Automated Color-Coding of Lesion Changes in Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1-Weighted Sequences for MRI Follow-up of Brain Metastases

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Achrol AS,
   2. Rennert RC,
   3. Anders C, et al

   . Brain metastases. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019;5:5 doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0055-y pmid:30655533

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Wen PY,
   2. Loeffler JS

   . Management of brain metastases. Oncology (Williston Park) 1999;13:941–54; discussion 961-62, 69 pmid:10442342

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Barnholtz-Sloan JS,
   2. Sloan AE,
   3. Davis FG, et al

   . Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2865–72 doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149 pmid:15254054

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Soffietti R,
   2. Rudā R,
   3. Mutani R

   . Management of brain metastases. J Neurol 2002;249:1357–69 doi:10.1007/s00415-002-0870-6 pmid:12382150

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Pope WB

   . Brain metastases: neuroimaging. Handb Clin Neurol 2018;149:89–112 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00007-4 pmid:29307364

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Sze G,
   2. Milano E,
   3. Johnson C, et al

   . Detection of brain metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR with unenhanced MR and enhanced CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:785–91 pmid:2114769

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Deuschl C,
   2. Kirchner J,
   3. Poeppel TD, et al

   . ¹¹C-MET PET/MRI for detection of recurrent glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:593–601 doi:10.1007/s00259-017-3916-9 pmid:29282517

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Kaufmann TJ,
   2. Smits M,
   3. Boxerman J, et al

   . Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2020;22:757–72 doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa030 pmid:32048719

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Patel N,
   2. Horsfield MA,
   3. Banahan C, et al

   . Detection of focal longitudinal changes in the brain by subtraction of MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:923–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5165 pmid:28364006

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Lassman AB,
    2. DeAngelis LM

    . Brain metastases. Neurol Clin 2003;21:1–23 doi:10.1016/S0733-8619(02)00035-X pmid:12690643

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Berbaum KS,
    2. Franken EA,
    3. Dorfman DD, et al

    . Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol 1990;25:133–40 pmid:2312249

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Ganesan A,
    2. Alakhras M,
    3. Brennan PC, et al

    . A review of factors influencing radiologists' visual search behaviour. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018;62:747–57 doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12798 pmid:30198628

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Zopfs D,
    2. Laukamp KR,
    3. Paquet S, et al

    . Follow-up MRI in multiple sclerosis patients: automated co-registration and lesion color-coding improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces reading time. Eur Radiol 2019;29:7047–54 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06273-x pmid:31201526

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Dahan A,
    2. Pereira R,
    3. Malpas CB, et al

    . PACS integration of semiautomated imaging software improves day-to-day MS disease activity detection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1624–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6195 pmid:31515214

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Galletto Pregliasco A,
    2. Collin A,
    3. Guéguen A, et al

    . Improved detection of new MS lesions during follow-up using an automated MR coregistration-fusion method. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1226–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5690 pmid:29880479

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Lennartz S,
    2. Zopfs D,
    3. Nobis A, et al

    . MRI follow-up of astrocytoma: automated coregistration and color-coding of FLAIR sequences improves diagnostic accuracy with comparable reading time. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020;52:1197–206 doi:10.1002/jmri.27136 pmid:32246803

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. van der Hoorn A,
    2. Yan J-L,
    3. Larkin TJ, et al

    . Validation of a semi-automatic co-registration of MRI scans in patients with brain tumors during treatment follow-up. NMR Biomed 2016;29:882–89 doi:10.1002/nbm.3538 pmid:27120035

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Chitphakdithai N,
    2. Chiang VL,
    3. Duncan JS

    . Non-rigid registration of longitudinal brain tumor treatment MRI. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011;2011:4893–96 doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091212 pmid:22255435

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Lin NU,
    2. Lee EQ,
    3. Aoyama H, et al

    ; Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:e270–78 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70057-4 pmid:26065612

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Chokshi FH,
    2. Hughes DR,
    3. Wang JM, et al

    . Diagnostic radiology resident and fellow workloads: a 12-year longitudinal trend analysis using national Medicare aggregate claims data. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:664–69 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.02.009 pmid:25972250

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Taylor-Phillips S,
    2. Stinton C

    . Fatigue in radiology: a fertile area for future research. Br J Radiol 2019;92:20190043 doi:10.1259/bjr.20190043 pmid:30933540

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Stec N,
    2. Arje D,
    3. Moody AR, et al

    . A systematic review of fatigue in radiology: is it a problem? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:799–806 doi:10.2214/AJR.17.18613 pmid:29446673

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Maskell G

    . Error in radiology: where are we now? Br J Radiol 2019;92:20180845 doi:10.1259/bjr.20180845 pmid:30457880

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Grøvik E,
    2. Yi D,
    3. Iv M, et al

    . Deep learning enables automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multisequence MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020;51:175–82 doi:10.1002/jmri.26766 pmid:31050074

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Laukamp KR,
    2. Thiele F,
    3. Shakirin G, et al

    . Fully automated detection and segmentation of meningiomas using deep learning on routine multiparametric MRI. Eur Radiol 2019;29:124–32 doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5595-8 pmid:29943184

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Geis JR,
    2. Brady AP,
    3. Wu CC, et al

    . Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement. Radiology 2019;293:436–40 doi:10.1148/radiol.2019191586 pmid:31573399

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Recht MP,
    2. Dewey M,
    3. Dreyer K, et al

    . Integrating artificial intelligence into the clinical practice of radiology: challenges and recommendations. Eur Radiol 2020;30:3576–84 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06672-5 pmid:32064565

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Tang A,
    2. Tam R,
    3. Cadrin-Chênevert A, et al

    ; Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Artificial Intelligence Working Group. Canadian Association of Radiologists White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in Radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J 2018;69:120–35 doi:10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.002 pmid:29655580

    CrossRefPubMed