. A nonsignificant, but positive trend toward longer OS for p16-positive patients harboring high τi and Ktrans suggests the prognostic utility of τi and Ktrans may also be valid in stratifying p16-positive patients. We recognize that these results may be subject to selection bias inherent to the availability of tissue specimens. However, a nonsignificant difference in OS between patients who had and those who did not have tissues for p16 expression indicated that there was a minimal influence of sample size in the determination of OS.

While predicting short-term (6 months) treatment response to CRT, no significant differences in pretreatment τi were observed between complete and partial responders.5 However, in the present study, patients who had higher pretreatment τi were associated with prolonged OS. The difference might be related to different follow-up duration, assessment of clinical outcome (local regional recurrence/evidence of residual disease on pathology versus OS), and different number of patients (n = 33 versus n = 60) enrolled between these 2 studies. We focused on assessing nodal metastases in predicting OS because lymphadenopathy in the neck is a well-known prognostic determinant in patients with HNSCC.29 A DCE-MRI analysis of primary tumors would also be important; however, artifacts induced by physiologic motion precluded the analysis of primary tumors. We combined DCE-MRI data from MR systems with 2 different field strengths (1.5T and 3T). To account for this variability, blood T1 and contrast agent relaxivities corresponding to the field strengths were used for converting signal intensity curves to concentration curves and estimating pharmacokinetic parameters. Previously,5 we reported similar trends for Ktrans in predicting treatment response in patients scanned at 2 different field strengths, suggesting that DCE-MRI–derived parameters are independent of magnetic field. Our supposition is corroborated by a study30 in which no significant differences in signal enhancement ratio, time to peak enhancement, uptake, and washout rates were observed for breast lesions scanned with 1.5T and 3T MR systems.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that shutter-speed model analysis of DCE-MRI provides 2 important imaging biomarkers (τi and Ktrans) presenting complementary physiologic information about the tumor microenvironment. Although τi may be a potential independent prognostic imaging biomarker for predicting OS, combined analysis of τi and Ktrans greatly improves the predictive power of these parameters in determining OS in HNSCC. Future prospective trials involving a larger patient population are required to confirm our findings.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Suyash Mohan—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Galileo, CDS, NovoCure*. Virginia LiVolsi—RELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health, Comments: grant R01-CA102756 (Harish Poptani)*. Harry Quon—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: University of Pennsylvania*. Harish Poptani—RELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health*; UNRELATED: Employment: University of Liverpool. *Money paid to the institution.

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01-CA102756 (H.P.).

  • Paper previously presented at: American Society of Neuroradiology Annual Meeting and the Foundation of the ASNR Symposium, May 21–26, 2016; Washington, D.C.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chen CC,
    2. Lin JC,
    3. Chen KW
    . Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in head and neck cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 2015;10:181 doi:10.1186/s13014-015-0490-9 pmid:26302761
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tofts PS,
    2. Kermode AG
    . Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:357–67 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910170208 pmid:2062210
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tofts PS,
    2. Brix G,
    3. Buckley DL, et al
    . Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223–32 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<223::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO%3B2-S pmid:10508281
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chawla S,
    2. Kim S,
    3. Dougherty L, et al
    . Pretreatment diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of local treatment response in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:35–43 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9432 pmid:23255739
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kim S,
    2. Loevner LA,
    3. Quon H, et al
    . Prediction of response to chemoradiation therapy in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:262–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1817 pmid:19797785
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jansen JF,
    2. Schöder H,
    3. Lee NY, et al
    . Tumor metabolism and perfusion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: pretreatment multimodality imaging with 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and [18F]FDG-PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:299–307 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.022 pmid:21236594
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bernstein JM,
    2. Kershaw LE,
    3. Withey SB, et al
    . Tumor plasma flow determined by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI predicts response to induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2015;51:508–13 doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.013 pmid:25700703
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chawla S,
    2. Kim S,
    3. Loevner LA, et al
    . Prediction of disease-free survival in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:778–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2376 pmid:21349969
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Shukla-Dave A,
    2. Lee NY,
    3. Jansen JF, et al
    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of outcome in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with nodal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:1837–44 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.006 pmid:21601373
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kim S,
    2. Quon H,
    3. Loevner LA, et al
    . Transcytolemmal water exchange in pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1607–17 doi:10.1002/jmri.21207 pmid:17968962
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Yankeelov TE,
    2. Lepage M,
    3. Chakravarthy A, et al
    . Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:1–13 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.006 pmid:17222711
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Springer CS Jr.,
    2. Li X,
    3. Tudorica LA, et al
    . Intratumor mapping of intracellular water lifetime: metabolic images of breast cancer? NMR Biomed 2014;27:760–73 doi:10.1002/nbm.3111 pmid:24798066
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Cai Y,
    3. Moloney B, et al
    . Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling. J Magn Reson 2016;269:104–12 doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2016.05.018 pmid:27288764
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tudorica A,
    2. Oh KY,
    3. Chui SY, et al
    . Early prediction and evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using quantitative DCE-MRI. Transl Oncol 2016;9:8–17 doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.016 pmid:26947876
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Priest RA,
    3. Woodward WJ, et al
    . Cell membrane water exchange effects in prostate DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson 2012;218:77–85 doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2012.03.019 pmid:22578558
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Lowry M,
    2. Zelhof B,
    3. Liney GP, et al
    . Analysis of prostate DCE-MRI: comparison of fast exchange limit and fast exchange regimen pharmacokinetic models in the discrimination of malignant from normal tissue. Invest Radiol 2009;44:577–84 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c1fe pmid:19668002
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Chang EY,
    2. Li X,
    3. Jerosch-Herold M, et al
    . The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:166–75 doi:10.1007/s11605-007-0253-5 pmid:17768665
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Jajamovich GH,
    2. Huang W,
    3. Besa C, et al
    . DCE-MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma: perfusion quantification with Tofts model versus shutter-speed model–initial experience. MAGMA 2016;29:49–58 doi:10.1007/s10334-015-0513-4 pmid:26646522
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lee SH,
    2. Hayano K,
    3. Zhu AX, et al
    . Water-exchange-modified kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as prognostic biomarkers of survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with antiangiogenic monotherapy. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136725 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136725 pmid:26366997
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ang KK,
    2. Harris J,
    3. Wheeler R, et al
    . Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:24–35 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0912217 pmid:20530316
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Klussmann JP,
    2. Mooren JJ,
    3. Lehnen M, et al
    . Genetic signatures of HPV-related and unrelated oropharyngeal carcinoma and their prognostic implications. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:1779–86 doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1463 pmid:19223504
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Elrefaey S,
    2. Massaro MA,
    3. Chiocca S, et al
    . HPV in oropharyngeal cancer: the basics to know in clinical practice. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2014;34:299–309 pmid:25709145
    PubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Song HK,
    2. Dougherty L
    . Dynamic MRI with projection reconstruction and KWIC processing for simultaneous high spatial and temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:815–24 doi:10.1002/mrm.20237 pmid:15389936
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Klaes R,
    2. Friedrich T,
    3. Spitkovsky D, et al
    . Overexpression of p16(INK4A) as a specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri. Int J Cancer 2001;92:276–84 doi:10.1002/ijc.1174 pmid:11291057
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Poirier-Quinot M,
    3. Springer CS Jr.., et al
    . Active trans-plasma membrane water cycling in yeast is revealed by NMR. Biophys J 2011;101:2833–42 doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.10.035 pmid:22261073
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Nath KPR,
    2. Nelson DS,
    3. Pickup S, et al
    . Acute changes in cellular-interstitial water exchange rate in DB-1 melanoma xenografts after lonidamine administration as a marker of tumor energetics and ion transport. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 2014;22:2757
  27. 27.↵
    1. Koch CJ,
    2. Jenkins WT,
    3. Jenkins KW, et al
    . Mechanisms of blood flow and hypoxia production in rat 9L-epigastric tumors. Tumor Microenviron Ther 2013;1:1–13 doi:10.2478/tumor-2012-0001 pmid:25436211
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Cooper RA,
    2. Carrington BM,
    3. Loncaster JA, et al
    . Tumour oxygenation levels correlate with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters in carcinoma of the cervix. Radiother Oncol 2000;57:53–59 doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00259-0 pmid:11033189
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Layland MK,
    2. Sessions DG,
    3. Lenox J
    . The influence of lymph node metastasis in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx: N0 versus N+. Laryngoscope 2005;115:629–39 doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000161338.54515.b1 pmid:15805872
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pineda FD,
    2. Medved M,
    3. Fan X, et al
    . Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 T: a pilot study. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150021 doi:10.1259/bjr.20150021 pmid:25785918
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received February 21, 2017.
  • Accepted after revision September 4, 2017.
  • © 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
Next
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI–Derived Intracellular Water Lifetime (τi): A Prognostic Marker for Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Chawla, L.A. Loevner, S.G. Kim, W.-T. Hwang, S. Wang, G. Verma, S. Mohan, V. LiVolsi, H. Quon, H. Poptani
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI–Derived Intracellular Water Lifetime (τi): A Prognostic Marker for Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2017, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5440

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI–Derived Intracellular Water Lifetime (τi): A Prognostic Marker for Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
S. Chawla, L.A. Loevner, S.G. Kim, W.-T. Hwang, S. Wang, G. Verma, S. Mohan, V. LiVolsi, H. Quon, H. Poptani
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2017, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5440
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (26)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Using 1H2O MR to measure and map sodium pump activity in vivo
    Charles S. Springer
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance 2018 291
  • Feasibility of filter-exchange imaging (FEXI) in measuring different exchange processes in human brain
    Ruiliang Bai, Zhaoqing Li, Chaoliang Sun, Yi-Cheng Hsu, Hui Liang, Peter Basser
    NeuroImage 2020 219
  • Measurement of cellular‐interstitial water exchange time in tumors based on diffusion‐time‐dependent diffusional kurtosis imaging
    Jin Zhang, Gregory Lemberskiy, Linda Moy, Els Fieremans, Dmitry S. Novikov, Sungheon Gene Kim
    NMR in Biomedicine 2021 34 6
  • NMR shutter‐speed elucidates apparent population inversion of 1H2O signals due to active transmembrane water cycling
    Xin Li, Silvia Mangia, Jing‐Huei Lee, Ruiliang Bai, Charles S. Springer
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2019 82 1
  • Improving MR cell size imaging by inclusion of transcytolemmal water exchange
    Xiaoyu Jiang, Sean P. Devan, Jingping Xie, John C. Gore, Junzhong Xu
    NMR in Biomedicine 2022 35 12
  • Shutter‐Speed DCE‐MRI Analyses of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Data
    Ruiliang Bai, Bao Wang, Yinhang Jia, Zejun Wang, Charles S. Springer, Zhaoqing Li, Chuanjin Lan, Yi Zhang, Peng Zhao, Yingchao Liu
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2020 52 3
  • The Promise of Novel Biomarkers for Head and Neck Cancer from an Imaging Perspective
    Loredana G. Marcu, Paul Reid, Eva Bezak
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2018 19 9
  • Time‐dependent diffusivity and kurtosis in phantoms and patients with head and neck cancer
    Eddy Solomon, Gregory Lemberskiy, Steven Baete, Kenneth Hu, Dariya Malyarenko, Scott Swanson, Amita Shukla‐Dave, Stephen E. Russek, Elcin Zan, Sungheon Gene Kim
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2023 89 2
  • The direction-dependence of apparent water exchange rate in human white matter
    Zhaoqing Li, Zhenfeng Pang, Juange Cheng, Yi-Cheng Hsu, Yi Sun, Evren Özarslan, Ruiliang Bai
    NeuroImage 2022 247
  • Prediction of distant metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck using DWI and DCE‐MRI
    Sanjeev Chawla, Sungheon G Kim, Laurie A Loevner, Sumei Wang, Suyash Mohan, Alexander Lin, Harish Poptani
    Head & Neck 2020 42 11

More in this TOC Section

  • Chondrosarcoma vs Synovial Chondromatosis: Imaging
  • WHO Classification Update: Nasal&Skull Base Tumors
  • Peritumoral Signal in Vestibular Schwannomas
Show more HEAD & NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire