Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

EditorialEDITORIALS

Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Few Good Images?

Harry Cloft
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 989-990;
Harry Cloft
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Lieutenant Daniel Kaffee, U.S. Navy: “I want the truth!”Colonel Nathan Jessup, U.S. Marine Corps: “You can’t handle the truth!”A Few Good Men, Columbia Pictures, 1992

Physicians want the truth when imaging patients suspected of having intracranial stenosis. Currently, four imaging modalities might be considered as pathways to the truth in cases of intracranial atherosclerosis. These modalities are digital subtraction angiography (DSA), CT angiography (CTA), MR angiography (MRA), and transcranial Doppler (TCD). Bash et al have done an unprecedented comparison of three of these modalities in 28 patients with intracranial stenosis. On the basis of their study, it is clear that, compared with CTA and DSA, MRA generally does not get us as close to the truth about intracranial stenosis.

Should we be surprised that MRA does not accurately depict intracranial atherosclerosis? Not really. It is a firmly established fact that MRA tends to overestimate degree of stenosis (1–3). MRA has poor spatial resolution relative to what is now available for CTA and DSA, so we cannot reasonably expect to image stenotic arteries reliably with a lumen of <1 mm. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MRA is susceptible to artifacts secondary to turbulent flow, and some degree of turbulent flow is generally present with stenotic intracranial atherosclerosis. Even normal arteries can be misrepresented on MRA, because curves in normal arteries can cause turbulence that creates an artifactual stenosis. These artifactual stenoses account for the poor positive predictive value of MRA for intracranial atherosclerosis. No contrast or ionizing radiation is needed for an MRA, but how much harm really comes to patients from the use of iodinated contrast material or ionizing radiation? Have we helped a patient by avoiding iodinated contrast material and radiation in exchange for an inaccurate diagnosis? Patient care based on an incorrect diagnosis, no matter how caring and well intentioned, is much more likely to fail than care based on the correct diagnosis.

DSA has traditionally been the criterion standard for imaging intracranial disease. It offers superb spatial resolution and contrast resolution. But DSA is an invasive procedure that carries a small but real (0.7%) risk of permanent neurologic deficit (4). DSA gives physiologic information about flow contribution from the injected artery. This physiologic effect is sometimes a disadvantage, because slow-flow vessels distal to a stenosis may be poorly filled with contrast material and thus poorly visualized. Multiple arteries often need to be injected to show collateral blood flow. For posterior circulation stenosis, both vertebral arteries generally need to be evaluated. For those of us who work in referral centers where complex patients whose symptoms are refractory to medical therapy are referred, angioplasty or bypass surgery is sometimes offered. These patients will all have conventional angiography as part of their preintervention evaluation.

As Bash et al have shown, CTA can give excellent anatomic visualization of intracranial atherosclerosis. The use of CT angiography does not avoid the use of contrast material or ionizing radiation, but these offer trivial risks in most patients relative to the potential risks associated with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Spatial resolution may occasionally limit our ability to distinguish very severe stenosis from occlusion compared with DSA. Calcium might also occasionally cause overestimation of a stenosis, as was described for CTA of the cervical carotid artery (5).

But perhaps we cannot quite handle the truth yet. There is certainly confusion about the best medical therapy for intracranial atherosclerosis. The latest results of WASID (Warfarin versus Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease) indicate that coumadin offers no benefit over aspirin (6). Newer antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel have not yet been subjected to rigorous testing for efficacy in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Patients with ischemic symptoms may get the same antiplatelet therapy regardless of the appearance of intracranial arteries on imaging. Nevertheless, we should strive to keep the art of diagnostic imaging ahead of the art of therapy. Treatments targeted to a patient’s specific disease can be developed only if we can reliably diagnose that disease.

References

  1. ↵
    Feldman E, Wilterdink J, Sarafin J, et al. Stroke outcomes and neuroimaging of intracranial atherosclerosis (SONIA). In: Proceedings of the 29th International Stroke Conference. San Diego: February2004
  2. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, et al. Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:93–101
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Nakagawa T, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:135–143
    Abstract
  4. ↵
    Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317–320
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-Leon J, Escribano J, et al. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1012–1019
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Chimowitz M. Warfarin vs. aspirin for symptomatic intracranial disease: final results. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Stroke Conference. San Diego: February2004
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 5
1 May 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Few Good Images?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Harry Cloft
Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Few Good Images?
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 989-990;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Few Good Images?
Harry Cloft
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 989-990;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Teaching Lessons by MR CLEAN
  • Coffee Houses and Reading Rooms
  • Comeback Victory
Show more EDITORIALS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire