Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticlePractice Perspectives

Bias in Neuroradiology Peer Review: Impact of a “Ding” on “Dinging” Others

P. Charkhchi, B. Wang, B. Caffo and D.M. Yousem
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2019, 40 (1) 19-24; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5908
P. Charkhchi
aFrom the Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (P.C., D.M.Y.), Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Charkhchi
B. Wang
bDepartment of Biostatistics (B.W., B.C.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Wang
B. Caffo
bDepartment of Biostatistics (B.W., B.C.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Caffo
D.M. Yousem
aFrom the Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (P.C., D.M.Y.), Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.M. Yousem
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alpert HR,
    2. Hillman BJ
    . Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:127–32 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2003.11.001 pmid:17411540
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Freedman S
    . How 2007 joint commission standards expand hospital peer review. 2007. https://www.psqh.com/analysis/peer-review-how-2007-joint-commission-standards-expand-hospital-peer-review/. Accessed November 17, 2018.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Donnelly LF,
    2. Strife JL
    . Performance-based assessment of radiology faculty: a practical plan to promote improvement and meet JCAHO standards. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1398–401 doi:10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841398 pmid:15855086
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Donnelly LF
    . Performance-based assessment of radiology practitioners: promoting improvement in accordance with the 2007 Joint Commission standards. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:699–703 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.05.007 pmid:17903754
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kaewlai R,
    2. Abujudeh H
    . Peer review in clinical radiology practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:W158–62 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.8143 pmid:22826416
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kruskal J,
    2. Eisenberg R
    . Focused professional performance evaluation of a radiologist: a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Joint Commission requirement. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016;45:87–93 doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.08.006 pmid:26365574
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Larson DB,
    2. Donnelly LF,
    3. Podberesky DJ, et al
    . Peer feedback, learning, and improvement: answering the call of the Institute of Medicine Report on Diagnostic Error. Radiology 2017;283:231–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016161254 pmid:27673509
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Brady AP
    . Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable? Insights Imaging 2017;8:171–82 doi:10.1007/s13244-016-0534-1 pmid:27928712
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bruno MA,
    2. Walker EA,
    3. Abujudeh HH
    . Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics 2015;35:1668–76 doi:10.1148/rg.2015150023 pmid:26466178
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Brady A,
    2. Laoide RÓ,
    3. McCarthy P, et al
    . Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J 2012;81:3–9 pmid:23536732
    PubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. FitzGerald R
    . Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1760–67 doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2662-8 pmid:15726377
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Abujudeh H,
    2. Pyatt RS,
    3. Bruno MA, et al
    . RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:899–904 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004 pmid:24842585
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Moriarity AK,
    2. Hawkins CM,
    3. Geis JR, et al
    . Meaningful peer review in radiology: a review of current practices and potential future directions. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:1519–24 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.005 pmid:28233533
    CrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 1
1 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bias in Neuroradiology Peer Review: Impact of a “Ding” on “Dinging” Others
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bias in Neuroradiology Peer Review: Impact of a “Ding” on “Dinging” Others
P. Charkhchi, B. Wang, B. Caffo, D.M. Yousem
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2019, 40 (1) 19-24; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5908

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Bias in Neuroradiology Peer Review: Impact of a “Ding” on “Dinging” Others
P. Charkhchi, B. Wang, B. Caffo, D.M. Yousem
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2019, 40 (1) 19-24; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5908
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Qualifying Certainty in Radiology Reports through Deep Learning–Based Natural Language Processing
  • Am I Ready to Be an Independent Neuroradiologist? Objective Trends in Neuroradiology Fellows' Performance during the Fellowship Year
  • Displaying Multiphase CT Angiography Using a Time-Variant Color Map: Practical Considerations and Potential Applications in Patients with Acute Stroke
Show more PRACTICE PERSPECTIVES

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire