Risk of Thrombus Fragmentation during Endovascular Stroke Treatment

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Berkhemer OA,
   3. Fransen PS,
   4. Beumer D, et al

   . A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Goyal M,
   3. Demchuk AM,
   4. Menon BK, et al

   ; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Jovin TG,
   3. Chamorro A,
   4. Cobo E, et al

   ; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Campbell BC,
   3. Mitchell PJ,
   4. Kleinig TJ, et al

   ; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Saver JL,
   3. Goyal M,
   4. Bonafe A, et al

   ; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Manning NW,
   3. Chapot R,
   4. Meyers PM

   . Endovascular stroke management: key elements of success. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;42:170–77 doi:10.1159/000445449 pmid:27111086

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Gralla J,
   3. Schroth G,
   4. Remonda L, et al

   . Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: thrombus-device interaction, efficiency, and complications in vivo. Stroke 2006;37:3019–24 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000248457.55493.85 pmid:17053185

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Gralla J,
   3. Schroth G,
   4. Remonda L, et al

   . A dedicated animal model for mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1357–61 pmid:16775297

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators. The Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 2009;40:2761–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544957 pmid:19590057

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Kleine JF,
    3. Wunderlich S,
    4. Zimmer C, et al

    . Time to redefine success? TICI 3 versus TICI 2b recanalization in middle cerebral artery occlusion treated with thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Feb 17. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:26888952

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Jayaraman MV,
    3. Grossberg JA,
    4. Meisel KM, et al

    . The clinical and radiographic importance of distinguishing partial from near-complete reperfusion following intra-arterial stroke therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:135–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3278 pmid:22837313

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Machi P,
    3. Jourdan F,
    4. Ambard D, et al

    . Experimental evaluation of stent retrievers' mechanical properties and effectiveness. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Mar 25. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012213 pmid:27016318

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Niesten JM,
    3. van der Schaaf IC,
    4. van Dam L, et al

    . Histopathologic composition of cerebral thrombi of acute stroke patients is correlated with stroke subtype and thrombus attenuation. PLoS One 2014;9:e88882 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088882 pmid:24523944

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Boeckh-Behrens T,
    3. Kleine JF,
    4. Zimmer C, et al

    . Thrombus histology suggests cardioembolic cause in cryptogenic stroke. Stroke 2016;47:1864–71 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013105 pmid:27197854

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Boeckh-Behrens T,
    3. Schubert M,
    4. Förschler A, et al

    . The impact of histological clot composition in embolic stroke. Clin Neuroradiol 2016;26:189–97 doi:10.1007/s00062-014-0347-x pmid:25261075

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Kim SK,
    3. Yoon W,
    4. Kim TS, et al

    . Histologic analysis of retrieved clots in acute ischemic stroke: correlation with stroke etiology and gradient-echo MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1756–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4402 pmid:26159515

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Marder VJ,
    3. Chute DJ,
    4. Starkman S, et al

    . Analysis of thrombi retrieved from cerebral arteries of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006;37:2086–93 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000230307.03438.94 pmid:16794209

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Liebeskind DS,
    3. Sanossian N,
    4. Yong WH, et al

    . CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke. Stroke 2011;42:1237–43 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605576 pmid:21393591

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Mokin M,
    3. Morr S,
    4. Natarajan SK, et al

    . Thrombus density predicts successful recanalization with Solitaire stent retriever thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:104–07 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011017 pmid:24510378

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Froehler MT,
    3. Tateshima S,
    4. Duckwiler G, et al

    ; UCLA Stroke Investigators. The hyperdense vessel sign on CT predicts successful recanalization with the Merci device in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:289–93 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010313 pmid:22619467

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Moftakhar P,
    3. English JD,
    4. Cooke DL, et al

    . Density of thrombus on admission CT predicts revascularization efficacy in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013;44:243–45 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.674127 pmid:23111438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Imamura T,
    3. Kaneda H,
    4. Nakamura S

    . New functions of neutrophils in the arthus reaction: expression of tissue factor, the clotting initiator, and fibrinolysis by elastase. Lab Invest 2002;82:1287–95 doi:10.1097/01.LAB.0000032374.21141.15 pmid:12379763

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Michel JB,
    3. Ho-Tin-Noé B

    . Thrombi and neutrophils. Circ Res 2015;116:1107–08 doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306050 pmid:25814679

    FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Komorowicz E,
    3. Kolev K,
    4. Léránt I, et al

    . Flow rate-modulated dissolution of fibrin with clot-embedded and circulating proteases. Circ Res 1998;82:1102–08 doi:10.1161/01.RES.82.10.1102 pmid:9622163

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Higashida RT,
    3. Furlan AJ,
    4. Roberts H, et al

    ; Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:e109–37 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09 pmid:12869717

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Kerr DM,
    3. Fulton RL,
    4. Lees KR, et al

    ; VISTA Collaborators. Seven-day NIHSS is a sensitive outcome measure for exploratory clinical trials in acute stroke: evidence from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. Stroke 2012;43:1401–03 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.644484 pmid:22308254

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Gratz PP,
    3. Schroth G,
    4. Gralla J, et al

    . Whole-brain susceptibility-weighted thrombus imaging in stroke: fragmented thrombi predict worse outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1277–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4275 pmid:25792535

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Chueh JY,
    3. Kühn AL,
    4. Puri AS, et al

    . Reduction in distal emboli with proximal flow control during mechanical thrombectomy: a quantitative in vitro study. Stroke 2013;44:1396–401 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.670463 pmid:23493730

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Gobin YP,
    3. Starkman S,
    4. Duckwiler GR, et al

    . MERCI 1: a phase 1 study of Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia. Stroke 2004;35:2848–54 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000147718.12954.60 pmid:15514171

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Simonsen CZ,
    4. Prabhakaran S, et al

    ; Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading Collaborators. Refining angiographic biomarkers of revascularization: improving outcome prediction after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke 2013;44:2509–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001990 pmid:23920017

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Rapp JH,
    3. Pan XM,
    4. Sharp FR, et al

    . Atheroemboli to the brain: size threshold for causing acute neuronal cell death. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:68–76 doi:10.1067/mva.2000.107315 pmid:10876208

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Sorimachi T,
    3. Nishino K,
    4. Shimbo J, et al

    . Routine use of debris aspiration before retrieval of distal filter protection devices in carotid arterial stenting: analysis of captured debris and evaluation of clinical results. Neurosurgery 2010;67:1260–67; discussion 1267 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ef5e85 pmid:20871452

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Behme D,
    3. Kabbasch C,
    4. Kowoll A, et al

    . Intravenous thrombolysis facilitates successful recanalization with stent-retriever mechanical thrombectomy in middle cerebral artery occlusions. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25:954–59 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.007 pmid:26851970

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Leker RR,
    3. Pikis S,
    4. Gomori JM, et al

    . Is bridging necessary? A pilot study of bridging versus primary Stentriever-based endovascular reperfusion in large anterior circulation strokes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:1163–67 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.01.008 pmid:25869772

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Pfefferkorn T,
    3. Holtmannspötter M,
    4. Patzig M, et al

    . Preceding intravenous thrombolysis facilitates endovascular mechanical recanalization in large intracranial artery occlusion. Int J Stroke 2012;7:14–18 doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00639.x pmid:22010996

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Kaesmacher J,
    3. Kleine JF

    . Bridging therapy with i. v. rtPA in MCA occlusion prior to endovascular thrombectomy: a double-edged sword? Clin Neuroradiol 2016 Aug 19. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:27541957
37. 37.↵
    2. Kirchhofer D,
    3. Riederer MA,
    4. Baumgartner HR

    . Specific accumulation of circulating monocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes on platelet thrombi in a vascular injury model. Blood 1997;89:1270–78 pmid:9028950

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Rainger GE,
    3. Rowley AF,
    4. Nash GB

    . Adhesion-dependent release of elastase from human neutrophils in a novel, flow-based model: specificity of different chemotactic agents. Blood 1998;92:4819–27 pmid:9845549

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. Massberg S,
    3. Grahl L,
    4. von Bruehl ML, et al

    . Reciprocal coupling of coagulation and innate immunity via neutrophil serine proteases. Nat Med 2010;16:887–96 doi:10.1038/nm.2184 pmid:20676107

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    2. Nicolini FA,
    3. Mehta JL,
    4. Nichols WW, et al

    . Leukocyte elastase inhibition and t-PA-induced coronary artery thrombolysis in dogs: beneficial effects on myocardial histology. Am Heart J 1991;122:1245–51 doi:10.1016/0002-8703(91)90562-V pmid:1950986

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    2. Schuhmann MK,
    3. Gunreben I,
    4. Kleinschnitz C, et al

    . Immunohistochemical analysis of cerebral thrombi retrieved by mechanical thrombectomy from patients with acute ischemic stroke. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:298 doi:10.3390/ijms17030298 pmid:26927082

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. De Meyer SF,
    3. Denorme F,
    4. Langhauser F, et al

    . Thromboinflammation in stroke brain damage. Stroke 2016;47:1165–72 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011238 pmid:26786115

    FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    2. Klinger-Gratz PP,
    3. Schroth G,
    4. Gralla J, et al

    . Protected stent retriever thrombectomy prevents iatrogenic emboli in new vascular territories. Neuroradiology 2015;57:1045–54 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1583-8 pmid:26319999

    CrossRefPubMed