Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleHead & Neck

MR Imaging Evolution of Endoscopic Cranial Defect Reconstructions Using Nasoseptal Flaps and Their Distinction from Neoplasm

K.O. Learned, N.D. Adappa, J.Y.K. Lee, J.G. Newman, J.N. Palmer and L.A. Loevner
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2014, 35 (6) 1182-1189; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3853
K.O. Learned
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (K.O.L., L.A.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.D. Adappa
cOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (N.D.A., J.G.N., J.N.P., L.A.L.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.Y.K. Lee
bNeurosurgery (J.Y.K.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.G. Newman
cOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (N.D.A., J.G.N., J.N.P., L.A.L.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.N. Palmer
cOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (N.D.A., J.G.N., J.N.P., L.A.L.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.A. Loevner
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (K.O.L., L.A.L.)
cOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (N.D.A., J.G.N., J.N.P., L.A.L.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Multilayer ESBR using NSF. A, Endoscopic coronal view of the nasal cavity illustrates harvesting of the NSF from the nasal septum with the preserved septal artery vascular pedicle (arrow) arising from the sphenopalatine artery. B, Sagittal view of the harvested NSF shows that the flap is anchored by its pedicle (arrow), leading toward the ipsilateral sphenopalatine foramen. C, Sagittal drawing of the ESBR shows inlay dura substitute (such as collagen matrix, fascia lata) and onlay mucosal closure with an NSF (labeled as a septal flap). Autologous fat graft may be placed above the dura substitute layer to fill the intracranial resection bed. The NSF is held in place by biologic tissue glue. Reconstruction is bolstered with nasal sponges and/or a balloon catheter to prevent dislodging during the immediate postoperative period. Reprinted with permission from Atlas of Endoscopic Sinus and Skull Base Surgery. Palmer JN, Chiu AG. Copyright Elsevier, 2013.12

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Graft shows the percentage of follow-up MR imaging studies performed before or without adjuvant treatment (gray bar) and after adjuvant treatment (black bar) versus postoperative time intervals.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    A 47-year-old man with normal evolution of the ESBR after EEA gross total resection and adjuvant radiation of a clival chordoma. A, Preoperative sagittal enhanced T1WI shows tumor (T) eroding the upper clivus and compressing the ventral pons (arrow). B, Immediate postoperative sagittal enhanced fat-saturated T1WI shows an enhancing C-shaped NSF covering the clival defect (arrow), abutting the nonenhancing fascia lata (arrowhead) and clivectomy fat packing (F). Nonenhancing Gelfoam (Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) and blood (G), enhancing pituitary (P). C, Five-month follow-up sagittal enhanced fat-saturated T1WI shows a solidly enhancing slightly thinner NSF and retraction of the reconstruction with the enhancing fascia lata (arrowhead) inseparable from granulation tissue/resorbing fat (F). Marked nodularity along the anterior and inferior portions of the NSF relates to retraction and incorporation of the flap into the newly enhancing free grafts and granulation tissues.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    A 58-year-old woman status post transcribriform resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma and NSF misinterpreted as a neoplasm. A, Preoperative coronal enhanced fat-saturated T1WI shows enhancing tumor (T) with intracranial extension. B and C, Immediate postoperative coronal and axial enhanced T1WI shows fat (F) in the subfrontal bed, nonenhancing T1-hypointense fascia lata (arrowheads) at the bone defect, and mucosal closure with enhancing NSF (arrows). D, Immediate postoperative axial T2WI shows T2-hyperintense fascia lata (arrowhead) and T2-isointense NSF (arrow). E, Three-month follow-up coronal enhanced T1WI shows normal evolution of the ESBR with retraction to the defect; significant resorption of intracranial fat graft (F); and a thin enhancing fascia lata (arrowhead) above the solidly enhancing NSF (arrows), mistaken for neoplasm in the official report. F and G, Sixteen-month follow-up (3 months after completion of chemoradiation) coronal fat-saturated enhanced T1WI and T2WI show little change of the enhancing fascia lata (arrowheads) and solidly enhancing T2-isointense NSF (arrows).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    A 52-year-old man following transplanum resection and chemoradiation for sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma has abnormal evolution of the ESBR, consistent with recurrent tumor. A, Preoperative coronal fat-saturated T2WI shows tumor (T) invading the planum sphenoidale and right optic canal (arrowhead). S indicates sinus secretions. B and C, Immediate postoperative coronal and axial enhanced fat-saturated T1WIs show an enhancing NSF (arrows) at the planum-sphenoidale defect with a right-sided vascular pedicle (asterisk). The thin nonenhancing collagen matrix dural inlay above the NSF is indiscernible. The nasal cavity is packed with sponge. D and E, Three-month follow-up coronal fat-saturated T2WI and enhanced T1WI show retraction of the enhancing NSF (arrows) into the skull base defect with a stable location of the right pedicle seen on the axial image (not shown) and mildly enhancing T2-hypointense dural graft/granulation (bow arrows). Nodular tumor recurrence at the edge of the reconstruction in the left sphenoid sinus (T) and along the supraorbital dura (arrowheads) has signal intensity and mild enhancement similar to that in preoperative tumor and different from that in the adjacent reconstructive layers.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Patient clinical data

    Pathologies (No. of Patients and Average Tumor Size)Skull Base DefectsESBR Tissues (No. of Patients)Length of MRI Follow-Up (mo)Adjuvant Therapy (No. of Patients)
    Esthesioneuroblastoma (n = 6; 2.5 cm)ASBF, FL, NSF, FM (n = 1)9–32Radiation (n = 4),
    D, NSF (n = 3)Chemoradiation (n = 2)
    D, NSF, FM (n = 2)
    Sinonasal endocrine carcinoma (n = 1; 4.0 cm)ASBF, FL, NSF, FM (n = 1)16Chemoradiation (n = 1)
    Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (n = 1; 2.2 cm)ASBD, NSF (n = 1)3Chemoradiation (n = 1)
    Chondrosarcoma (n = 1; 2.5 cm)ClivusD, NSF (n = 1)21Radiation (n = 1)
    Chordoma (n = 3; 2.0 cm)ClivusNSF (n = 2)9–21Radiation (n = 2)
    F, FL, NSF (n = 1)
    Meningioma (n = 4; 2.2 cm)ASBD, NSF (n = 1)3–41Radiation (n = 1)
    CSBF, FL, NSF (n = 2)
    ClivusF, FL, NSF (n = 1)
    Craniopharyngioma (n = 1; 3.5 cm)CSBF, FL, NSF (n = 1)6
    Pituicytoma (n = 1; 3.1 cm)CSBF, FL, NSF (n = 1)13Radiation (n = 1)
    Pituitary macroadenoma (n = 4; 3.4 cm)CSBNSF (n = 1)6–27Radiation (n = 1)
    F, NSF (n = 1)
    FL, NSF (n = 1)
    F, FL, NSF (n = 1)
    • Note:—ASB indicates cribriform plates, crista galli, and/or ethmoid fovealis; CSB, planum sphenoidale, tuberculum sella, sella, and/or dorsum sella; D, collagen matrix dural graft; F, intracranial fat; FL, fascia lata; FM, free mucosa.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    MR imaging evolution of ESBR from the immediate postoperative period to stability on follow-up

    Immediate Postoperative MRIFollow-Up MRI at 2–6 Months
    NSFSolid enhancement, T2-isointensity to brain (mostly similar to gray matter), distinctive C shape and vascular pedicle configurationsPersistent solid enhancement, persistent T2-isointensity to brain (mostly similar to gray matter), thickness reduction by 20%–30%, average thickness of 4.5 mm
    Less well-defined C shape and vascular pedicle configurations, unchanged flap location
    Fascia lataNonenhancing, variable T2 signal intensityMildly enhancing, increasing T2-hypointensity, thickness reduction by ≥50%, average thickness of 3.5 mm
    Collagen matrix dural graftNonenhancing, nonvisible to ≤2 mmInseparable from enhancing granulation tissue at the reconstruction site, nonvisible to ≤2 mm
    Fat graftFat signal intensity fills intracranial surgical bedFat signal intensity in retracted intracranial surgical bed, progressive resorption with volume reduction by ≥50%
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 6
1 Jun 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Imaging Evolution of Endoscopic Cranial Defect Reconstructions Using Nasoseptal Flaps and Their Distinction from Neoplasm
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MR Imaging Evolution of Endoscopic Cranial Defect Reconstructions Using Nasoseptal Flaps and Their Distinction from Neoplasm
K.O. Learned, N.D. Adappa, J.Y.K. Lee, J.G. Newman, J.N. Palmer, L.A. Loevner
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2014, 35 (6) 1182-1189; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3853

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
MR Imaging Evolution of Endoscopic Cranial Defect Reconstructions Using Nasoseptal Flaps and Their Distinction from Neoplasm
K.O. Learned, N.D. Adappa, J.Y.K. Lee, J.G. Newman, J.N. Palmer, L.A. Loevner
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2014, 35 (6) 1182-1189; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3853
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • CT and MR Imaging Appearance of the Pedicled Submandibular Gland Flap: A Potential Imaging Pitfall in the Posttreatment Head and Neck
  • Increased Labyrinthine T1 Postgadolinium Signal Intensity Is Associated with the Degree of Ipsilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Patients with Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma
  • MRI for Cushing Disease: A Systematic Review
Show more HEAD & NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire