Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleInterventional

Treatment of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms with 1-Stage Coiling

P. Jeon, B.M. Kim, D.J. Kim, D.I. Kim and S.H. Suh
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2014, 35 (6) 1170-1173; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3821
P. Jeon
aFrom the Department of Radiology (P.J.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.M. Kim
bDepartment of Radiology (B.M.K., D.J.K., D.I.K.), Severance Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.J. Kim
bDepartment of Radiology (B.M.K., D.J.K., D.I.K.), Severance Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.I. Kim
bDepartment of Radiology (B.M.K., D.J.K., D.I.K.), Severance Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.H. Suh
cDepartment of Radiology (S.H.S.), Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although multiple intracranial aneurysms are frequent, determining treatment strategy and methods for them is often complicated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 1-stage coiling for multiple intracranial aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent 1-stage coiling for ≥2 aneurysms were identified from a prospectively registered neurointerventional data base during 10 years. The patient characteristics and clinical and angiographic outcomes at discharge and follow-up were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients (male/female ratio, 30:137; mean age, 58 years) with multiple aneurysms (418 aneurysms; mean, 2.5 aneurysms/patient) underwent attempted 1-stage coiling for ≥2 aneurysms (359 aneurysms; mean, 2.1 aneurysms/patient). In 131 patients (78.4%), all detected aneurysms were treated with coiling only. Treatment-related morbidity and mortality at discharge were 1.8% and 0.6% per patient, respectively. Of the 132 patients without subarachnoid hemorrhage, 129 (97.7%) had favorable outcomes (mRS 0–2) at discharge; of the 35 patients with SAH, 27 (77.1%) had favorable outcomes at discharge. Of the 162 patients (97%) for whom clinical follow-up was available (mean, 35.8 months), 154 patients (95.1%) had favorable outcomes. Immediate posttreatment angiography showed complete occlusion in 186 (51.8%) aneurysms, neck remnants in 134 (37.3%), sac remnants in 33 (9.2%), and failure in 6 (1.7%). Of the 262 (73.9%) aneurysms that underwent follow-up imaging (mean, 24.8 months), 244 (93.1%) showed a stable or improved state, with 12 (4.6%) minor and 6 (2.3%) major recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS: One-stage coiling of multiple aneurysms seems to be safe and effective, with low morbidity and mortality.

Intracranial aneurysm is the most important cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage, resulting in 8%–20% dependent morbidity and 37%–57% mortality.1 Strategies and methods for treating intracranial aneurysms have been extensively studied. Multiple intracranial aneurysms are frequent, with a reported incidence of 19%–34% of patients who present with SAH.2⇓⇓–5 Determining treatment strategy and methods for multiple aneurysms is often complicated. Coiling is currently accepted as a standard treatment for ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms and has been increasingly used, regardless of the location of the intracranial aneurysm.6 Nevertheless, while many cases of clipping for multiple aneurysms have been reported,7⇓⇓⇓⇓–12 there were only 2 small case series using coiling for multiple aneurysms.13,14 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 1-stage coiling for multiple intracranial aneurysms.

Materials and Methods

The institutional review board approved this retrospective analysis and waived patient informed consent due to the study design. All patients who underwent 1-stage coiling for ≥2 aneurysms were identified from a prospectively registered neurointerventional data base in 2 tertiary referral academic hospitals from January 2003 through December 2012. In patients with acute SAH with multiple aneurysms, the ruptured aneurysm was first treated; then, if feasible, the other aneurysms were treated in the same session. However, if it was not clear which aneurysm was ruptured, coiling was attempted only if it was feasible for all potentially ruptured aneurysms. In the patients with multiple unruptured aneurysms, neurointerventionists and vascular neurosurgeons determined, after diagnostic angiography, which aneurysms could be treated with 1-stage coiling. All procedures were performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Coiling was performed by using a conventional single catheter, multicatheter, balloon-assisted, stent-assisted, or combined technique. For all unruptured aneurysms, preoperative dual antiplatelet medication (aspirin, 100–325 mg, and clopidogrel, 75 mg) was given at least 5 days before treatment for all patients starting in late 2010. Generally, dual antiplatelet medication was stopped after the treatment but was maintained for at least 3 months and then changed to aspirin monotherapy for patients who received stent-assisted coiling.

All clinical and radiographic data were prospectively registered into neurointerventional and neurosurgical data bases in each hospital at the time of treatment and then were retrospectively analyzed by the authors. All periprocedural complications during and after treatment were prospectively recorded and retrospectively evaluated for this study. For patients presenting with SAH, treatment-related morbidity was defined as treatment-related complications causing deterioration of the patient's neurologic condition. For patients without SAH, treatment-related morbidity was defined as any objective clinical symptom developing after coiling and remaining at discharge. Patients were regularly followed up on an outpatient basis, according to the protocol of each institution, typically 1 month after discharge and then every 3–6 months. Clinical outcome was evaluated at discharge and follow-up, according to the modified Rankin Scale score. The mRS score at the latest clinical follow-up was defined as the final outcome. If the latest clinical follow-up was performed >3 months before the commencement of this study, a structured telephone interview was performed to evaluate clinical outcome.15 If the patient's clinical condition deteriorated due to an event definitively unrelated to treatment or an intracranial aneurysm, the functional outcome at the follow-up just before that event was defined as the final outcome.

Immediate angiographic results were assessed according to the Raymond classification: complete, neck remnant, or sac remnant.16 Follow-up imaging (conventional angiography and/or MR angiography) was performed initially at 6–12 months and then at 24–36 months. Imaging follow-up results were classified into 3 categories compared with immediate posttreatment control angiography: 1) stable or improved; 2) minor recurrence, when the recurrence did not require retreatment; and 3) major recurrence, when the recurrence required retreatment. If major recanalization was detected, retreatment was performed.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 20 (IBM, Armonk, New York). All categoric variables are presented as a percentage and 95% confidence intervals. All continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD.

Results

The characteristics of the patients and aneurysms as well as the clinical and angiographic outcomes are summarized in the Table. One-stage coiling was used to treat 167 patients with ≥2 aneurysms. The patients had 418 aneurysms (2.5 aneurysms per patient); 108 patients had two, 44 had three, 9 had four, 3 had five, 2 had 6, and 1 patient had 7 aneurysms. One-stage coiling was attempted on 359 aneurysms (2.1 aneurysms per patient). In 131 patients (78.4%), all detected aneurysms were treated with coiling only. Ninety-seven patients were treated with 1 type; 68 patients, with 2 types; and 2 patients, with 3 types of coiling techniques. Specifically, coiling was completed with a single catheter in 151 (42.1%), multicatheters in 60 (16.7%), balloon-assisted in 70 (19.5%), and stent-assisted in 78 (21.7%) aneurysms. Coiling was aborted in 6 (1.7%) aneurysms due to technical difficulties, but without complications.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Characteristics of patients and aneurysms, and immediate clinical and angiographic outcomes after treatment with 1-stage coilinga

The rate of any complication was 6.6% (11/167). Of the 11 complications, 2 occurred in patients with SAH, while the other 9 occurred in patients without SAH. All complications occurred during the treatment of the last aneurysm or were detected after completion of the embolization. Specifically, thromboembolic events occurred in 6 patients, all of which resolved with intra-arterial infusion of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban, 0.5–1.0 mg). Five of the 6 patients had no symptoms posttreatment, but 1 patient experienced morbidity at discharge (mRS 3) due to a small infarction in the midbrain. After completion of the treatment without any problems during the procedure, perforator infarctions (2 brain stem and 1 basal ganglia) were detected in 3 patients, resulting in morbidity at discharge in 2 patients (mRS 2 and 3, respectively). One patient had a puncture site pseudoaneurysm, requiring surgical repair. The final patient had an ICA rupture during balloon-assisted coiling for the last hypophyseal aneurysm after successful embolization of basilar artery tip and anterior choroidal aneurysms, resulting in mortality.

Treatment-related morbidity and mortality at discharge occurred in 3 (1.8%) and in 1 (0.6%) of the 167 patients, respectively. Favorable outcomes (mRS 0–2) at discharge occurred in 129 (97.7%) of 132 patients without SAH and in 27 (77.1%) of 35 patients with SAH. Of the 162 patients (97%) for whom clinical follow-up was available for a mean of 35.8 months, 154 patients (95.1%) had favorable outcomes. Immediate posttreatment angiography showed complete occlusion in 186 (51.8%) patients, neck remnant in 134 (37.3%), sac remnant in 29 (7.8%), and failure in 6 (1.7%). Of the 262 (73.9%) aneurysms that had available follow-up imaging for a mean of 24.8 months, 244 (93.1%) showed a stable or improved state and there were 12 (4.6%) minor and 6 (2.3%) major recurrences. All major recurrent aneurysms were retreated with coiling without complications.

Discussion

Multiple intracranial aneurysms occur in 19%–34% of patients who present with SAH.2⇓⇓–5 Coiling as a treatment for multiple intracranial aneurysms has not been well studied. To our knowledge, only 2 small case series of 1-stage coiling for multiple intracranial aneurysms have been reported in the literature. Solander et al13 treated 38 patients with 93 aneurysms with coiling (n = 79) and clipping (n = 14). Twenty-five patients underwent 1-stage coiling for >1 aneurysm at various distributions. No patient had treatment-related permanent morbidity. Xavier et al14 treated 6 patients with 1-stage coiling for 13 aneurysms. No periprocedural complications were reported in that study. In the current study, 1-stage coiling was completed with 1–3 different types of coiling techniques in 353 (98.3%) of 359 aneurysms in 167 patients, with 1.8% morbidity and 0.6%. mortality. Furthermore, in 78.4% of patients, all detected aneurysms were treated with coiling only.

There have been many reported cases in which multiple aneurysms have been treated with clipping.7⇓⇓⇓⇓–12 Clipping of multiple aneurysms, however, results in poorer outcomes than in a single aneurysm.7⇓⇓⇓–11 This can be explained by the increased manipulation of cerebral arteries and brain tissue during multiple-aneurysm surgery.8,11 Coiling for multiple aneurysms, however, does not require increased manipulation of cerebral arteries or brain tissue. Although the ruptured aneurysm should be treated first, in a patient with SAH who has multiple intracranial aneurysms, it is often difficult to determine which aneurysm is ruptured. In this case, all of the possibly ruptured aneurysms should be treated in the same session. One-stage clipping for multiple aneurysms may be limited in cases in which multiple aneurysms are distributed bilaterally or are in both the anterior and posterior circulations.8 One-stage treatment of multiple aneurysms distributed bilaterally or in both the anterior and posterior circulations may be more feasible with coiling than with clipping.

In patients with SAH who had multiple aneurysms and in whom it was unclear which aneurysm was ruptured, 1-stage coiling for all of the possibly ruptured aneurysms, regardless of the distribution of multiple aneurysms, was an important advantage (Fig 1). In patients with unruptured aneurysms, multiplicity is associated with a greater risk of rupture compared with single aneurysms.17 Which patients with unruptured aneurysms will experience SAH is often unpredictable, and it is even more difficult to determine which of the multiple unruptured aneurysms will rupture. In our institution, 3 patients had SAH from a remaining aneurysm after the most dangerous-looking aneurysms had been treated (data not shown). Therefore, it is our policy to treat, if feasible, all unruptured aneurysms in patients in good medical condition. Because coiling of unruptured aneurysms is associated with less morbidity and mortality than clipping,18 it seems reasonable to treat as many aneurysms as possible with coiling.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 61-year-old woman presented with a Hunt and Hess scale grade 3 subarachnoid hemorrhage. Nonenhanced CT (not shown) showed a diffuse, nonlocalized, subarachnoid hemorrhage in the entire basal cistern. 3D reconstruction images of cerebral angiography reveal 3 similar-sized small aneurysms at the left superior cerebellar artery origin (A) and bilateral posterior communicating artery origin (B and C). Each of the 3 aneurysms also has an irregular shape with a daughter sac. The white arrowhead indicates a left tuberothalamic artery incorporated into the aneurysm sac. Postembolization control angiograms after balloon-assisted coiling for all 3 aneurysms show complete occlusion of the superior cerebellar artery (D) and the left posterior communicating artery (E) aneurysms, and an intentional neck remnant, from which a left tuberothalamic artery (black arrowhead) directly originated, of the right posterior communicating artery aneurysm (F).

Another advantage of 1-stage coiling of multiple intracranial aneurysms is that coiling avoids repeat general anesthesia and groin punctures compared with multiple separate procedures; 1-stage coiling may decrease the rate of complications associated with repeat general anesthesia and multiple femoral artery punctures. One-stage coiling of multiple aneurysms may prolong the time that patients remain under general anesthesia. Therefore, in terms of general anesthesia, one should balance the benefits and the risks of 1-stage coiling versus coiling in multiple separate sessions, considering each patient's medical condition.

Cost-effectiveness is also an expected advantage of coiling. Coiling was associated with significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay and significantly lower total hospital charges for patients with both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, compared with clipping.19 One-stage coiling of multiple aneurysms may further shorten the lengths of overall hospital stays and reduce overall total medical costs.

In addition to the retrospective nature, this study has several limitations. Because the treatment strategy was different between the 2 hospitals, case selection for 1-stage coiling was also different, which might affect our results. Coiling technique and perioperative medications have changed during the 10 years of the case-registration period; these changes might affect angiographic and clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, the results of this study may help determine treatment strategies for multiple intracranial aneurysms.

Conclusions

One-stage coiling of multiple intracranial aneurysms seems to be a safe and effective treatment with low morbidity and mortality.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Dong Joon Kim—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine Faculty research grant.

  • This study was supported by a faculty grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2009 (6-2009-0080).

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Nieuwkamp DJ,
    2. Setz LE,
    3. Algra A,
    4. et al
    . Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:635–42
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kassell NF,
    2. Torner JC,
    3. Jane JA,
    4. et al
    . The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. Part 2. Surgical results. J Neurosurg 1990;73:37–47
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kaminogo M,
    2. Yonekura M,
    3. Shibata S
    . Incidence and outcome of multiple intracranial aneurysms in a defined population. Stroke 2003;34:16–21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rinne J,
    2. Hernesniemi J,
    3. Puranen M,
    4. et al
    . Multiple intracranial aneurysms in a defined population: prospective angiographic and clinical study. Neurosurgery 1994;35:803–08
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Juvela S
    . Risk factors for multiple intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2000;31:392–97
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Andaluz N,
    2. Zuccarello M
    . Recent trends in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: analysis of a nationwide inpatient database. J Neurosurg 2008;108:1163–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mount LA,
    2. Brisma R
    . Treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1971;35:728–30
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mizoi K,
    2. Suzuki J,
    3. Yoshimoto T
    . Surgical treatment of multiple aneurysms: review of experience with 372 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1989;96:8–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Inagawa T
    . Surgical treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991;108:22–29
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Vajda J
    . Multiple intracranial aneurysms: a high risk condition. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992;118:59–75
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rinne J,
    2. Hernesniemi J,
    3. Niskanen M,
    4. et al
    . Management outcome for multiple intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995;36:31–37, discussion 37–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hong T,
    2. Wang Y
    . Unilateral approach to clip bilateral multiple intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol 2009;72 (suppl 1):S23–28, discussion S28
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Solander S,
    2. Ulhoa A,
    3. Vinuela F,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms by using Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1999;90:857–64
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Xavier AR,
    2. Rayes M,
    3. Pandey P,
    4. et al
    . The safety and efficacy of coiling multiple aneurysms in the same session. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:27–30
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Janssen PM,
    2. Visser NA,
    3. Dorhout Mees SM,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of telephone and face-to-face assessment of the modified Rankin Scale. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:137–39
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Milot G,
    3. Raymond J
    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sonobe M,
    2. Yamazaki T,
    3. Yonekura M,
    4. et al
    . Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVs study, Japan. Stroke 2010;41:1969–77
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Higashida RT,
    2. Lahue BJ,
    3. Torbey MT,
    4. et al
    . Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:146–51
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hoh BL,
    2. Chi YY,
    3. Lawson MF,
    4. et al
    . Length of stay and total hospital charges of clipping versus coiling for ruptured and unruptured adult cerebral aneurysms in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database 2002 to 2006. Stroke 2010;41:337–42
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received August 24, 2013.
  • Accepted after revision October 21, 2013.
  • © 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 6
1 Jun 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treatment of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms with 1-Stage Coiling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
P. Jeon, B.M. Kim, D.J. Kim, D.I. Kim, S.H. Suh
Treatment of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms with 1-Stage Coiling
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2014, 35 (6) 1170-1173; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3821

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Treatment of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms with 1-Stage Coiling
P. Jeon, B.M. Kim, D.J. Kim, D.I. Kim, S.H. Suh
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2014, 35 (6) 1170-1173; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3821
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Single-stage endovascular treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms with combined endovascular techniques: is it safe to treat all at once?
  • Crossref (46)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Early Identification of Individuals at High Risk for Cerebral Infarction after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The BEHAVIOR Score
    Ramazan Jabbarli, Matthias Reinhard, Roland Roelz, Mukesch Shah, Wolf-Dirk Niesen, Klaus Kaier, Christian Taschner, Astrid Weyerbrock, Vera Van Velthoven
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2015 35 10
  • Intracranial Mirror Aneurysm: Epidemiology, Rupture Risk, New Imaging, Controversies, and Treatment Strategies
    Heng-Jian Liu, Han Zhou, Dong-Lin Lu, Ying-Bin Jiao, Song-Feng Chen, Jing Cheng, Xu-Jin Yao, Jin-Yang Ren, Shi-Fang Li, Wei Liu, Jing-Chen Gao, Yong Yue, Jin-Xiang Xu, Pi-Ning Zhang, Yu-Gong Feng
    World Neurosurgery 2019 127
  • Accuracy in Identifying the Source of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Setting of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms
    Jennifer L Orning, Sophia F Shakur, Ali Alaraj, Mandana Behbahani, Fady T Charbel, Victor A Aletich, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani
    Neurosurgery 2018 83 1
  • Single-stage endovascular treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms with combined endovascular techniques: is it safe to treat all at once?
    Cagatay Andic, Fatih Aydemir, Ozgur Kardes, Murat Gedikoglu, Sule Akin
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017 9 11
  • Treatment Strategies for Intracranial Mirror Aneurysms
    Wen-Xin Wang, Zhe Xue, Lin Li, Chen Wu, Yan-Yang Zhang, Xin Lou, Lin Ma, Zheng-Hui Sun
    World Neurosurgery 2017 100
  • Single-Stage Coil Embolization of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms: Technical Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes
    Y.D. Cho, J.H. Ahn, S.C. Jung, C.H. Kim, W.S. Cho, H.-S. Kang, J.E. Kim, M.H. Han
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2016 26 3
  • Impact of Aneurysm Multiplicity on Treatment and Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    Michel Roethlisberger, Rita Achermann, Schatlo Bawarjan, Martin N Stienen, Christian Fung, Donato D’Alonzo, Nicolai Maldaner, Andrea Ferrari, Marco V Corniola, Daniel Schöni, Johannes Goldberg, Daniele Valsecchi, Thomas Robert, Rodolfo Maduri, Martin A Seule, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Serge Marbacher, Philippe Bijlenga, Kristine A Blackham, Heiner C Bucher, Luigi Mariani, Raphael Guzman, Daniel W Zumofen
    Neurosurgery 2019 84 6
  • Outcome of Microsurgical Clipping for Multiple Versus Single Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Institution Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
    Narayanam Anantha Sai Kiran, Vivek Raj, Laxminadh Sivaraju, Kanneganti Vidyasagar, Dilip Mohan, Alangar S. Hegde
    World Neurosurgery 2020 143
  • Comparison Between Balloon-Assisted and Stent-Assisted Technique for Treatment of Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms
    Keun Young Park, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim
    Neurointervention 2016 11 2
  • Intracranial Mirror Aneurysms: Anatomic Characteristics and Treatment Options
    Hyun Ho Choi, Young Dae Cho, Dong Hyun Yoo, Jeongjun Lee, Jong Hyeon Moon, Sang Jun Ahn, Hyun-Seung Kang, Won-Sang Cho, Jeong Eun Kim, Moon Hee Han
    Korean Journal of Radiology 2018 19 5

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire