Validation of a New Semiautomated Segmentation Pipeline Based on the Spinal Cord Toolbox DeepSeg Algorithm to Estimate the Cervical Canal Area

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Liu Z,
   2. Yaldizli Ö,
   3. Pardini M, et al

   . Cervical cord area measurement using volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015;4:52–57 doi:10.1016/j.msard.2014.11.004 pmid:25787053

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Eden D,
   2. Gros C,
   3. Badji A, et al

   . Spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord. Brain 2019;142:633–46 doi:10.1093/brain/awy352 pmid:30715195

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Arrambide G,
   2. Rovira A,
   3. Sastre-Garriga J, et al

   . Spinal cord lesions: a modest contributor to diagnosis in clinically isolated syndromes but a relevant prognostic factor. Mult Scler 2018;24:301–12 doi:10.1177/1352458517697830 pmid:28301287

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Sumowski JF,
   2. Rocca MA,
   3. Leavitt VM, et al

   . Brain reserve against physical disability progression over 5 years in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2016;86:2006–09 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002702 pmid:27164681

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Sastre-Garriga J,
   2. Rovira A,
   3. García-Vidal A, et al

   . Spinal cord reserve in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023 Jan 23 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-330613 pmid:36690430

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. De Leener B,
   2. Lévy S,
   3. Dupont SM, et al

   . SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage 2017;145:24–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 pmid:27720818

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. De Leener B,
   2. Fonov VS,
   3. Collins DL, et al

   . PAM50: unbiased multimodal template of the brainstem and spinal cord aligned with the ICBM152 space. Neuroimage 2018;165:170–79 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.041 pmid:29061527

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Tukey JW

   . Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley; 1977:43–44
9. 9.↵
   1. Zou KH,
   2. Warfield SK,
   3. Bharatha A, et al

   . Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index 1. Acad Radiol 2004;11:178–89 doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00671-8 pmid:14974593

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Koo TK,
    2. Li MY

    . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63 doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 pmid:27330520

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Kato F,
    2. Yukawa Y,
    3. Suda K, et al

    . Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine, Part II: magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 2012;21:1499–507 doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2176-4 pmid:22302162

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Rocca MA,
    2. Valsasina P,
    3. Meani A, et al

    ; MAGNIMS Study Group. Clinically relevant cranio-caudal patterns of cervical cord atrophy evolution in MS. Neurology 2019;93:e1852–66 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008466 pmid:31611336

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Papinutto N,
    2. Bakshi R,
    3. Bischof A, et al

    ; North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative (NAIMS). Gradient nonlinearity effects on upper cervical spinal cord area measurement from 3D T1-weighted brain MRI acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:1595–601 doi:10.1002/mrm.26776 pmid:28617996

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Lukas C,
    3. Steenwijk MD, et al

    . Multicenter validation of mean upper cervical cord area measurements from head 3D T1-weighted MR imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:749–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4635 pmid:26659338

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Oh J,
    2. Seigo M,
    3. Saidha S, et al

    . Spinal cord normalization in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2014;24:577–84 doi:10.1111/jon.12097 pmid:24593281

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Papinutto N,
    2. Schlaeger R,
    3. Panara V, et al

    . Age, gender and normalization covariates for spinal cord gray matter and total cross-sectional areas at cervical and thoracic levels: a 2D phase sensitive inversion recovery imaging study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118576–18 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118576 pmid:25781178

    CrossRefPubMed