Propensity Score Analysis of Flow Diverters Placed in Scaffolding Stents

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Briganti F,
   3. Napoli M,
   4. Leone G, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by flow diverter devices: long-term results from a single center. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1683–90 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.029 pmid:24985339

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Pumar JM,
   3. Banguero A,
   4. Cuellar H, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Silk embolization device in a multicenter study: a retrospective data analysis. Neurosurgery 2017;81:595–601 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw123 pmid:28327963

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Strauss I,
   3. Maimon S

   . Silk flow diverter in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience with 60 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016;158:247–54 doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2644-9 pmid:26630988

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Lubicz B,
   3. Collignon L,
   4. Raphaeli G, et al

   . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589911 pmid:20798369

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Piano M,
   3. Valvassori L,
   4. Quilici L, et al

   . Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2013;118:408–16 doi:10.3171/2012.10.JNS112222 pmid:23176329

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Rivet DJ II.,
   3. Reavey-Cantwell J,
   4. Moran CJ

   2. Park MS,
   3. Taussky P,
   4. Albuquerque FC, et al

   . Off-label use. In: Rivet DJ II., Reavey-Cantwell J, Moran CJ, eds. Flow Diversion of Cerebral Aneurysms. Thieme 2017; 40–63
7. 7.↵
   2. Maimon S,
   3. Gonen L,
   4. Nossek E, et al

   . Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the Silk flow diverter: 2 years' experience with 28 patients at a single center. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:979–87 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1316-2 pmid:22402875

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Gurkas E,
   3. Kaya T,
   4. Daglioglu E, et al

   . Silk device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, Part 1: peri-procedural results, technical aspects and learning curve. Turk Neurosurg 2016;26:525–32 doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.14759-15.0 pmid:27400098

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Peker A,
   3. Akgul E,
   4. Daglioglu E, et al

   . Tapered flow diverters in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Turk Neurosurg 2017;27:863–66 doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.17426-16.0 pmid:27593817

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Becske T,
    4. Nelson PK

    . Learning from failure: persistence of aneurysms following Pipeline embolization. J Neurosurg 2017;126:578–85 doi:10.3171/2015.12.JNS152065 pmid:27153168

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Srinivasan VM,
    3. Carlson AP,
    4. Mokin M, et al

    . Prolapse of the Pipeline Embolization Device in aneurysms: incidence, management, and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E16 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1738 pmid:28565987

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Cohen JE,
    3. Gomori JM,
    4. Moscovici S, et al

    . Delayed complications after flow-diverter stenting: reactive in-stent stenosis and creeping stents. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1116–22 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.010 pmid:24524952

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Macdonald IR,
    3. Shankar JJS

    . Delayed parent artery occlusions following use of Silk flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:690–93 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014354 pmid:30514737

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Bhogal P,
    3. Pérez MA,
    4. Ganslandt O, et al

    . Treatment of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms with flow diverters: a single-center experience and review of 56 patients. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:471–81 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012781 pmid:27836994

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S,
    4. Phillips JL, et al

    . A single Pipeline Embolization Device is sufficient for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1562–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3957 pmid:24788125

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Nelson PK,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. Szikora I, et al

    . The Pipeline Embolization Device for the Intracranial Treatment of Aneurysms Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Daou B,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Chalouhi N, et al

    . Pipeline Embolization Device in the treatment of recurrent previously stented cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:849–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4613 pmid:26611991

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Heiferman DM,
    3. Billingsley JT,
    4. Kasliwal MK, et al

    . Use of flow-diverting stents as salvage treatment following failed stent-assisted embolization of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:692–95 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011672 pmid:26041098

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Bender MT,
    3. Vo CD,
    4. Jiang B, et al

    . Pipeline embolization for salvage treatment of previously stented residual and recurrent cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neurol 2018;7:359–69 doi:10.1159/000489018 pmid:30410513

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Ebrahimi N,
    3. Claus B,
    4. Lee CY, et al

    . Stent conformity in curved vascular models with simulated aneurysm necks using flat-panel CT: an in vitro study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:823–29 pmid:17494650

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Ferrigno AS,
    3. Caro-Osorio E,
    4. Martinez HR, et al

    . Coiling as a rescue strategy for flow diverter prolapse into a giant intracranial aneurysm. World Neurosurg 2020;133:392–97 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.141 pmid:31476475

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Trivelato FP,
    3. Wajnberg E,
    4. Rezende MT, et al

    . Safety and effectiveness of the Pipeline Flex embolization device with shield technology for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: midterm results from a multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2020;87:104–11 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz356 pmid:31504821

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Siddiqui AH,
    3. Kan P,
    4. Abla AA, et al

    . Complications after treatment with Pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery 2012;71:E509–13; discussion 13 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318258e1f8 pmid:22710418

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. de Andrade GC,
    3. Alves HP,
    4. Clímaco V, et al

    . Two-stage reconstructive overlapping stent LEO+ and Silk for treatment of intracranial circumferential fusiform aneurysms in the posterior circulation. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:516–23 doi:10.1177/1591019916656475 pmid:27402799

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Ocal O,
    3. Arat A

    . The exchange-free technique: a novel technique for enhancing Surpass flow diverter placement. Asian J Neurosurg 2020;15:620–26 doi:10.4103/ajns.AJNS_374_19 pmid:33145216

    CrossRefPubMed