Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
EditorialEDITORIAL

Language Processing during Natural Sleep in a 6-Year-Old Boy, as Assessed with Functional MR Imaging

Bruce Nolan
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2003, 24 (1) 4;
Bruce Nolan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

In recent years, the use of newer and combined techniques for the evaluation of brain activity during wakefulness and sleep has added new perspectives to our understanding of these different states. Among currently useful ways of determining regional brain activity are the electrophysiologic monitoring of wakefulness and sleep by using the techniques of electroencephalography (EEG), polysomnography (PSG), and functional MR imaging (fMRI). Ample evidence establishes distinct physiologic differences between the waking and sleeping states and also between the stages of non–rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Brain activity during REM sleep was previously found to be important in mood disorders, memory, and learning. Combined studies have more recently identified clear evidence for the processing of auditory information and language during NREM sleep.

A case report in this issue of the AJNR presents the possibility of assessing the localization of language processing with the coincidence of sleep and fMRI during an evaluation for surgery. Because sleeping occurred by chance in the child reported, the assessment of sleep was conducted by means of behavioral observation. In this instance, we cannot be certain what stage of sleep was actually occurring, but NREM sleep would seem more likely than REM sleep under the circumstances. At present, natural sleep (as in this instance), rather than sedated sleep, appears to be best for assessing functional localization. The authors correctly point out that sedative medication may confound the results.

The advantage of testing while the patient is asleep is potentially limited, for a number of reasons. The need to obtain a baseline fMRI study for comparison followed by auditory input in the form of stories and further imaging poses some logistical concerns. Such needs may render the timing of sleep and imaging unpredictable. Unfortunately, the choice of sleep deprivation before the test may also increase the likelihood of clinical seizures. Young children may not necessarily be able to reliably fall asleep during such studies in the daytime hours, even when sleep deprived. The potential advantage of a motion-free study during sleep may be offset by such uncertainties, particularly in young children. Nevertheless, in the current report, the observation that corresponding language areas are prominent during sleep is noteworthy. At this point, spontaneous sleep, if it happens to occur during testing, may appear to be helpful because of some of the reasons indicated. However, not all sleep stages are equivalent, and confusion could potentially occur if different sleep stages are encountered. Physiologic responses in NREM sleep stages 3–4 and in REM sleep may be considerably different from those in the more commonly observed NREM sleep stages 1 and 2 that typically occur at sleep onset. Further delineation of fMRI findings in wakefulness and in sleeping may also help to satisfy those who believe in a continuing need to more firmly establish the accuracy of such noninvasive testing as a feasible alternative to older intracarotid amobarbital testing.

The present report also adds to the information that is being accumulated on the blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) contrast responses. Increasing evidence indicates that the authors’ suggestion that language processing during spontaneous natural sleep can be detected in young children by using an fMRI technique will likely be proven valid. Until functional similarities and differences of brain activity during waking and various sleep stages are better established, the importance of individual observations leaves some uncertainty. Newer vistas continue to open in our understanding of brain function. An increasingly elaborate landscape seems to be emerging in which the organization of brain functions may vary substantially and even fundamentally, depending on whether the brain is awake or asleep in the conventional sense. If asleep, however, the organization of brain functions may also be very different, depending on the stage of sleep occurring at the time. For the alert investigator, fMRI can help to open some of these vistas and to improve our understanding of these processes.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 24 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 24, Issue 1
1 Jan 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Language Processing during Natural Sleep in a 6-Year-Old Boy, as Assessed with Functional MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Language Processing during Natural Sleep in a 6-Year-Old Boy, as Assessed with Functional MR Imaging
Bruce Nolan
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2003, 24 (1) 4;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Language Processing during Natural Sleep in a 6-Year-Old Boy, as Assessed with Functional MR Imaging
Bruce Nolan
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2003, 24 (1) 4;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The No Surprises Act: What Neuroradiologists Should Know
  • Call to Action: Women in Neuroradiology’s Group (WINNERS)—Is There a Need?
  • The Z-Shift: A Need for Quality Management System Level Testing and Standardization in Neuroimaging Pipelines
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire