Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleSpine

Clinical Utility of a Novel Ultrafast T2-Weighted Sequence for Spine Imaging

M.B. Keerthivasan, B. Winegar, J.L. Becker, A. Bilgin, M.I. Altbach and M. Saranathan
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2018, 39 (8) 1568-1575; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5713
M.B. Keerthivasan
aFrom the Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering (M.B.K., A.B.)
bMedical Imaging (M.B.K., B.W., J.L.B., M.I.A., M.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.B. Keerthivasan
B. Winegar
bMedical Imaging (M.B.K., B.W., J.L.B., M.I.A., M.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Winegar
J.L. Becker
bMedical Imaging (M.B.K., B.W., J.L.B., M.I.A., M.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.L. Becker
A. Bilgin
aFrom the Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering (M.B.K., A.B.)
cBiomedical Engineering (A.B.) University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Bilgin
M.I. Altbach
bMedical Imaging (M.B.K., B.W., J.L.B., M.I.A., M.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.I. Altbach
M. Saranathan
bMedical Imaging (M.B.K., B.W., J.L.B., M.I.A., M.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Saranathan
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Surface plots of the peak and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the simulated point spread function (PSF) as a function of αmin and αcent are shown in A and B, respectively. C, The relative SAR as a function of the 2 control angles. Note that the computed PSF is maximized at higher values of αcent, however, at the cost of increased SAR. D, The refocusing flip angle modulation scheme for a conventional fast spin-echo and the variable flip angle sequence along with the T2 signal evolution (E). Note that the VFA scheme stabilizes the signal evolution over the echo-train. The point spread functions for the constant and the variable flip angle echo-trains are compared in F. There is a considerable improvement in the PSF with the use of variable refocusing flip angles at longer echo-train lengths, resulting in better spatial resolution and less blurring. FA indicates flip angle; deg, degree; a.u., arbitrary units.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Phantom experiments comparing the resolution performance of TSE-VFA. Data were acquired on agarose gel phantoms (A) using the conventional TSE at ETL = 21, ETL = 56, and TSE-VFA at ETL = 56. B, Line plots across the 2 phantoms for the 3 sequences. Note the reduction in ringing when using TSE-VFA at the longer echo-train length of 56. FA indicates flip angle; a.u., arbitrary units.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Images of the lumbar spine demonstrating better PSF behavior (reduced blurring) with variable flip angle TSE at ETL = 56 (A) compared with conventional TSE at the same ETL (B). C, Image acquired using the TSE sequence at ETL = 21. The TSE-VFA had a lower SAR value of 1.22 compared with the TSE at ETL = 21 (SAR = 1.665). Note that at the effective TE = 105 ms, the contrast between TSE-VFA and the T2-TSE sequence is comparable.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Sagittal T2WI TSE (A and C) and TSE-VFA (B and D) images of the lumbar spine for 2 subjects. A and B, The presence of multifocal osseous metastases with a pathologic fracture of L2 (arrowhead). The conventional TSE image (3 min 24 sec scan time) shows aliasing artifacts (dotted arrows) due to motion, which are absent in the TSE-VFA image (1 min 30 sec scan time). C and D, Images are from a patient with multilevel degenerative disc disease and a right subarticular disc protrusion abutting the right L3 nerve root at L2–L3 (white arrow). Note that the small hemangioma within the L1 vertebral body (open arrow) is well-resolved by the TSE-VFA (D). The TSE-VFA image for this subject received a score of 4 for the SNR and the CSF signal compared with a score of 5 for the TSE image.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Sagittal STIR TSE (A and C) and sagittal HASTE-VFA (B and D) images of the whole spine for 2 subjects. A and B, Disc protrusions in the lower thoracic spine with several Schmorl nodes in the lumbar spine. C and D, Images from a subject with degenerative disc changes in the lumbar and the lower thoracic spine. Note the increased motion-related artifacts (arrows) with the 9 min 30 sec STIR TSE sequence (A and C) when compared to the single-shot sequence (B and D) with a 1 min 54 sec scan time.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Scan parameters used for the conventional TSE and the proposed variable flip angle sequences

    ParametersConventional TSETSE-VFAHASTE-VFA
    Resolution (phase × freq) (mm2)0.81 × 0.730.81 × 0.731.25 × 1.0
    Slice thickness (mm)333
    Refocusing flip angle140°αstart = 130°αstart = 130°
    αmin = 45°αmin = 50°
    αcent = 110°αcent = 90°
    αend = 45°αend = 45°
    Parallel imaging acceleration factor221
    ETL2156160
    TR (ms)28003600770
    Scan time (min)3 min 25 sec1 min 28 sec1 min 57 sec
    • Note:—freq indicates frequency.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Quantitative analysis of TSE and TSE-VFA using phantom data

    SequenceSNR Phantom 1SNR Phantom 2SNR Efficiency Phantom 1SNR Efficiency Phantom 2Relative ContrastSARScan Time (min)
    Conventional TSE ETL = 21469.76248.56261.38138.300.470.243 min 13 sec
    Conventional TSE ETL = 56412.99195.29201.5295.290.460.384 min 12 sec
    TSE-VFA ETL = 56423.54216.12338.02172.480.460.171 min 34 sec
    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Image-quality assessment scores for lumbar spine data of 5 volunteers

    Scoring CriteriaMean Score TSEMean Score TSE-VFAWeighted Gwet AC1
    Motion4.9 ± 0.325 ± 00.97
    Artifacts5 ± 05 ± 01
    Edge sharpness5 ± 05 ± 01
    SNR5 ± 04.4 ± 0.520.93
    Facet joints5 ± 04.8 ± 0.421
    Endplates5 ± 05 ± 01
    Nerve roots5 ± 04.8 ± 0.421
    Spinal cord5 ± 05 ± 01
    Discs5 ± 05 ± 01
    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Quantitative analysis of lumbar spine data from volunteers and clinical subjects

    SequenceVertebral Body SNRVertebral Body SNR EfficiencyVertebrae-Disc Relative ContrastSAR
    Healthy volunteersTSE36.08 ± 7.5119.48 ± 4.050.47 ± 0.331.69 ± 0.14
    TSE-VFA27.81 ± 4.3322.94 ± 3.570.45 ± 0.321.31 ± 0.21
    Clinical patientsTSE55.45 ± 18.7529.93 ± 10.120.13 ± 0.691.84 ± 0.61
    TSE-VFA45.18 ± 14.9637.27 ± 12.340.12 ± 0.71.37 ± 0.34
    • View popup
    Table 5:

    Image-quality assessment scores from 35 clinical lumbar spine cases

    Scoring CriteriaMean Score TSEMean Score TSE-VFAP Value of Wilcoxon TestaWeighted Gwet AC1
    Motion4.71 ± 0.594.83 ± 0.42<.0010.88
    Artifacts4.94 ± 0.234.76 ± 0.46<.0010.93
    Edge sharpness4.91 ± 0.334.79 ± 0.41<.0010.93
    SNR4.84 ± 0.404.36 ± 0.64b.371b0.84
    Facet joints4.83 ± 0.404.67 ± 0.50<.0010.86
    Endplates4.94 ± 0.234.83 ± 0.38<.0010.94
    Nerve roots4.76 ± 0.494.51 ± 0.58<.0010.78
    Spinal cord4.73 ± 0.514.47 ± 0.61<.010.86
    Discs4.87 ± 0.444.80 ± 0.44<.0010.91
    • ↵a The null hypothesis states that the median difference in the image-quality scores between TSE and TSE-VFA is greater than the noninferiority margin Δ, and rejecting the null hypothesis shows noninferiority in performance.

    • ↵b Refers to lack of noninferiority between the TSE-VFA and TSE at a significance level of P < .025.

    • View popup
    Table 6:

    Estimate of agreement in diagnostic quality between the conventional TSE and the proposed sequence

    Clinical Diagnostic CriteriaLumbar Spine
    Overall Agreement (%)Positive Agreement (%)
    Facet joints100100
    Endplates100100
    Nerve roots98.5798.53
    Spinal cord97.1497.06
    Discs100100
    • View popup
    Table 7:

    Image-quality assessment scores for the whole-spine cases

    Scoring CriteriaMean Score HASTE-VFAGwet AC1 Interobserver Reliability
    Motion4.66 ± 0.480.74
    Artifacts4.56 ± 0.500.65
    Edge sharpness4.78 ± 0.420.94
    SNR4.34 ± 0.750.39
    Facet joints4.69 ± 0.470.77
    Endplates4.91 ± 0.510.98
    Nerve roots4.47 ± 0.570.66
    Spinal cord4.72 ± 0.460.79
    Discs4.75 ± 0.440.91
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 39 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 39, Issue 8
1 Aug 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Utility of a Novel Ultrafast T2-Weighted Sequence for Spine Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M.B. Keerthivasan, B. Winegar, J.L. Becker, A. Bilgin, M.I. Altbach, M. Saranathan
Clinical Utility of a Novel Ultrafast T2-Weighted Sequence for Spine Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2018, 39 (8) 1568-1575; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5713

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Clinical Utility of a Novel Ultrafast T2-Weighted Sequence for Spine Imaging
M.B. Keerthivasan, B. Winegar, J.L. Becker, A. Bilgin, M.I. Altbach, M. Saranathan
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2018, 39 (8) 1568-1575; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5713
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (2)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Deep learning‐based reconstruction can improve canine thoracolumbar magnetic resonance image quality and reduce slice thickness
    Hyesun Kang, Daji Noh, Sang‐Kwon Lee, Sooyoung Choi, Kija Lee
    Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 2023 64 6
  • MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE LUMBAR SPINE
    NICOLETA CAZACU, CLAUDIA CHILOM
    Romanian Journal of Biophysics 2024 34 3

More in this TOC Section

  • Bern Score Validity for SIH
  • MP2RAGE 7T in MS Lesions of the Cervical Spine
  • Resisted Inspiration for CSF-Venous Fistula
Show more Spine

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire