Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

LetterLETTER

Gradient- and Spin-Echo MR Imaging of the Brain

Mahesh R. Patel and Roman A. Klufas
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 1999, 20 (7) 1381-1383;
Mahesh R. Patel
a Neuroradiology Service Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roman A. Klufas
b Neuroradiology Service Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

In their study comparing gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) and T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging of the brain, Rockwell et al (1) conclude that T2-weighted GRASE images are better at depicting lesions with paramagnetic susceptibility effects. Although this is likely true, as fast-spin-echo images have diminished susceptibility artifact, the authors fail to note previous reporting of hemosiderin-containing lesions from hemorrhage that were not visible on GRASE images but were seen on conventional spin-echo images (2). Therefore, neither GRASE nor fast spin-echo images should supplant gradient-echo images for the detection of hemosiderin.

Furthermore, we wish to caution readers that the contrast properties and sensitivity to detection of T2 hyperintense lesions on rapid, hybrid imaging sequences depend on the specific implementation of the pulse sequence, and particularly the k-space trajectory used for data acquisition (3–5). Two prior studies have shown that GRASE images have diminished sensitivity to T2 hyperintense lesions when compared with conventional spin-echo images (2, 6), although, admittedly, conventional spin-echo images may be more sensitive to small lesions than fast spin-echo images. Consequently, before reliance is placed on using rapid hybrid sequences in clinical practice, each site should develop its own experience and familiarity with these sequences.

References

  1. ↵
    Rockwell DT, Melhem ER, Bhatia RG. GRASE (gradient- and spin-echo) MR of the brain.. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1923-1928
    Abstract
  2. ↵
    Patel MR, Klufas RA, Shapiro AW. MR imaging of diseases of the brain: comparison of GRASE and conventional spin-echo T2-weighted pulse sequences.. AJR 1995;165:963-966
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Patel MR, Klufas RA, Alberico RA, Edelman RR. Half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MR: comparison with fast spin-echo NM in diseases of the brain.. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1635-1640
    Abstract
  4. Feinberg DA, Kiefer B, Litt AW. Dual contrast GRASE (gradient-spin echo) imaging using mixed bandwidth.. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:461-464
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. Feinberg DA, Kiefer B, Litt AW. High resolution GRASE MRI of the brain and spine: 512 and 1024 matrix imaging.. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:1-7
    PubMed
  6. Fellner F, Schmitt R, Trenkler J, Fellner C, Bohm-Jurkovic H. Turbo gradient-spin-echo (GRASE): first clinical experiences with a fast T2-weighted sequence in MRI of the brain.. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:171-176
    PubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 20, Issue 7
1 Jul 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gradient- and Spin-Echo MR Imaging of the Brain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Mahesh R. Patel, Roman A. Klufas
Gradient- and Spin-Echo MR Imaging of the Brain
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 1999, 20 (7) 1381-1383;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Gradient- and Spin-Echo MR Imaging of the Brain
Mahesh R. Patel, Roman A. Klufas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 1999, 20 (7) 1381-1383;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire