Spiral 2D T2-Weighted TSE Brain MR Imaging:
Initial Clinical Experience

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kaufmann TJ,
   2. Smits M,
   3. Boxerman J, et al

   . Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2020;22:757–72 doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa030 pmid:32048719

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Pruessmann KP,
   2. Weiger M,
   3. Scheidegger MB, et al

   . SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–62 pmid:10542355

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Lustig M,
   2. Donoho D,
   3. Pauly JM

   . Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 pmid:17969013

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Pipe JG

   . Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:963–69

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Ohgiya Y,
   2. Suyama J,
   3. Seino N, et al

   . MRI of the neck at 3 Tesla using the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) (BLADE) sequence compared with T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:1061–67 doi:10.1002/jmri.22234 pmid:21031509

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Ooi MB,
   2. Li Z,
   3. Robison RK, et al

   . Spiral T1 spin-echo for routine postcontrast brain MRI exams: a multicenter multireader clinical evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:238–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6409 pmid:32029467

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Sartoretti T,
   2. van Smoorenburg L,
   3. Sartoretti E, et al

   . Ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 T: an in vitro and clinical study in healthy volunteers. Invest Radiol 2020;55:293–303 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000641 pmid:31895223

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Sartoretti T,
   2. Sartoretti E,
   3. Schwenk Á, et al

   . Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: an intra-individual comparison study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232372 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232372 pmid:32348366

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Sartoretti T,
   2. Sartoretti E,
   3. van Smoorenburg L, et al

   . Spiral 3-dimensional T1-weighted turbo field echo: increased speed for magnetization-prepared gradient echo brain magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radio 2020;55:775–84 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000705 pmid:32816415

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Sartoretti E,
    2. Sartoretti T,
    3. van Smoorenburg L, et al

    . Qualitative and quantitative analysis of a spiral gradient echo sequence for contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted spine magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2021;56:517–24 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000770 pmid:33653993

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Hu HH,
    3. Miller JH, et al

    . A spiral spin-echo MR imaging technique for improved flow artifact suppression in T1-weighted postcontrast brain imaging: a comparison with Cartesian turbo spin-echo. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:642–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4600 pmid:26611994

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Greve T,
    2. Sollmann N,
    3. Hock A, et al

    . Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time. Eur Radiol 2020;30:855–65 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06442-y pmid:31664504

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Greve T,
    2. Sollmann N,
    3. Hock A, et al

    . Novel ultrafast spiral head MR angiography compared to standard MR and CT angiography. J Neuroimaging 2020;31:45–56 doi:10.111/jon.12791 pmid:33118692

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Robison RK,
    2. Li Z,
    3. Wang D, et al

    . Correction of B. Magn Reson Med 2019;81:2501–13 doi:10.1002/mrm.27583 pmid:30444004

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Herrmann J,
    2. Gassenmaier S,
    3. Nickel D, et al

    . Diagnostic confidence and feasibility of a deep learning accelerated HASTE sequence of the abdomen in a single breath-hold. Invest Radiol 2021;56:313–19 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000743 pmid:33208596

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Vranic JE,
    2. Cross NM,
    3. Wang Y, et al

    . Compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) accelerated brain imaging: reduced scan time without reduced image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:92–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5905 pmid:30523142

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Kim HG,
    2. Choi JW,
    3. Yoon SH, et al

    . Image quality assessment of silent T. Br J Radiol 2018;91:20170680 doi:10.1259/bjr.21070680 pmid:29212354

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Sartoretti E,
    2. Wyss M,
    3. Eichenberger B, et al

    . Rapid T2-weighted turbo spin echo MultiVane brain MRI using compressed SENSE: a qualitative analysis. Clin Radiol 2021;76:786.e15–22 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2021.06.017 pmid:34272060

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ngamsombat C,
    2. Gonçalves Filho AL,
    3. Longo MG, et al

    . Evaluation of ultrafast wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging 3D-FLAIR in the visualization and volumetric estimation of cerebral white matter lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1584–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7191 pmid:34244127

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Jensen CT,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Tamm EP, et al

    . Image quality assessment of abdominal CT by use of new deep learning image reconstruction: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;215:50–57 doi:10.2214/AJR.19.22332 pmid:32286872

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Ye J,
    3. Bao Z, et al

    . Benefits of silent DWI MRI in success rate, image quality, and the need for secondary sedation during brain imaging of children of 3-36 months of age. Acad Radiol 2020;27:543–49 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.022 pmid:31630998

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Wang D,
    3. Robison RK, et al

    . Sliding-slab three-dimensional TSE imaging with a spiral-in/out readout. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:729–38 doi:10.1002/mrm.25660 pmid:25753219

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Karis JP,
    3. Pipe JG

    . A 2D spiral turbo-spin-echo technique. Magn Reson Med 2018;80:1989–96 doi:10.1002/mrm.27171 pmid:29524248

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Nyberg E,
    2. Sandhu GS,
    3. Jesberger J, et al

    . Comparison of brain MR images at 1.5T using BLADE and rectilinear techniques for patients who move during data acquisition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:77–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2737 pmid:22095963

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Corcuera-Solano I,
    2. Doshi A,
    3. Pawha PS, et al

    . Quiet PROPELLER MRI techniques match the quality of conventional PROPELLER brain imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1124–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4235 pmid:25678482

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Pipe JG,
    3. Ooi MB, et al

    . Improving the image quality of 3D FLAIR with a spiral MRI technique. Magn Reson Med 2020;83:170–77 doi:10.1002/mrm.27911 pmid:31393038

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Sun C,
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Cai X, et al

    . Non-Cartesian slice-GRAPPA and slice-SPIRiT reconstruction methods for multiband spiral cardiac MRI. Magn Reson Med 2020;83:1235–49 doi:10.1002/mrm.28002 pmid:31565819

    CrossRefPubMed