Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleInterventional

Packing Density Necessary to Reach a High Complete Occlusion Rate in Circumferential Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization

R.T. Tosello, U.C. Batista, B.J.A. Pereira and R.L. Piske
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2017, 38 (10) 1973-1977; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5303
R.T. Tosello
aFrom the Centro de Neuro-Angiografia, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo-SP, Paulo-SP, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.T. Tosello
U.C. Batista
aFrom the Centro de Neuro-Angiografia, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo-SP, Paulo-SP, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for U.C. Batista
B.J.A. Pereira
aFrom the Centro de Neuro-Angiografia, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo-SP, Paulo-SP, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B.J.A. Pereira
R.L. Piske
aFrom the Centro de Neuro-Angiografia, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo-SP, Paulo-SP, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.L. Piske
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study is a homogeneous series of circumferential unruptured intracranial aneurysms with large necks treated with stent-assisted coil embolization. Our purpose was to demonstrate which value of packing density is required to produce a durable occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms who were treated with stent-assisted coil embolization having late angiographic control between 2004 and 2014, in a single large cerebrovascular referral center. To calculate the packing density, aneurysm volume, and coil volume, we used an on-line system.

RESULTS: In 49 circumferential unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coil embolization, 38.7% (n = 19) had complete occlusion in the immediate control. Of those with incomplete occlusion, 80% (n = 24) progressed to complete occlusion in the late angiographic follow-up. At late angiographic control, 87.7% (n = 43) of aneurysms were completely occluded. All aneurysms with a packing density of ≥19% were completely occluded. Packing density was the only statistically significant predictor of complete occlusion. None of the aneurysms with complete occlusion at immediate control or at late angiographic control had recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS: In circumferential aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coil embolization, packing density is the main predictor of complete occlusion. In this type of aneurysm, a packing density of ≥19% was enough to reach complete occlusion; knowing this is important to avoid higher packing densities that have more risk.

ABBREVIATIONS:

PD
packing density
SACE
stent-assisted coil embolization
UIA
unruptured intracranial aneurysm

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are present in 3% of the adult population and are increasingly detected due to more frequent use of noninvasive angiographic diagnostic imaging.1⇓–3

Endovascular coiling for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms was first introduced into clinical use in 1990, and since then, the greatest concern has been the high recanalization rate, recently estimated to be approximately 20%.4,5 This occurs more often in large-neck aneurysms,6 which are currently treated with stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE).

In unassisted coil embolization, higher packing density (PD) rates are correlated with lower recanalization rates.7⇓⇓–10 It is likely that in SACE treatment, the packing density necessary to reach a stable complete occlusion is lower, but there is no homogeneous study to confirm that possibility, to our knowledge.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate which value of PD is likely to produce durable occlusion in a homogeneous series of circumferential, large-neck UIAs treated with SACE in a single cerebrovascular referral center.

Materials and Methods

The study protocol was approved by a local institutional review board. This is a single-center retrospective review of our data bank from February 2004 to June 2014. Clinical and image records were independently reviewed by a member of the research team who did not participate in the treatment of any of the included patients. The patient demographics, treatment details and effects, results of follow-up, and complications were recorded.

All patients were treated under general anesthesia, and stent-assisted coiling was performed on a biplane Integris Allura FD20/30 angiographic system (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). Regular techniques were used, including prior use of dual antiplatelet therapy.

From the 310 aneurysms in 271 patients treated with SACE, we selected 49 unruptured circumferential wide-neck aneurysms, not previously treated in 47 patients, with 3D reconstruction angiography before treatment and at least 1 late angiographic control. The mean time from the operation until the first follow-up was 7.0 months. Wide-neck aneurysms were defined as having at least 1 of the following criteria: neck size ≥ 4 mm, dome-to-neck ratio < 1.5, or a cylindric neck.

To calculate the packing density, volume of aneurysms, and volume of coils, we used an on-line system available at www.angiocalc.com. This calculation was based on the shape and size of the aneurysm and on the type and size of the coils. All aneurysms treated with coils that did not have calculations based on this site were excluded.

Of the 47 patients, 15 were men, and 32, women. The mean age was 56.7 years. Of the 49 aneurysms, 32 had wide necks (>4 mm), 42 had unfavorable dome-to-neck ratios (<1.5 mm), 26 had wide necks and unfavorable dome-to-neck ratios, and 2 had cylindric necks.

The relationship between the location and number of aneurysms is shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Relationship between the location and number of the aneurysms

Aneurysm obliteration rates on the immediate control and first follow-up angiograms were classified as complete (100%); any opacity in the neck or sac of the aneurysm was considered incomplete obliteration.

In the late angiographic control, we evaluated the rate of progression from incomplete to complete occlusion and whether there was recurrence of an aneurysm with initial complete occlusion. We compared these data with the location of the aneurysm, the volume of the aneurysm and coils, the PD, and the type of stent used.

We used 4 types of stents: the Neuroform stent (Stryker Neurovascular, Kalamazoo, Michigan) in 35 procedures, the LEO stent (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France) in 16 procedures, the Enterprise stent (Codman & Shurtleff, Raynham, Massachusetts) in 2 procedures, and the Solitaire stent (Solitaire AB neurovascular remodeling device; Covidien, Irvine, California) in 1 procedure.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by using R statistical and computing software, Version 3.2.2 (http://www.r-project.org/). For the relationships between volume and packing and volume and incomplete occlusion, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated. To obtain the relationship among age, sex, aneurysm volume, packing density, and volume of coils and complete occlusion at 6-month follow-up, we used logistic regression. We also calculated the corresponding 95% confidence interval to verify the existence of the relationship. The relationships between a high percentage of PD and complete occlusion and between large aneurysms and incomplete occlusion were assessed with logistic regression analysis. P values < .05 indicated a significant difference.

Results

In the immediate control, complete occlusion occurred in 38.7% of aneurysms (n = 19), and incomplete occlusion, in 61.2% aneurysms (n = 30). However, of those who had incomplete occlusion, 80% (n = 24) progressed to complete occlusion and the remaining 20% (n = 6) had incomplete occlusion (Fig 1). At the late angiographic control, 43 aneurysms (87.7%) had complete occlusion. There was no aneurysm recurrence in the first follow-up for those aneurysms that were completely occluded in the immediate control.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 62-year-old man presenting with a small, incidental aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery. A 3D rotational angiogram (A) was obtained before the embolization. Measurements were made of the neck (blue line), diameter parallel to the neck (green line), height (red line), and largest diameter (yellow line). Projection work after a right internal carotid contrast injection (B) shows the relation of the anterior communicating artery aneurysm to the anterior cerebral arteries. Final control after simultaneous contrast injections in the internal carotid artery. C and D, Residual neck flow (white arrow) after stent-assisted coil embolization (stent, white arrows; coils, black arrow). Six-month angiographic controls (E and F) show the evolution to complete occlusion (black and white arrows).

The mean volume of the 49 aneurysms was 175.2 mm3 (median, 329.7 mm3; range, 4.2–4849.9 mm3). The mean coil volume was 38.5 mm3 (median, 54.7 mm3; range, 1.5–396.3 mm3), and the average PD was 37.9% (median, 28.6%; range, 2.8%–54.9%).

Above 19% of PD, all aneurysms were completely occluded, independent of their volume (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Results of the Pearson test, demonstrating that above 19% packing density, all aneurysms had complete occlusion. Regarding the volume, aneurysms above 179.6 mm3 had a higher rate of incomplete occlusion when the packing density was below 19%. If >1 aneurysm is overlapping, note the following symbols: Embedded Image, 2 aneurysms, Embedded Image, 3 aneurysms, Embedded Image, 4 aneurysms.

According to Fig 2, the aneurysms were subdivided into 2 groups on the basis of volume: A, <179.6 mm3 (n = 37); B, >179.6 mm3. In group A, all aneurysms except 1 had complete occlusion, independent of their PD. The only aneurysm incompletely occluded in this group was one in which we could not deploy a necessary second coil due to the impossibility of recatheterizing the aneurysm sac after the first coil. In group B, complete occlusion was reached for all aneurysms with a PD of >19%. Aneurysms of >179.59 mm3 had a larger diameter, between 7.0 and 7.8 mm.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient (P < .05) between aneurysm volume and PD was −0.42 (95% CI, −0.62 to −0.15; P = .003), and the correlation between aneurysm volume and incomplete aneurysm occlusion was −0.44 (95% CI, 0.18–0.64; P = .002). The correlation coefficient between coil volume and PD was 0.26 (95% CI, −0.50 to 0.02; P = .071), which is not statistically significant. Large volumes of coils are used in large aneurysms, which tend to have lower PD.

A multivariate analysis with predictive factors of complete aneurysm obliteration, including age, aneurysm volume, PD, and volume of coils, showed that the only statistically significant predictive factor was PD (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Multivariate analysis of predictive factors for complete occlusion

Procedure-related complications occurred in 3 patients (6.4%, 3/47). In 2 patients (4.1%, 2/49), there was thrombosis of the stent after its release; one was treated with an intravenous infusion of a loading dose of abciximab (ReoPro), and the other, with an intra-arterial injection of tirofiban (Aggrastat) and mechanical thrombolysis, with full opening of the parent vessel. Both had a transient deficit and full recovery in 3 and 4 days, respectively. One patient (2.1%, 1/47) had an asymptomatic vertebral artery dissection, and a stent was placed at the site of dissection. There was no neurologic deficit in any of the 3 patients at discharge.

Discussion

Stent-assisted coil treatment for large-neck aneurysms has shown a higher rate of evolution to complete occlusion in the follow-up and a lower rate of late aneurysm recanalization compared with nonstented aneurysms.6,8,11⇓⇓–14 The mechanisms involved are hemodynamic modification of the inflow angle to the sac, the presence of more metal on the neck, and the scaffold provided by the stent and coils favoring better endothelialization.6,15⇓–17 It is thought that the main predictor of immediate and late complete occlusion and the absence of aneurysm recurrence is the PD.8,11,12,18⇓⇓⇓–22

However, we supposed that to achieve a higher PD, it is necessary to place several coils inside the aneurysm, increasing the treatment time, the risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, and the cost of the procedure.

Gallas et al23 found that 26% of aneurysms had an incomplete occlusion among 1036 aneurysms treated with coils. Raymond and Roy7 reported that incomplete occlusion in the immediate control of aneurysms treated with coils is a risk factor for aneurysm recanalization. Piotin et al11 reported that aneurysms treated with SACE had lower recanalization rates than nonstented aneurysms. Lawson et al22 identified PD as a predictor of complete occlusion in aneurysms treated with SACE.

Chalouhi et al8,13 found an adequate PD of 12%–22% for complete occlusion of aneurysms in angiographic follow-up tests in 290 aneurysms treated with SACE, but the aneurysm recurrence rate was not reported.

Unlike others, our study considered only circumferential saccular UIAs, homogenizing the group to find the PD required for a high complete aneurysm occlusion rate, with low rates of recurrence and complications during the procedure.

Our study presented a rate of 38.7% (n = 19) with complete occlusion and 61.2% (n = 30) with incomplete occlusion in the immediate control. Of those in the latter group, 80% (n = 24) progressed to complete occlusion in the late angiographic follow-up.

PD is the main predictor of complete occlusion and aneurysm recurrence. Our study found all aneurysms with PD ≥19% with initial incomplete occlusion evolved to complete occlusion in the late angiographic follow-ups, with a statistically significant relationship between the variable PD and the first follow-up, in agreement with the study of Chalouhi et al.8 Aneurysms with low PD (<19%) tended to not evolve to complete occlusion. None of the aneurysms that were completely occluded had recurrence, emphasizing the relevance of the flow-remodeling theory in the use of stents.6,15⇓–17

However, aneurysms with smaller (<100 mm3) and moderate (100–1150.3 mm3) volumes had high rates of complete occlusion (96% and 85%, respectively), compared with aneurysms with greater volume (>1150.3 mm3), demonstrating that smaller aneurysm volume can reach a better PD value with higher complete occlusion rates than those of large aneurysms, as described in the literature.5,6,9,11,12,18,24 There was no statistically significant relation between the volume and packing density of an aneurysm: The P value was .079 (statistical significance, P < .05), probably due to the low number of aneurysms.

Sluzewski et al9 reported that all aneurysms with packing densities of >24% and a volume of <600 mm3, treated with coil embolization, had complete occlusion. We found that all aneurysms with packing densities of ≥19% independent of their volume had complete occlusion. This finding shows that stents help neck endothelization, requiring fewer coils to reach complete occlusion.17

No patient with complete occlusion in our study needed retreatment, and our complication rate was 6%. All patients were discharged without neurologic deficits and none died.

A limitation of our study is its retrospective, no randomization design in a single center with a small sample due to the inclusion of only circumferential UIAs. Another limitation is the use of a variety of regular stents and coils.

Today with the advancement of technology, new stents with lower porosity or double layers (eg, LVIS Blue, Lvis, Lvis Jr; MicroVention, Tustin, California) may produce different results, needing specific studies.

Conclusions

This study shows that the SACE technique has high rates of evolution from incomplete-to-complete occlusion of aneurysms, without recurrence. The PD is the main predictor for complete aneurysm occlusion. All aneurysms with PD of ≥19% achieved complete occlusion. For small aneurysms, the rate of complete occlusion was higher than in large aneurysms because it is difficult to achieve an optimal packing density in large aneurysms. The PD needed to occlude large-neck aneurysms treated with stents is lower than in those without stents.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wiebers DO,
    2. Whisnant JP,
    3. Huston J 3rd., et al
    ; International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3 pmid:12867109
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Etminan N,
    2. Brown RD Jr.,
    3. Beseoglu K, et al
    . The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: a multidisciplinary consensus. Neurology 2015;85:881–89 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001891 pmid:26276380
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Seibert B,
    2. Tummala RP,
    3. Chow R, et al
    . Intracranial aneurysms: review of current treatment options and outcomes. Front Neurol 2011;2:45 doi:10.3389/fneur.2011.00045 pmid:21779274
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Birks J, et al
    ; ISAT Collaborators. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70080-8 pmid:19329361
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mascitelli JR,
    2. Oermann EK,
    3. De Leacy RA, et al
    . Predictors of treatment failure following coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:1275–81 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.002 pmid:25986179
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Colby GP,
    2. Paul AR,
    3. Radvany MG, et al
    . A single center comparison of coiling versus stent assisted coiling in 90 consecutive paraophthalmic region aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:116–20 doi:10.1136/jnis.2011.004911 pmid:21990478
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Roy D
    . Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1997;41:1235–45; discussion 1245–46 doi:10.1097/00006123-199712000-00002 pmid:9402574
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Dumont AS,
    3. Hasan D, et al
    . Is packing density important in stent-assisted coiling? Neurosurgery 2012;71:381–86; discussion 386–87 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31825c36dd pmid:22569059
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sluzewski M,
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Slob MJ, et al
    . Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 2004;231:653–58 doi:10.1148/radiol.2313030460 pmid:15118115
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chueh JY,
    2. Vedantham S,
    3. Wakhloo AK, et al
    . Aneurysm permeability following coil embolization: packing density and coil distribution. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:676–81 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011289 pmid:25031179
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Spelle L, et al
    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:110–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558114 pmid:19959540
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Jabbour P,
    3. Singhal S, et al
    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000641 pmid:23512976
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Starke RM,
    3. Koltz MT, et al
    . Stent-assisted coiling versus balloon remodeling of wide-neck aneurysms: comparison of angiographic outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1987–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3538 pmid:23639562
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hong Y,
    2. Wang YJ,
    3. Deng Z, et al
    . Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling in treatment of intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e82311 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082311 pmid:24454690
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Tanemura H,
    2. Ishida F,
    3. Miura Y, et al
    . Changes in hemodynamics after placing intracranial stents. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2013;53:171–78 doi:10.2176/nmc.53.171 pmid:23524501
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tateshima S,
    2. Tanishita K,
    3. Hakata Y, et al
    . Alteration of intraaneurysmal hemodynamics by placement of a self-expandable stent: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg 2009;111:22–27 doi:10.3171/2009.2.JNS081324 pmid:19267529
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lopes D,
    2. Sani S
    . Histological postmortem study of an internal carotid artery aneurysm treated with the Neuroform stent. Neurosurgery 2005;56:E416; discussion E doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000147977.07736.66 pmid:15670395
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Geyik S,
    2. Yavuz K,
    3. Yurttutan N, et al
    . Stent-assisted coiling in endovascular treatment of 500 consecutive cerebral aneurysms with long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2157–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3574 pmid:23886748
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Sadato A,
    2. Adachi K,
    3. Hayakawa M, et al
    . Effects of anatomic characteristics of aneurysms on packing density in endovascular coil embolization: analysis of a single center's experience. Neurosurg Rev 2016;39:109–14; discussion 114 doi:10.1007/s10143-015-0658-7 pmid:26223542
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ozretić D,
    2. Radoš M,
    3. Pavliša G, et al
    . Long-term angiographic outcome of stent-assisted coiling compared to non-assisted coiling of intracranial saccular aneurysms. Croat Med J 2015;56:24–31 doi:10.3325/cmj.2015.56.24 pmid:25727039
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bouillot P,
    2. Brina O,
    3. Ouared R, et al
    . Particle imaging velocimetry evaluation of intracranial stents in sidewall aneurysm: hemodynamic transition related to the stent design. PLoS One 2014;9:e113762 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113762 pmid:25470724
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lawson MF,
    2. Newman WC,
    3. Chi YY, et al
    . Stent-associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2011;69:598–603; discussion 603–04 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181c2b pmid:21430583
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Gallas S,
    2. Januel AC,
    3. Pasco A, et al
    . Long-term follow-up of 1036 cerebral aneurysms treated by bare coils: a multicentric cohort treated between 1998 and 2003. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1986–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1744 pmid:19679641
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Yang H,
    2. Sun Y,
    3. Jiang Y, et al
    . Comparison of stent-assisted coiling vs coiling alone in 563 intracranial aneurysms: safety and efficacy at a high-volume. Neurosurgery 2015;77:241–47; discussion 247 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000765 pmid:25856112
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received March 6, 2017.
  • Accepted after revision May 18, 2017.
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 10
1 Oct 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Packing Density Necessary to Reach a High Complete Occlusion Rate in Circumferential Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R.T. Tosello, U.C. Batista, B.J.A. Pereira, R.L. Piske
Packing Density Necessary to Reach a High Complete Occlusion Rate in Circumferential Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2017, 38 (10) 1973-1977; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5303

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Packing Density Necessary to Reach a High Complete Occlusion Rate in Circumferential Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization
R.T. Tosello, U.C. Batista, B.J.A. Pereira, R.L. Piske
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2017, 38 (10) 1973-1977; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5303
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A novel self-expanding shape memory polymer coil for intracranial aneurysm embolization: 1 year follow-up in Chile
  • Crossref (12)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Risk factors for recurrence and retreatment after endovascular treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysm larger than 8 mm
    Yung Ki Park, Hong-Ju Bae, Dong Young Cho, Jai Ho Choi, Bum-Soo Kim, Yong Sam Shin
    Acta Neurochirurgica 2019 161 5
  • Low rates of recanalization for wide-necked aneurysms treated with stenting after balloon-assisted coiling: combination of techniques delivers stable and improved results during follow-up
    Aglaé Velasco González, P. Stracke, H. Nordmeyer, M. Heddier, S. Saleme, C. Sauerland, S. Berkemeyer, B. Buerke, W. Heindel, R. Chapot
    Neuroradiology 2018 60 11
  • The SMART Registry: Long-Term Results on the Utility of the Penumbra SMART COIL System for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms and Other Malformations
    Alejandro M. Spiotta, Min S. Park, Richard J. Bellon, Bradley N. Bohnstedt, Albert J. Yoo, Clemens M. Schirmer, Reade A. DeLeacy, David J. Fiorella, B. Keith Woodward, Harris E. Hawk, Ashish Nanda, Osama O. Zaidat, Peter J. Sunenshine, Kenneth C. Liu, Mouhammed R. Kabbani, Kenneth V. Snyder, Thinesh Sivapatham, Travis M. Dumont, Alan R. Reeves, Robert M. Starke
    Frontiers in Neurology 2021 12
  • Optimal Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device Size Selection Using Automated Volumetric Software
    Sameer Ansari, Cynthia B. Zevallos, Mudassir Farooqui, Andres Dajles, Sebastian Schafer, Darko Quispe-Orozco, Alan Mendez-Ruiz, Samir Abdelkarim, Sudeepta Dandapat, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez
    Brain Sciences 2021 11 7
  • Technical considerations of endovascular management of true visceral artery aneurysms
    M. K. Khairallah, R. A. Morgan, R. Das
    CVIR Endovascular 2023 6 1
  • A novel self-expanding shape memory polymer coil for intracranial aneurysm embolization: 1 year follow-up in Chile
    Daniel Echeverría, Rodrigo Rivera, Pablo Giacaman, Juan Gabriel Sordo, Martín Einersen, Lautaro Badilla
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2023 15 8
  • Flow Diversion vs. Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Intradural Large Vertebrobasilar Artery Aneurysms
    Qiaowei Wu, Chunxu Li, Shancai Xu, Chunlei Wang, Zhiyong Ji, Jingtao Qi, Yuchen Li, Bowen Sun, Huaizhang Shi, Pei Wu
    Frontiers in Neurology 2022 13
  • Risk factors of recurrence after endovascular embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms
    Degang Wu, Bin Sheng, Xinggen Fang, Zhenbao Li
    Interventional Neuroradiology 2022 28 5
  • A comparison of endovascular coil systems for the treatment of small intracranial aneurysms
    Sabrina L Begley, Timothy G White, Kevin A Shah, Justin Turpin, Daniel Toscano, Amir R Dehdashti, Ina Teron, Thomas Link, Athos Patsalides, Henry H Woo
    Interventional Neuroradiology 2023
  • Effects of the Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment Method on Coil Packing Density and Its Relationship with the Ostium Area
    Çağrı Kesim, Ümit Can Özcan, Erkan Yildirim
    Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2022 33 6

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire