Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Effects of Arterial Stiffness on Cerebral WM Integrity in Older Adults: A Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging and Magnetization Transfer Saturation Imaging Study

J. Kikuta, K. Kamagata, M. Abe, C. Andica, Y. Saito, K. Takabayashi, W. Uchida, H. Naito, H. Tabata, A. Wada, Y. Tamura, R. Kawamori, H. Watada and S. Aoki
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2022, 43 (12) 1706-1712; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7709
J. Kikuta
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Kikuta
K. Kamagata
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Kamagata
M. Abe
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Abe
C. Andica
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
dFaculty of Health Data Science (C.A.), Juntendo University, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Andica
Y. Saito
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Saito
K. Takabayashi
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Takabayashi
W. Uchida
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W. Uchida
H. Naito
bMetabolism and Endocrinology (H.N., Y.T., R.K., H.W.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Naito
H. Tabata
cSportology Center (H.T., Y.T., R.K., H.W.), Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Tabata
A. Wada
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Wada
Y. Tamura
bMetabolism and Endocrinology (H.N., Y.T., R.K., H.W.)
cSportology Center (H.T., Y.T., R.K., H.W.), Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Tamura
R. Kawamori
bMetabolism and Endocrinology (H.N., Y.T., R.K., H.W.)
cSportology Center (H.T., Y.T., R.K., H.W.), Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Kawamori
H. Watada
bMetabolism and Endocrinology (H.N., Y.T., R.K., H.W.)
cSportology Center (H.T., Y.T., R.K., H.W.), Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Watada
S. Aoki
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.K., K.K., M.A., C.A., Y.S., K.T., W.U., A.W., S.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Aoki
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arterial stiffness is reported to be able to cause axonal demyelination or degeneration. The present study aimed to use advanced MR imaging techniques to examine the effect of arterial stiffness on the WM microstructure among older adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Arterial stiffness was measured using the cardio-ankle vascular elasticity index (CAVI). The high-CAVI (mean CAVI ≥ 9 points) and the low-CAVI groups (mean CAVI < 9 points) were created. The neuronal fiber integrity of the WM was evaluated by neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging and magnetization transfer saturation imaging. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics and the tracts-of-interest analysis were performed. Specific WM regions (corpus callosum, internal capsule, anterior thalamic radiation, corona radiata, superior longitudinal fasciculus, forceps minor, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus) were selected in the tracts-of-interest analysis.

RESULTS: In Tract-Based Spatial Statistics, the high-CAVI group showed a significantly lower myelin volume fraction value in the broad WM and significantly higher radial diffusivity and isotropic volume fraction values in the corpus callosum, forceps minor, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, internal capsule, corona radiata, and anterior thalamic radiation than the low-CAVI group. In tracts-of-interest analysis using multivariate linear regression, significant associations were found between the mean CAVI and radial diffusivity in the anterior thalamic radiation and the corona radiata; isotropic volume fraction in the anterior thalamic radiation and the corona radiata; and myelin volume fraction in the superior longitudinal fasciculus (P < .05). Additionally, partial correlation coefficients were observed for the significant associations of executive function with radial diffusivity and myelin volume fraction (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Arterial stiffness could be associated with demyelination rather than axonal degeneration.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ATR
anterior thalamic radiation
CAVI
cardio-ankle vascular elasticity index
CC
corpus callosum
CR
corona radiata
FA
fractional anisotropy
FMi
forceps minor
IC
internal capsule
IFOF
inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus
ISOVF
isotropic volume fraction
NODDI
neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging
MT
magnetization transfer
MVF
myelin volume fraction
RD
radial diffusivity
SLF
superior longitudinal fasciculus
TBSS
Tract-Based Spatial Statistics
TMT
Trail-Making Test
TOI
tracts of interest

Arterial stiffness can be measured by several different methods. The pulse wave velocity has been measured by various methods as an indirect index of arterial elasticity, but it is blood pressure–dependent.1 Conversely, the cardio-ankle vascular elasticity index (CAVI) directly reflects vascular elasticity and is blood pressure–independent.2 Reports regarding the association between CAVI-measured arterial stiffness and WM microstructure have still not been published, though some studies reported the association between pulse wave velocity–measured arterial stiffness and brain WM integrity.

Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) is a new, advanced DWI technique that improves WM characterization using a multicompartment model to describe different WM functions. By enabling the estimation of neurite structure, NODDI can provide more specific insight into the underlying WM microstructural changes.3 Thus, NODDI could be useful in assessing arterial stiffness–associated WM microstructure, though no study has tested this hypothesis. Moreover, myelin-sensitive imaging using MR imaging can evaluate the WM microstructure from a different viewpoint from DWI.

Arterial stiffness is indicated to cause axonal demyelination or degeneration.4,5 Notably, Badji et al6 showed that carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is significantly associated with both fractional anisotropy (FA) and radial diffusivity (RD) but not with the myelin volume fraction (MVF). The results suggested that arterial stiffness is associated with axonal degeneration rather than with demyelination. However, reports supporting such results are still limited. We hypothesized that the impact of arterial stiffness on the brain WM microstructure could be better understood by using the above-mentioned multimodal WM-sensitive MR imaging techniques. Hence, this study aimed to explore the associations between CAVI-measured arterial stiffness and WM-sensitive MR imaging measures of the brain in older adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board of Juntendo University Hospital in Japan approved this study in compliance with the World Medical Association’s Code of Ethics (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans.

Study Participants

The Bunkyo Health Study is a prospective cohort study of 1629 older individuals.7 Of these, 160 participants underwent both FLAIR imaging and DWI. Exclusion criteria included major psychiatric or neurologic disorders, heart failure, stroke, and/or a history of alcohol or drug abuse. Ultimately, 110 older participants were included for the analysis. Arteriosclerosis was estimated by CAVI determined by using an automatic waveform analyzer (Vascular Screening System VaSera VS1500; Fukuda Denshi).8 High CAVI (≥9.0) implies progression of carotid and coronary arteriosclerosis;9 thus, CAVI 9 was set as the cutoff value. The eligible participants were divided into the high-CAVI group (those with a mean [average of left and right values] CAVI of ≥ 9 points; 37 men and 23 women; mean age, 72.72 [SD, 5.00] years) and the low-CAVI group (those with a mean CAVI of < 9 points; 29 men and 21 women; mean age, 72.58 [SD, 4.82] years). Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics. Deep and subcortical WM hyperintensity and periventricular hyperintensity were evaluated using the Fazekas scale,10 according to axial FLAIR imaging.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Demographic characteristics of the participantsa

Image Acquisition

MR imaging data were acquired using a 3T MR imaging scanner (Magnetom Prisma; Siemens) with a 64-channel head coil. We acquired multishell DWI data using a spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence, which included 2 b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2 along 64 isotropic diffusion gradients uniformly distributed on a sphere, with a simultaneous multisection echo-planar imaging sequence in the anterior-posterior phase-encoding direction with the following parameters: TR = 3300 ms; TE = 70 ms; FOV = 229 × 229 mm; matrix size = 130 × 130; section thickness = 1.8 mm; resolution = 1.8 × 1.8 mm; acquisition time = 7 minutes and 29 seconds. DWI acquisition was completed with a b = 0 image. Standard and antiphase-encoded blipping images were acquired without diffusion weighting to compensate for the distortion caused by the magnetic susceptibility associated with the echo-planar imaging acquisition. The predominant T1-weighted, proton density–weighted, and magnetization transfer (MT)–weighted images were obtained using a 3D multiecho high-speed low-angle shot sequence for calculating the MT saturation index.11 The settings for the MT saturation sequences were as follows: for MToff and MTon scanning, TE = 2.53 ms, TR = 24 ms, flip angle = 5°; for T1WI, TE = 2.53 ms, TR = 10 ms, flip angle = 13°, with parallel imaging using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition with a factor of 2 in the phase-encoding direction, 7/8 partial Fourier acquisition in the partition direction, bandwidth = 260 Hz/pixel, matrix = 128 × 128, acquisition time = 6 minutes 25 seconds, section thickness = 1.8 mm, FOV = 224 × 224 mm.

Diffusion MR Imaging Processing

For eliminating artifacts, the eddy (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/eddy/UsersGuide) and topup (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/topup) toolboxes, which are part of the FSL (www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl), were used.12 The resulting images were fitted to the NODDI model3 using the NODDI Matlab Toolbox 5 (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/noddi_toolbox). Table 2 summarizes the parameters of DTI and NODDI. The maps of the orientation dispersion index, isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF), and intracellular volume fraction were generated using the Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization.13 Furthermore, the DTIFit tool (https://open.win.ox.ac.uk/pages/fsl/fslpy/fsl.data.dtifit.html) was used to generate tensor-derived maps according to the ordinary least-squares method14 using DWI data with b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Summary of WM metrics

Myelin-Sensitive Imaging Processing

MT saturation (MTsat) data were analyzed using a Matlab script (https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/run.html).15 First, the apparent longitudinal relaxation rate (R1app) was calculated as the following equation: Embedded Image

Here, ST1 and SPD indicate the signal strength of T1- and proton-density (PD)-weighted imaging, respectively. TRT1 and TRPD reflect the TRs of T1- and PD-weighted imaging, respectively. αT1 and αPD show the excitation flip angles of T1- and PD-weighted imaging. Second, the apparent signal amplitude (Aapp) was calculated as the following: Embedded Image

Third, the apparent δapp was calculated as the following equation: Embedded Image

TRMT, SMT, and αMT show the TR, signal intensity, and excitation flip angle of the MT-weighted imaging respectively. The following formula was applied to fix the small residual high-order dependency of MTsat on the local radiofrequency (RF) transmit field:16 Embedded Image

RFlocal was calculated using the dual-angle method.17 In addition, we added 2 B1 maps with flip angles of 10° and 20°, respectively, obtained by echo-planar imaging in about 10 seconds. The first and second images were obtained after excitation with flip angles α and 2α proportional to sinα and sin 2α, respectively. The ratio of the 2 acquisitions was calculated using the following formula: Embedded Image

From there, the local flip angle α was calculated.

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics Analysis

Voxelwise statistical analysis was performed using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS; http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TBSS) implemented in FSL.18 The TBSS procedure was as follows: First, using FMRIB’s Nonlinear Registration Tool (FNIRT; http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FNIRT), we aligned the FA maps of all participants into the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 standard space with 1 × 1 × 1  mm³ voxel size. Second, we created and thinned a population-based mean FA image to establish the mean FA skeleton, which shows the centers of all tracts common to the group. The threshold of the mean FA skeleton was 0.2 to exclude the peripheral tracts and GM. Third, a binary mask of the FA skeletonized image was used as the mask image to make a voxel-by-voxel statistical comparison between the high- and low-CAVI groups of the 4D skeleton image file. This comparison was performed using FSL’s Randomise tool (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Randomise/UserGuide), and the number of permutations was set to 10,000. The data for other WM metrics was analyzed using the tbss_non_FA script (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TBSS/UserGuide#Using_non-FA_Images_in_TBSS) to generate a 4D skeleton image file for each metric.

Tract-of-Interest Analysis

Tracts of interest (TOI) were analyzed using the ICBM DTI-81 Atlas (http://www.bmap.ucla.edu/portfolio/atlases/ICBM_DTI-81_Atlas/).19 According to the TBSS results (Figure) and previous studies showing arterial stiffness–associated WM regions, 6 major WM tracts, namely, the corpus callosum (CC), internal capsule (IC), corona radiata (CR), inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), forceps minor (FMi), and anterior thalamic radiation (ATR), were identified as TOI of RD and ISOVF. Additionally, 7 major WM tracts, namely, the CC, IC, CR, IFOF, FMi, ATR, and superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), were selected as TOI of the MVF. These WM regions are reportedly vulnerable to increased arterial stiffness.4,5,20,21 Then, the mean value (the average of left and right values) within each ROI was computed for each WM metric.

FIGURE.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE.

Comparison between the high- and low-CAVI groups. For TBSS, the low- and high-CAVI groups were compared (family-wise error–corrected P < .05, adjusting for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy use, intracranial volume, and systolic blood pressure). Red–yellow voxels demonstrate significantly higher RD and ISOVF values in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group. Blue–light blue voxels illustrate a significantly lower MVF value in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics, Version 27 (IBM). Demographic and clinical data were analyzed using the χ2 or Mann-Whitney U test. A P value (2-tailed) < .05 was considered statistically significant.

For TBSS, the high- and low-CAVI groups were compared using the Randomize tool (family-wise error–corrected P < .05, adjusting for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy use, systolic blood pressure, and intracranial volume).

In all participants, we applied univariate linear regression analyses for each WM metric as a dependent variable and the mean CAVI as an independent variable. Subsequently, multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted using backward linear regression to identify independent factors associated with the mean CAVI. The variable P < .2 in the univariate model was included in the back-removal procedure with P-removal = .1. Age, sex, antihypertensive therapy, systolic blood pressure, and intracranial volume were considered confounding covariates to separate from the strength of the relation between the mean CAVI and WM integrity.

Additionally, the partial correlation analyses between each WM metric and the cognitive performance scores were examined separately for all participants, the high-CAVI group, and the low-CAVI group, adjusting for age, sex, and education level. Multiple comparisons were corrected using the false discovery rate procedure for each WM metric and region.22 The false discovery rate–corrected P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Participant Characteristics

Table 1 shows all participant characteristics. The high-CAVI group showed a significantly higher mean CAVI than the low-CAVI group. However, age, sex, education level, body mass index, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and antihypertensive therapy history; the Mini-Mental State Examination; the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Japanese version); Trail Making Test (TMT) A, TMT B, TMT B minus A; deep and subcortical WM hyperintensity; and periventricular hyperintensity were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Whole-Brain Analysis

TBSS results identified a significantly lower MVF in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group in the broad WM area (family-wise error–corrected P < .05; Figure). RD was significantly higher in the high-CAVI group in specific WM areas such as the CC, FMi, bilateral IFOF, bilateral ATR, bilateral CR, and left IC compared with the low-CAVI group. The ISOVF was significantly higher in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group in the CC, FMi, right IC, right CR, right ATR, and right IFOF. Most interesting, RD and ISOVF changes were relatively overlapped, mainly observed in the anterior area. Whereas FA, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, the orientation dispersion index, and intracellular volume fraction did not significantly differ between 2 groups.

Tract-Specific Analysis

The univariate linear regression analysis revealed the significant associations of the mean CAVI with RD in the FMi; ISOVF in the CC, CR, and FMi; and MVF in the CR, IC, FMi, IFOF, ATR, and SLF (false discovery rate–corrected P < .05; Table 3). In the multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy, systolic blood pressure, and intracranial volume, the mean CAVI was significantly associated with RD and ISOVF in the ATR and CR, and the MVF in the SLF (false discovery rate–corrected P < .05; Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy, systolic blood pressure, and intracranial volume for the association of mean CAVI with WM metrics in specific regions

In all participants, the partial correlation analyses demonstrated significant associations of TMT B with RD in the CR, FMi, and IC, or MVF in all tested WM regions (false discovery rate–corrected P < .05; Table 4). In the low-CAVI group, TMT B was significantly associated with RD in the FMi and MVF in the CR (false discovery rate–corrected P < .05; Table 4). Furthermore, the partial correlation coefficients for the significant associations of TMT B minus A with RD in the CR, IC, and FMi and with MVF in the ATR, CR, and FMi were noted in all participants (false discovery rate–corrected P < .05; Table 5). Meanwhile, the low-CAVI group had partial correlation coefficients for the significant associations of TMT B minus A with MVF in the CC, CR, FMi, IC, IFOF, and SLF (false discovery rate–corrected P < .05; Table 5). However, the partial correlation coefficients showed no significant associations among the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Japanese version), and TMT A and WM metrics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4:

Partial correlation coefficients between WM metrics and TMT B, adjusted for age, sex, and educationa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5:

Partial correlation coefficients between WM metrics and TMT B minus A, adjusted for age, sex, and educationa

DISCUSSION

The present study evaluated the WM microstructural changes in older adults with arterial stiffness. The major findings are as follows: First, whole-brain voxelwise results identified a significantly lower MVF in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group in the broad WM regions. TBSS results also showed significantly higher RD and ISOVF in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group in the CC, FMi, IFOF, IC, CR, and ATR. Second, the multivariate linear analysis noted significant associations of the mean CAVI with RD and ISOVF in the ATR and CR; and with MVF in the SLF. Finally, we found partial correlation coefficients for the significant associations between the executive function scores and RD and MVF in specific WM areas.

Whole-brain voxelwise results revealed that the high-CAVI group had a significantly lower MVF value than the low-CAVI group in the broad WM area. Low MVF values indicate the loss of the myelin sheath insulating the nerves, implying WM demyelination.23 In this study, the high-CAVI group also had higher RD and ISOVF values than the low-CAVI group. High ISOVF values associated with high CAVI suggest increased extracellular water diffusion and have been shown to be related to increased inflammatory activation or blood-brain barrier permeability.24 Moreover, elevated RD is also associated with demyelination.25 From these results, the WM in the high-CAVI group could involve demyelination more than in the low-CAVI group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the degree of WM hyperintensities between the high- and low-CAVI groups in this study. Considering that TBSS showed significant differences in RD, ISOVF, and MVF between the two groups, our results suggest that WM microstructural changes precede WM hyperintensities and brain atrophy. In support of our findings, prior studies have indicated that DTI metrics capture ultrastructural changes in WM before the onset of WM hyperintensities and brain atrophy.26,27 Therefore, it is thought that there was no correlation between the degree of WM hyperintensities and WM metrics.

In the multivariate linear analyses, the mean CAVI was significantly associated with RD in the ATR, CR, and FMi; ISOVF in the ATR and CR; and MVF in the SLF. These findings could reflect arteriosclerosis relating to demyelination. In previous studies, the WM microstructure has been reported to be vulnerable to circulatory alterations and correlates with arterial stiffness.4⇓-6,20 Notably, Badji et al6 showed that carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was significantly associated with both FA and RD but not with MVF.17 The present study indicated the significant associations between the mean CAVI and not only DTI and NODDI metrics but also MVF, possibly reflecting the progression of arteriosclerosis exacerbating demyelination. The conflicting results regarding MVF between this study and that of Badji et al might be caused by differences in the characteristics of the target cohort. For instance, in our study, the average value of the body mass index (22.54 [SD, 2.84] kg/m2) in all participants was lower than that in the study of Badji et al (26.1 ([SD, 4.23] kg/m2). However, the average value of systolic blood pressure (137.47 [SD, 15.67] mm Hg) in our study was higher than that in the study of Badji et al (125.66 [SD, 11.65] mm Hg). Suzuki et al24 showed that pathologic processes related to hypertension are associated with image differences, suggesting changes in WM axons. In addition, WM integrity is particularly vulnerable to obesity.28 A higher body mass index is associated with lower FA in the FMi and CC.29 Therefore, except for the degree of arterial stiffness, the difference in participants’ physical characteristics may influence WM integrity. However, exact matching of these clinical findings is difficult. Additionally, our participants were all Japanese, whereas the participants of Badji et al were all Canadian; thus, racial differences may affect WM integrity.30

The present study also showed the existence of the partial correlation coefficients for the significant associations between the executive function and WM metrics. In all participants and the low-CAVI group, the MVF in several WM areas was negatively associated with the executive function. These findings suggest that executive dysfunction may be associated with demyelination. However, in the high-CAVI group of the study, there was no significant connection between WM metrics and TMT scores, which are measures of executive function. Furthermore, although there was no difference in the TMT scores between the high- and low-CAVI groups, we found significant differences in WM metrics between two groups. The findings imply that WM microstructural changes may have already occurred before the impairment of executive function.

This study has some limitations. First, it is based on data obtained from Japanese individuals living in the city; hence, bias in genetic factors and environmental factors, such as eating habits, may occur. Second, it was conducted in a single facility. Thus, multicenter and epidemiologic studies are needed to examine further these investigations.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial stiffness could be strongly associated with demyelination rather than axonal degeneration.

Footnotes

  • J. Kikuta and K. Kamagata contributed equally to this work.

  • This work is supported by the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (S1411006) and KAKENHI (18H03184, 18H02772, and 20K16737) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lim J,
    2. Pearman M,
    3. Park W, et al
    . Interrelationships among various measures of central artery stiffness. Am J Hypertens 2016;29:1024–28 doi:10.1093/ajh/hpw045 pmid:27143395
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Matsushita K,
    2. Ding N,
    3. Kim ED, et al
    . Cardio-ankle vascular index and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and cross-sectional studies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2019;21:16–24 doi:10.1111/jch.13425 pmid:30456903
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Schneider T,
    3. Wheeler-Kingshott CA, et al
    . NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. NeuroImage 2012;61:1000–16 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 pmid:22484410
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Maillard P,
    2. Mitchell GF,
    3. Himali JJ, et al
    . Aortic stiffness, increased white matter free water, and altered microstructural integrity: a continuum of injury. Stroke 2017;48:1567–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016321 pmid:28473633
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tarumi T,
    2. de Jong DL,
    3. Zhu DC, et al
    . Central artery stiffness, baroreflex sensitivity, and brain white matter neuronal fiber integrity in older adults. Neuroimage 2015;110:162–70 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.041 pmid:25623500
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Badji A,
    2. Noriega de la Colina A,
    3. Karakuzu A, et al
    . Arterial stiffness and white matter integrity in the elderly: a diffusion tensor and magnetization transfer imaging study. Neuroimage 2019;186:577–85 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.015 pmid:30448213
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Someya Y,
    2. Tamura Y,
    3. Kaga H, et al
    . Skeletal muscle function and need for long-term care of urban elderly people in Japan (the Bunkyo Health Study): a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031584 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031584 pmid:31530621
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shirai K,
    2. Utino J,
    3. Otsuka K, et al
    . A novel blood pressure-independent arterial wall stiffness parameter: cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). J Atheroscler Thromb 2006;13:101–07 doi:10.5551/jat.13.101 pmid:16733298
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Izuhara M,
    2. Shioji K,
    3. Kadota S, et al
    . Relationship of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) to carotid and coronary arteriosclerosis. Circ J 2008;72:1762–67 doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0152 pmid:18802315
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fazekas F,
    2. Chawluk JB,
    3. Alavi A, et al
    . MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–56 doi:10.2214/ajr.149.2.351 pmid:3496763
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kamagata K,
    2. Zalesky A,
    3. Yokoyama K, et al
    . MR g-ratio-weighted connectome analysis in patients with multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep 2019;9:13522 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50025-2 pmid:31534143
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yamada H,
    2. Abe O,
    3. Shizukuishi T, et al
    . Efficacy of distortion correction on diffusion imaging: comparison of FSL Eddy and Eddy_Correct using 30 and 60 directions diffusion encoding. PLoS One 2014;9:e112411 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112411 pmid:25405472
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Daducci A,
    2. Canales-Rodríguez EJ,
    3. Zhang H, et al
    . Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization (AMICO) from diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 2015;105:32–44 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.026 pmid:25462697
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Basser PJ,
    2. Mattiello J,
    3. LeBihan D
    . Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B 1994;103:247–54 doi:10.1006/jmrb.1994.1037 pmid:8019776
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Helms G,
    2. Dathe H,
    3. Kallenberg K, et al
    . High-resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1396–407 doi:10.1002/mrm.21732 pmid:19025906
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Weiskopf N,
    2. Suckling J,
    3. Williams G, et al
    . Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation. Front Neurosci 2013;7:95 doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00095 pmid:23772204
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Morrell GR,
    2. Schabel MC
    . An analysis of the accuracy of magnetic resonance flip angle measurement methods. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:6157–74 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/008 pmid:20876970
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Johansen-Berg H, et al
    . Tract-Based Spatial Statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487–505 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 pmid:16624579
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Mori S,
    2. Oishi K,
    3. Jiang H, et al
    . Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage 2008;40:570–82 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.035 pmid:18255316
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maillard P,
    2. Mitchell GF,
    3. Himali JJ, et al
    . Effects of arterial stiffness on brain integrity in young adults from the Framingham heart study. Stroke 2016;47:1030–36 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012949 pmid:26965846
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tamura Y,
    2. Shimoji K,
    3. Ishikawa J, et al
    . Subclinical atherosclerosis, vascular risk factors, and white matter alterations in diffusion tensor imaging findings of older adults with cardiometabolic diseases. Front Aging Neurosci 2021;13:712385 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.712385 pmid:34489681
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Benjamini Y,
    2. Hochberg Y
    . Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 1995;57:289–300
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Duval T,
    2. Stikov N,
    3. Cohen-Adad J
    . Modeling white matter microstructure. Funct Neurol 2016;31:217–28 doi:10.11138/fneur/2016.31.4.217 pmid:28072382
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Suzuki H,
    2. Gao H,
    3. Bai W, et al
    . Abnormal brain white matter microstructure is associated with both pre-hypertension and hypertension. PLoS One 2017;12:e0187600 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187600 pmid:29145428
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Song SK,
    2. Yoshino J,
    3. Le TQ, et al
    . Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage 2005;26:132–40 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.028 pmid:15862213
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Andica C,
    2. Kamagata K,
    3. Hatano T, et al
    . Free-water imaging in white and gray matter in Parkinson’s disease. Cells 2019;8:839 doi:10.3390/cells8080839 pmid:31387313
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Maillard P,
    2. Carmichael O,
    3. Harvey D, et al
    . FLAIR and diffusion MRI signals are independent predictors of white matter hyperintensities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:54–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3146 pmid:22700749
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Bettcher BM,
    2. Walsh CM,
    3. Watson C, et al
    . Body mass and white matter integrity: the influence of vascular and inflammatory markers. PLoS One 2013;8:e77741 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077741 pmid:24147070
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Kullmann S,
    2. Schweizer F,
    3. Veit R, et al
    . Compromised white matter integrity in obesity. Obes Rev 2015;16:273–81 doi:10.1111/obr.12248 pmid:25676886
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Liu G,
    2. Allen B,
    3. Lopez O, et al
    . Racial differences in gray matter integrity by diffusion tensor in black and white octogenarians. Curr Alzheimer Res 2015;12:648–54 doi:10.2174/1567205011666141107153634 pmid:25387332
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 12, 2022.
  • Accepted after revision October 15, 2022.
  • © 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 43 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 43, Issue 12
1 Dec 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of Arterial Stiffness on Cerebral WM Integrity in Older Adults: A Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging and Magnetization Transfer Saturation Imaging Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J. Kikuta, K. Kamagata, M. Abe, C. Andica, Y. Saito, K. Takabayashi, W. Uchida, H. Naito, H. Tabata, A. Wada, Y. Tamura, R. Kawamori, H. Watada, S. Aoki
Effects of Arterial Stiffness on Cerebral WM Integrity in Older Adults: A Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging and Magnetization Transfer Saturation Imaging Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2022, 43 (12) 1706-1712; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7709

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Arterial Stiffness & White Matter in Older Adults
J. Kikuta, K. Kamagata, M. Abe, C. Andica, Y. Saito, K. Takabayashi, W. Uchida, H. Naito, H. Tabata, A. Wada, Y. Tamura, R. Kawamori, H. Watada, S. Aoki
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2022, 43 (12) 1706-1712; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7709
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (4)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Association of the triglyceride-glucose index variability with blood pressure and hypertension: a cohort study
    D Wang, W Li, M Zhou, J Ma, Y Guo, J Yuan, M He, X Zhang, W Chen
    QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 2024 117 4
  • Interstitial Fluidopathy of the Central Nervous System: An Umbrella Term for Disorders with Impaired Neurofluid Dynamics
    Toshiaki Taoka, Rintaro Ito, Rei Nakamichi, Toshiki Nakane, Hisashi Kawai, Shinji Naganawa
    Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 2024 23 1
  • Early Vascular Aging (EVA)
    Pierre Boutouyrie, Pedro Guimarães Cunha
    2024
  • Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
    Madoka Nakajima, Kostadin Karagiozov
    2023

More in this TOC Section

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Functional

  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Brain Iron in Niemann-Pick Type C: 7T Study
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire