Low-Profile Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor Systems for Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Sivan-Hoffmann R,
   3. Gory B,
   4. Riva R, et al

   . One-year angiographic follow-up after WEB-SL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2320–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A445 pmid:26294645

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Lubicz B,
   3. Mine B,
   4. Collignon L, et al

   . WEB device for endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1209–14. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3387 pmid:23292529

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Klisch J,
   4. Liebig T, et al

   . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: long-term results in a European series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2314–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4445 pmid:26228882

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Ding Y,
   3. Lewis D,
   4. Kadirvel R, et al

   . The Woven EndoBridge: a new aneurysm occlusion device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:607–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2399 pmid:21330397

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Kabbasch C,
   3. Goertz L,
   4. Siebert E, et al

   . WEB embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: comparison of complication rates and angiographic outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:812–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014555 pmid:30674636

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Kabbasch C,
   3. Goertz L,
   4. Siebert E, et al

   . Comparison of WEB embolization and coiling in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: safety and efficacy based on a propensity score analysis. World Neurosurg 2019 Mar 9. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.016 pmid:30862582

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Fiorella D,
   3. Molyneux A,
   4. Coon A, et al

   . Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT). J NeuroIntervent Surg 2017;40:1191–96 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012841 pmid:28096478

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Gubucz I,
   4. Buhk J, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1151 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5178 pmid:28450432

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Costalat V,
   4. Moret J, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1250–56 doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634 pmid:26381253

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Moret J,
    4. Turjman F, et al

    . WEB treatment of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and anatomic results in the French Observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:655–59 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4578 pmid:26514608

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Goertz L,
    3. Liebig T,
    4. Siebert E, et al

    . Risk factors of procedural complications related to Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Clin Neuroradiol 2019 Feb 7. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00062-019-00762-8 pmid:30734053

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Kabbasch C,
    3. Goertz L,
    4. Siebert E, et al

    . Factors that determine aneurysm occlusion after embolization with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB). J Neurointerv Surg 2018 Feb 7. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00062-019-00762-8 pmid:30734053

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Kabbasch C,
    3. Goertz L,
    4. Siebert E, et al

    . Treatment strategies for recurrent and residual aneurysms after Woven Endobridge implantation. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;11:390–95 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014230 pmid:30154251

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Arthur AS,
    3. Molyneux A,
    4. Coon AL, et al

    . The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study. J Neurointerv Surg 2019 Apr 16. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815 pmid:30992395

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Lawson A,
    3. Molyneux A,
    4. Sellar R, et al

    . Safety results from the treatment of 109 cerebral aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge technique: preliminary results in the United Kingdom. J Neurosurg 2018;128:144–53 doi:10.3171/2016.9.JNS152849 pmid:28156251

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Moret J,
    4. Turjman F, et al

    . WEB treatment of intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, complications, and 1-month safety results with the WEB DL and WEB SL/SLS in the French Observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:922–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4230 pmid:25655876

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Popielski J,
    3. Berlis A,
    4. Weber W, et al

    . Two-center experience in the endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms using the WEB device: a retrospective analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:111–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5413 pmid:29051205

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Tau N,
    3. Sadeh-Gonik U,
    4. Aulagner G, et al

    . The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms: update of a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018;166:110–15 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.025 pmid:29408767

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. van Rooij S,
    3. Peluso J,
    4. Sluzewski M, et al

    . The new low-profile WEB 17 system for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: first clinical experiences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:859–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5608 pmid:29567650

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Asnafi S,
    3. Rouchaud A,
    4. Pierot L, et al

    . Efficacy and safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2287–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4900 pmid:27516237

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Goertz L,
    3. Liebig T,
    4. Siebert E, et al

    . Extending the indication of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization to internal carotid artery aneurysms: a multicenter safety and feasibility study. World Neurosurg 2019 Mar 12. Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.198 pmid:30876989

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Caroff J,
    4. Pagiola I, et al

    . Safety and efficiency of the fifth generation Woven EndoBridge device. J NeuroInterv Surg 2019;11:511–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014343 pmid:30655358

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Muskens IS,
    3. Senders JT,
    4. Dasenbrock HH, et al

    . The Woven Endobridge device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2017;98:809–17.e1 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.020 pmid:27856383

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Lv X,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Jiang W

    . Systematic review of Woven EndoBridge for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: complications, adequate occlusion rate. World Neurosurg 2018;110:20–25 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.113 pmid:29107726

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Kraus B,
    3. Goertz L,
    4. Turowski B, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of the Derivo Embolization Device for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicentric study. J NeuroInterv Surg 2019;11:68–73 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013963 pmid:29848557

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Ley D,
    3. Mühl-Benninghaus R,
    4. Yilmaz U, et al

    . The Derivo embolization device, a second-generation flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, evaluated in an elastase-induced aneurysm model. Clin Neuroradiol 2017;27:335–43 doi:10.1007/s00062-015-0493-9 pmid:26699192

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Jankowitz BT,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Jadhav AP, et al

    . Neuroform Atlas Stent System for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm: primary results of the Atlas Humanitarian Device Exemption cohort. J NeuroInterv Surg 2019;11:801–06 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014455 pmid:30670625

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Brassel F,
    3. Grieb D,
    4. Meila D, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms using Acandis Acclino stents. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:854–59 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012571 pmid:27557944

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Kabbasch C,
    4. Strasilla C, et al

    . Intrasaccular flow disruption in acutely ruptured aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective review of the use of the WEB. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1721–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4347 pmid:26138139

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Rezek I,
    3. Lingineni R,
    4. Sneade M, et al

    . Differences in the angiographic evaluation of coiled cerebral aneurysms between a core laboratory reader and operators: results of the Cerecyte Coil Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:124–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3623 pmid:23868159

    Abstract/FREE Full Text