Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL
Open Access

Evolution of Flow-Diverter Endothelialization and Thrombus Organization in Giant Fusiform Aneurysms after Flow Diversion: A Histopathologic Study

I. Szikora, E. Turányi and M. Marosfoi
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1716-1720; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4336
I. Szikora
aFrom the National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences (I.S., M.M.), Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Turányi
b1st Department of Pathology (E.T.), Semmelweis University Medical School, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Marosfoi
aFrom the National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences (I.S., M.M.), Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment of giant fusiform aneurysms with flow diverters has been associated with a relatively high rate of complications. Our goal was to study the evolution of flow-diverter endothelialization and thrombus organization at different time points after flow-diverter treatment in giant fusiform aneurysms to better understand reasons for flow-diverter thrombosis and delayed aneurysm ruptures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two giant anterior and 2 posterior circulation aneurysms, all of which had partially thrombosed before treatment, were studied. An unruptured, untreated posterior circulation aneurysm was used as a control. Each specimen was removed at 7 days or at 6, 9, or 13 months after flow-diverter treatment. The 3 patients who survived longer than 7 days were followed up by angiography and MR imaging. Formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were stained by using H&E, Van Gieson elastic, CD34, h-Caldesmon, and Picrosirius stains and studied by light microscopy.

RESULTS: According to angiography, aneurysms were found to be obliterated partially at 6 and 9 months and completely at 13 months. MR imaging revealed that mass effect remained unchanged in each case. Sections of the flow diverter within the normal parent artery were covered by an endothelialized fibrous layer as early as 6 months, but there was no tissue coverage or endothelialization seen even at 13 months inside the aneurysm itself. Each treated aneurysm had a thin wall with complete lack of smooth muscle cells. No signs of thrombus organization were found at any of the time points studied.

CONCLUSIONS: Endothelialization of the flow diverter in giant fusiform aneurysms may not occur and thrombus organization may not be initiated inside these aneurysms for as long as 1 year, which explains delayed flow-diverter thrombosis and the possibility of delayed ruptures.

ABBREVIATIONS:

GFA
giant fusiform aneurysm
FD
flow diverter
PED
Pipeline embolization device

Because of the limited efficacy of endovascular coil packing, intravascular flow diversion has been proposed recently for large and giant aneurysms.1⇓⇓⇓⇓–6 The relative safety and high efficacy of flow diversion in saccular aneurysms presenting with mass effect have been reported.1,7,8 However, a high rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications has been found in giant fusiform aneurysms (GFAs), particularly in those located in the posterior fossa.9,10

Flow diversion is expected to produce aneurysm thrombosis and facilitate subsequent thrombus organization. Simultaneously, the flow diverter (FD) is supposed to become covered by an intimal layer, sealing the aneurysm cavity from the parent artery and preventing it from thromboembolic complications. Considering the poor results in giant fusiform aneurysms, it was reasonable to assume that one or both of these mechanisms did not work as expected in these lesions. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of these processes in GFAs. We also analyzed whether the clinical problems were related to the location (posterior circulation) or the morphology of aneurysms.

Materials and Methods

Treatment and Follow-Up

A total of 5 GFAs were studied as approved by our institutional internal review board. One unruptured, nonthrombosed, and untreated aneurysm was removed 7 days after the patient died as a result of a stroke in the brain stem. This aneurysm was used as a control. Each of the other ones was partially thrombosed, treated with an FD, and removed at 7 days or 6, 9, or 13 months after the treatment after the patients died as a result of either hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications. Two of these aneurysms were located in the posterior and the other 2 in the anterior circulation, and all were symptomatic. Alternative surgical or endovascular treatment options, including parent artery occlusion, were discussed with each patient and excluded after multidisciplinary consultation in each case. Of the 4 patients, 3 were treated with double antiplatelets (100 mg of acetylsalicylic acid and 75 mg of clopidogrel) before and during their follow-up period; the fourth patient (patient 5) (On-line Table 1) was on dual antiplatelets for 9 months and single-antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel afterward. Platelet functions were tested by the Platelet Function Assay (PFA 100; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany), adenosine diphosphate closure time (ADP-CT; Siemens), and the Innovance PY2 test (Siemens) and found to be sufficiently inhibited before the procedure. No further tests were performed during the follow-up. Four- to 5-mm-diameter telescopic Surpass FDs (Stryker Neurovascular, Kalamazoo, Michigan) were used in both posterior circulation aneurysms, and double-layer 3.5- to 4.5-mm-diameter Pipeline embolization devices (PEDs) (Covidien, Irvine, California) were applied in the anterior circulation aneurysms. All patients were scheduled for follow-up MR imaging and DSA studies at 5–6 and 12 months after the procedure. All the patients received methylprednisolone (2 × 250 mg/day) for at least 2 days before and 3–5 days after the procedure, and the dose was decreased gradually afterward (On-line Table 1).

Histopathologic Analysis

Each aneurysm was removed during autopsy, fixed in buffered formaldehyde, sectioned, and stained with H&E and Van Gieson elastic stains. For immunohistochemistry, CD34 was used to demonstrate endothelium, h-Caldesmon to visualize smooth muscle cells, and Picrosirius to detect connective tissue. Sections were studied by light microscopy. Special attention was given to the identification of any tissue coverage on the internal surface of the FD, to the structure of the aneurysm wall, and any signs of smooth muscle cell invasion or connective tissue formation inside the intra-aneurysmal clot, indicating thrombus organization.

Results

Case 1: Untreated GFA of the Vertebrobasilar Junction

The cavity of this control aneurysm was filled with fresh thrombus. The aneurysm wall was well structured and had a strong muscular layer. There were no signs of inflammation within the wall or any signs of thrombus organization by immunohistochemistry within the cavity (Fig 1, On-line Table 2).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Unruptured, nonthrombosed giant fusiform aneurysm involving the vertebrobasilar junction. A, Volume-rendering 3D reconstruction of a CTA, demonstrating fusiform aneurysm of the vertebrobasilar junction. B, Histologic section of the fusiform aneurysm showing fresh clot inside the aneurysm (star), intact elastic lamina (arrow), and thick aneurysm wall (double arrow) (H&E staining). C, Section of the aneurysm wall showing a thick layer of smooth muscle cells (arrow) (h-Caldesmon staining). D, Section of the aneurysm wall showing a thick subintimal layer of connective tissue (Picrosirius staining) (arrows) and no connective tissue invasion into the thrombus inside the aneurysm, indicating a lack of thrombus organization.

Case 2: GFA of the Vertebrobasilar Junction 7 Days after FD Treatment

The patient died as a result of SAH related to an intraprocedural aneurysm rupture. No tissue layer was found covering the internal surface of the FD. The aneurysm cavity was filled with unorganized thrombus. The aneurysm wall was thin and fragmented with no smooth muscle cells identified in it (On-line Table 2).

Case 3: Partially Thrombosed GFA of the MCA

This patient died as a result of a major MCA infarct that developed because of occlusion of one of the M2 branches distal to the FD 6 months after the procedure implanting the FD.

A section of the FD placed within the normal artery proximal to the aneurysm was covered by a thick tissue layer consisting of smooth muscle cells and covered by a single endothelial cell layer corresponding to intimal hyperplasia. The FD inside the aneurysm was free of any tissue coverage. The GFA was filled with unorganized clot only, despite most of the aneurysm not being filled with contrast material (as detected by angiography at 6 months). There were no signs of smooth muscle cell invasion or connective tissue formation inside the thrombus. The aneurysm wall was thick and fragmented and showed signs of chronic inflammation, including lymphocytes and macrophages (Fig 2, On-line Table 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Giant, partially thrombosed, fusiform aneurysm of the left MCA treated with a construct of 2 Pipeline embolization devices; the specimen was removed 6 months after PED implantation. A, T2-weighted MR image before treatment, showing large mass of mixed signal intensity, associated with significant mass effect and white matter edema, consistent with a giant aneurysm. B, DSA of the same aneurysm. The arrow points to the proximal, normal portion of the M1 section. and the double arrow points to the fusiform aneurysm expending into the M2 sections. C, Follow-up DSA 6 months later showing “angiographic reconstruction” of the distal M1 section (arrow), significant enlargement of the dilated proximal section of the cranial M2 branch (bent arrow), and lack of filling (occlusion) of this branch distal to the dilation. The PED construct can be seen between the 2 dotted arrows. D, Follow-up T2-weighted MR image from 6 months after treatment showing unchanged mass effect, edema, and mixed signal intensity. E, Longitudinal cut of the proximal landing zone. The luminal surface of the PED is covered by a smooth tissue layer. F, Microscopic section of the layer removed from the luminal surface of the PED showing neointimal growth consisting of smooth muscle cells (h-Caldesmon staining). G, The same layer is covered by a single cell layer of endothelium (arrow) (CD34 staining). H, Macroscopic cross-section of the specimen at the level of the fusiform aneurysm. The implanted PED construct (arrow) is uncovered and surrounded by fresh clot (bent arrow).

Case 4: GFA of the Vertebrobasilar Junction 9 Months after FD Treatment

This patient reportedly died as a result of a brain stem infarct, but no MR imaging was performed to confirm the diagnosis. The FD was patent, and its internal surface was covered by a thin fibrin layer only, with no smooth muscle cells or endothelial lining. The aneurysm was filled with fresh thrombus. There were no signs of clot organization. According to MR imaging and angiography, the size and filling of this aneurysm did not change at 6 months. The wall of the aneurysm was thin and fragmented (On-line Table 2).

Case 5: GFA of the ICA 13 Months after FD Treatment

This patient died as a result of a major MCA infarct that developed after a sudden thrombosis of the FD construct, as confirmed by DSA 1 month after the last angiography, while still on a single-antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel.

The internal surface of the FD inside the aneurysm was covered again by a thin fibrin layer only. Despite the aneurysm not being visible by angiography, the cavity of the aneurysm was filled with fresh clot only. There were signs of chronic inflammation inside the wall, which contained no smooth muscle cells. There were no signs of smooth muscle cell invasion or any other signs of thrombus organization (Fig 3, On-line Table 2).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Giant, partially thrombosed fusiform aneurysm of the right ICA treated by a construct of 2 PEDs. The specimen was removed 13 months after treatment. A, DSA before treatment showing the circulating portion of the partially thrombosed GFA involving the supraclinoid ICA on the right. B, DSA 1 year after treatment showing angiographic reconstruction of the entire length of the fusiform aneurysm. C. Thin fibrin layer removed from the luminal surface of the PED construct by H&E staining. The arrows in C and D point to the impressions of the flow-diverter struts on the outer surface of the fibrin layer. D, h-Caldesmon staining fails to show smooth muscle cells inside this layer. E, CD34 fails to show endothelial coverage on the luminal surface (arrows) of the layer. F, Histologic section showing a thick aneurysm wall with low cell attenuation (star) and fresh thrombus underneath the wall (double star) by H&E staining. G, h-Caldesmon staining fails to show any smooth muscle cells within the wall (star) or invasion into the clot (double star). H, Picrosirius staining reveals subintimal connective tissue within the thick aneurysm wall (star) but no invasion into the thrombus (double star).

MR imaging showed that regardless of the angiographic occlusion of the GFA, none of the treated aneurysms changed in either size or signal intensity throughout the follow-up period up to 9 months (Fig 2). No perforator occlusions were identified in any of the follow-up angiograms.

Discussion

Fusiform aneurysms of the circle of Willis represent 3%–13% of all intracranial aneurysms, with most located in the posterior circulation.11 Their etiology is unclear; both atherosclerosis and dissection have been proposed as pathogenetic factors.12 Some may present with subarachnoid hemorrhage, and these are generally considered dissecting aneurysms.13 Others may grow very large or giant and become symptomatic via neural compression or ischemia. The clinical course is generally progressive and, without successful treatment, almost always devastating.

Treatment options are limited. Drake and Peerless14 reported the results of 120 patients surgically treated for GFAs. Seventy-six percent of these patients with an anterior circulation GFA had a good outcome, whereas only 67% of those with a vertebrobasilar aneurysm had a good outcome. The treatment mostly included parent artery occlusion. In a more recent series, 6 of 9 symptomatic lesions resulted in poor outcomes (1 with bypass surgery, 1 with attempted clipping, and 4 with no intervention). Only those for whom parent artery occlusion was feasible fared well.15

Among the endovascular techniques, parent artery occlusion remains the best option for those with good collateral circulation.16 Reconstructive endovascular techniques, including FD-supported coiling or double-FD implantation, have been successfully applied for smaller fusiform aneurysms17,18 but not for giant ones.

The introduction of FDs raised enthusiasm regarding reconstructive treatment of hardly treatable intracranial aneurysms, including GFAs. Fiorella et al19⇓–21 reported 4 such patients successfully treated by FD implantation and coil packing. However, these publications were soon followed by reports on late complications, including late thrombosis of the FD within 2 years.9 Of 13 delayed ruptures after FD treatment reported by Kulcsár et al,22 4 were in patients with a GFA. In a series by Siddiqui et al,10 after FD treatment for posterior circulation GFAs in 7 patients, 4 patients died and 2 had a poor outcome.

This study was undertaken to investigate potential reasons for such poor results, particularly when compared with the better outcomes achieved in patients with saccular aneurysms, even when those aneurysms were large or giant.1 In general, the low efficacy of coil packing in giant aneurysms is attributed to the inability of the coils to induce permanent thrombosis and endothelial lining of the neck. In such lesions, thrombus organization and neck endothelialization were not found 2–6 months after treatment with coils.23 FDs are expected to initially induce aneurysm thrombosis by intra-aneurysmal flow reduction and to seal the aneurysm cavity off from the circulation by inducing neointimal coverage of the FD surface at the neck. This seal would allow the intrasaccular thrombus to be eventually organized. In animal models, neointimal lining of the PED has been demonstrated as early as 7 days after implantation in normal arterial sections and 4–8 weeks after treatment across the neck of saccular aneurysms.24,25 Studies on the endothelialization of FDs in human subjects have not been reported yet. We hypothesized that the reason for the poor results in GFAs was the lack of thrombus organization inside the aneurysm, the lack of intimal coverage of the FD, or both. Thrombus organization was expected to be visualized in the form of smooth muscle cell invasion and connective tissue formation within the clot.26 Intimal growth over the luminal surface of the FD device was expected to be seen as a tissue layer consisting of smooth muscle cells covered by endothelium.

The design of the FD did not seem to make any difference. Two types were used, and each diameter was chosen to match the diameter of the normal artery proximal and distal to the fusiform dilation as closely as possible. Because of the fusiform nature of the aneurysms, all the FDs were fully opened and reached their nominal diameter inside the aneurysm. Subsequently, the device-to-vessel diameter ratio did not affect the final metal coverage, which is supposed to be approximately 30% for each device. The Surpass device had higher pore attenuation than the PED (20–32 and 15–22 pores/mm2, respectively), but that did not influence the histologic outcome up to 9 months after treatment (On-line Table 1, patient 4).

The wall of the nonthrombosed control aneurysm contained a thick layer of smooth muscle cells consistent with myointimal hyperplasia.27 In contrast, the walls of all treated aneurysms were fragmented with low cell attenuation, signs of inflammation, and a lack of smooth muscle cells. Inside the GFAs, there were no signs of smooth muscle cell invasion or connective tissue formation indicating clot organization, regardless of the length of follow-up (for as long as 13 months) and regardless of occlusion or patency of the aneurysm as seen on angiography. Clinical experience and experimental evidence have shown that the loss of mural cells is associated with an inability to transform intraluminal thrombus to stable scar tissue because of the lack of smooth muscle cells inside the wall.28 Subsequently, the lack of thrombus organization is likely to be related to cellular loss of the sick wall in our GFAs.

All the treated aneurysms were partially thrombosed before treatment, which is likely to be the reason for their wall degeneration. The release of thrombocyte-derived growth factors and peroxidases from the luminal thrombus, together with deoxygenation of stagnating red blood cells and a subsequent lack of oxygen, are supposed to trigger cell death and inflammation inside the wall.27 FDs may significantly reduce flow velocity within the aneurysm but cannot repair the aneurysm wall and facilitate clot organization because of the pre-existing lack of necessary smooth muscle cells. In fact, the stagnation induced by the FD may trigger further release of substances, such as matrix metalloproteinases, that damage the aneurysmal wall and increase the risk of rupture.22,29

Histology showed lack of thrombus organization, which was consistent with MR imaging findings, which showed no change in signal intensity or size of the aneurysms during the follow-up period. Considering that simultaneous angiography showed partial or complete occlusion of the aneurysm and reconstruction of the parent artery, one must keep in mind that nonfilling of an aneurysm by angiography indicates only that blood is not flowing inside the aneurysm any more, but it certainly does not indicate healing of the aneurysm.

Intimal coverage is necessary for preventing FD thrombosis without aggressive antiplatelet medication. In our patients, only the section of FD implanted within the normal parent artery and circumferentially covered by normal arterial wall got covered by neointima and endothelialized as early as 6 months (patient 3). The portion of the FD inside the GFA without any contact with normal vascular wall remained uncovered, and no endothelial cells were found at any time point inside the aneurysms for as long as 13 months after treatment. This finding is similar to the lack of endothelialization seen in aortic FD grafts.30 Although this is a typical characteristic of fusiform aneurysms, the same phenomenon may occur in giant aneurysms with very broad necks. Under such circumstances, any lack of sufficient platelet inhibition may result in either distal embolization or FD thrombosis.

Because histologic findings were similar in anterior and posterior fossa aneurysms, these phenomena are likely related to the fusiform morphology rather than the location of the aneurysms.

This work was limited by the small number of samples and warrants further experimental and clinical pathologic studies. High-resolution vessel wall imaging and sequential MR imaging of giant aneurysms after FD treatment may help us to understand more thoroughly the process of aneurysm thrombosis and the role of the aneurysm wall in the thrombotic process.

Conclusions

The results of this study confirm the hypothesis that in GFAs, thrombus organization and intimal coverage of the FD may not occur for more than 1 year, which leads to a prolonged risk of aneurysm rupture and FD thrombosis. The lack of thrombus organization does not seem to be related to FD design or aneurysm location and probably results from wall degeneration of partially thrombosed GFAs. Nonfilling of the aneurysm by angiography should not be interpreted as a sign of aneurysm healing. Because of their inefficacy, FDs should be considered for this pathology only if treatment is needed and no other option is available.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely acknowledge the contribution of Surpass Ltd. and Ajay Kumar Wakhloo for providing material support and advising in the procedures.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Istvan Szikora—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Covidien Neurovascular; Consultancy: Covidien Neurovascular, Stryker Neurovascular, and Codman Neurovascular.

  • This study was supported in part by grant KTIA_NAP_13-1-2013-0001 from the National Brain Research Program of Hungary.

  • Paper previously presented in part at: 12th Congress of the World Federation of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (WFITN), November 9–13, 2013; Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Becske T,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Saatci I, et al
    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Miranda C,
    3. Ceratto R, et al
    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–43; quiz N6 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65 pmid:19349825
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Berentei Z,
    3. Kulcsar Z, et al
    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2023 pmid:20150304
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I, et al
    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Saatci I,
    2. Yavuz K,
    3. Ozer C, et al
    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Piano M,
    2. Valvassori L,
    3. Quilici L, et al
    . Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2013;118:408–16 doi:10.3171/2012.10.JNS112222 pmid:23176329
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Marosfoi M,
    3. Salomváry B, et al
    . Resolution of mass effect and compression symptoms following endoluminal flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:935–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3547 pmid:23493889
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sahlein DH,
    2. Fouladvand M,
    3. Becske T, et al
    . Neuro-ophthalmologic outcomes from the Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2015. In press
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Hsu D,
    3. Woo HH, et al
    . Very late thrombosis of a Pipeline embolization device construct: case report. Neurosurgery 2010;67(3 suppl):onsE313–14; discussion onsE314 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000383875.08681.23 pmid:20679914
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Siddiqui AH,
    2. Abla AA,
    3. Kan P, et al
    . Panacea or problem: flow diverters in the treatment of symptomatic large or giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:1258–66 doi:10.3171/2012.2.JNS111942 pmid:22404673
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Park SH,
    2. Yim MB,
    3. Lee CY, et al
    . Intracranial fusiform aneurysms: it's pathogenesis, clinical characteristics and managements. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008;44:116–23 doi:10.3340/jkns.2008.44.3.116 pmid:19096660
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Findlay JM,
    2. Hao C,
    3. Emery D
    . Non-atherosclerotic fusiform cerebral aneurysms. Can J Neurol Sci 2002;29:41–48 doi:10.1017/S0317167100001700 pmid:11858533
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nakayama Y,
    2. Tanaka A,
    3. Kumate S, et al
    . Giant fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery: consideration of its pathogenesis. Surg Neurol 1999;51:140–45 doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(98)00050-0 pmid:10029417
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Drake CG,
    2. Peerless SJ
    . Giant fusiform intracranial aneurysms: review of 120 patients treated surgically from 1965 to 1992. J Neurosurg 1997;87:141–62 doi:10.3171/jns.1997.87.2.0141 pmid:9254076
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Nakatomi H,
    2. Segawa H,
    3. Kurata A, et al
    . Clinicopathological study of intracranial fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms: insight on the mechanism of growth. Stroke 2000;31:896–900 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.4.896 pmid:10753995
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gobin YP,
    2. Viñuela F,
    3. Gurian JH, et al
    . Treatment of large and giant fusiform intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1996;84:55–62 doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.1.0055 pmid:8613836
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Collignon L,
    3. Lefranc F, et al
    . Circumferential and fusiform intracranial aneurysms: reconstructive endovascular treatment with self-expandable stents. Neuroradiology 2008;50:499–507 doi:10.1007/s00234-008-0366-x pmid:18365185
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Devulapalli KK,
    2. Chowdhry SA,
    3. Bambakidis NC, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of fusiform intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:110–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010233 pmid:22278931
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Woo HH,
    3. Albuquerque FC, et al
    . Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2008;62:1115–20; discussion 1120–21 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000325873.44881.6e pmid:18580809
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque F,
    3. Gonzalez F, et al
    . Reconstruction of the right anterior circulation with the Pipeline embolization device to achieve treatment of a progressively symptomatic, large carotid aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2010;2:31–37 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000554 pmid:21990555
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Kelly ME,
    3. Albuquerque FC, et al
    . Curative reconstruction of a giant midbasilar trunk aneurysm with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2009;64:212–17; discussion 217 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000337576.98984.E4 pmid:19057425
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kulcsár Z,
    2. Houdart E,
    3. Bonafé A, et al
    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Ellison DW,
    3. Morris J, et al
    . Histological findings in giant aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: report of 2 cases with autopsy correlation. J Neurosurg 1995;83:129–32 doi:10.3171/jns.1995.83.1.0129 pmid:7782828
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D, et al
    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576 pmid:17615366
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kadirvel R,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D, et al
    . Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology 2014;270:394–99 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130796 pmid:24086073
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Seifert P,
    3. Hanzely Z, et al
    . Histopathologic evaluation of aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils or Matrix detachable microcoils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:283–88 pmid:16484393
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Frösen J,
    2. Tulamo R,
    3. Paetau A, et al
    . Saccular intracranial aneurysm: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol 2012;123:773–86 doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0939-3 pmid:22249619
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Marbacher S,
    2. Marjamaa J,
    3. Bradacova K, et al
    . Loss of mural cells leads to wall degeneration, aneurysm growth, and eventual rupture in a rat aneurysm model. Stroke 2014;45:248–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002745 pmid:24222045
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Fontaine V,
    2. Jacob MP,
    3. Houard X, et al
    . Involvement of the mural thrombus as a site of protease release and activation in human aortic aneurysms. Am J Pathol 2002;161:1701–10 doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64447-1 pmid:12414517
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. McArthur C,
    2. Teodorescu V,
    3. Eisen L, et al
    . Histopathologic analysis of endovascular stent grafts from patients with aortic aneurysms: does healing occur? J Vasc Surg 2001;33:733–38 doi:10.1067/mva.2001.113980 pmid:11296325
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 19, 2014.
  • Accepted after revision February 4, 2015.
  • © 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 9
1 Sep 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evolution of Flow-Diverter Endothelialization and Thrombus Organization in Giant Fusiform Aneurysms after Flow Diversion: A Histopathologic Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
I. Szikora, E. Turányi, M. Marosfoi
Evolution of Flow-Diverter Endothelialization and Thrombus Organization in Giant Fusiform Aneurysms after Flow Diversion: A Histopathologic Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2015, 36 (9) 1716-1720; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4336

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Evolution of Flow-Diverter Endothelialization and Thrombus Organization in Giant Fusiform Aneurysms after Flow Diversion: A Histopathologic Study
I. Szikora, E. Turányi, M. Marosfoi
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2015, 36 (9) 1716-1720; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4336
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Long-term outcomes and dynamic changes of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms
  • Treatment of fusiform aneurysms with a pipeline embolization device: a multicenter cohort study
  • Learning Curve for Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Long-Term International Multicenter Cohort Study
  • Flow Diversion for ICA Aneurysms with Compressive Neuro-Ophthalmologic Symptoms: Predictors of Morbidity, Mortality, and Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion
  • Neck Location on the Outer Convexity is a Predictor of Incomplete Occlusion in Treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes
  • Implications of the Collar Sign in Incompletely Occluded Aneurysms after Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation: A Follow-Up Study
  • Endothelialization following Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review
  • Risk of Branch Occlusion and Ischemic Complications with the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms
  • Endovascular Treatment of Very Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison between Reconstructive and Deconstructive Techniques--A Meta-Analysis
  • Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion following Pipeline Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Is It Less Effective in Older Patients?
  • In situ tissue engineering: endothelial growth patterns as a function of flow diverter design
  • Treatment of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms with flow diverters: a single-center experience and review of 56 patients
  • Lack of Association between Statin Use and Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes after Pipeline Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Republished: Pipeline embolization device induced collateral channels in elective flow diversion treatment
  • Republished: Pipeline embolization device thrombosis induced peri-construct collateral channels
  • Risk Factors for Ischemic Complications following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Results from the IntrePED Study
  • Pipeline embolization device induced collateral channels in elective flow diversion treatment
  • Pipeline embolization device thrombosis induced peri-construct collateral channels
  • Crossref (77)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Treatment of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms with flow diverters: a single-center experience and review of 56 patients
    P Bhogal, M Aguilar Pérez, O Ganslandt, H Bäzner, H Henkes, S Fischer
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017 9 5
  • Risk Factors for Ischemic Complications following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Results from the IntrePED Study
    W. Brinjikji, G. Lanzino, H.J. Cloft, A.H. Siddiqui, E. Boccardi, S. Cekirge, D. Fiorella, R. Hanel, P. Jabbour, E. Levy, D. Lopes, P. Lylyk, I. Szikora, D.F. Kallmes
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 37 9
  • Mechanism of Action and Biology of Flow Diverters in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
    Krishnan Ravindran, Amanda M Casabella, Juan Cebral, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes, Ram Kadirvel
    Neurosurgery 2020 86 Supplement_1
  • Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion following Pipeline Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Is It Less Effective in Older Patients?
    N. Adeeb, J.M. Moore, M. Wirtz, C.J. Griessenauer, P.M. Foreman, H. Shallwani, R. Gupta, A.A. Dmytriw, R. Motiei-Langroudi, A. Alturki, M.R. Harrigan, A.H. Siddiqui, E.I. Levy, A.J. Thomas, C.S. Ogilvy
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2017 38 12
  • Endothelialization following Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review
    K. Ravindran, M.M. Salem, A.Y. Alturki, A.J. Thomas, C.S. Ogilvy, J.M. Moore
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2019 40 2
  • Endovascular Treatment of Very Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison between Reconstructive and Deconstructive Techniques—A Meta-Analysis
    F. Cagnazzo, D. Mantilla, A. Rouchaud, W. Brinjikji, P.-H. Lefevre, C. Dargazanli, G. Gascou, C. Riquelme, P. Perrini, D. di Carlo, A. Bonafe, V. Costalat
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018 39 5
  • Thrombosis in Cerebral Aneurysms and the Computational Modeling Thereof: A Review
    Malebogo N. Ngoepe, Alejandro F. Frangi, James V. Byrne, Yiannis Ventikos
    Frontiers in Physiology 2018 9
  • Risk of Branch Occlusion and Ischemic Complications with the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms
    N. Adeeb, C.J. Griessenauer, A.A. Dmytriw, H. Shallwani, R. Gupta, P.M. Foreman, H. Shakir, J. Moore, N. Limbucci, S. Mangiafico, A. Kumar, C. Michelozzi, Y. Zhang, V.M. Pereira, C.C. Matouk, M.R. Harrigan, A.H. Siddiqui, E.I. Levy, L. Renieri, T.R. Marotta, C. Cognard, C.S. Ogilvy, A.J. Thomas
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018 39 7
  • Predictive factors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion after endovascular treatment with the Pipeline embolization device
    Georgios A. Maragkos, Luis C. Ascanio, Mohamed M. Salem, Sricharan Gopakumar, Santiago Gomez-Paz, Alejandro Enriquez-Marulanda, Abhi Jain, Clemens M. Schirmer, Paul M. Foreman, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Peter Kan, Christopher S. Ogilvy, Ajith J. Thomas
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2020 132 5
  • In situ tissue engineering: endothelial growth patterns as a function of flow diverter design
    Miklos Marosfoi, Erin T Langan, Lara Strittmatter, Kajo van der Marel, Srinivasan Vedantham, Jennifer Arends, Ivan R Lylyk, Siddharth Loganathan, Gregory M Hendricks, Istvan Szikora, Ajit S Puri, Ajay K Wakhloo, Matthew J Gounis
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017 9 10

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire