Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Manganese-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

D.J. Suto, G. Nair, D.M. Sudarshana, S.U. Steele, J. Dwyer, E.S. Beck, J. Ohayon, H. McFarland, A.P. Koretsky, I.C.M. Cortese and D.S. Reich
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2020, 41 (9) 1569-1576; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6665
D.J. Suto
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.J. Suto
G. Nair
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Nair
D.M. Sudarshana
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.M. Sudarshana
S.U. Steele
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.U. Steele
J. Dwyer
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Dwyer
E.S. Beck
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E.S. Beck
J. Ohayon
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Ohayon
H. McFarland
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. McFarland
A.P. Koretsky
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.P. Koretsky
I.C.M. Cortese
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for I.C.M. Cortese
D.S. Reich
aFrom the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.S. Reich
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cellular uptake of the manganese ion, when administered as a contrast agent for MR imaging, can noninvasively highlight cellular activity and disease processes in both animals and humans. The purpose of this study was to explore the enhancement profile of manganese in patients with multiple sclerosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mangafodipir is a manganese chelate that was clinically approved for MR imaging of liver lesions. We present a case series of 6 adults with multiple sclerosis who were scanned at baseline with gadolinium, then injected with mangafodipir, and followed at variable time points thereafter.

RESULTS: Fourteen new lesions formed during or shortly before the study, of which 10 demonstrated manganese enhancement of varying intensity, timing, and spatial pattern. One gadolinium-enhancing extra-axial mass, presumably a meningioma, also demonstrated enhancement with manganese. Most interesting, manganese enhancement was detected in lesions that formed in the days after mangafodipir injection, and this enhancement persisted for several weeks, consistent with contrast coming from intracellular uptake of manganese. Some lesions demonstrated a diffuse pattern of manganese enhancement in an area larger than that of both gadolinium enhancement and T2-FLAIR signal abnormality.

CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the first use of a manganese-based contrast agent to enhance MS lesions on MR imaging. Multiple sclerosis lesions were enhanced with a temporal and spatial profile distinct from that of gadolinium. Further experiments are necessary to uncover the mechanism of manganese contrast enhancement as well as cell-specific uptake.

ABBREVIATION:

RRMS
relapsing-remitting MS

Multiple sclerosis causes focal inflammatory demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system, with variable axonal destruction and remyelination.1 MR imaging is commonly used in MS to monitor disease activity and response to treatment, but MR imaging can also be used to investigate lesion pathophysiology.2 Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the criterion standard for the detection of acute disease activity. Gadolinium chelates are the most commonly used MR imaging contrast agents to detect new lesions when the BBB is disrupted, resulting in leakage of gadolinium into the parenchyma. However, exploration of other contrast agents with different mechanisms of action offers the potential for additional insights into disease pathophysiology.

MS lesions are believed to form in a complicated series of immune cell interactions that combine to cause demyelination and cell death.3 Blood-derived macrophages play a key role in this process and have been shown by histopathologic techniques to be abundant in early lesions.4 Despite our evolving understanding of the cellular and biochemical stages of an MS lesion, current imaging techniques lack the ability to finely monitor this development.3 Additionally, gadolinium chelates, which are confined to the intravascular and interstitial compartments, are limited to detecting changes in vascular permeability and are unable to directly probe intracellular processes.

Manganese ions (Mn2+) are paramagnetic and shorten the T1 relaxation time, allowing the metal to be used as an MR imaging contrast agent. Additionally, manganese acts as a calcium analog and can enter cells through calcium channels.5 Due to these dual properties, manganese has been explored in animal models as a surrogate marker for neuroanatomy, cell activity and viability, and neuronal transport. Additionally, like calcium, manganese can be trafficked through axons, released at synapses, and taken up by postsynaptic neurons, allowing tract tracing in animal studies.6-10 Despite the focus of the field on neuronal import of manganese, uptake by other cell types is likely, given the ubiquity of calcium channels.

In humans, manganese-enhanced MR imaging has been limited by concerns about free manganese toxicity to cardiac muscle cells.11 Mangafodipir, a chelate of manganese and an organic ligand dipyridoxyl diphosphate, was therefore developed to allow safe and tolerable release of manganese via transmetallation with zinc in plasma to lower the risk of cardiotoxicity relative to infusion of manganese salts.12 Mangafodipir was approved by the FDA in 1997 as a contrast agent for imaging lesions in the liver and pancreas. However, mangafodipir-enhanced brain MR imaging in humans has received little attention. In a recent study, we described a typical pattern of enhancement of manganese in the choroid plexus, anterior pituitary gland, and exocrine glands (including lacrimal, submandibular, and parotid glands) in healthy people.13 We found no evidence on MR imaging of manganese enhancement within the brain parenchyma in these subjects, suggesting that mangafodipir is unable to cross the BBB. We established a peak of enhancement in the anterior pituitary gland between 1 and 24 hours and a peak of choroid plexus enhancement at 1.5 hours. Both the spatial and the temporal enhancement profiles of these structures are consistent with studies that infused manganese salts into animals, suggesting that the contrast seen was due to released manganese.14

The intracellular uptake characteristics of manganese, as gleaned from animal studies, offer the potential to expand our understanding of cellular activity and viability in active, demyelinating lesions in vivo. Thus, using a 1-time, single-dose injection of mangafodipir, we explored manganese enhancement of lesions in the brain in adults with MS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six adults with MS (4 women) were recruited under an institutional review board–approved protocol (NCT01326715) from April 2015 to February 2019, after confirming no stated history of excessive manganese exposure, inadequate hepatic or biliary function, or contraindications to MR imaging. The average age was 37 ± 3.9 years; the median Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 2 (range, 0–6), and median years since MS symptom onset was 7 (range, 0–15) (Table).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Clinical and demographic data

MR Imaging Acquisition and Mangafodipir Administration

All prospective participants were imaged at baseline with gadolinium (gadobutrol, 0.1 mmol/kg) no more than 1 week before mangafodipir injection to assess evidence of a disrupted BBB and to exclude individuals with >5 enhancing lesions (a prespecified safety measure). Mangafodipir was reformulated from a clinical-grade stock under an FDA investigational new drug application, because commercial mangafodipir is no longer produced or marketed. For 1 minute, 5 µmol/kg of mangafodipir was administered intravenously. Five of the 6 participants were imaged within 4 hours of mangafodipir injection; one was first scanned 3 days after injection. Subsequent scans were obtained at variable points within the days to weeks after injection, on the basis of our initial experience in healthy volunteers, participant availability, and an intention to sample a range of postinjection time points in this pilot study. Because manganese (unlike gadolinium) enters cells, we expected slower washout than with gadolinium. All participants underwent a 1-month post-mangafodipir injection MR imaging to assess for persistent signal change in the brain; if found, monthly scans were obtained until residual enhancement resolved.

Images were acquired on a 3T Magnetom Skyra (Siemens) scanner with a 32-channel head coil. Several T1- and T2-weighted sequences were acquired, including a 3D T1 sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE sequence; Siemens) (0.67-mm isotropic resolution, TR = 700 ms, TE = 26 ms, FOV = 256 mm, turbo factor = 96, fat suppression = SPectral Attenuated Inversion Recovery), a 3D-T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence (1 mm isotropic, TR = 7.8 ms, TE = 3ms, FOV = 256 mm, flip angle = 18°), and a 3D-T2-FLAIR sequence (1- mm isotropic resolution, TR = 4800 ms, TE = 353 ms, FOV = 256 mm). No dynamic image series was acquired during postmangafodipir acquisitions.

MR Imaging Processing

Images from all postmangafodipir time points were cross-sectionally and then longitudinally registered to the baseline T1-gradient-echo sequence using 3dAllineate (afni.nimh.nih.gov). Image processing also included inhomogeneity correction with N4 Bias Field Correction (https://simpleitk.readthedocs.io/en/master/link_N4BiasFieldCorrection_docs.html).15 Intensity normalization was achieved by normalizing the whole brain to the median intensity of the skull-stripped brain and subsequently scaling by the maximum intensity. Subtraction images were generated by voxelwise subtraction of the registered, uniformity-corrected, and intensity-normalized T1-SPACE baseline scans from the respective postmangafodipir T1-SPACE images.

RESULTS

Findings in All Participants

All participants demonstrated a typical pattern of enhancement in the choroid plexus, anterior pituitary, and exocrine glands, including lacrimal, submandibular, and parotid glands, similar to that in healthy volunteers.13

Findings in Specific Participants

Findings in individual lesions are summarized in Fig 1 and the On-line Table.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Summary of MR imaging time points and contrast enhancement. Participants were imaged at baseline, shortly after injection, and in the days to months after injection. Red vertical lines indicate MR imaging scans; blue bars, enhancement of MS lesions due to mangafodipir injection; yellow bars, gadolinium enhancement of MS lesions; the green bar, enhancement of a meningioma due to mangafodipir injection; and the orange bar, gadolinium enhancement of a meningioma. Gradients suggest decay of signal between time points but are not intended to be quantitative because temporal granularity is limited by infrequent imaging time points. D indicates days; Gd2+, gadolinium ion.

Participant 1

Participant 1 was a 38-year-old man with mild lesion burden and minimally prominent CSF spaces. On baseline MR imaging, there was a large, gadolinium-enhancing lesion in the left periventricular white matter (the lesion that was responsible for his initial MS presentation). Two days later, he was imaged before and within 1 hour after infusion with mangafodipir. This scan demonstrated subtle manganese enhancement in the same lesion (Fig 2C). Central enhancement in this lesion resolved by day 13. No other brain lesions enhanced with mangafodipir. In scans obtained 13 and 27 days postmangafodipir, faint and diffuse enhancement was noted caudal to the lesion border (Fig 2I, -J, -L, -M).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Mangafodipir enhancement of an active gadolinium-enhancing lesion (participant 1). At screening, this lesion enhanced with gadolinium on T1-SPACE (A) with caudal edema visible on T1 (F, yellow arrow). At the center of the lesion (green plane, A–E), faint manganese enhancement is noted at 62 minutes (C) and resolved 13 days after injection (D). Caudal to the lesion (blue plane, F–M), manganese enhancement was noted outside the lesion border at 13 days (I, blue arrow) and on subtraction images (L). This enhancement persisted at 27 days (J and M, blue arrow). Additionally, ventricular narrowing, which commonly fluctuates,16 was noted on day 13 postmangafodipir in reference to the baseline (L); this appeared to resolve by day 27 postmangafodipir.

Participant 2

Participant 2 was a 42-year-old woman with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), minimally prominent CSF spaces, and a moderate lesion burden. The baseline MR imaging showed no evidence of parenchymal gadolinium enhancement. Images acquired approximately 30 minutes after injection of mangafodipir demonstrated no abnormal enhancement in the brain and no enhancement of previously visualized MS lesions (On-line Fig 1A–C). Hyperintense T1-weighted signal had resolved in the choroid plexus by 14 days post-mangafodipir injection, similar to prior work on healthy volunteers. All typical manganese-related enhancement had resolved by 38 days postinjection. No new lesions formed during this period.

Participant 3

Participant 3 was a 32-year-old woman with moderate lesion burden and minimally prominent CSF spaces. Baseline MR imaging 1 week before mangafodipir injection demonstrated 2 small lesions on T2-FLAIR, measuring approximately 4 × 2 and 3 × 2 mm in-plane and enhancing faintly with gadolinium. Four hours post-mangafodipir injection, manganese enhancement was not apparent in any MS lesion, regardless of gadolinium enhancement status (On-line Fig 1D–F). Typical mangafodipir-related enhancement in the exocrine glands and choroid plexus resolved by day 27 postmangafodipir. At this time point, the 2 small, previously gadolinium-enhancing lesions were no longer visible on T2-FLAIR. A small new T2-FLAIR lesion had formed, but this did not demonstrate T1-hyperintensity indicative of manganese enhancement. Follow-up imaging 8 days later (35 days post-mangafodipir injection) showed gadolinium enhancement of this new lesion.

Participant 4

Participant 4 was a 40-year-old woman with moderately prominent CSF spaces and moderate lesion burden. The baseline scan showed no abnormal enhancement with gadolinium. On the first postmangafodipir scan 3 days after mangafodipir injection, there was no evidence of enhancement within the brain parenchyma, including in MS lesions. No new lesions developed during the study. All typical manganese enhancement that persisted through 30 days postmangafodipir had resolved by 66 days after mangafodipir injection.

Participant 5

Participant 5 was a 33-year-old woman with severe lesion burden and moderately prominent CSF spaces. The baseline scan showed no abnormal enhancement with gadolinium. Immediately after mangafodipir injection, there was no abnormal manganese enhancement in the brain and no enhancement of previously visualized MS lesions. MR imaging was repeated 3 days post-mangafodipir injection, no new T2-FLAIR lesions had formed, and there was no manganese enhancement in the brain. At 31 days postinjection, 8 new T2-FLAIR lesions were noted. Of these lesions, all were T1-hyperintense, which was not typical of new MS lesions visualized previously in this individual; this finding suggests that the lesions had taken up Mn2+ between imaging time points. Three of the lesions demonstrated blush-like enhancement, characterized by a faint and diffuse enhancement pattern covering an area approximately 4 times larger than the T2 lesion (Fig 3, upper part). Five lesions demonstrated a punctate pattern of enhancement. A follow-up scan the next day (32 days postinjection) demonstrated nodular gadolinium enhancement in 5 of the 8 total lesions (Fig 3, middle and lower parts), and the area of gadolinium enhancement was contained within the T2-FLAIR lesion area. At 38 days post-mangafodipir injection, 2 additional new T2-FLAIR lesions had formed. All of this participant's manganese-enhancing lesions are shown in On-line Fig 2. Retrospective review of the day 31 scan showed T1-hyperintense signal in 1 of these lesions (On-line Fig 2, lesion 13), suggestive of manganese uptake before lesion detection on T2-FLAIR.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Mangafodipir enhancement of MS lesions (participant 5). Upper part, Lesion 6 showed blush-like mangafodipir enhancement in a T2 lesion that formed between days 3 and 31 post-mangafodipir injection. There is subtle T1-hyperintense signal visible only on subtraction, suggesting manganese enhancement, in an area larger than the T2-FLAIR lesion. This lesion did not enhance with gadolinium on day 32 post-mangafodipir injection. Middle, lower part, Several lesions that formed between day 3 and day 31 post-mangafodipir injection enhanced with both manganese and gadolinium. Lesion 8 (middle) demonstrates nodular (black arrow) and ependymal (red arrow) enhancement with manganese but only nodular enhancement with gadolinium. Lesions 9 and 10 (lower part) demonstrate blush-like enhancement with manganese, visible on subtraction images, and nodular enhancement with gadolinium. Gad indicates gadolinium.

Participant 6

Participant 6 was a 39-year-old man with secondary-progressive MS, a moderate lesion burden, and minimally prominent CSF spaces. There were no gadolinium-enhancing MS lesions on baseline MR imaging; however, there was a long-standing extra-axial, dural-based mass anterior to the left temporal lobe, characteristic of meningioma, that was gadolinium-enhancing (Fig 4B, -F). He was imaged before and 3 hours after mangafodipir injection. The mass enhanced with mangafodipir (Fig 4C, -G), but none of the MS lesions enhanced. Enhancement in the mass had resolved by the next scan, 13 days post-mangafodipir injection (Fig 4D, -H).

FIG 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4.

Manganese enhancement of a presumed meningioma in participant 6, a 39-year-old man with secondary-progressive MS. The mass (arrow) is visible on precontrast T1-weighted images (A and E) with vivid gadolinium enhancement (gadolinium [Gad]) visible on both T1-weighted (B) and T1 gadolinium subtraction (F) images. Mangafodipir enhancement is visible within the mass 3 hours after mangafodipir (C and G) and had resolved by 13 days postinjection (D and H).

DISCUSSION

In this report, we describe the use of a manganese-based contrast agent (mangafodipir) in a series of adults with MS and report that active MS plaques enhance with manganese in patterns distinct from those of gadolinium enhancement in the same lesions. Although variable delays between mangafodipir infusion and imaging limit direct comparison across the participants in our study, several patterns emerged. Similar to healthy volunteers,13 we found a characteristic pattern of manganese enhancement in the anterior pituitary gland, exocrine glands, and choroid plexus shortly after injection. We did not observe manganese enhancement in chronic MS lesions. One MS lesion that was gadolinium-enhancing 2 days before mangafodipir administration also demonstrated manganese enhancement. Most interesting, some lesions that formed in the days to weeks after mangafodipir injection also enhanced, evident in delayed scans.

With respect to the manganese enhancement pattern, 4 active lesions demonstrated diffuse, blush-like enhancement that encompassed a much larger volume than was hyperintense on either T2-FLAIR or postgadolinium T1 (Fig 3). Considering that we never observed manganese enhancement in areas with intact BBBs, this observation suggests that the manganese ion or mangafodipir entered the brain parenchyma within the lesions, was taken up by local cells or cell processes, and subsequently spread outside the T2-FLAIR area. We cannot resolve whether such uptake was within axons, glia, invading immune cells, or some combination.

In addition to distinct enhancement patterns, the kinetics of manganese enhancement also differ from that of gadolinium. In participant 5, manganese enhancement occurred during a much longer time window than gadolinium enhancement: Lesions newly visible on T2-FLAIR even 38 days after injection demonstrated manganese enhancement. Lesion 13, which was not visible on T2-FLAIR 31 days postinjection, showed faint enhancement with manganese at that timepoint. Additionally, this lesion demonstrated gadolinium enhancement the following day, with no T2-FLAIR correlate. This result is consistent with published data suggesting that demyelination, which causes hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images, is preceded by other pathologic processes in both MS17,18 and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis3,19 lesions and that these processes are not entirely invisible to MR imaging. It also suggests that the manganese that is injected with mangafodipir may be retained in various stores within the body (possibly in the liver, kidney, and exocrine/endocrine glands), subsequently re-entering the circulation at low-but-steady levels. This characteristic would allow manganese accumulation within the intracellular compartments in newly forming lesions with damaged BBBs.

Observations in participant 3 further illustrate that manganese enhancement of MS lesions must be interpreted differently from gadolinium enhancement. This participant had 2 small lesions that enhanced with gadolinium at baseline, as well as a newly formed and later gadolinium-enhancing lesion. However, none of these lesions demonstrated evidence of enhancement after mangafodipir. It is possible that the small size and faint gadolinium enhancement of these lesions at baseline were below detectability with mangafodipir at the dose we used, but it could also suggest that these lesions were at a late active stage. Additionally, a lesion in this participant that formed after mangafodipir injection did not visibly take up manganese, potentially because the time between manganese injection and lesion formation was too long.

A key difference between manganese and gadolinium in animal studies is the ability of manganese to be imported into cells and, in neurons, transported within axons and across synapses.20 The enhancement patterns we observed in MS lesions, though, appear different from those demonstrated in animal models, with no obvious linear enhancement along white matter tracts.21,22 It is possible that tract-restricted manganese enhancement was too faint at the FDA-approved dose, which delivers a much lower manganese load than is typically given in animal experiments.11,23 PET imaging with manganese-52 (Mn2+) might overcome this limitation at the expense of spatial resolution.24

In addition to the observed manganese enhancement in MS lesions, participant 6 had a presumed meningioma that enhanced 3 hours following mangafodipir injection. The meningioma also avidly enhanced with gadolinium, but unlike with gadolinium, mangafodipir enhancement was not masked by nearby vascular enhancement. Manganese enhancement had resolved by the next scan 13 days later. Although mangafodipir has been previously shown to be equal or better at detecting liver lesions and metastases than contrast-enhanced CT and ferucarbotran-enhanced MR imaging, its use in meningiomas has not been reported.25⇓⇓-28 One study reported that manganese retention in hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with tumor staging and prognosis,29 and it is possible that patterns of manganese enhancement could also provide useful clinical information about intracranial tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate enhancement dynamics of manganese within MS lesions. Our data show that manganese ions enable visualization of the acute inflammatory demyelination that occurs in active MS lesions. Furthermore, the intracellular capability of manganese is consistent with diffuse enhancement in an area larger than that of the T2-FLAIR lesion days after injection. From the results in this small cohort, we cannot comment on differences in enhancement patterns that may be induced by disease-modifying therapies. Most important, we cannot distinguish between enhancement due to Mn2+ ions and mangafodipir at early time points because these may generate similar enhancement profiles. However, transmetallation of mangafodipir increases the likelihood that enhancement at later time points is due to the ion itself. While mangafodipir used at the dose in this study does not fully recapitulate the ability of gadolinium to vividly and immediately mark active MS lesions, use of mangafodipir in MS imaging offers the possibility of following lesion formation in a longer window than gadolinium and may provide new insights into the pathophysiology of lesion formation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Neuroimmunology Clinic and the Clinical Trials Unit (in particular Rosalind Hayden, Rosemarie Cuento, and Sandra Martin), National Institutes of Health Pharmaceutical Development Section (especially Gopal Potti and Judith Starling), Dzung Pham, John Olson, and the Functional MR Imaging Facility for their assistance.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (Z01 NS003119).

  • Paper previously presented as an oral presentation at: Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, September 11–13, 2019; Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Disclosures: Daniel J. Suto—RELATED: Grant: National Institutes of Health Internal Funding, Comments: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Z01 NS003119*; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis; Provision of Writing Assistance, Medicines, Equipment, or Administrative Support: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Z01 NS003119*; UNRELATED: Employment: National Institutes of Health, Comments: National Institutes of Health Postbaccalaureate Program.* Erin S. Beck—RELATED: Grant: National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Comments: fellowship grant to support my salary.* Henry McFarland—UNRELATED: Employment: Scientific Director of the Cummings Foundation, Comments: not-for-profit educational foundation; Royalties: daclizumab (Biogen through the National Institutes of Health), Comments: <$100 in 2019. Alan P. Koretsky—RELATED: Grant: I am an Intramural Investigator at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health; Congress allocated money to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke that was used to support this work; however, we do not refer to this support as a grant; UNRELATED: Patents (Planned, Pending or Issued): The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke supports patents for intramural investigators. I do have some patents pending, but there is no money to me or the National Institutes of Health; these are not related in any way to the submitted work; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Typically, travel is reimbursed when Intramural Investigators give academic presentations at universities or relevant meetings. No money is paid to me or the National Institutes of Health for these presentations. In addition, I serve on a couple of advisory committees (no compensation to me or the National Institutes of Health), for which travel is paid. Daniel S. Reich—UNRELATED: Expert testimony: Leventhal and Puga LLC, Bounds Law Group LLC; Grants/Grants Pending: Vertex Pharmaceuticals.* *Money paid to the institution.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Reich DS,
    2. Lucchinetti CF,
    3. Calabresi PA
    . Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2018;378:169–80 doi:10.1056/NEJMra1401483 pmid:29320652
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Filippi M,
    2. Rocca MA,
    3. Barkhof F, et al
    ; Attendees of the Correlation between Pathological MRI Findings in MS Workshop. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:349–60 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70003-0 pmid:30663609
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Absinta M,
    2. Sati P,
    3. Reich DS
    . Advanced MRI and staging of multiple sclerosis lesions. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:358–68 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.59 pmid:27125632
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Henderson AP,
    2. Barnett MH,
    3. Parratt JD, et al
    . Multiple sclerosis: distribution of inflammatory cells in newly forming lesions. Ann Neurol 2009;66:739–53 doi:10.1002/ana.21800 pmid:20035511
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Silva AC,
    2. Bock NA
    . Manganese-enhanced MRI: an exceptional tool in translational neuroimaging. Schizophr Bull 2008;34:595–604 doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn056 pmid:18550591
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Stieltjes B,
    2. Schlüter M,
    3. Didinger B, et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging in primary brain tumors: reproducible quantitative analysis of corpus callosum infiltration and contralateral involvement using a probabilistic mixture model. Neuroimage 2006;31:531–42 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.052 pmid:16478665
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    1. Walder N,
    2. Petter-Puchner AH,
    3. Brejnikow M, et al
    . Manganese enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a contusion model of spinal cord injury in rats: correlation with motor function. Invest Radiol 2008;43:277–83 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318162f1bd pmid:18424947
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Lee JH,
    2. Silva AC,
    3. Merkle H, et al
    . Manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of mouse brain after systemic administration of MnCl2: dose-dependent and temporal evolution of T1 contrast. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:640–48 doi:10.1002/mrm.20368 pmid:15723400
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Monosov IE,
    2. Leopold DA,
    3. Hikosaka O
    . Neurons in the primate medial basal forebrain signal combined information about reward uncertainty, value, and punishment anticipation. J Neurosci 2015;35:7443–59 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0051-15.2015 pmid:25972172
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Van Meir V,
    2. Pavlova D,
    3. Verhoye M, et al
    . In vivo MR imaging of the seasonal volumetric and functional plasticity of song control nuclei in relation to song output in a female songbird. Neuroimage 2006;31:981–92 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.005 pmid:16529952
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Crossgrove J,
    2. Zheng W
    . Manganese toxicity upon overexposure. NMR Biomed 2004;17:544–53 doi:10.1002/nbm.931 pmid:15617053
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Toft KG,
    2. Hustvedt SO,
    3. Grant D, et al
    . Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of MnDPDP in man. Acta Radiol 1997;38(4 Pt 2):677–89 doi:10.1080/02841859709172400 pmid:9245963
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sudarshana DM,
    2. Nair G,
    3. Dwyer JT, et al
    . Manganese-enhanced MRI of the brain in healthy volunteers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1309–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6152 pmid:31371354
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Aoki I,
    2. Wu YJ,
    3. Silva AC, et al
    . In vivo detection of neuroarchitecture in the rodent brain using manganese-enhanced MRI. Neuroimage 2004;22:1046–59 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.031 pmid:15219577
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Tustison NJ,
    2. Avants BB,
    3. Cook PA, et al
    . N4ITK: improved N3 Bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:1310–20 doi:10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908 pmid:20378467
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nakamura K,
    2. Brown RA,
    3. Narayanan S, et al
    . Diurnal fluctuations in brain volume: statistical analyses of MRI from large populations. Neuroimage 2015;118:126–32 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.077 pmid:26049148
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Absinta M,
    2. Nair G,
    3. Sati P, et al
    . Direct MRI detection of impending plaque development in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2:e145 doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000145 pmid:26401516
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Goodkin DE,
    2. Rooney WD,
    3. Sloan R, et al
    . A serial study of new MS lesions and the white matter from which they arise. Neurology 1998;51:1689–97 doi:10.1212/wnl.51.6.1689 pmid:9855524
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Maggi P,
    2. Macri SM,
    3. Gaitán MI, et al
    . The formation of inflammatory demyelinated lesions in cerebral white matter. Ann Neurol 2014;76:594–608 doi:10.1002/ana.24242 pmid:30687321
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Pautler RG
    . In vivo, trans-synaptic tract-tracing utilizing manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI). NMR Biomed 2004;17:595–601 doi:10.1002/nbm.942 pmid:15761948
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Saleem KS,
    2. Pauls JM,
    3. Augath M, et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging of neuronal connections in the macaque monkey. Neuron 2002;34:685–700 doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00718-3 pmid:12062017
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Chuang KH,
    2. Lee JH,
    3. Silva AC, et al
    . Manganese enhanced MRI reveals functional circuitry in response to odorant stimuli. Neuroimage 2009;44:363–72 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.046 pmid:18848997
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wolf GL,
    2. Baum L
    . Cardiovascular toxicity and tissue proton T1 response to manganese injection in the dog and rabbit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;141:193–97 doi:10.2214/ajr.141.1.193 pmid:6305179
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Saar G,
    2. Millo C,
    3. Szajek L, et al
    . Anatomy, functionality, and neuronal connectivity with manganese radiotracers for positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol 2018;20:562–74 doi:10.1007/s11307-018-1162-6 pmid:29396750
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kim HJ,
    2. Kim KW,
    3. Byun JH, et al
    . Comparison of mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for detection and characterization of hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1059–66 doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1941 pmid:16554579
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Oudkerk M,
    2. Torres CG,
    3. Song B, et al
    . Characterization of liver lesions with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging: multicenter study comparing MR and dual-phase spiral CT. Radiology 2002;223:517–24 doi:10.1148/radiol.2232010318 pmid:11997562
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Choi JY,
    2. Kim MJ,
    3. Kim JH, et al
    . Detection of hepatic metastasis: manganese- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MR imaging (in French). Eur J Radiol 2006;60:84–90 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.016 pmid:16920315
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Beziat C,
    2. Pilleul F,
    3. Yzebe D, et al
    . Detection of liver metastases in colorectal cancer on chemotherapy: comparative study between MRI with Teslascan and computed tomography with intravenous contrast media. J Radiol 2004;85:307–11 doi:10.1016/S0221-0363(04)97583-X pmid:15192523
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sutcliffe RP,
    2. Lewis D,
    3. Kane PA, et al
    . Manganese-enhanced MRI predicts the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma in potential surgical candidates. Clin Radiol 2011;66:237–43 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.08.007 pmid:21295202
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received March 15, 2020.
  • Accepted after revision May 31, 2020.
  • © 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 41 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 41, Issue 9
1 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Manganese-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
D.J. Suto, G. Nair, D.M. Sudarshana, S.U. Steele, J. Dwyer, E.S. Beck, J. Ohayon, H. McFarland, A.P. Koretsky, I.C.M. Cortese, D.S. Reich
Manganese-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2020, 41 (9) 1569-1576; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6665

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Manganese-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
D.J. Suto, G. Nair, D.M. Sudarshana, S.U. Steele, J. Dwyer, E.S. Beck, J. Ohayon, H. McFarland, A.P. Koretsky, I.C.M. Cortese, D.S. Reich
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2020, 41 (9) 1569-1576; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6665
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Longitudinal manganese‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neural projections and activity
    Taylor W. Uselman, Christopher S. Medina, Harry B. Gray, Russell E. Jacobs, Elaine L. Bearer
    NMR in Biomedicine 2022 35 6
  • Manganese‐Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Heart
    Trisha Singh, Shruti Joshi, Lucy E Kershaw, Marc R Dweck, Scott I Semple, David E Newby
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2023 57 4
  • Genetic control of MRI contrast using the manganese transporter Zip14
    Harikrishna Rallapalli, Eleanor C. McCall, Alan P. Koretsky
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2024 92 2

More in this TOC Section

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Functional

  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Multiparametric MRI in PEDS Pontine Glioma
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire