Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleADULT BRAIN

Atypical Presentations of Intracranial Hypotension: Comparison with Classic Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

A.A. Capizzano, L. Lai, J. Kim, M. Rizzo, L. Gray, M.K. Smoot and T. Moritani
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2016, 37 (7) 1256-1261; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4706
A.A. Capizzano
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.A.C., T.M.), University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.A. Capizzano
L. Lai
bDepartment of Radiology (L.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Lai
J. Kim
cDepartment of Radiology (J.K.), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Kim
M. Rizzo
dDepartment of Neurological Sciences (M.R.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Rizzo
L. Gray
eDepartment of Radiology (L.G.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Gray
M.K. Smoot
fDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine (K.S.), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.K. Smoot
T. Moritani
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.A.C., T.M.), University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Moritani
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atypical clinical presentations of spontaneous intracranial hypotension include obtundation, memory deficits, dementia with frontotemporal features, parkinsonism, and ataxia. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and imaging features of spontaneous intracranial hypotension with typical-versus-atypical presentations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records and neuroimaging of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension from September 2005 to August 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (n = 33; mean age, 41.7 ± 14.3 years) were compared with those with intracranial hypotension with atypical clinical presentation (n = 8; mean age, 55.9 ± 14.1 years) and 36 controls (mean age, 41.4 ± 11.2 years).

RESULTS: Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension were older than those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (55.9 ± 14.1 years versus 41.7 ± 14.3 years; P = .018). Symptom duration was shorter in classic compared with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension (3.78 ± 7.18 months versus 21.93 ± 18.43 months; P = .015). There was no significant difference in dural enhancement, subdural hematomas, or cerebellar tonsil herniation. Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension had significantly more elongated anteroposterior midbrain diameter compared with those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (33.6 ± 2.9 mm versus 27.3 ± 2.9 mm; P < .001) and shortened pontomammillary distance (2.8 ± 1 mm versus 5.15 ± 1.5 mm; P < .001). Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension were less likely to become symptom-free, regardless of treatment, compared with those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (χ2 = 13.99, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of 8 patients, atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension was a more chronic syndrome compared with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension, with more severe brain sagging, lower rates of clinical response, and frequent relapses. Awareness of atypical presentations of spontaneous intracranial hypotension is paramount.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AP
average anteroposterior midbrain diameter
FBSS
frontotemporal brain sagging syndrome
PM
pontomammillary distance
SIH
spontaneous intracranial hypotension

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) results from CSF hypovolemia, most commonly from a CSF spinal leak, and typically presents with orthostatic headache.1 On brain MR imaging, classic features of SIH are the following: downward brain sagging with effacement of perimesencephalic cisterns and pituitary and dural engorgement, which are sometimes associated with subdural hematoma.1,2 Recognition of SIH is very important for adequate management, which may include epidural blood patch when appropriate. Atypical clinical presentations of SIH have been sparsely reported in the literature, mostly in case report format, and include the following: obtundation,3 stupor,4 sensorineural deafness,5 short-term memory deficit,5 dementia with frontotemporal features,6⇓–8 and parkinsonism and ataxia.9. An intriguing association of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia-like symptoms with SIH has recently been reported as “frontotemporal brain sagging syndrome” (FBSS) on the basis of clinical-radiologic correlation.10

The prevalence of FBSS is thought to be very low, with the retrospective series from the Mayo Clinic consisting of 8 patients identified between January 1996 and July 2010.10 However, the true incidence of intracranial hypotension is most likely underestimated, particularly with atypical clinical presentations. Furthermore, an incorrect diagnosis of SIH is very common, such as misdiagnosis of SIH as Chiari I malformation, leading to improper patient management.11 Neuroradiologists play a key role in diagnosing classic and particularly atypical intracranial hypotension by recognizing the specific findings of brain sagging on MR imaging, detecting the level of CSF leak on spinal imaging, and guiding therapy accordingly. Therefore, the aim of this study was to illustrate different clinical presentations of intracranial hypotension that differ from the classic SIH syndrome and to assess their neuroimaging correlates and outcome. Specifically, the purpose of this study was to compare demographic, clinical, and brain imaging features of patients with classic SIH versus intracranial hypotension with atypical clinical presentations, including FBSS.

Materials and Methods

An institutional review board–approved, retrospective review was performed of clinical records and brain MRI of patients evaluated for intracranial hypotension from September 2005 to August 2014 at the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. A waiver of consent was obtained from the local institutional review board. Only patients with brain MRI available for review were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH, n = 33; mean age, 41.7 ± 14.3 years; 10 men, 23 women) and intracranial hypotension with atypical clinical presentation (atypical, n = 8; mean age, 55.9 ± 14.1 years; 5 men, 3 women). The control group consisted of 36 subjects with normal brain MRI findings, age- and sex-matched to patients with SIH (mean age, 41.4 ± 11.2 years; 12 men, 24 women). Patients with SIH presented with orthostatic headaches and brain MR imaging findings of brain sagging and dural enhancement with or without subdural fluid collections. Patients with atypical SIH were selected on the basis of clinical and imaging features of intracranial hypotension with atypical brain stem, cognitive, and/or behavioral symptoms previously referred to as FBSS,10 for which no other explanation for brain sagging could be obtained after extensive clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessment. The average clinical follow-up was 42.5 ± 37.2 months for atypical SIH and 18.2 ± 23.7 months for classic SIH.

All subjects were scanned with clinical 1.5T or 3T MR imaging scanners with clinical brain MR imaging protocols, including conventional pre- and postgadolinium T1-, T2-, and T2*- weighted sequences and an axial DTI sequence with 12 diffusion directions. The axial level of the midbrain was selected on 5-mm-thick axial T2 images oriented parallel to the line connecting the inferiormost points of the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum at the level showing the red nuclei. The average anteroposterior midbrain diameter (AP) and pontomammillary distance (PM) were combined in the Sagging Index = AP/PM (Fig 1), which was used as an imaging biomarker of the severity of brain sagging and not to diagnose SIH. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the 36 controls between 2 independent image readers were 0.86, 0.81, and 0.8 for the AP midbrain diameter, the PM distance, and the Sagging Index, respectively, indicating very good reproducibility. When available, spinal imaging (nuclear medicine cisternography, CT myelography, and/or whole-spine MR imaging) was assessed for determination of the site of CSF leak. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 21 (IBM, Armonk, New York). Nonparametric statistical analyses by using the Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate were performed. Distribution of discrete variables between groups was assessed with the χ2 test. A 2-tailed P value <.05 was used as a statistical significance threshold.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Pontomammillary distance on sagittal T1 (A–C) and anteroposterior midbrain diameter on axial T2-weighted MRI (D–F) in a healthy control (A and D), and patients with classic SIH (B and E) and atypical SIH (C and F).

Results

Demographics and Clinical Data

There were no significant differences in age or sex distribution between patients with classic SIH and controls (SIH: 41.7 ± 14.3 years, 70% women versus controls: 41.4 ± 11.2 years, 67% women). Patients with atypical SIH were older than those with classic SIH (55.9 ± 14.1 years versus 41.7 ± 14.3 years, P = .018). Among those with atypical SIH, there was a higher percentage of men (63%) compared with classic SIH (30%), but this trend in sex distribution did not reach statistical significance (χ2 = 2.87, P = .09). No differences among the 3 groups were detected for body mass index (P = .86). No neuropsychological assessment was performed for patients with classic SIH. A formal neurologic examination at the time of SIH symptoms was performed in 94% (31/33) of patients with classic SIH. Classic SIH invariably presented with orthostatic headaches (ie, with worsening pain while standing up and improving on lying down), and 6 of these patients (18%) had uni- or bilateral sixth nerve palsy, which resolved along with the headache. Symptom duration was <1 year for all classic SIH cases except for 1 woman with 10 years of positional headaches after delivery. When this latter patient was excluded, symptom duration was significantly shorter in classic SIH compared with atypical SIH (3.78 ± 7.18 months versus 21.93 ± 18.43 months, P = .015).

The On-line Table summarizes the clinical features of 8 patients with atypical intracranial hypotension. Seven of 8 patients with atypical SIH had headache, which was mild in 2 of them. None of these patients had oculomotor abnormalities. Neuropsychological assessment of patients with atypical SIH yielded an atypical, not-otherwise-specified neuropsychological profile. Seven of 8 patients had anterograde memory impairment, which, in 4 cases, was associated with disinhibition, with 2 of these patients (cases 2 and 3 in the On-line Table) fulfilling the clinical diagnostic criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.12 However, follow-up did not confirm this diagnosis: Neuropathologic assessment of patient 2 at postmortem examination did not show changes of frontotemporal dementia or any other neurodegenerative disease, while patient 3 showed clinical improvement after patching of spinal leaks, intraspinal fluid infusions, and ultimately a spinal operation. Notably, 7 of 8 patients with atypical SIH had daytime hypersomnia. Five of 8 had gait anomalies with ataxic gait and imbalance resulting in frequent falls. Four of 8 had movement disorders: Two had facial grimacing, 1 had upper limb chorea, and 1 had resting tremor. Finally, 3 of 8 patients with atypical SIH had dysarthria and dysphagia, and 2 of 8 had stereotyped vocal tics.

Imaging Findings: Classic SIH versus Atypical SIH

Twenty-seven (82%) patients with classic SIH had dural enhancement, and 14 (42%) had subdural fluid collections. Patients with atypical SIH had a lower prevalence of dural enhancement (62%) and subdural hematomas (25%) compared with those with classic SIH, but this was not statistically significant. Furthermore, no significant difference in the extent of herniation of the cerebellar tonsils below the plane of the foramen magnum was detected (SIH: 2.25 ± 2.96 mm versus atypical: 5.96 ± 6.44 mm; P = .2). Patients with atypical SIH had more distorted midbrain anatomy at the level of the tentorial incisura compared with those with classic SIH, with significantly elongated anteroposterior midbrain diameter (atypical: 33.6 ± 2.9 mm versus SIH: 27.3 ± 2.9 mm, P < .001) and shortened pontomammillary distance (atypical: 2.8 ± 1 mm versus SIH: 5.15 ± 1.5 mm; P < .001). The combination of the latter 2 measurements in the Sagging Index (AP/PM) showed highly significant differences between the 2 groups (atypical: 14.98 ± 8.6 versus SIH: 6.02 ± 2.25, P < .001) (Fig 2). When we used a cutoff value of 10 in the Sagging Index, only 3 patients were misclassified, with a correct classification of 93%. Finally, 4 of 8 (50%) patients with atypical SIH had CSF leaks on spinal imaging (spine MR imaging, CT myelography, and/or radioisotope cisternography), while 19 of 33 (57%) patients with classic SIH had CSF leaks on spinal imaging, with no significant statistical difference between the groups.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Pontomammillary distance, anteroposterior midbrain diameter, and Sagging Index in patients with atypical and classic SIH and controls.

Treatment and Follow-Up

All 30 patients with classic SIH with follow-up clinical data available found their symptoms resolved following blood patch (13/30), burr-hole for subdural drainage (2/30), spinal dural surgical repair (1/30), or medical treatment alone (14/30). There was a significantly lower chance of symptom resolution for patients with atypical compared with classic SIH (χ2 = 13.99, P < .001). Four of 7 patients with atypical SIH with available follow-up showed continued clinical improvement; these were treated with epidural blood patch (case 6 in the On-line Table), multiple epidural blood and glue patches and CSF infusions followed by surgery (case 3), thoracic dural cyst ligation (case 4), and burr-hole drainage of a subdural hematoma (case 8). The remaining 3 patients with atypical SIH did not show clinical improvement: One was treated with Chiari decompression and had stable symptoms of ataxia and resting tremor (case 5), and 2 patients died from unrelated conditions (cases 2 and 7). One patient with atypical SIH was lost on follow-up due to relocation before receiving specific treatment (case 1). Three patients with atypical SIH died of unrelated conditions (case 2, from myocardial infarction; case 4 died at another institution; and case 7, from complications of trauma and anticoagulation). Postmortem examination with neuropathologic assessment of the brain for neurodegenerative disease was performed in case 2 and did not show evidence of frontotemporal dementia pathology or any other neurodegenerative disease.

Discussion

Patients with atypical SIH were older than those with classic SIH and had a trend toward higher representation of men, while women are more commonly affected than men in classic SIH.2 Patients with atypical SIH had a longer clinical history and lower odds of becoming symptom-free compared with those with classic SIH. The degree of brain sagging at the tentorial incisura was more severe in patients with atypical-versus-classic SIH without significant differences in other radiographic signs of intracranial hypotension, such as dural enhancement, fluid collections, or cerebellar tonsillar herniation. A Sagging Index higher than 10 should prompt consideration of intracranial hypotension in subjects with atypical clinical presentations.

Case 3 (On-line Table) exemplifies the challenges associated with atypical SIH. A 57-year-old man presented with behavioral changes, anterograde amnesia, headache, hypersomnia, dysphagia, ataxia, dysarthria, and gait instability and was diagnosed with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. He had a history of mitral valve prolapse, suggesting connective tissue laxity. Brain MR imaging showed severe brain sagging but no cortical atrophy. On CT myelography, 2 small CSF leaks at T10–T11 and T11–T12 were seen and treated with fluoroscopically guided autologous blood patches (3 times), followed by transient clinical improvement. Neuropsychological evaluation showed mild deficits in processing speed, attention, and concentration, with improvement after blood patches. His symptoms relapsed. Therefore, he was referred to another institution, where on dynamic CT myelogram, multiple CSF leaks at the cervicothoracic neuroforamina were detected and patched under CT guidance first with blood and later with glue; and he also received artificial CSF infusions. The patient's gait and speech improved after the spinal procedures, but symptoms eventually relapsed.

Three years after presentation, he underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Although intracranial hypotension is not an indication for endoscopic third ventriculostomy, the rationale was the presence of a gradient between low intracranial pressure (as measured in an outside ventriculostomy) and normal spinal pressure measured at spinal procedures. Because there was no evidence of a blockade at the foramen magnum, the neurosurgeons hypothesized that the endoscopic third ventriculostomy would equalize pressures between the ventricular system and the subarachnoid spaces of the basal cisterns and spine. His gait and speech improved for 2 weeks, but full relapse followed. Brain MR imaging showed stable sagging and undetectable CSF flow in the aqueduct (Fig 3A–C). Technetium Tc99m SPECT spinal CSF leak study findings were negative. Four months after ventriculostomy, he underwent T9 through T12 laminoplasties, levels where small CSF leaks had been seen on myelography, but these were not found at the operation. Exposure of the arachnoid revealed adhesions, which were partially released, and arachnoid biopsy reported fibrosis without inflammation or granulomas. Fibrin sealant (TISSEEL; Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, Illinois) was applied to seal the dura. Six months after the operation, he had continued clinical improvement with normalization of gait and speech, recovery of the gag reflex, and behavioral and cognitive recovery to baseline. Brain MR imaging showed resolution of brain sagging and recovery of aqueductal CSF flow for the first time at the 4-year follow-up (Fig 3D–F).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Preoperative (A–C) and postoperative (D–F) sagittal T1 (A and D), axial T2 (B and E), and sagittal CISS (C and F) brain MRI in case 3. Note postoperative resolution of brain sagging and recovery of aqueductal CSF lumen.

The etiology of SIH has been linked to weakness of the spinal dura, resulting in spinal CSF leak, in some cases associated with hereditary connective tissue disorders.13 CSF venous fistulas have also recently been implicated in a few cases.14 Management includes medical treatment (rest, hydration, caffeine) with escalation to spinal epidural patching when symptoms persist. The success rate of the epidural blood patch for SIH, however, is about 30%, far lower than that for post–lumbar puncture headache,15 and patients with SIH may require repeat spinal procedures. Surgical repair of the spinal dural defect by using different techniques16 is reserved for cases that fail to respond to conservative measures. As in case 3, a CSF leak was not seen on surgery in 6 of 10 patients with SIH in whom epidural patching with muscle and Gelfoam (Pfizer, New York, New York) was, nevertheless, 100% successful in treating headache.16 Neuroradiologists make key contributions in the diagnosis and management of classic and particularly atypical SIH. The latter has a longer clinical history probably because the atypical clinical features distract clinicians from the consideration of intracranial hypotension. Furthermore, clinical response is less favorable in patients with atypical compared with those with classic SIH. This could result from structural weakness of the dura or insufficient physiologic adaptation to chronic CSF hypovolemia.1

Atypical clinical presentations of SIH can be grouped into 4 domains: cognitive-behavioral, lower cranial nerve, imbalance-gait, and arousal deficits. Typically patients present with a combination of these symptom complexes. Neuropsychologically, patients with atypical SIH present with a not-otherwise-specified profile suggestive of a subcortical type of cognitive impairment17 with slowed information processing, preserved language, and anterograde amnesia. FBSS is a rare, recently recognized syndrome in which behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia-like symptoms present in the context of intracranial hypotension, though an unidentified etiology can not be ruled out,10 and therefore should be included among the causes of potentially reversible cognitive impairment. Age of onset and male predominance in FBSS coincide with those in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. On imaging, FBSS lacks the typical cortical atrophy seen in frontotemporal dementia, presenting with brain sagging instead.10 In the few reported cases of neuropathologic examination,10 including our case 2, no specific neurodegenerative disease was found. We propose that FBSS, with its predominant neurocognitive presentation, should be included in the more inclusive category of atypical SIH.

Apart from cognitive and behavioral deficits, patients with atypical SIH frequently present with gait disturbance, imbalance, dysarthria, dysphagia, daytime somnolence, and movement disorders, which are not typical features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. These clinical manifestations suggest midbrain and/or brain stem involvement, corresponding to the level of brain sagging and anatomic distortion. The frequent association of daytime somnolence in our sample of patients with atypical SIH and in the published series of FBSS10 points to involvement of the brain stem reticular activation system. In agreement with this notion, reversibility of obtundation from SIH has been highly time-correlated to recovery of a normal intracranial pressure waveform with reactive pupils after intrathecal saline infusion, supporting a mesencephalic level.3 Ataxia and dysarthria likely result from stretching of the superior cerebellar peduncles. Some of the symptoms associated with atypical SIH respond promptly to intrathecal saline infusion, such as the transient gait improvements noted in our case 3. Half of our patients with atypical SIH presented with involuntary movement disorders including a case of upper limb chorea with negative neuropathologic findings for Huntington disease or other neurodegenerative diseases. Parkinsonism and ataxia with recovery after blood patch were reported in a case of SIH.9 Finally, oculomotor abnormalities were also reported in FBSS,10 though these were not observed in our sample.

The cardinal radiologic feature of SIH is brain sagging at the tentorial incisura, resulting in the following morphologic distortions: approximation of both thalami, caudal displacement of the mammillary bodies with shortened pontomammillary distance, and anteroposterior elongation from lateral compression of the midbrain at the tentorial incisura. The Monro-Kellie doctrine18 explains the imaging findings of pachymeningeal enhancement (from venous engorgement) and subdural fluid collections as compensatory mechanisms to preserve the homeostasis of intracranial volume in the setting of a CSF volume deficit.19 Atypical SIH is a more chronic and severe brain sagging syndrome compared with classic SIH, as evidenced by the significantly higher Sagging Index (Fig 2) in the absence of other neuroradiologic differences. Compensatory mechanisms to CSF hypovolemia might become insufficient in such chronic conditions to prevent the observed parenchymal stretching across the tentorial incisura. On the basis of imaging and clinical features, we propose that the anatomic site of involvement in atypical SIH corresponds to the structures adjacent to the tentorial incisura: the medial thalamus, hypothalamus, midbrain tegmentum, and upper brain stem.

The main limitation of this study is the low number of patients with atypical SIH, inherent in the rarity of this syndrome and/or its underdiagnosis. Another limitation is the incomplete clinical and imaging follow-up related to the retrospective nature of this study. One patient with atypical SIH was treated with Chiari decompression based on neurosurgical indications, with no clinical improvement. Finally, no systematic information was available on connective tissue anomalies, which could underlie the chronicity and frequent relapses of patients with atypical SIH.

Conclusions

Atypical SIH, including FBSS, is a complex syndrome that should be included in the category of potentially reversible, treatable causes of dementia. It is therefore paramount to suspect it clinically and to confirm it on brain MR imaging, for which a Sagging Index of ≥10 is highly suggestive. Older age and male sex are more common in atypical compared with classic SIH. The longer clinical duration and less favorable outcome of atypical SIH may relate to a weaker dura from an underlying connective tissue anomaly and/or insufficient physiologic adaptation to CSF hypovolemia, leading to parenchymal stretching with brain sagging. The potential for reversibility of symptoms and signs, even in chronic cases with atypical presentation after tamponade of the CSF leak, underscores the relevant role of neuroradiologists in diagnosing and managing SIH.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Deline CR
    . Headache secondary to intracranial hypotension. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2014;18:457 doi:10.1007/s11916-014-0457-9 pmid:25255993
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Urbach H
    . Intracranial hypotension: clinical presentation, imaging findings, and imaging-guided therapy. Curr Opin Neurol 2014;27:414–24 doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000105 pmid:24978633
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Binder DK,
    2. Dillon WP,
    3. Fishman RA, et al
    . Intrathecal saline infusion in the treatment of obtundation associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2002;51:830–36; discussion 836–37 pmid:12188967
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pleasure SJ,
    2. Abosch A,
    3. Friedman J, et al
    . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension resulting in stupor caused by diencephalic compression. Neurology 1998;50:1854–57 doi:10.1212/WNL.50.6.1854 pmid:9633740
    FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Peng PW
    . Intracranial hypotension with severe neurological symptoms resolved by epidural blood patch. Can J Neurol Sci 2004;31:569–71 doi:10.1017/S0317167100003838 pmid:15595269
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sayao AL,
    2. Heran MK,
    3. Chapman K, et al
    . Intracranial hypotension causing reversible frontotemporal dementia and coma. Can J Neurol Sci 2009;36:252–56 doi:10.1017/S0317167100006636 pmid:19378725
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hong M,
    2. Shah GV,
    3. Adams KM, et al
    . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension causing reversible frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2002;58:1285–87 doi:10.1212/WNL.58.8.1285 pmid:11971102
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Walker L,
    2. DeMeulemeester C
    . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension masquerading as frontotemporal dementia. Clin Neuropsychol 2008;22:1035–53 doi:10.1080/13854040701874386 pmid:18609334
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pakiam AS,
    2. Lee C,
    3. Lang AE
    . Intracranial hypotension with parkinsonism, ataxia, and bulbar weakness. Arch Neurol 1999;56:869–72 doi:10.1001/archneur.56.7.869 pmid:10404990
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wicklund MR,
    2. Mokri B,
    3. Drubach DA, et al
    . Frontotemporal brain sagging syndrome: an SIH-like presentation mimicking FTD. Neurology 2011;76:1377–82 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182166e42 pmid:21502595
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Schievink WI
    . Misdiagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1713–18 doi:10.1001/archneur.60.12.1713 pmid:14676045
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Neary D,
    2. Snowden JS,
    3. Gustafson L, et al
    . Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51:1546–54 doi:10.1212/WNL.51.6.1546 pmid:9855500
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Gordon OK,
    3. Tourje J
    . Connective tissue disorders with spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks and intracranial hypotension: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 2004;54:65–70; discussion 70–71 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000097200.18478.7B pmid:14683542
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Moser FG,
    3. Maya MM
    . CSF-venous fistula in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology 2014;83:472–73 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000639 pmid:24951475
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mokri B
    . Spontaneous CSF leaks: low CSF volume syndromes. Neurol Clin 2014;32:397–422 doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2013.11.002 pmid:24703536
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Morreale VM,
    3. Atkinson JL, et al
    . Surgical treatment of spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. J Neurosurg 1998;88:243–46 doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0243 pmid:9452231
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Cummings JL
    . Subcortical dementia: neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and pathophysiology. Br J Psychiatry 1986;149:682–97 pmid:2878699
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mokri B
    . The Monro-Kellie hypothesis: applications in CSF volume depletion. Neurology 2001;56:1746–48 doi:10.1212/WNL.56.12.1746 pmid:11425944
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fishman RA,
    2. Dillon WP
    . Dural enhancement and cerebral displacement secondary to intracranial hypotension. Neurology 1993;43:609–11 doi:10.1212/WNL.43.3_Part_1.609 pmid:8451008
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received October 29, 2015.
  • Accepted after revision December 21, 2015.
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 7
1 Jul 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Atypical Presentations of Intracranial Hypotension: Comparison with Classic Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.A. Capizzano, L. Lai, J. Kim, M. Rizzo, L. Gray, M.K. Smoot, T. Moritani
Atypical Presentations of Intracranial Hypotension: Comparison with Classic Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2016, 37 (7) 1256-1261; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4706

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Atypical Presentations of Intracranial Hypotension: Comparison with Classic Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
A.A. Capizzano, L. Lai, J. Kim, M. Rizzo, L. Gray, M.K. Smoot, T. Moritani
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2016, 37 (7) 1256-1261; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4706
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Spontaneous intracranial hypotension
  • Brain Sagging Dementia--Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome: A Review
  • Spontaneous intracranial hypotension presenting with progressive cognitive decline
  • Intracranial Hypotension With Mild Parkinsonism and Bulbar Dysfunction
  • Isolated gait dysfunction due to intracranial hypotension
  • Crossref (38)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Assessing Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension With a Scoring System Based on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings
    Tomas Dobrocky, Lorenz Grunder, Philipe S. Breiding, Mattia Branca, Andreas Limacher, Pascal J. Mosimann, Pasquale Mordasini, Felix Zibold, Levin Haeni, Christopher M. Jesse, Christian Fung, Andreas Raabe, Christian T. Ulrich, Jan Gralla, Jürgen Beck, Eike I. Piechowiak
    JAMA Neurology 2019 76 5
  • Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
    Peter G. Kranz, Michael D. Malinzak, Timothy J. Amrhein, Linda Gray
    Current Pain and Headache Reports 2017 21 8
  • The splenium of the corpus callosum: embryology, anatomy, function and imaging with pathophysiological hypothesis
    J. Blaauw, L. C. Meiners
    Neuroradiology 2020 62 5
  • Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: diagnostic and therapeutic workup
    Niklas Luetzen, Philippe Dovi-Akue, Christian Fung, Juergen Beck, Horst Urbach
    Neuroradiology 2021 63 11
  • Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia as a Serious Complication of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
    Wouter I Schievink, M Marcel Maya, Zachary R Barnard, Franklin G Moser, Stacey Jean-Pierre, Alan D Waxman, Miriam Nuño
    Operative Neurosurgery 2018 15 5
  • Human Prion Diseases
    Michael D. Geschwind, Katy Murray
    2018 153
  • Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: updates from diagnosis to treatment
    Paul J. Farnsworth, Ajay A. Madhavan, Jared T. Verdoorn, Darya P. Shlapak, Derek R. Johnson, Jeremy K. Cutsforth-Gregory, Waleed Brinjikji, Vance T. Lehman
    Neuroradiology 2023 65 2
  • Brain Sagging Dementia—Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome
    Aslan Lashkarivand, Per Kristian Eide
    Neurology 2022 98 19
  • Comparisons of clinical characteristics, brain MRI findings, and responses to epidural blood patch between spontaneous intracranial hypotension and post-dural puncture headache: retrospective study
    Gha-Hyun Lee, Jiyoung Kim, Hyun-Woo Kim, Jae Wook Cho
    BMC Neurology 2021 21 1
  • Parkinsonism and cerebrospinal fluid disorders
    Jinyoung Youn, Massimiliano Todisco, Mario Zappia, Claudio Pacchetti, Alfonso Fasano
    Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2022 433

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Cerebral ADC Changes in Fabry Disease
  • ML for Glioma Molecular Subtype Prediction
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire