Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Intradural Vertebral Dissecting Aneurysms

Patients and Methods

Between January 2000 and January 2006, 14 patients with symptomatic intradural dissecting vertebral aneurysms were treated at the 2 participating hospitals. In the same period, 756 aneurysms were treated with endovascular means, of which 568 were ruptured and 188 were unruptured. The incidence of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms was 1.9% (14/756). Patient and aneurysmal characteristics are summarized in the accompanying on-line Table. There were 7 female and 7 male patients with a mean age of 48 years (age range, 10–64 years). A total of 13 (93%) patients presented with SAH, and 1 (7%) presented with symptoms of mass effect on the brain stem of acute onset. Of the 13 patients with SAH, clinical condition on admission was Hunt and Hess (HH) grade I–II in 4, HH III in 3, and HH IV–V in 6. Treatment was started within 5 days after SAH in 9 patients and between 14 and 180 days in 4 patients. At the time of treatment, none of the patients had a lateral medullary (Wallenberg) syndrome.

Results

Representative Cases

Case 1.

A 47-year-old man (patient #3) was admitted with SAH grade III. Left vertebral angiograms revealed a small vertebral aneurysm proximal to the PICA origin on a narrowed segment consistent with dissection. Both vertebral arteries had a normal caliber. The dissecting aneurysm, including the vertebral artery, was completely occluded with coils. After occlusion of the left vertebral artery, the left PICA remained patent via the right vertebral artery (Fig 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig 1.

Acutely ruptured left vertebral dissecting aneurysm proximal to the PICA origin in a 47-year-old man (patient #3). A, Left vertebral angiogram shows dissecting aneurysm on a narrowed segment proximal to the PICA origin (arrow). B, Right vertebral angiogram after internal coil trapping of the aneurysm and dissecting aneurysm demonstrates retrograde filling of the left distal vertebral artery and PICA (arrow).

Case 2.

A 51-year-old man (patient #5) was referred 4 weeks after SAH from a right vertebral dissecting aneurysm involving the origin of the right PICA. The contralateral left vertebral artery showed a dissection in the V3 segment; therefore, it was decided to preserve the right vertebral artery. A Leo stent (Balt, Montmorency, France) was placed over the aneurysm and PICA origin as the only treatment. Follow-up angiograms after 6 months showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm with a patent right PICA (Fig 2).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig 2.

Right vertebral dissecting aneurysm involving the origin of the PICA in a 51-year-old man referred 4 weeks after SAH (patient #5). A, Right vertebral angiogram shows dissecting aneurysm. B, Follow-up angiogram 6 months after stent placement demonstrates complete occlusion of the aneurysm with a patent right PICA.

Case 3.

A 10-year-old boy (patient #8) complained of sudden headache and difficulty in swallowing. MR imaging and angiograms revealed a giant dissecting aneurysm of the right vertebral artery distal to the PICA with an intramural thrombus compressing the brain stem. The lumen of the aneurysm, including the dissected vertebral segment, was occluded with coils. At follow-up MR imaging 3 and 6 months later, the aneurysm had substantially decreased in size. From a clinical standpoint, the patient was free of symptoms (Fig 3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig 3.

Giant, partially thrombosed right vertebral dissecting aneurysm distal to the PICA origin occurring with acute compression of the brain stem in a 10-year-old boy (patient #8). A, MR imaging shows dissecting aneurysm compressing the brain stem. B,C, Right (B) and left (C) vertebral angiogram shows giant aneurysm of the right vertebral artery distal to the PICA origin. D,E, Bilateral vertebral angiograms (D) and corresponding radiograph (E) with complete coil occlusion of the aneurysm and parent vertebral segment. F, MR imaging 6 months later demonstrates shrinkage of the aneurysm with decreased compression of the brain stem.

Case 4.

A 36-year-old woman (patient #9) was admitted with SAH grade IV from a dissecting aneurysm of the dominant left vertebral artery distal to the PICA. The right vertebral artery was of small caliber. With the patient under general anesthesia, a balloon test occlusion of the left vertebral artery was performed, and angiograms of the right vertebral artery during the test occlusion demonstrated adequate filling of the posterior circulation. The dissected segment of the left vertebral artery, including the aneurysm, was occluded with coils. The patient had an uneventful recovery (Fig 4).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig 4.

Acutely ruptured left vertebral dissecting aneurysm of a dominant vertebral artery in a 36-year-old woman presenting in HH IV (patient #9). A, Angiogram of the dominant left vertebral artery demonstrates a dissecting aneurysm distal to the PICA origin (long arrow) with focal narrowing. Note proximal basilar fenestration (short arrow). B, Right vertebral angiogram during test occlusion of the left vertebral artery shows adequate filling of posterior circulation vessels despite small caliber. C, Unsubstracted radiograph after internal coil trapping of the distal left vertebral artery.

Discussion

Dissections located on the intradural V4 segment are uncommon, and presentation with SAH is rare. In a study by Arnold et al¹ comprising 169 patients with 195 vertebral dissections, only 22 dissections (11%) were located in the intradural V4 segment and 6 (4%) occurred with SAH. When vertebrobasilar dissections occur with SAH, the risk of recurrent hemorrhage is extremely high (30% to 70%)^7,8 and prompt treatment is indicated. In a study by Yamada et al⁹ of 24 conservatively treated patients with ruptured vertebral dissecting aneurysms, 14 (58%) experienced a total of 35 rebleeding episodes. Of these 14 patients, 13 died and 11 of these deaths were directly attributable to rebleeding.

Surgical treatment of vertebral dissecting aneurysms may consist of proximal vertebral occlusion, trapping, bleb clipping, or wrapping and when the dissection involves the PICA origin, with or without PICA revascularization.^10–16 In recent years, endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms has evolved as an alternative to surgical treatment and may consist of proximal vertebral occlusion, internal coil trapping, stent-assisted coiling, or stent placement as the only therapy.^17–23

Results of multiple series^6,10–23 suggest surgical or internal coil trapping to occlude the affected segment of the artery as the appropriate therapy for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms. In some instances, PICA revascularization procedures are considered required.^15,16 Vessel wrapping for intradural lesions was ineffective in the small number of documented cases.¹⁴ Proximal surgical or endovascular balloon or coil occlusion is not effective in a substantial proportion of cases¹⁷ because of retrograde filling of the dissecting aneurysm from the contralateral vertebral artery with outflow in the ipsilateral PICA. Also, stent-assisted coiling or stent placement with preservation of the vascular patency^18,23 is mostly not effective in excluding dissecting aneurysms from the circulation. In a study by Ahn et al,²³ 10 of 13 dissecting aneurysms were incompletely occluded after stent placement and at 6 to 12 months follow-up, 6 of 12 aneurysms were still not occluded. In addition, the required antiplatelet medication may have been a major drawback.

In internal coil trapping, several theoretical and technical considerations can be made. First, there may be a concern of occluding perforating arteries or a contribution to the anterior spinal artery arising from the dissected segment. Because small perforators usually are invisible on angiograms, this cannot be avoided with certainty. On the other hand, it seems unlikely that small vessels would still be patent in a dissected segment; thus, occluding the affected segment can be considered safe.

Second, there may be a concern of perforation of the aneurysm or vessel wall, as it is well known that dissections may harbor extremely thin and fragile walls prone to recurrent hemorrhage. In addition, the stability of the first inserted coil should be guaranteed in a high-flow state. In this respect, we found it helpful to use coils of 0.018-inch thickness and oversize the first coil relative to the maximum diameter of the dissecting aneurysm. After insertion of the first coil loop in the aneurysm, we deliberately allow the second coil loop to herniate into the parent vessel. In this way, the coil conducts its force to the microcatheter instead of to the fragile aneurysmal wall, and the risk of perforation is thus reduced. At the same time, maximum stability of the coil is obtained because both the parent vessel and the aneurysm serve as an anchor. After creating this framework, we insert additional smaller size coils that finally completely occlude both the aneurysm and the parent vertebral artery. In this way, coiling of dissecting aneurysms is less challenging and more straightforward than traditional selective coiling of the aneurysmal sac because maneuvers to keep the parent vessel open are not necessary.

In our study, we applied internal coil trapping of the dissected vertebral segment in 12 of 13 patients, with excellent clinical and angiographic results. When the dissection involved the dominant vertebral artery, balloon test occlusion was valuable in the evaluation of the collateral circulation via the contralateral vertebral artery or posterior communicating arteries. In 2 patients with acute hemorrhagic dissections involving the PICA origin, coil occlusion including the PICA origin did not lead to clinical symptoms or infarctions on imaging studies. In 1 patient with a dissection involving the PICA origin and a long delay in referral, the vertebral artery and PICA patency was preserved with stent placement. From our results, and from those of others, we believe that in the acute phase of SAH after vertebral dissection, immediate internal coil trapping is the preferred therapy. This also holds true for dissections involving the PICA origin because prevention of recurrent SAH outweighs the risk of ischemia in the PICA territory. In patients with a single vertebral artery and insufficient posterior communicating arteries, stent-assisted coiling or surgical treatment is indicated.

When patients present in a delayed time course, and the risk of recurrent hemorrhage is low, more sophisticated treatment options to preserve patency of the parent vessel may be considered, including stent-assisted coiling, single stent placement or stent in stent, neurosurgical bypass and trapping, combined procedures, or conservative close follow-up. Balloon test occlusion in the patient who is awake may be helpful. Although revascularization procedures of the PICA are technically possible, this type of therapy is technically challenging and is not available in all centers. In our experience with deliberate PICA origin occlusion (also for PICA aneurysms), clinical outcome is usually good.²⁴ Nevertheless, when expertise is available, in selected cases PICA revascularization may be a valuable treatment.

Conclusion

Intradural vertebral dissecting aneurysms that occur with SAH should be treated promptly because of the high risk of recurrent hemorrhage. In our experience, trapping of the dissected segment with coils was straightforward, could be done in most patients, and was effective in preventing rebleeding. In our opinion, only in exceptional circumstances are more sophisticated techniques aimed at preservation of the parent artery necessary.