Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Review ArticleReview Articles
Open Access

The Role of Functional Dopamine-Transporter SPECT Imaging in Parkinsonian Syndromes, Part 2

T.C. Booth, M. Nathan, A.D. Waldman, A.-M. Quigley, A.H. Schapira and J. Buscombe
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2015, 36 (2) 236-244; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3971
T.C. Booth
aFrom the Department of Neuroradiology (T.C.B.), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Nathan
bDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (M.N., A.-M.Q.), Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.D. Waldman
cDepartment of Imaging (A.D.W.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.-M. Quigley
bDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (M.N., A.-M.Q.), Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.H. Schapira
dDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences (A.H.S.), Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Buscombe
eDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (J.B.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: The functional imaging technique most widely used in European clinics to differentiate a true parkinsonian syndrome from vascular parkinsonism, drug-induced changes, or essential tremor is dopamine-transporter SPECT. This technique commonly reports dopamine-transporter function, with decreasing striatal uptake demonstrating increasingly severe disease. The strength of dopamine-transporter SPECT is that nigrostriatal degeneration is observed in both clinically inconclusive parkinsonism and early, even premotor, disease. In this clinical review (Part 2), we present the dopamine-transporter SPECT findings in a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, including multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and dementia with Lewy bodies. The findings in vascular parkinsonism, drug-induced parkinsonism, and essential tremor are also described. It is hoped that this technique will be the forerunner of a range of routinely used, process-specific ligands that can identify early degenerative disease and subsequently guide disease-modifying interventions.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CBD
corticobasal degeneration
DaT
dopamine transporters
18F
fluorine 18
IBF
123I-(S)-5-iodo-7-N-{(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl) methyl}carboxamido-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran
IBZM
123I-S-(K)-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2-hydroxy-3-iodo-6-methoxybenzamide
123I-FP-CIT
123I-ioflupane (N-ω-fluoropropyl-β CIT)
MSA
multiple system atrophy
MSA-P
patients with multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism
PSP
progressive supranuclear palsy

The dopamine transporter is a sodium chloride–dependent transmembrane protein localized to the presynaptic nigrostriatal cell surface. SPECT imaging of dopamine transporters (DaT) with specific tracers gives a guide to the attenuation of functional dopaminergic neurons. The technical concepts of DaT-SPECT were outlined in Part 1 (The Role of Functional Dopamine Transporter SPECT Imaging in Parkinsonian Syndromes, Part 1) of this 2-part Review Article and would be valuable reading as background to this article.

What appears to be the strength of DaT-SPECT, like 6-[18F]-fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET, is that nigrostriatal degeneration is observed in both clinically inconclusive parkinsonism and early, even premotor, disease. DaT-SPECT images are easy to interpret compared with advanced MR imaging techniques; the cost is low compared with that of PET; all compliant patients can be imaged, unlike in transcranial sonography; and at least in Europe, SPECT is widely available compared with PET, advanced MR imaging, and transcranial sonography.

Parkinsonian syndromes are a group of movement disorders characterized by tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity. They are most frequently due to primary neurodegenerative disease, resulting in loss of dopaminergic nerve terminals along the nigrostriatal pathway, as occurs in idiopathic Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and dementia with Lewy bodies. Other causes of parkinsonism that do not involve nigrostriatal degeneration include drug-induced, vascular or toxic insult, and psychogenic disease. Patients with nigrostriatal degeneration may benefit from dopaminergic medication, whereas nondegenerative or postsynaptic etiologies do not.

The Table demonstrates the distinguishing clinical features of idiopathic Parkinson disease, MSA, PSP, CBD, and dementia with Lewy bodies. Due to its multisystem involvement, patients with MSA are typically subdivided into those who present with predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P) and those with predominant cerebellar ataxia (MSA-C). The clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease, based on clinical signs, assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and good response to levodopa,1 can be straightforward. However, mild, atypical, or ambiguous signs with unconvincing responses to levodopa, can make the diagnosis inconclusive.2 This may have adverse prognostic implications in the management of parkinsonism.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Distinguishing clinical features of the neurodegenerative and non-neurodegenerative causes of parkinsonism

Another important clinical differential diagnosis is essential tremor. Typical cases of essential tremor are easily distinguished from idiopathic Parkinson disease, but diagnosis may be more of a challenge if the tremor is unilateral or if there is a dystonic upper limb tremor. Where there is clinical doubt, functional DaT-SPECT imaging may be decisive.

Multiple System Atrophy

Approximately 10% of patients with parkinsonism are diagnosed with MSA,3 which is characterized by widespread neurodegeneration, especially within the striatum, substantia nigra, pons, inferior olivary and vagal motor nuclei, cerebellum, and spinal cord.4

Structural MR imaging findings overlap in all MSA subtypes, independent of clinical presentation, though trends can be seen. In MSA-P, the putamen may demonstrate a rim of increased signal on T2-weighted sequences due to gliosis (Fig 1).5 In MSA with predominant cerebellar ataxia, pontocerebellar degeneration may result in visually apparent cerebellar and pontine atrophy, which, along with MSA-P to a lesser extent, is associated with increased signal on T2-weighted sequences in the middle cerebellar peduncles, cerebellum, and the pontine transverse fibers and raphe (“hot cross bun” sign) (Fig 2).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Axial T2-weighted MR imaging sequence at 1.5T in a patient with MSA-P (A) demonstrating hyperintense putaminal rims. The sign is 96% specific in differentiating patients with MSA from those with idiopathic Parkinson disease; however, it is only 56% sensitive according to 1 study.6 The corresponding coronal T1-weighted MR imaging sequence (B) shows that the putaminal rims are hypointense. The putaminal rim sign is nonspecific in the wider population—for example, it can be seen in Wilson disease or some spinocerebellar ataxia subtypes. It is also a normal finding at 3T.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Axial T2-weighted MR imaging sequence in a patient with MSA with predominant cerebellar ataxia (A) demonstrating the “hot-cross bun” sign, which results from selective loss of myelinated pontine transverse fibers and raphe neurons. One study showed that the sign is 100% specific in differentiating patients with MSA from those with idiopathic Parkinson disease; however, it is only 50% sensitive.6 Marked pontine and cerebellar atrophy is also demonstrated. This olivopontocerebellar volume loss is shown on the sagittal T1-weighted sequences (B), where a middle cerebellar peduncle width <8 mm is demonstrated. All these signs are nonspecific in the wider population—for example, they can be seen in some spinocerebellar ataxia subtypes.

Atrophy is most evident in patients with well-established disease. If one uses a cutoff value of 8 mm, the middle cerebellar peduncle width allows differentiation of patients with MSA compared with controls or those with idiopathic Parkinson disease with 100% positive predictive value (Fig 2).6 Volumetry and voxel-based morphometry group studies show striatal and cerebellar volume loss in patients with MSA-P compared with those with idiopathic Parkinson disease and controls.7⇓–9 Voxel-based morphometry also demonstrates selective cortical atrophy in MSA-P, affecting the motor cortical targets of basal ganglia output pathways such as the primary sensorimotor and lateral premotor cortices and the prefrontal and insular cortices.8

Although validation in prospective studies is required, high regional ADC in patients with MSA-P appears discriminatory. With 100% positive predictive value, putaminal ADC differentiates MSA-P and idiopathic Parkinson disease,10 whereas middle cerebellar peduncle ADC distinguishes MSA-P from PSP and idiopathic Parkinson disease.11 Similarly, when combined with DTI, high ADC and low fractional anisotropy in either the pons, cerebellum, or putamen are demonstrated in all patients with MSA-P, allowing this disease to be distinguished from idiopathic Parkinson disease.12 Although less impressive than diffusion-based strategies, at 3T 1H-MRS, combined assessment of the NAA/Cr ratio in the pontine base and putamen may be effective in differentiating MSA-P from idiopathic Parkinson disease.13

With transcranial sonography, a combination of lenticular hyperechogenicity and normal echogenicity of the substantia nigra distinguishes MSA-P from idiopathic Parkinson disease with a positive predictive value of 100%.14 With 6-[18F]fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET, MSA may be indistinguishable from idiopathic Parkinson disease or may show lower caudate uptake.15,16 PET studies also show reduced striatal dopamine-receptor binding and 18F-FDG uptake in MSA, with 1 study suggesting that MSA can be distinguished from idiopathic Parkinson disease with 100% positive predictive value.7,16

DaT-SPECT in Multiple System Atrophy

There is no discernible difference in the pattern of nigrostriatal degeneration between idiopathic Parkinson disease and MSA. This is reflected in DaT-SPECT imaging in which abnormal scan findings demonstrating asymmetric reduction in DaT binding are consistent with either disease (Fig 3).17,18 Recently, DaT-SPECT voxel-based morphometry has been used at the group level to distinguish MSA-P from idiopathic Parkinson disease.19 In the dorsal brain stem, there was greater signal reduction of patients with MSA-P compared with those with idiopathic Parkinson disease, and after a mean follow-up of 2.4 years, there was a greater signal reduction in the caudate and anterior putamen in patients with MSA-P compared with those with idiopathic Parkinson disease. This is in accordance with faster disease progression.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Axial 123I-FP-CIT DaT-SPECT image in a patient with MSA. Note that imaging appearances are similar to those in idiopathic Parkinson disease, with asymmetric reduction in putaminal uptake. It is, therefore, difficult to differentiate MSA and idiopathic Parkinson disease on the basis of DaT-SPECT imaging alone.

Similar to those who investigated PET, researchers have endeavored to distinguish idiopathic Parkinson disease and MSA by using SPECT dopamine D2 receptor imaging. Most striatal D2 receptors are located postsynaptically and function by facilitating cell-to-cell communication. They have a key role in modulating locomotion and are a critical target for dopaminergic therapeutics.20 SPECT radiolabeled ligands used to image D2 receptors are dopamine-receptor antagonists such as 123I-S-(K)-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2-hydroxy-3-iodo-6-methoxybenzamide (IBZM)21 and 123I-(S)-5-iodo-7-N-{(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl) methyl}carboxamido-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran (IBF).22 A neuropathologic study has demonstrated loss of striatal D2 receptors in patients with MSA,23 and there is corroborative evidence on SPECT24 and PET as described above. Therefore, in contrast to patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease who do not have reduced D2 receptor binding, patients with MSA may demonstrate a reduction in D2 receptors.25 This feature may also explain why patients with MSA do not show a noteworthy response to dopaminergic medication that binds to D2 receptors. Several studies have sought to differentiate idiopathic Parkinson disease from MSA or PSP by combining presynaptic DaT-SPECT with postsynaptic D2 imaging by using IBZM or IBF, and these are summarized below.

Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

PSP accounts for a small minority of patients with parkinsonism. Neuropathologically, this tauopathy is characterized by neuronal degeneration of the nigrostriatal pathway, basal ganglia, and brain stem nuclei with deposition of neurofibrillary tangles. A number of MR imaging features suggestive of PSP have been described, such as dilation of the third ventricle and signal increase of the midbrain.5,26 Although often absent, atrophy of the red nucleus, frontal and temporal lobe, and an anteroposterior midbrain diameter of <17 mm can each differentiate PSP from MSA with at least 75% positive predictive value (Fig 4). If one uses a “MR parkinsonism index” [(pons/midbrain) · (middle cerebellar peduncle/superior cerebellar peduncle)], PSP can be prospectively distinguished from idiopathic Parkinson disease, MSA-P, and controls with 100% positive predictive value.27 Group studies additionally demonstrate that atrophy in the striatum and frontotemporal cortices, measured with volumetry and voxel-based morphometry, respectively, differentiate those with PSP from controls.9,28 Additionally, white matter atrophy in the subthalamic region can distinguish PSP from controls and idiopathic Parkinson disease when using voxel-based morphometry.29

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Axial T2-weighted MR imaging sequence in a patient with PSP (A) demonstrating increased midbrain signal intensity (which is only 60% sensitive and 70% specific compared with MSA) and an atrophic midbrain with an anteroposterior diameter of <17 mm (which is 23% sensitive and 96% specific compared with MSA).5 The signs are nonspecific in the wider population—for example, midbrain signal intensity can be seen in Wilson disease and a severely atrophic midbrain can be seen in CBD. The concave posterolateral borders of the atrophic midbrain give it a “morning glory” flower appearance. The corresponding sagittal T1-weighted sequence (B) shows tectal atrophy with a “hummingbird” appearance.

With similarities to MSA, diffusion imaging and PET may have roles in diagnosing PSP. ADC is increased in the decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncles compared with idiopathic Parkinson disease, MSA, and control groups,30 and elevated putaminal ADC might discriminate PSP and idiopathic Parkinson disease with a positive predictive value of 100%.31 With PET, 11C-raclopride demonstrates reduced striatal dopamine receptor binding,32 while 18F-FDG is reduced in the putamen, thalamus, frontal cortex, and midbrain.33

DaT-SPECT in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

In PSP, some DaT-SPECT studies show a predominant loss of DaT density in the putamen, comparable with idiopathic Parkinson disease,17 whereas others demonstrate more uniform DaT loss in both the caudate nucleus and putamen.34 Overall, on the basis of DaT-SPECT results alone, it is not possible to reliably distinguish idiopathic Parkinson disease, MSA, and PSP (Fig 5).17,18 As with MSA, there appears to be D2 receptor striatal loss in PSP, and the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT to differentiate MSA from PSP is low.24

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Axial 123I-FP-CIT DaT-SPECT image in a patient with PSP, depicting a bilateral reduction in putaminal uptake. Note that the imaging features are similar to those of idiopathic Parkinson disease and MSA.

In some cases of MSA and PSP, the postsynaptic tracer has normal uptake. As such, a meta-analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT in parkinsonian syndromes found that postsynaptic and presynaptic tracers could not reliably distinguish idiopathic Parkinson disease and MSA or PSP.35 Nonetheless, while negative postsynaptic SPECT scan findings do not exclude MSA or PSP, the positive predictive value of abnormal postsynaptic SPECT findings for the diagnosis of these conditions is very high; therefore, reduced postsynaptic radiotracer binding effectively excludes a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease.

Some studies combining DaT-SPECT with IBZM or IBF have shown that idiopathic Parkinson disease can be differentiated from MSA or PSP,36,37 whereas others have demonstrated otherwise.38,39 More promising is a recent prospective study, which, by using a combination of DaT-SPECT, 123I-IBZM SPECT, and meta-123I-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy (which probes myocardial adrenergic denervation seen in idiopathic Parkinson disease), reports a positive predictive value of 89%, and a negative predictive value of 97% (Fig 6).40

Fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6.

Axial 123I-FP-CIT DaT-SPECT, 123I-IBZM, and meta-123I-iodobenzylguanidine SPECT studies in idiopathic Parkinson disease (A) and atypical Parkinson disease (MSA or PSP) (B). Uptake patterns with all 3 radiopharmaceuticals are typical for idiopathic Parkinson disease with asymmetric striatal reduction using 123I-FP-CIT, normal dopamine D2 receptor binding with 123I-IBZM, and reduction in myocardial uptake due to adrenergic denervation with meta-123I-iodobenzylguanidine (A). B, Images demonstrate findings of MSA or PSP: reduced striatal uptake with 123I-FP-CIT and 123I-IBZM but normal myocardial uptake with meta-123I-iodobenzylguanidine. Image courtesy of Dr M. Südmeyer. This was originally published in: Südmeyer M, Antke C, Zizek T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of combined FP-CIT, IBZM, and MIBG scintigraphy in the differential diagnosis of degenerative parkinsonism: a multidimensional statistical approach. J Nucl Med 2011;52:733–40. © by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Corticobasal Degeneration

CBD is a rare movement disorder presenting with rigidity, hypokinesia, and predominantly asymmetric cortical dysfunction. It is characterized by deposition of tau proteins in the form of neuronal inclusion bodies. On conventional MR imaging, asymmetric frontoparietal atrophy might distinguish patients with CBD from those with idiopathic Parkinson disease or MSA (Fig 7).26 To differentiate CBD from PSP, another tauopathy with frontal atrophy, measuring cortical atrophy with voxel-based morphometry or volumetry appears promising,41,42 as does probing motor thalamic involvement with ADC.43 With 18F-FDG there is asymmetric hypometabolism in the parietal lobe, while striatal dopamine-receptor binding is relatively preserved.44 Transcranial sonography shows substantia nigra hyperechogenicity but does not allow discrimination between idiopathic Parkinson disease and CBD or dementia with Lewy bodies.14

Fig 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 7.

Axial T2-weighted MR imaging sequence in a patient with CBD (A) demonstrating asymmetric frontoparietal atrophy. The corresponding coronal FLAIR sequence (B) shows the asymmetric superior parietal lobules.

DaT-SPECT in Corticobasal Degeneration

In CBD, the dopaminergic neurons of 10% of cases appear to have preserved DaT density, whereas the remainder of cases that are affected tend to show a more uniform DaT reduction throughout the striatum and greater hemispheric asymmetry compared with idiopathic Parkinson disease (Fig 8).45 However, DaT-SPECT does not allow CBD to be distinguished from idiopathic Parkinson disease, PSP, MSA, and dementia with Lewy bodies at the individual level.39 SPECT imaging of the D2 receptor is of limited value, with studies showing either normal or slightly reduced D2 receptor binding.39,46

Fig 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 8.

Axial 123I-FP-CIT DaT SPECT image in a patient with corticobasal degeneration. There is uniform striatal reduction in tracer activity with marked hemispheric asymmetry on the left. However, in many cases, imaging appearances can be indistinguishable from those in idiopathic Parkinson disease, MSA, or PSP. Image courtesy of Dr Roberto Ceravolo, Department of Neurosciences, University of Pisa, Italy.45

Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Dementia with Lewy bodies is a form of dementia that is thought to be related to idiopathic Parkinson disease. In contrast to idiopathic Parkinson disease, Lewy bodies are found not only in the deep gray matter but diffusely throughout the brain including the cortex. It is the second most common cause of dementia after Alzheimer disease, and distinguishing the 2 diseases is often a diagnostic challenge because the clinical features can overlap. Alzheimer disease accounts for 31% of those with dementia, presenting with short-term memory decline, language dysfunction, neuropsychiatric features, and, in 5% of cases, parkinsonism.47⇓–49 Dementia with Lewy bodies accounts for approximately 11% of patients with dementia and can present with falls or depression, which are also seen in Alzheimer disease; fluctuating dementia; and the more discriminatory presentations of visual hallucinations, multiple features, and, in 41% of cases, parkinsonism. Of note, the clinical features of parkinsonism in both forms of dementia are less severe than those seen in idiopathic Parkinson disease, presenting commonly with rigidity and bradykinesia and infrequently with resting tremor.50

It is difficult to differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies from other dementias, though by using MR imaging to differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia, the absence of medial temporal lobe atrophy is highly suggestive of dementia with Lewy bodies.51 With voxel-based morphometry, compared with Alzheimer disease, atrophy in the midbrain, hypothalamus, and substantia innominata is marked and the medial temporal lobe is relatively preserved.52 Nonetheless, medial temporal lobe atrophy often occurs in dementia with Lewy bodies, with volumetry showing the entorhinal cortex to be smaller than that in control and idiopathic Parkinson disease groups.53 In the parietal lobe of those with dementia with Lewy bodies, DTI appears to show reduced fractional anisotropy compared with control or Alzheimer disease groups.54 While in the occipital lobe of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies, compared with patients with Alzheimer disease, hypoperfusion and hypometabolism are demonstrated by reduced hexamethylpropylene amine oxime and 18F-FDG uptake, respectively.55,56

DaT-SPECT in Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Postmortem studies have shown normal levels of putaminal dopamine in Alzheimer disease compared with a 72% reduction in dementia with Lewy bodies.57 This finding is reflected in DaT-SPECT studies that show an asymmetric reduction in DAT binding in dementia with Lewy bodies compared with a normal appearance in Alzheimer disease, allowing differentiation with 90% positive predictive value (Fig 9).39,58 It is particularly important to exclude dementia with Lewy bodies if the patient requires treatment for hallucinations. Otherwise, a parkinsonian crisis may be precipitated in a patient with dementia with Lewy bodies because some neuroleptic drugs block the postsynaptic D2 receptor, thereby exacerbating the shortage of dopamine within the synaptic cleft. More than half of such patients will have severe adverse reactions, some of which are fatal.49

Fig 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 9.

Axial 123I-FP-CIT DaT-SPECT images in a patient with dementia with Lewy bodies (A) and a patient with Alzheimer disease (B). Note that the DaT-SPECT study helped to distinguish the 2 causes of dementia with the patient with dementia with Lewy bodies exhibiting a Catafau and Tolosa2 type 3 pattern of abnormal striatal uptake; in contrast, the patient with Alzheimer disease demonstrates normal striatal uptake. Images from both patients have low gain as demonstrated by low background activity.

DaT-SPECT does not allow idiopathic Parkinson disease with dementia (an arbitrary definition of dementia developing at least 1 year after the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease) and dementia with Lewy bodies to be distinguished.58

Other DaT SPECT Imaging Features

Idiopathic Parkinson Disease versus Vascular Parkinsonism.

Because vascular lesions are often incidental findings in patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease, it is often difficult to diagnose parkinsonism secondary to vascular lesions (vascular parkinsonism). Criteria for the diagnosis of vascular parkinsonism have been described by Zijlmans et al59 following a detailed clinical and neuropathologic analysis of the condition. The authors proposed that the diagnosis of vascular parkinsonism could be made if the following clinicoradiologic features were present: 1) bradykinesia with at least 1 of the following: resting tremor, rigidity, or postural instability; 2) cerebrovascular disease demonstrated either on CT/MR imaging or by the presence of focal clinical signs of stroke; and 3) a relationship between the 2 disorders: specifically, an acute or delayed progressive onset with infarcts in or near areas that can increase the basal ganglia motor output (globus pallidus or substantia nigra pars compacta) or decrease the thalamocortical drive directly (thalamus or large frontal lobe infarct), or an insidious onset of parkinsonism with extensive subcortical white matter lesions, bilateral symptoms at onset, and the presence of an early shuffling gait or cognitive dysfunction.

These criteria, even when applied to the retrospective sample from which they were derived, are not 100% sensitive. DaT-SPECT has, therefore, been used to help establish the diagnosis of vascular parkinsonism because the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway is typically unaffected,59 and consequently, the DaT binding will not be reduced as in idiopathic Parkinson disease.39 The caveat is that occasionally a massive vascular infarct within the striatum can cause moderate nigrostriatal degeneration60; therefore, though infrequent, marked asymmetry can be evident on DaT-SPECT. Nonetheless, in the absence of postsynaptic causes of parkinsonism (eg, drug-induced) and the presence of vascular lesions on CT/MR imaging (eg, a “punched out” lesion characteristic of an infarct or the diffuse white matter disease of ischemia), in an appropriate clinical context, normal DaT-SPECT findings are diagnostic of vascular parkinsonism (Fig 10).1 Overall, a meta-analysis of the diagnostic differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson disease and vascular parkinsonism by using DaT-SPECT demonstrated a sensitivity of 80%–100% and a specificity of 73%–100%.38

Fig 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 10.

Axial 123I-FP-CIT DaT-SPECT (A) and axial MR imaging FLAIR sequence (B) of the brain in the same patient with vascular parkinsonism. Note that the DAT-SPECT study has normal findings with symmetric, intense uptake in the caudate nuclei and putamina. This effectively excludes a nigrostriatal degenerative cause of parkinsonism. Consistent with ischemic disease, the MR imaging demonstrates diffuse T2-weighted hyperintensities in the striatum and in the periventricular and subcortical white matter.

Idiopathic Parkinson Disease versus Drug-Induced Parkinsonism.

Drugs that have a competitive antagonistic effect on the postsynaptic D2 receptors, such as neuroleptics (eg, olanzapine) and centrally acting antiemetics (eg, metoclopramide), can cause parkinsonism, which is usually reversible. Clinically, it can be very difficult to distinguish drug-induced parkinsonism from idiopathic Parkinson disease.1 However, in contrast to idiopathic Parkinson disease, DaT-SPECT imaging has either normal findings or depicts increased striatal DAT activity, the latter suggesting a compensatory up-regulation of DaT in response to D2 receptor blockade.38,61 Of clinical importance is the masking of early idiopathic Parkinson disease in patients with schizophrenia on neuroleptic medication. In these cases, the DaT-SPECT study findings will be abnormal, in keeping with coexistent idiopathic Parkinson disease (or another neurodegenerative parkinsonian syndrome) (Fig 11).

Fig 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 11.

Axial 123I-FP-CIT DaT-SPECT image from a patient with schizophrenia on neuroleptic medication. The patient presented with extrapyramidal signs. If the patient's clinical signs were purely due to the side effects of neuroleptic medication, then the DaT-SPECT study findings would be normal. However, in this case, there is absent putaminal uptake bilaterally and asymmetric caudate nuclei uptake (Catafau and Tolosa2 type 2), indicative of coexistent idiopathic Parkinson disease, MSA, or PSP.

Idiopathic Parkinson Disease and Essential Tremor.

Typically, the unilateral resting tremor of idiopathic Parkinson disease can be distinguished from the symmetric essential tremor on clinical grounds, especially when there are other signs of parkinsonism. However, clinical confusion may occur when the 2 diagnoses coexist or when there are equivocal parkinsonian features. In these cases, DaT-SPECT discriminates essential tremor and idiopathic Parkinson disease because patients with essential tremor consistently have, effectively, normal striatal DaT binding.18,38,39,62 Indeed, in a meta-analysis of the diagnostic differentiation of essential tremor and idiopathic Parkinson disease using DaT-SPECT, the study with the lowest sensitivity and specificity reported percentages of 80% and 95%, respectively.35 Recently, DaT-SPECT has challenged the view that essential tremor has absolutely no pathophysiologic effect on dopaminergic transmission because a slight reduction in caudate DaT binding has been noted.62

Rare Causes of Parkinsonism

Nigrostriatal degeneration may also be seen in other, rarer, causes of parkinsonism. Wilson disease demonstrates striatal DaT-SPECT reduction comparable with that in idiopathic Parkinson disease.63 Similarly, reductions in DaT binding are seen in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.64 Neuroacanthocytosis encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by the association of neurologic abnormalities with red cell acanthocytosis. They are categorized into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of movement disorders. In patients with neuroacanthocytosis presenting with movement disorders, there is underlying degeneration of the striatum.65 Therefore, it can be inferred that DaT-SPECT imaging is likely to be abnormal in these cases (Fig 12).

Fig 12.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 12.

Axial 123I-FP-CIT DaT-SPECT image (A) and axial T2*-weighted MR imaging sequence (B) in the same patient with neuroacanthocytosis. The patient presented with parkinsonian features. Note the asymmetric reduction of 123I-FP-CIT uptake in the left putamen. MR imaging depicts marked hypointensity in the caudate nuclei and putamina, indicative of iron deposition, which is a feature of neuroacanthocytosis.

In conclusion, dopamine-transporter imaging, in particular DaT-SPECT, reliably distinguishes neurodegenerative causes of parkinsonism (idiopathic Parkinson disease, MSA, PSP, and CBD) from parkinsonism without nigrostriatal DaT loss (such as essential tremor, vascular parkinsonism, and drug-induced parkinsonism). DaT-SPECT alone cannot differentiate the disorders within the neurodegenerative group, whereas initial studies using a combination of radiotracers or other advanced imaging techniques appear promising. DaT-SPECT also helps to differentiate dementia secondary to Lewy body deposition and Alzheimer disease, thereby avoiding a potential treatment-induced parkinsonian crisis. It is hoped that this technique will be the forerunner of a range of routinely used, process-specific ligands that can identify early degenerative disease and subsequently guide disease-modifying interventions.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Jonathan Hart for help in manuscript preparation.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Ann-Marie Quigley—RELATED: Other: Travel, hotel and conference fees were paid by Novartis to attend the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2013 meeting; travel and hotel paid by Nordion to attend the TheraSphere User Group in 2013; No fees were paid to me or my institution. Adam D. Waldman—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Bayer Healthcare, Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Bayer Healthcare, Siemens Healthcare, Comments: fees for lectures on education courses, Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Bayer Healthcare, Comments: expenses for attendance at meetings for discussion groups and consultancy. John Buscombe—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Navidea, Comments: for work on Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency submission, Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: BTG, Comments: to learn about TheraSpheres, Germany, February 2014. Anthony H. Schapira—RELATED: receives Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust funding.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Scherfler C,
    2. Schwarz J,
    3. Antonini A, et al
    . Role of DAT-SPECT in the diagnostic work-up of parkinsonism. Mov Disord 2007;22:1229–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Catafau AM,
    2. Tolosa E
    . Impact of dopamine transporter SPECT using 123I-Ioflupane on diagnosis and management of patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord 2004;19:1175–82
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Quinn N
    . Multiple system atrophy: the nature of the beast. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989(suppl):78–89
  4. 4.↵
    1. Papp MI,
    2. Lantos PL
    . The distribution of oligodendroglial inclusions in multiple system atrophy and its relevance to clinical symptomatology. Brain 1994;117:235–43
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Schrag A,
    2. Good CD,
    3. Miszkiel K, et al
    . Differentiation of atypical parkinsonian syndromes with routine MRI. Neurology 2000;54:697–702
    CrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nicoletti G,
    2. Fera F,
    3. Condino F, et al
    . MR imaging of middle cerebellar peduncle width: differentiation of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson disease. Radiology 2006;239:825–30
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ghaemi M,
    2. Hilker R,
    3. Rudolf J, et al
    . Differentiating multiple system atrophy from Parkinson's disease: contribution of striatal and midbrain MRI volumetry and multi-tracer PET. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:517–23
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Brenneis C,
    2. Seppi K,
    3. Schocke MF, et al
    . Voxel-based morphometry detects cortical atrophy in the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord 2003;18:1132–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schulz JB,
    2. Skalej M,
    3. Wedekind D, et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry differentiates idiopathic Parkinson's syndrome from multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Neurol 1999;45:65–74
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Schocke MF,
    2. Seppi K,
    3. Esterhammer R, et al
    . Diffusion-weighted MRI differentiates the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy from PD. Neurology 2002;58:575–80
    CrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Nicoletti G,
    2. Lodi R,
    3. Condino F, et al
    . Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the middle cerebellar peduncle differentiate the Parkinson variant of MSA from Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain 2006;129:2679–87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ito M,
    2. Watanabe H,
    3. Kawai Y, et al
    . Usefulness of combined fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of involvement in multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:722–28
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Watanabe H,
    2. Fukatsu H,
    3. Katsuno M, et al
    . Multiple regional 1H-MR spectroscopy in multiple system atrophy: NAA/Cr reduction in pontine base as a valuable diagnostic marker. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:103–09
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Berg D,
    2. Godau J,
    3. Walter U
    . Transcranial sonography in movement disorders. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:1044–55
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Brooks DJ,
    2. Salmon EP,
    3. Mathias CJ, et al
    . The relationship between locomotor disability, autonomic dysfunction, and the integrity of the striatal dopaminergic system in patients with multiple system atrophy, pure autonomic failure, and Parkinson's disease, studied with PET. Brain 1990;113:1539–52
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Antonini A,
    2. Leenders KL,
    3. Vontobel P, et al
    . Complementary PET studies of striatal neuronal function in the differential diagnosis between multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease. Brain 1997;120:2187–95
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Brücke T,
    2. Asenbaum S,
    3. Pirker W, et al
    . Measurement of the dopaminergic degeneration in Parkinson's disease with [123I] beta-CIT and SPECT: correlation with clinical findings and comparison with multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neural Transm Suppl 1997;50:9–24
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Benamer TS,
    2. Patterson J,
    3. Grosset DG, et al
    . Accurate differentiation of parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the [123I]-FP-CIT study group. Mov Disord 2000;15:503–10
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Nocker M,
    2. Seppi K,
    3. Donnemiller E, et al
    . Progression of dopamine transporter decline in patients with the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy: a voxel-based analysis of [123I]beta-CIT SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:1012–20
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Seeman P,
    2. Niznik H
    . Dopamine receptors and transporters in Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia. FASEB J 1990;4:2737–44
    Abstract
  21. 21.↵
    1. Costa DC,
    2. Verhoeff NP,
    3. Cullum ID, et al
    . In vivo characterisation of 3-iodo-6-methoxybenzamide 123I in humans. Eur J Nucl Med 1990;16:813–16
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Ichise M,
    2. Ballinger JR,
    3. Vines D, et al
    . Simplified quantification and reproducibility studies of dopamine D2-receptor binding with iodine-123-IBF SPECT in healthy subjects. J Nucl Med 1997;38:31–37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Churchyard A,
    2. Donnan GA,
    3. Hughes A, et al
    . Dopa resistance in multiple-system atrophy: loss of postsynaptic D2 receptors. Ann Neurol 1993;34:219–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. van Royen E,
    2. Verhoeff NPLG,
    3. Speelman JD, et al
    . Multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy: diminished striatal D2-receptor activity demonstrated by 123I-IBZM single photon emission computed tomography. Arch Neurol 1993;50:513–16
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Schwarz J,
    2. Tatsch K,
    3. Gasser T, et al
    . 123I-IBZM binding compared with long-term clinical follow up in patients with de novo parkinsonism. Mov Disord 1998;13:16–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Yekhlef F,
    2. Ballan G,
    3. Macia F, et al
    . Routine MRI for the differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, MSA, PSP, and CBD. J Neural Transm 2003;110:151–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Quattrone A,
    2. Nicoletti G,
    3. Messina D, et al
    . MR imaging index for differentiation of progressive supranuclear palsy from Parkinson disease and the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy. Radiology 2008;246:214–21
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Brenneis C,
    2. Seppi K,
    3. Schocke MF, et al
    . Voxel-based morphometry reveals a distinct pattern of frontal atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:246–49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Price S,
    2. Paviour D,
    3. Scahill R, et al
    . Voxel-based morphometry detects patterns of atrophy that help differentiate progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage 2004;23:663–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Blain CR,
    2. Barker GJ,
    3. Jarosz JM, et al
    . Measuring brain stem and cerebellar damage in parkinsonian syndromes using diffusion tensor MRI. Neurology 2006;67:2199–205
    CrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Seppi K,
    2. Schocke MF,
    3. Esterhammer R, et al
    . Diffusion-weighted imaging discriminates progressive supranuclear palsy from PD, but not from the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy. Neurology 2003;60:922–27
    CrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Brooks DJ,
    2. Ibanez V,
    3. Sawle GV, et al
    . Striatal D2 receptors in patients with Parkinson's disease, striatonigral degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy, measured with11C-raclopride and positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1992;31:184–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Garraux G,
    2. Salmon E,
    3. Degueldre C, et al
    . Comparison of impaired subcortico-frontal metabolic networks in normal aging, subcortico-frontal dementia, and cortical frontal dementia. Neuroimage 1999;10:149–62
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Antonini A,
    2. Benti R,
    3. De NR, et al
    . 123I-Ioflupane SPECT binding to striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) uptake in patients with Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurol Sci 2003;24:149–50
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Vlaar AM,
    2. van Kroonenburgh MJ,
    3. Kessels AG, et al
    . Meta-analysis of the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT in parkinsonian syndromes. BMC Neurol 2007;1:27
  36. 36.↵
    1. Koch W,
    2. Hamann C,
    3. Radau PE, et al
    . Does combined imaging of the pre-and postsynaptic dopaminergic system increase the diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:1265–73
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kim YJ,
    2. Ichise M,
    3. Ballainger JR, et al
    . Combination of dopamine transporter and D2 receptor SPECT in the diagnostic evaluation of PD, MSA and PSP. Mov Disord 2002;2:303–12
  38. 38.↵
    1. Vlaar AM,
    2. de Nijs T,
    3. Kessels AG, et al
    . Diagnostic value of 123I-Ioflupane and 123I-iodobenzamide SPECT scans in 248 patients with Parkinsonian syndromes. Eur Neurol 2008;59:258–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Plotkin M,
    2. Amthauer H,
    3. Klaffke S, et al
    . Combined [123I]-FPCIT and [123I]-IBZM SPECT for the diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes: study on 72 patients. J Neural Transm 2005;112:677–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Südmeyer M,
    2. Antke C,
    3. Zizek T, et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of combined FP-CIT, IBZM, and MIBG scintigraphy in the differential diagnosis of degenerative parkinsonism: a multidimensional statistical approach. J Nucl Med 2011;52:733–40
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Gröschel K,
    2. Hauser TK,
    3. Luft A, et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry differentiates progressive supranuclear palsy from corticobasal degeneration. Neuroimage 2004;21:714–24
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Boxer AL,
    2. Geschwind MD,
    3. Belfor N, et al
    . Patterns of brain atrophy that differentiate corticobasal degeneration syndrome from progressive supranuclear palsy. Arch Neurol 2006;63:81–86
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Erbetta A,
    2. Mandelli ML,
    3. Savoiardo M, et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging shows different topographic involvement of the thalamus in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1482–87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Klaffke S,
    2. Kuhn AA,
    3. Plotkin M, et al
    . Dopamine transporters, D2 receptors, and glucose metabolism in corticobasal degeneration. Mov Disord 2006;21:1724–27
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Cilia R,
    2. Rossi C,
    3. Frosini D, et al
    . Dopamine transporter SPECT imaging in corticobasal syndrome. PLoS One 2011;6:e18301
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Pirker S,
    2. Perju-Dumbrava L,
    3. Kovacs GG, et al
    . Dopamine D2 receptor SPECT in corticobasal syndrome and autopsy-confirmed corticobasal degeneration. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2013;19:222–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Stevens T,
    2. Livingston G,
    3. Kitchen G, et al
    . Islington study of dementia subtypes in the community. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:270–76
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Ala TA,
    2. Yang KH,
    3. Sung JH, et al
    . Hallucinations and signs of parkinsonism help distinguish patients with dementia and cortical Lewy bodies from patients with Alzheimer's disease at presentation: a clinicopathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;62:16–21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. McKeith I,
    2. Fairbairn A,
    3. Perry R, et al
    . Neuroleptic sensitivity in patients with senile dementia of Lewy body type. BMJ 1992;305:673–78
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Ditter SM,
    2. Mirra SS
    . Neuropathologic and clinical features of Parkinson's disease in Alzheimer's disease patients. Neurology 1987;37:754–60
    CrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    1. Barber R,
    2. Gholkar A,
    3. Scheltens P, et al
    . Medial temporal lobe atrophy on MRI in dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology 1999;52:1153–58
    CrossRef
  52. 52.↵
    1. Whitwell JL,
    2. Weigand SD,
    3. Shiung MM, et al
    . Focal atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies on MRI: a distinct pattern from Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2007;130:708–19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Kenny ER,
    2. Burton EJ,
    3. O'Brien JT
    . A volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study of entorhinal cortex volume in dementia with Lewy bodies: a comparison with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease with and without dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008;26:218–25
    CrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Firbank MJ,
    2. Blamire AM,
    3. Krishnan MS, et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry Res 2007;155:135–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Lobotesis K,
    2. Fenwick JD,
    3. Phipps A, et al
    . Occipital hypoperfusion on SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies but not AD. Neurology 2001;56:643–49
    CrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    1. Gilman S,
    2. Koeppe RA,
    3. Little R, et al
    . Differentiation of Alzheimer's disease from dementia with Lewy bodies utilizing positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and neuropsychological testing. Exp Neurol 2005;191:S95–S103
    CrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Piggott MA,
    2. Marshall EF,
    3. Thomas N, et al
    . Striatal dopaminergic markers in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases: rostrocaudal distribution. Brain 1999;122:1449–68
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. O'Brien JT,
    2. Colloby S,
    3. Fenwick J, et al
    . Dopamine transporter loss visualized with FP-CIT SPECT in the differential diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. Arch Neurol 2004;61:919–25
    CrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Zijlmans JC,
    2. Daniel SE,
    3. Hughes AJ, et al
    . Clinicopathological investigation of vascular parkinsonism, including clinical criteria for diagnosis. Mov Disord 2004;19:630–40
    CrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Forno L
    . Reaction of the substantia nigra to massive basal ganglia infarction. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1983;62:96–102
    CrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Sjøholm H,
    2. Bratlid T,
    3. Sundsfjord J
    . [123I]-beta-CIT SPECT demonstrates increased presynaptic dopamine transporter binding sites in basal ganglia in vivo in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2004;173:27–31
    CrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Isaias IU,
    2. Marotta G,
    3. Hirano S, et al
    . Imaging essential tremor. Mov Disord 2010;25:679–86
    CrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Jeon B,
    2. Kim JM,
    3. Jeong JM
    . Dopamine transporter imaging with [123I]-beta-CIT demonstrates presynaptic nigrostriatal dopaminergic damage in Wilson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:60–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    1. Borasio GD,
    2. Linke R,
    3. Schwarz J, et al
    . Dopaminergic deficit in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis assessed with [I-123] IPT single photon emission computed tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:263–65
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    1. Ichiba M,
    2. Nakamura M,
    3. Sano A
    . Neuroacanthocytosis update. Brain Nerve 2008;60:635–41
    PubMed
  • © 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 2
1 Feb 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Role of Functional Dopamine-Transporter SPECT Imaging in Parkinsonian Syndromes, Part 2
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T.C. Booth, M. Nathan, A.D. Waldman, A.-M. Quigley, A.H. Schapira, J. Buscombe
The Role of Functional Dopamine-Transporter SPECT Imaging in Parkinsonian Syndromes, Part 2
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2015, 36 (2) 236-244; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3971

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
The Role of Functional Dopamine-Transporter SPECT Imaging in Parkinsonian Syndromes, Part 2
T.C. Booth, M. Nathan, A.D. Waldman, A.-M. Quigley, A.H. Schapira, J. Buscombe
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2015, 36 (2) 236-244; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3971
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (45)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Importance of low diagnostic Accuracy for early Parkinson&#039;s disease
    Thomas G. Beach, Charles H. Adler
    Movement Disorders 2018 33 10
  • High-Accuracy Classification of Parkinson&#039;s Disease Through Shape Analysis and Surface Fitting in 123I-Ioflupane SPECT Imaging
    R. Prashanth, Sumantra Dutta Roy, Pravat K. Mandal, Shantanu Ghosh
    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2017 21 3
  • Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease from ioflupane-123 single-photon emission computed tomography dopamine transporter scans using transfer learning
    Daniel H. Kim, Huub Wit, Mark Thurston
    Nuclear Medicine Communications 2018 39 10
  • Role of Neuroimaging on Differentiation of Parkinson’s Disease and Its Related Diseases
    Toshihide Ogawa, Shinya Fujii, Keita Kuya, Shin-ichiro Kitao, Yuki Shinohara, Mana Ishibashi, Yoshio Tanabe
    Yonago Acta Medica 2018 61 3
  • Clinical utility of DaTscan™ imaging in the evaluation of patients with parkinsonism: a US perspective
    Stuart H. Isaacson, Stanley Fisher, Fiona Gupta, Neal Hermanowicz, Daniel E. Kremens, Mark F. Lew, Kenneth Marek, Rajesh Pahwa, David S. Russell, John Seibyl
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2017 17 3
  • Imaging analysis of Parkinson’s disease patients using SPECT and tractography
    Seong-Jin Son, Mansu Kim, Hyunjin Park
    Scientific Reports 2016 6 1
  • Corticobasal syndrome: neuroimaging and neurophysiological advances
    F. Di Stasio, A. Suppa, L. Marsili, N. Upadhyay, F. Asci, M. Bologna, C. Colosimo, G. Fabbrini, P. Pantano, A. Berardelli
    European Journal of Neurology 2019 26 5
  • Morphological Characterization of Functional Brain Imaging by Isosurface Analysis in Parkinson’s Disease
    Diego Castillo-Barnes, Francisco J. Martinez-Murcia, Andres Ortiz, Diego Salas-Gonzalez, Javier RamÍrez, Juan M. Górriz
    International Journal of Neural Systems 2020 30 09
  • Clinical Phenotypes in Corticobasal Syndrome with or without Amyloidosis Biomarkers
    Agnès Benvenutto, Eric Guedj, Olivier Felician, Alexandre Eusebio, Jean-Philippe Azulay, Mathieu Ceccaldi, Lejla Koric
    Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2020 74 1
  • Comparative Performance of 99mTc-TRODAT-1 SPECT/CT and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT Imaging in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease, Parkinson-Plus Syndrome, and Essential Tremor
    Apurva Sood, Jaya Shukla, Ritu Shree, Rakhee Vatsa, Manish Modi, Bhagwant Rai Mittal
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine 2021 46 2

More in this TOC Section

  • Mechanisms of Healing in Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: A Review of the Literature
  • Ultra-High-Field MR Neuroimaging
  • 4D-CTA in Neurovascular Disease: A Review
Show more Review Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire