Carotid CTA at the Lowest Tube Voltage (70 kV) in Comparison with Automated Tube Voltage Adaption

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Brott TG,
   3. Halperin JL,
   4. Abbara S, et al

   . 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:e16–94 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.006 pmid:21288679

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Berrington de Gonzalez A,
   3. Mahesh M,
   4. Kim KP, et al

   . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2071–77 doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440 pmid:20008689

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Kuefner MA,
   3. Grudzenski S,
   4. Schwab SA, et al

   . DNA double-strand breaks and their repair in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing angiographic procedures. Invest Radiol 2009;44:440–46 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a654a5 pmid:19448553

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. van Gils MJ,
   3. Vukadinovic D,
   4. van Dijk AC, et al

   . Carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression and change in plaque composition over time: a 5-year follow-up study using serial CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1267–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2970 pmid:22345501

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Narvid J,
   3. Do HM,
   4. Blevins NH, et al

   . CT angiography as a screening tool for dural arteriovenous fistula in patients with pulsatile tinnitus: feasibility and test characteristics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:446–53 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2328 pmid:21402614

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Söderberg M,
   3. Gunnarsson M

   . Automatic exposure control in computed tomography–an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiol 2010;51:625–34 doi:10.3109/02841851003698206 pmid:20429764

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Coakley FV,
   3. Gould R,
   4. Yeh BM, et al

   . CT radiation dose: what can you do right now in your practice? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:619–25 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5043 pmid:21343506

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Kalender WA,
   3. Deak P,
   4. Kellermeier M, et al

   . Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT. Med Phys 2009;36:993–1007 doi:10.1118/1.3075901 pmid:19378760

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Chen GZ,
   3. Fang XK,
   4. Zhou CS, et al

   . Cerebral CT angiography with iterative reconstruction at 70kVp and 30mL iodinated contrast agent: initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2017;88:102–08 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.037 pmid:28189194

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Kayan M,
    3. Demirtas H,
    4. Türker Y, et al

    . Carotid and cerebral CT angiography using low volume of iodinated contrast material and low tube voltage. Diagn Interv Imaging 2016;97:1173–79 doi:10.1016/j.diii.2016.06.005 pmid:27421672

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Chen GZ,
    3. Zhang LJ,
    4. Schoepf UJ, et al

    . Radiation dose and image quality of 70 kVp cerebral CT angiography with optimized sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: comparison with 120 kVp cerebral CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1453–63 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3533-y pmid:25636415

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Eller A,
    3. May MS,
    4. Scharf M, et al

    . Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt selection in abdominal computed tomography: effects on radiation exposure and image quality. Invest Radiol 2012;47:559–65 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318260c5d6 pmid:22836308

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Andreini D,
    3. Mushtaq S,
    4. Conte E, et al

    . Coronary CT angiography with 80 kV tube voltage and low iodine concentration contrast agent in patients with low body weight. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016;10:322–26 doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2016.06.003 pmid:27357327

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Wei L,
    3. Li S,
    4. Gao Q, et al

    . Use of low tube voltage and low contrast agent concentration yields good image quality for aortic CT angiography. Clin Radiol 2016;71:1313.e5–10 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2016.07.018 pmid:27671868

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Eller A,
    3. Wuest W,
    4. Scharf M, et al

    . Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt (kV)-selection in computed tomography of the chest: effects on radiation exposure and image quality. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:2386–91 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.043 pmid:24050878

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Winklehner A,
    3. Goetti R,
    4. Baumueller S, et al

    . Automated attenuation-based tube potential selection for thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography: improved dose effectiveness. Invest Radiol 2011;46:767–73 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182266448 pmid:21730872

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Eller A,
    3. Wuest W,
    4. Kramer M, et al

    . Carotid CTA: radiation exposure and image quality with the use of attenuation-based, automated kilovolt selection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:237–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3659 pmid:23907241

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Spearman JV,
    3. Schoepf UJ,
    4. Rottenkolber M, et al

    . Effect of automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection on radiation dose at CT: an observational study on a global scale. Radiology 2016;279:167–74 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015141507 pmid:26473641

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Deak PD,
    3. Smal Y,
    4. Kalender WA

    . Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 2010;257:158–66 doi:10.1148/radiol.10100047 pmid:20851940

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Beitzke D,
    3. Wolf F,
    4. Edelhauser G, et al

    . Computed tomography angiography of the carotid arteries at low kV settings: a prospective randomised trial assessing radiation dose and diagnostic confidence. Eur Radiol 2011;21:2434–44 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2188-1 pmid:21710265

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Bartlett ES,
    3. Walters TD,
    4. Symons SP, et al

    . Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19 pmid:16418349

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Lurz M,
    3. Lell MM,
    4. Wuest W, et al

    . Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance. Invest Radiol 2015;50:352–60 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000133 pmid:25591129

    CrossRefPubMed