Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

Combined Diffusion Imaging and MR Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Human Prion Diseases

D. Galanaud, S. Haik, M.G. Linguraru, J.-P. Ranjeva, B. Faucheux, E. Kaphan, N. Ayache, J. Chiras, P. Cozzone, D. Dormont and J.-P. Brandel
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2010, 31 (7) 1311-1318; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2069
D. Galanaud
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Haik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.G. Linguraru
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-P. Ranjeva
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Faucheux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Kaphan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Ayache
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Chiras
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Cozzone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Dormont
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-P. Brandel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The physiopathologic bases underlying the signal intensity changes and reduced diffusibility observed in prion diseases (TSEs) are still poorly understood. We evaluated the interest of MRS combined with DWI both as a diagnostic tool and a way to understand the mechanism underlying signal intensity and ADC changes in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a prospective study of multimodal MR imaging in patients with suspected TSEs. Forty-five patients with a suspicion of TSE and 11 age-matched healthy volunteers were included. The MR imaging protocol included T1, FLAIR, and DWI sequences. MRS was performed on the cerebellum, pulvinar, right lenticular nucleus, and frontal cortex. MR images were assessed visually, and ADC values were calculated.

RESULTS: Among the 45 suspected cases, 31 fulfilled the criteria for probable or definite TSEs (19 sCJDs, 3 iCJDs, 2 vCJDs, and 7 genetic TSEs); and 14 were classified as AltDs. High signals in the cortex and/or basal ganglia were observed in 26/31 patients with TSEs on FLAIR and 29/31 patients on DWI. In the basal ganglia, high DWI signals corresponded to a decreased ADC. Metabolic alterations, increased mIns, and decreased NAA were observed in all patients with TSEs. ADC values and metabolic changes were not correlated; this finding suggests that neuronal stress (vacuolization), neuronal loss, and astrogliosis do not alone explain the decrease of ADC.

CONCLUSIONS: MRS combined with other MR imaging is of interest in the diagnosis of TSE and provides useful information for understanding physiopathologic processes underlying prion diseases.

Abbreviations

ADC
apparent diffusion coefficient
AltD
alternative diagnosis
Avg
average
C (or c)
control
Cho
choline
CJD
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
Cr
creatine
DWI
diffusion-weighted imaging
EEG
electroencephalograph
FFI
fatal familial insomnia
FLAIR
fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
GABA
gamma-aminobutyric acid
gCJD
genetic CJD
Glx
glutamine-glutamate-GABA
GSS
Gerstmann Strausser Sheinker syndrome
iCJD
iatrogenic CJD
mIns
myo-inositol
MM
methionine homozygosity (PRNP: genotype at codon 129)
MRS
MR spectroscopy
MRI
MR imaging
MV
methionine-valine heterozygosity (PRNP: genotype at codon 129)
NA
data not available
NAA
N-acetylaspartate
NS
not significant or nonspecific slow waves
P (or p)
patient
PRNP
genotype at codon 129
PrP
prion protein or persistent plexus gene
S
sum of metabolites
sCJD
sporadic CJD
TSE
human transmissible spongiform encephalopathy
vCJD
variant CJD
VV
valine homozygosity (PRNP: genotype at codon 129)

MR imaging has become a tool of choice in the diagnosis of several forms of prion diseases (TSEs). The presence of areas of increased signal intensity, usually associated with a decreased ADC, are frequently observed on the cortex, thalamus, and/or basal ganglia of patients with sCJD, vCJD, or iCJD. However, the exact physiopathologic processes underlying these changes are still subject to debate. They have been variously attributed to the PrP deposits, the morphologic changes of neurons, or gliosis.1–3 Correlation of these signal-intensity changes with pathologic data is further impaired by their modification during the time course of the disease.4–6 MRS can, on the other hand, be performed simultaneously with conventional imaging and can give information on the ongoing pathologic processes: Neuronal loss or stress will lead to a decrease in NAA, while gliosis will induce an increase in the resonance of mIns. Hence, to determine the diagnostic value of MRS in TSEs and to better understand the physiopathologic processes underlying the signal intensity/ADC changes, we prospectively studied 45 patients clinically suspected of having prion diseases with a multimodal MR imaging protocol, including MRS and conventional and diffusion imaging.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study was approved by the committee on ethics of La Timone Hospital. Patients (or their representatives) and controls gave written informed consent to participate in the study.

Selection and Classification of Patients

Patients were referred to the neurology departments of La Pitié Salpêtrière (Paris) and La Timone hospital (Marseille) for suspicion of TSEs (sporadic, genetic, iatrogenic, or variant). This diagnosis was reassessed by 2 neurologists who were experts in prion diseases (J.-P.B. and S.H.). Patients then underwent a multimodal MR imaging, which was part of an extensive evaluation, including 14.3.3 protein detection in the CSF, EEG, and genotyping of the PrP gene. Tonsil biopsies were performed when vCJD was suspected. Postmortem examination was performed in 9 subjects. The eventual diagnosis was based on the World Health Organization clinical diagnostic criteria for prion diseases.7 The pathologic findings in the patient with FFI were published in a previous article.8

MR Imaging Protocol

MR imaging examinations were performed on 1.5T magnets at La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris (Signa HDx; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) and at La Timone Hospital, Marseille (Vision; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Patients were given a light sedation with hydroxyzine dichlorhydrate, 100 mg, when required by their clinical status. Pulse saturometry was monitored during the procedure. Total time inside the magnet was approximately 1 hour. The MR imaging protocol included the following:

  • 1) A sagittal T1-weighted sequence.

  • 2) One axial T1-weighted sequence (TR = 644 ms, TE = 15 ms, 3-mm thickness, interleaved).

  • 3) An axial FLAIR sequence (TR = 8000 ms, TI = 2200 ms, TE = 110 ms, 5-mm thickness, interleaved).

  • 4) DWI (single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence; b = 0, 500, 1000 s/mm2 applied in the x, y, and z directions sequentially; 19 sections; 5-mm thickness; matrix = 128 × 128; FOV = 256 × 256 mm2). ADC maps were reconstructed by using this sequence as previously described.9

  • 5) Four stimulated echo acquisition mode single-voxel spectroscopy acquisitions (TR = 1500 ms, TE = 20 ms, TM = 30 ms) on regions known to be frequently involved in prion diseases: the cerebellar vermis (voxel size, 20 × 20 × 15 mm), the pulvinar (voxel location as previously described10), the right lenticular nucleus (voxel size, 35 × 15 × 15 mm), and the bifrontal cortex (voxel size, 40 × 20 × 15 mm). The locations of the voxels are shown on Fig 1.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Location of the MRS voxels on axial FLAIR (A and C) and sagittal T1-weighted (B) sequences: lenticular nucleus (1), pulvinar (2), cerebellar vermis (3), and frontal cortex (4).

Processing of MR Images and Spectra

MR images were analyzed with 2 methods:

  • 1) MR imaging examinations were interpreted by 2 expert neuroradiologists (D.G. and D.D.). Signal intensity on FLAIR and DWIs was evaluated side by side in cortical regions (frontal, temporoinsular, and parieto-occipital) and 3 areas of the basal ganglia (caudate, putamen, and thalamus). Signal intensity was ranked from 1 to 4 as follows: 1, normal; 2, dubious area of increased signal intensity; 3, obvious area of increased signal intensity; and 4, area of markedly increased signal intensity. Differences between observers were settled by consensus.

  • 2) ADC values were calculated by using the software provided by the manufacturers in the following locations: head of the caudate nuclei, putamen, thalamus, and pulvinar. ADC regions were drawn on the DWI image, on the section on which each nucleus had the greatest extension. The voxel included the whole structure present on this section minus the pixels closest to the ventricles, to avoid partial volume effect. Because of partial volume effects, we did not calculate the ADC in the cerebellum and frontal cortex.

Quantification of MR Spectra

The MRS data were analyzed by using a dedicated software described elsewhere.11 Resonances were assigned according to those described in the literature.12,13 Spectra were processed as previously described.14,15 Briefly, we manually corrected the baselines and integrated the resonances of the following metabolites: NAA, Cr, Cho, mIns, and Glx. The value of each metabolite was then divided by the sum (S = NAA + Cr + Cho + mIns + Glx) of all metabolite values (semiquantitative evaluation). This semiquantitative analysis, the sum of metabolites, was preferred to the calculation of individual metabolite ratios (eg, NAA/Cr or Cho/Cr), which are dependent on both numerator and denominator variations. For instance, a decreased NAA/Cr ratio could be attributed to both a reduction in NAA (resulting from neuronal stress) or an increase in Cr (resulting from a glial activation or proliferation).16–18 Ratios of the sum of metabolites “smoothen” these variations and enable a better evaluation of the variations of the metabolite in the numerator. However, we did evaluate the mIns/NAA ratio. Because NAA is a neuronal marker and mIns is a glial marker, this ratio simultaneously evaluates neuronal stress/death and gliosis, which are 2 of the main histologic landmarks of prion diseases. The presence of detectable free lipids and lactate was also assessed.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by using the JMP software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Differences among patients, volunteers, and AltDs were determined by a Kruskal-Wallis analysis followed by a Scheffé test with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The statistical analysis was also performed on the subgroup of patients with sCJD, who were compared with controls by using an unpaired Student t test. Due to the small numbers and heterogeneity of the other subtypes of CJD and AltDs, no further statistical analysis could be performed on these patients and their metabolic anomalies were only described.

Results

Forty-five patients were prospectively studied. The diagnosis of prion diseases was eventually confirmed in 31 subjects and included 1 FFI, 1 GSS, 2 vCJD, 3 iCJD related to growth hormone treatment of CJD, 5 gCJD, and 19 sCJD. The mean time between first symptoms and the MR imaging examination was 7 months. The median duration of disease in sCJD was 7 months. Genotype at codon 129 of the PRNP gene was determined in 29/31 subjects. The patients' main clinical and paraclinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Main clinical and paraclinical data of patients

The diagnoses for the other 14 patients were the following: 2 Alzheimer diseases, 1 vascular dementia, 1 Hashimoto encephalitis, 1 depression, 1 metabolic, 1 epileptic encephalopathy, 1 atypical Parkinson disease, 1 paraneoplastic syndrome, and 5 dementias of unknown etiology.

Conventional Imaging

High signals in the cortex and/or basal ganglia were observed in 26/31 patients with TSEs on FLAIR sequence. The 5 patients with normal findings on the FLAIR sequence were the ones with FFI and the GSS, 1/19 sCJD and 1/3 iCJD, and 1 codon 200 mutation of the 5 cases of gCJD.

On the DWI sequence, 29/31 patients had abnormalities: 26/31 on the cortical areas and 25/31 on the basal ganglia. The 3 patients with normal FLAIR findings and lesions on the DWI sequence were the patient with gCJD, who presented clear abnormalities on both cortical areas and basal ganglia; the one with sCJD, who had widespread involvement of the cortex; and the one with iatrogenic CJD, who had clear involvement of the striatum.

Neither patients with an AltD nor the control subjects had areas of increased signal intensity or reduced diffusibility in the cortex or basal ganglia.

Typical images are shown on Fig 2. The frequency of involvement of the major brain structures is summarized on Table 2.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Typical images in cases of sCJD (A), vCJD (B), and gCJD (C). FLAIR, DWI, and ADC map, respectively, are shown. Areas of increased signal intensity, which involve the cortex and the striatum are more extensive and more clearly visible on diffusion images. On the basal ganglia, these changes are associated with a decreased ADC. There is widespread involvement of the cortex in the patient with sCJD. gCJD and vCJD both present with lesions of the thalamus and lenticular nuclei. However, in the variant case, as opposed to the genetic one, the areas of high signal intensity are more pronounced in the pulvinar than in the striatum as has been previously described in this phenotype.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Number of patients presenting with areas of significant (≥3 on the visual scale) increased signal/decreased ADC in the different brain structuresa

ADC Values

ADC values were significantly reduced in the head of the caudate nuclei, thalamus, pulvinar, and lenticular nuclei in patients with prion disease compared with controls (P < 10−2 in all cases). This difference was also present when the analysis was restricted to subjects with sCJD.

In patients with AltDs, ADC values were not significantly different from those of controls.

MRS

A summary of MRS results is given in On-line Table 1. Typical spectra are shown in Fig 3. MRS could be performed in all patients and controls. Some spectra had to be excluded because of poor quality in 1 control (lenticular voxel) and 2 patients with CJD (a pulvinar acquisition in a patient with sCJD and a lenticular acquisition in the patient with FFI). No difference was observed in the metabolic ratios between the controls in the 2 MR imaging centers.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Typical spectra recorded in a patient with sCJD (left column) and in a healthy volunteer (right column) in the vermis, pulvinar, right lenticular nucleus, and frontal gray matter. Metabolic anomalies are observed on the bifrontal voxel (decreased NAA and increased mIns), on the lenticular voxel (decreased NAA), and on the bipulvinar voxel (decreased NAA and increased mIns). Note that to get an accurate idea of NAA and mIns variations, one should compare their resonances with “stable” metabolites (eg, Cr).

The NAA/S, the mIns/S, and mIns/NAA ratios showed differences in the global (Kruskal-Wallis) analysis. No other metabolic ratio was significantly different between groups. The NAA/S ratio was lower and the mIns/S and mIns/NAA ratios were higher in patients with prion disease compared with controls in most studied voxels (On-line Table 1). The mIns/NAA ratio was the only one to be significantly different in all 4 voxels (Fig 4).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

ADC values in the lenticular (A) and caudate (B) nuclei and mIns/NAA ratios on the vermis (C), pulvinar (D), right lenticular nucleus (E), and frontal gray matter (F) in patients with prion disease (p), controls (c), and those with AltD. ADC is decreased and mIns/NAA is increased in patients with prion disease compared with both controls and AltDs. Neither ADC values nor the mIns/NAA ratios can discriminate between the 2 latter groups.

In the lenticular and pulvinar nuclei, where both MRS was performed and ADC values could be calculated, no metabolic ratio was significantly correlated to ADC values (Fig 5), regardless of the presence of areas of increased signal intensity in FLAIR or DWI.

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

ADC values plotted against the NAA/S (A) and mIns/S (B) ratios measured on the same area of the pulvinar in patients with prion disease. There is an absence of correlation between these parameters (R2 = 0.003, P = .8 and R2 = 0.11, P = .08 respectively).

No parameter on DWI or MRS was correlated to the survival of the patients.

Discussion

While the value of MR imaging for the diagnosis of most subtypes of prion diseases has been well established in several large retrospective studies, the pathologic bases of the observed signal-intensity changes on diffusion and T2/FLAIR images are still imperfectly understood. Correlating signal intensity or ADC changes with the findings at autopsy is of crucial importance but should be complemented by in vivo studies because it is known that the pattern of lesions on MR imaging can change during the course of the disease,4,6,19,20 and because the interval between MR imaging and death is often long. MRS is a noninvasive method to study brain metabolism, which can be performed during the same examination as diffusion imaging and can thus allow the synchronous evaluation of diffusion lesions and cellular changes.

The MRS results in our study are in accordance with the classic pathologic findings in prion diseases. The metabolic alterations are a decrease in NAA/S, which corresponds to neuronal stress and death, and an increase in mIns/S, which is a marker of gliosis. To our knowledge, this study is the first prospective evaluation of MRS in human prion diseases. Our findings are similar to those reported in previously published articles of human and animal models of prion diseases.4,,21–27 We did not observe any correlation between ADC values and any metabolic ratio. This does not support neuronal stress such as vacuolization (spongiform changes) as the main factor that could explain a reduced diffusibility of water.28 Because gliosis increases ADC,3 we can speculate a role for PrP deposits in the decrease of ADC. The normalization of the ADC values observed in some patients later in the course of the disease could be explained at least in part by the subsequent development of gliosis.8 This hypothesis could be verified with follow-up examinations, which could show an increase in mIns. However, while they were initially intended in our study, they could not be performed due to the rapidly worsening clinical condition of most patients. A specific postmortem study of radiopathologic correlations with extensive quantification of tissue alterations, including spongiform change, astrogliosis, microglial activation, and neuronal loss together with an assessment of abnormal protein accumulation, will help to better understand the pathologic supports of each neuroradiologic perturbation. The distinct prion-related lesions may influence differently, and sometimes with opposite effects, each MR imaging component.

The high frequency of metabolic alterations on MRS in patients with prion diseases can be explained by the targeting of MRS to the regions most commonly affected by these diseases. However, metabolic alterations were not present in all 4 locations in every patient. This is in accordance with the heterogeneous distribution of the pathologic changes in these diseases.29 In addition, variations in NAA and mIns were also not systematically associated and could be found separately. These results are in agreement with the pathologic pattern of prion diseases, which diversely associates neuronal impairment and gliosis and varies among brain regions.

The coherence of these results with the pathologic data is reinforced by the findings in some subtypes: In the 2 cases of vCJD, the most severely affected areas were the pulvinars,30 with a marked decrease in NAA/S and increase in mIns/S ratios, with vCJD being characterized by the occurrence of severe neuronal loss with intense gliosis in this region. In addition, the 3 patients with iCJD exhibited stronger decreased NAA/S in the cerebellum compared with the population with sCJD. This is in agreement with the early and predominant cerebellar symptoms and the neuropathologic patterns that are regularly observed in this form.31

We observed a higher sensitivity of FLAIR (84%) than was previously reported by Tschampa et al32 in a large retrospective study (47%) of patients from different institutions. This can probably be explained by a homogeneous acquisition protocol on similar MR imaging magnets in our study.

The sensitivity (94%) of diffusion imaging was higher than previously observed in retrospective studies32,33 and similar (92.3%) to the only prospective study that evaluated DWI in prion diseases so far.34 This sequence is thus clearly the most sensitive among conventional MR imaging acquisitions for the diagnosis of prion diseases. The 2 cases with negative findings were genetic forms (1 FFI and 1 GSS). All cases of sCJD, gCJD, and iCJD had abnormalities on the DWI sequence. No patient with an AltD had areas of decreased ADC, confirming the high specificity of DWI for the diagnosis of prion diseases in the clinical setting of dementia of rapid onset.

One of 19 patients with sCJD had no lesions on the FLAIR sequence. The cortex was involved in 16/19 patients and the basal ganglia, in 13/19. All patients had areas of increased signal intensity on DWI, involving the cortex (19/19) and the basal ganglia (15/19). The distribution of lesions among the cortex and basal ganglia was similar to the one reported recently by Meissner et al.35 Results of the analysis of MRS and ADC data performed on this subgroup of patients were comparable to those of the total group of patients with prion diseases (On-line Table 1).

Among the 17 patients with sCJD for which the genotype of PRNP at codon 129 was available, 9 had the MM; 7, the MV; and 1, the VV phenotype. Median duration of the disease was 4 months for the MM phenotype and 11.5 months for patients with MV and VV phenotypes. On FLAIR imaging, lesions of the basal ganglia were more frequent in patients with the MV or VV (7/8) phenotypes than in subjects with the MM (4/9) phenotype.

MR imaging findings in gCJD were heterogeneous. The patient with mutation D178N-129V had extensive areas of increased signal intensity on the cortex, on both FLAIR and DWI, with only minimal involvement of the basal ganglia (hypersignal of the left caudate). One patient with mutation 200 had no abnormalities on the FLAIR sequence but showed areas of hypersignal on the DWI sequences in the left striatum and frontal and insular cortices. The 2 other patients with mutation 200 had marked hypersignals in the striatum on both FLAIR and DWI imaging. Involvement of the cortex was also present on DWI. These results (frequency of involvement of the basal ganglia and cortical lesions detected on DWI) are comparable with those previously described in a population of subjects with mutation 200.36 The patient with mutation V203I had diffuse lesions on both the cortex and basal ganglia. ADC values were diminished in the basal ganglia of all patients. Spectroscopic findings in the 5 genetic cases were similar to those of sporadic cases.

Among patients with iCJD, FLAIR imaging findings were normal in 1 patient; showed lesions restricted to the striatum in 1; and evidenced widespread involvement of the striatum, thalamus, periaqueductal gray matter, and cortex in another. On DWI, all patients showed marked areas of increased signal intensity in the striatum, which were associated with decreased ADC values. The 3 cases of iCJD had in common a markedly reduced NAA/S in the cerebellar vermis. MRS results were otherwise heterogeneous.

We observed the classic imaging pattern of vCJD, with hypersignals of the basal ganglia in both FLAIR and DWI sequences, predominating in the pulvinar (pulvinar sign). No lesions were seen on the cortex. The 2 patients with vCJD had similar spectroscopic findings, in accordance with previously published reports of MRS in this disease by the authors (about a previous patient) and others.10,21,26 A pronounced decrease in NAA/S and an increase in mIns/S were present in the pulvinar. The metabolic abnormalities in the lenticular nuclei were limited to an increase in mIns, and the metabolic profiles of the vermis and the frontal cortex were both normal.

The patient with FFI had normal findings on FLAIR and DWI. Most interesting, as opposed to all other cases of prion diseases, ADC values were increased in the thalamus compared with those in healthy volunteers. MRS showed a decrease in NAA/S on the pulvinar, associated with an increased mIns/S. The metabolic profiles of the frontal cortex and of the vermis were normal, and the lenticular nucleus was not interpretable.

The patient with GSS had normal findings on FLAIR and DWI, except a moderate cerebellar atrophy. ADC values were within the normal range in all the locations studied. MRS showed diffuse changes overall similar to those of patients with sCJD. The most striking abnormality was a pronounced decrease in NAA/S in the lenticular nucleus.

Conclusions

Metabolic changes were detected in all patients with sporadic, inherited, or infectious prion diseases in at least 1 of the studied voxels, even in areas that looked normal on conventional imaging. In addition, we confirm, in this prospective study, that DWI has the highest sensitivity (94%) among the conventional MR imaging sequences. No metabolic ratio was correlated to ADC values, indicating that these 2 imaging modalities explore different pathologic processes. It should now be of great interest to confirm the specificity of DWI and MRS by a study on a large non-CJD population with dementia and to explore further the neuropathologic bases of MR imaging alterations in humans and in experimental in vivo models of prion diseases.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the patients who took part in this study and their families.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by a grant from the Groupement d'intérêt spécifique “Prions.” Other financial support for this work was provided by the French Ministry of Research, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, and the Institut Universitaire de France.

  • indicates article with supplemental on-line table.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bahn MM,
    2. Parchi P
    . Abnormal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Arch Neurol 1999;56:577–83
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Finkenstaedt M,
    2. Szudra A,
    3. Zerr I,
    4. et al
    . MR imaging of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Radiology 1996;199:793–98
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Haik S,
    2. Dormont D,
    3. Faucheux BA,
    4. et al
    . Prion protein deposits match magnetic resonance imaging signal abnormalities in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Ann Neurol 2002;51:797–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Oppenheim C,
    2. Zuber M,
    3. Galanaud D,
    4. et al
    . Spectroscopy and serial diffusion MR findings in hGH-Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1066–69
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tribl GG,
    2. Strasser G,
    3. Zeitlhofer J,
    4. et al
    . Sequential MRI in a case of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neuroradiology 2002;44:223–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ukisu R,
    2. Kushihashi T,
    3. Kitanosono T,
    4. et al
    . Serial diffusion-weighted MRI of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:560–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Brandel JP,
    2. Delasnerie-Laupretre N,
    3. Laplanche JL,
    4. et al.
    , Diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: effect of clinical criteria on incidence estimates. Neurology 2000;54:1095–99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Haik S,
    2. Galanaud D,
    3. Linguraru MG,
    4. et al
    . In vivo detection of thalamic gliosis: a pathoradiologic demonstration in familial fatal insomnia. Arch Neurol 2008;65:545–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Nicoli F,
    2. Lefur Y,
    3. Denis B,
    4. et al
    . Metabolic counterpart of decreased apparent diffusion coefficient during hyperacute ischemic stroke: a brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study. Stroke 2003;34:e82–87
    CrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Galanaud D,
    2. Dormont D,
    3. Grabli D,
    4. et al
    . MR spectroscopic pulvinar sign in a case of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J Neuroradiol 2002;29:285–87
    PubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Galanaud D,
    2. Le Fur Y,
    3. Nicoli F,
    4. et al
    . Regional metabolite levels of the normal posterior fossa studied by proton chemical shift imaging. MAGMA 2001;13:127–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Frahm J,
    2. Bruhn H,
    3. Gyngell M,
    4. et al
    . Localized proton spectroscopy using stimulated echoes: initial application to human brain in vivo. Magn Reson Med 1989;9:79–93
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Michaelis T,
    2. Merboldt K,
    3. Hänicke W,
    4. et al
    . On the identification of cerebral metabolites in localized H-1 NMR spectra of the human brain in vivo. NMR Biomed 1991;4:90–98
    PubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Confort-Gouny S,
    2. Vion-Dury J,
    3. Nicoli F,
    4. et al
    . A multiparametric data analysis showing the potential of localized proton MR spectroscopy in the brain in the metabolic characterization of neurological diseases. J Neurol Sci 1993;118:123–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Galanaud D,
    2. Nicoli F,
    3. Chinot O,
    4. et al
    . Noninvasive diagnostic assessment of brain tumors using combined in vivo MR imaging and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1236–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Chang L,
    2. Ernst T,
    3. Osborn D,
    4. et al
    . Proton spectroscopy in myotonic dystrophy. Arch Neurol 1998;55:305–11
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fernando KT,
    2. McLean MA,
    3. Chard DT,
    4. et al
    . Elevated white matter myo-inositol in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2004;127:1361–69
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Vrenken H,
    2. Barkhof F,
    3. Uitdehaag BM,
    4. et al
    . MR spectroscopic evidence for glial increase but not for neuro-axonal damage in MS normal-appearing white matter. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:256–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Matoba M,
    2. Tonami H,
    3. Miyaji H,
    4. et al
    . Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: serial changes on diffusion-weighted MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:274–77
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Krasnianski A,
    2. Kallenberg K,
    3. Collie DA,
    4. et al
    . MRI in the classical MM1 and the atypical MV2 subtypes of sporadic CJD: an inter-observer agreement study. Eur J Neurol 2008;15:762–71
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Pandya HG,
    2. Coley SC,
    3. Wilkinson ID,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance spectroscopic abnormalities in sporadic and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Clin Radiol 2003;58:148–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Graham GD,
    2. Petroff OA,
    3. Blamire AM,
    4. et al
    . Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 1993;43:2065–68
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Behar KL,
    2. Boucher R,
    3. Fritch W,
    4. et al
    . Changes in N-acetylaspartate and myo-inositol detected in the cerebral cortex of hamsters with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:963–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Konaka K,
    2. Kaido M,
    3. Okuda Y,
    4. et al
    . Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of a patient with Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease. Neuroradiology 2000;42:662–65
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lim CC,
    2. Tan K,
    3. Verma KK,
    4. et al
    . Combined diffusion-weighted and spectroscopic MR imaging in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:625–29
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Cordery RJ,
    2. Macmanus D,
    3. Godbolt A,
    4. et al
    . Short TE quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1–7. Epub 2006 Jan 12
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Broom KA,
    2. Anthony DC,
    3. Lowe JP,
    4. et al
    . MRI and MRS alterations in the preclinical phase of murine prion disease: association with neuropathological and behavioural changes. Neurobiol Dis 2007;26:707–17. Epub 2007 Apr 5
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Mittal S,
    2. Farmer P,
    3. Kalina P,
    4. et al
    . Correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with neuropathology in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Arch Neurol 2002;59:128–34
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Parchi P,
    2. Giese A,
    3. Capellari S,
    4. et al
    . Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on molecular and phenotypic analysis of 300 subjects. Ann Neurol 1999;46:224–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Brandel JP,
    2. Heath CA,
    3. Head MW,
    4. et al
    . Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in France and the United Kingdom: evidence for the same agent strain. Ann Neurol 2009;65:249–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Billette de Villemeur T,
    2. Gelot A,
    3. Deslys JP,
    4. et al
    . Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in three growth hormone recipients: a neuropathological study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1994;20:111–17
    PubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Tschampa HJ,
    2. Kallenberg K,
    3. Urbach H,
    4. et al
    . MRI in the diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a study on inter-observer agreement. Brain 2005;128(pt 9):2026–33. Epub 2005 Jun 15
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Young GS,
    2. Geschwind MD,
    3. Fischbein NJ,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1551–62
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Shiga Y,
    2. Miyazawa K,
    3. Sato S,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted MRI abnormalities as an early diagnostic marker for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 2004;63:443–49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Meissner B,
    2. Kallenberg K,
    3. Sanchez-Juan P,
    4. et al
    . Isolated cortical signal increase on MR imaging as a frequent lesion pattern in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1519–24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Fulbright RK,
    2. Hoffmann C,
    3. Lee H,
    4. et al
    . MR imaging of familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a blinded and controlled study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1638–43
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received August 19, 2009.
  • Accepted after revision December 13, 2009.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 31 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 31, Issue 7
1 Aug 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Combined Diffusion Imaging and MR Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Human Prion Diseases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
D. Galanaud, S. Haik, M.G. Linguraru, J.-P. Ranjeva, B. Faucheux, E. Kaphan, N. Ayache, J. Chiras, P. Cozzone, D. Dormont, J.-P. Brandel
Combined Diffusion Imaging and MR Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Human Prion Diseases
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2010, 31 (7) 1311-1318; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2069

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Combined Diffusion Imaging and MR Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Human Prion Diseases
D. Galanaud, S. Haik, M.G. Linguraru, J.-P. Ranjeva, B. Faucheux, E. Kaphan, N. Ayache, J. Chiras, P. Cozzone, D. Dormont, J.-P. Brandel
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2010, 31 (7) 1311-1318; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2069
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (31)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Imaging of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: Imaging Patterns and Their Differential Diagnosis
    Diego Cardoso Fragoso, Augusto Lio da Mota Gonçalves Filho, Felipe Torres Pacheco, Bernardo Rodi Barros, Ingrid Aguiar Littig, Renato Hoffmann Nunes, Antônio Carlos Martins Maia Júnior, Antonio J. da Rocha
    RadioGraphics 2017 37 1
  • Viral and Prion Infections of the Central Nervous System: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation:From the Radiologic Pathology Archives
    Kelly K. Koeller, Robert Y. Shih
    RadioGraphics 2017 37 1
  • White matter involvement in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
    Eduardo Caverzasi, Maria Luisa Mandelli, Stephen J. DeArmond, Christopher P. Hess, Paolo Vitali, Nico Papinutto, Abby Oehler, Bruce L. Miller, Irina V. Lobach, Stefano Bastianello, Michael D. Geschwind, Roland G. Henry
    Brain 2014 137 12
  • Structure-adaptive sparse denoising for diffusion-tensor MRI
    Lijun Bao, Marc Robini, Wanyu Liu, Yuemin Zhu
    Medical Image Analysis 2013 17 4
  • Diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy of sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: correlation with clinical course
    Jae Hyoung Kim, Byung Se Choi, Cheolkyu Jung, YoungHee Chang, SangYun Kim
    Neuroradiology 2011 53 12
  • Imaging of prion diseases
    Laurent Letourneau‐Guillon, Ryan Wada, Walter Kucharczyk
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2012 35 5
  • Neuroradiology of human prion diseases, diagnosis and differential diagnosis
    Simona Gaudino, Emma Gangemi, Raffaella Colantonio, Annibale Botto, Emanuela Ruberto, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Matia Martucci, Maria Gabriella Vita, Carlo Masullo, Alfonso Cerase, Cesare Colosimo
    La radiologia medica 2017 122 5
  • Multimodality imaging of neurodegenerative disorders with a focus on multiparametric magnetic resonance and molecular imaging
    James Ryan Loftus, Savita Puri, Steven P. Meyers
    Insights into Imaging 2023 14 1
  • Using NMR spectroscopy to investigate the role played by copper in prion diseases
    Rawiah A. Alsiary, Mawadda Alghrably, Abdelhamid Saoudi, Suliman Al-Ghamdi, Lukasz Jaremko, Mariusz Jaremko, Abdul-Hamid Emwas
    Neurological Sciences 2020 41 9
  • Mathematical models for the diffusion magnetic resonance signal abnormality in patients with prion diseases
    Matteo Figini, Daniel C. Alexander, Veronica Redaelli, Fabrizio Fasano, Marina Grisoli, Giuseppe Baselli, Pierluigi Gambetti, Fabrizio Tagliavini, Alberto Bizzi
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2015 7

More in this TOC Section

  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire