Flow Diversion versus Standard Endovascular Techniques for the Treatment of Unruptured Carotid-Ophthalmic Aneurysms

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. D'Urso PI,
   3. Karadeli HH,
   4. Kallmes DF, et al

   . Coiling for paraclinoid aneurysms: time to make way for flow diverters? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1470–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3009 pmid:22403773

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Jabbour P,
   4. Singhal S, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000641 pmid:23512976

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Kan P,
   3. Siddiqui AH,
   4. Veznedaroglu E, et al

   . Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 2012;71:1080–87; discussion 1087–88 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827060d9 pmid:22948199

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Yu SC,
   3. Kwok CK,
   4. Cheng PW, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device–a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422 pmid:22996749

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Starke RM,
   4. Koltz MT, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling versus balloon remodeling of wide-neck aneurysms: comparison of angiographic outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1987–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3538 pmid:23639562

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Tjoumakaris SI,
   4. Gonzalez LF, et al

   . Spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of the Pipeline embolization device: report of 5 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2326–30 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3632 pmid:23811979

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Jabbour P,
   3. Chalouhi N,
   4. Tjoumakaris S, et al

   . The Pipeline embolization device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration. Neurosurgery 2013;73:113–20; discussion 120 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000429844.06955.39 pmid:23615106

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Satti SR,
   4. Tjoumakaris S, et al

   . Delayed migration of a Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2013;72:ons229–234; discussion ons234 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827e5870 pmid:23190638

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Chitale R,
    3. Gonzalez LF,
    4. Randazzo C, et al

    . Single center experience with Pipeline stent: feasibility, technique, and complications. Neurosurgery 2012;71:679–91; discussion 691 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318260fe86 pmid:22653389

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. O'Kelly CJ,
    3. Spears J,
    4. Chow M, et al

    . Canadian experience with the Pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:381–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3224 pmid:22859284

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Hu YC,
    3. Deshmukh VR,
    4. Albuquerque FC, et al

    . Histopathological assessment of fatal ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhages after the treatment of supraclinoid aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. J Neurosurg 2014;120:365–74 doi:10.3171/2013.11.JNS131599 pmid:24320006

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Burrows AM,
    3. Cloft H,
    4. Kallmes DF, et al

    . Periprocedural and mid-term technical and clinical events after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2014 Jul 31. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011184 pmid:25082803

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Jahshan S,
    3. Abla AA,
    4. Natarajan SK, et al

    . Results of stent-assisted vs non-stent-assisted endovascular therapies in 489 cerebral aneurysms: single-center experience. Neurosurgery 2013;72:232–39 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827b93ea pmid:23149972

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Geyik S,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. Yurttutan N, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling in endovascular treatment of 500 consecutive cerebral aneurysms with long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2157–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3574 pmid:23886748

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Saatci I,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. Ozer C, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Barros G, et al

    . Flow-diversion for ophthalmic segment aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:286–89; discussion 289–90 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000607 pmid:25584955

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Grossberg J,
    3. Tong F,
    4. Cawley C, et al

    . E-039 safety and efficacy of flow diverter treatment for carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2914;6(suppl 1):A55–56 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011343.106 pmid:25064956

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Moon K,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. Ducruet AF, et al

    . Treatment of ophthalmic segment carotid aneurysms using the Pipeline embolization device: clinical and angiographic follow-up. Neurol Res 2014;36:344–50 doi:10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000322 pmid:24617935

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Yang S, et al

    . Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke 2014;45:54–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003038 pmid:24253543

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Crobeddu E,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Efficacy and safety of flow diversion for paraclinoid aneurysms: a matched-pair analysis compared with standard endovascular approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2158–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3207 pmid:22790243

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Turk AS 3rd.,
    3. Martin RH,
    4. Fiorella D, et al

    . Flow diversion versus traditional endovascular coiling therapy: design of the prospective LARGE aneurysm randomized trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1341–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3968 pmid:24831596

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Darsaut TE,
    4. Guilbert F, et al

    . Flow diversion in aneurysms trial: the design of the FIAT study. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:147–53 pmid:21696651

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Turjman F,
    3. Levrier O,
    4. Combaz X, et al

    . EVIDENCE trial: design of a phase 2, randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing flow diversion and traditional endovascular strategy in unruptured saccular wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2015;57:49–54 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1439-7 pmid:25280445

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Miranda C,
    4. Ceratto R, et al

    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–43; quiz N6 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65 pmid:19349825

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science