Clinical Utility of a Novel Ultrafast T2-Weighted Sequence for Spine Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Perry J,
   3. Haughton V,
   4. Anderson PA, et al

   . The value of T2 relaxation times to characterize lumbar intervertebral disks: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:337–42 pmid:16484406

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Stankiewicz JM,
   3. Neema M,
   4. Alsop DC, et al

   . Spinal cord lesions and clinical status in multiple sclerosis: a 1.5T and 3T MRI study. J Neurol Sci 2009;279:99–105 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2008.11.009 pmid:19178916

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Fruehwald-Pallamar J,
   3. Szomolanyi P,
   4. Fakhrai N, et al

   . Parallel imaging of the cervical spine at 3T: optimized trade-off between speed and image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1867–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3101 pmid:22555578

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. O'Connell MJ,
   3. Ryan M,
   4. Powell T, et al

   . The value of routine MR myelography at MRI of the lumbar spine. Acta Radiol 2003;44:665–72 pmid:14616212

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Duerinckx AJ,
   3. Yu WD,
   4. El-Saden S, et al

   . MR imaging of cervical spine motion with HASTE. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:371–81 doi:10.1016/S0730-725X(98)00176-3 pmid:10195580

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Xie C,
   3. Kong K,
   4. Guan J, et al

   . SSFSE sequence functional MRI of the human cervical spinal cord with complex finger tapping. Eur J Radiol 2009;70:1–6 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.003 pmid:18353589

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Greenspan SL,
   3. Mathews VP,
   4. Caldemeyer KS, et al

   . FLAIR and HASTE imaging in neurologic diseases. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6:53–65 pmid:9449740

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Hennig J,
   3. Scheffler K

   . Hyperechoes. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:6–12 doi:10.1002/mrm.1153 pmid:11443704

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Hennig J,
   3. Weigel M,
   4. Scheffler K

   . Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS). Magn Reson Med 2003;49:527–35 doi:10.1002/mrm.10391 pmid:12594756

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Busse RF,
    3. Hariharan H,
    4. Vu A, et al

    . Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1030–37 doi:10.1002/mrm.20863 pmid:16598719

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Busse RF,
    3. Brau A,
    4. Vu A, et al

    . Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:640–49 doi:10.1002/mrm.21680 pmid:18727082

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Mugler JP 3rd.

    . Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:745–67 doi:10.1002/jmri.24542 pmid:24399498

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Kijowski R,
    3. Davis KW,
    4. Woods MA, et al

    . Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging—diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 2009;252:486–95 doi:10.1148/radiol.2523090028 pmid:19703886

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Li CQ,
    3. Chen W,
    4. Rosenberg JK, et al

    . Optimizing isotropic three-dimensional fast spin-echo methods for imaging the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:1417–25 doi:10.1002/jmri.24315 pmid:24987753

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Lee S,
    3. Jee WH,
    4. Jung JY, et al

    . MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T. Acta Radiol 2015;56:174–81 doi:10.1177/0284185114524196 pmid:24553584

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Loening AM,
    3. Saranathan M,
    4. Ruangwattanapaisarn N, et al

    . Increased speed and image quality in single-shot fast spin echo imaging via variable refocusing flip angles. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1747–58 doi:10.1002/jmri.24941 pmid:26094580

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Litwiller DV,
    3. Holmes JH,
    4. Saranathan M, et al

    . Sensitivity of modulated refocusing flip angle single-shot fast spin echo to impulsive cardiac-like motion. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Milan, Italy. May 10–16, 2014
18. 18.↵
    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013
19. 19.↵
    2. Ahn S,
    3. Park SH,
    4. Lee KH

    . How to demonstrate similarity by using noninferiority and equivalence statistical testing in radiology research. Radiology 2013;267:328–38 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120725 pmid:23610094

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Langenbucher J,
    3. Labouvie E,
    4. Morgenstern J

    . Measuring diagnostic agreement. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:1285–89 doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1285 pmid:8991315

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    Food Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Statistical Guidance on Reporting Results from Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Tests, Document 1620, Maryland, 2007. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocument/ucm071287.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2017.
22. 22.↵
    2. Cicchetti DV,
    3. Feinstein AR

    . High agreement but low kappa, II: resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:551–58 doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-M pmid:2189948

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Wongpakaran N,
    3. Wongpakaran T,
    4. Wedding D, et al

    . A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:61 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-61 pmid:23627889

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Madhuranthakam AJ,
    3. Busse RF,
    4. Brittain JH, et al

    . Sensitivity of low flip angle SSFSE of the abdomen to cardiac motion. In: Proceedings of the Joint Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology, Berlin, Germany. May 19–25, 2007