Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticlePediatrics
Open Access

Regional Differences in Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid and Glutamate Concentrations in the Healthy Newborn Brain

S.K. Basu, S. Pradhan, S.D. Barnett, M. Mikkelsen, K.J. Kapse, J. Murnick, J.L. Quistorff, C.A. Lopez, A.J. du Plessis and C. Limperopoulos
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2022, 43 (1) 125-131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7336
S.K. Basu
aFrom the Department of Neonatology (S.K.B.)
bDeveloping Brain Institute (S.K.B., S.P., S.D.B., K.J.K., J.L.Q., C.A.L., C.L.)
eGeorge Washington University School of Medicine (S.K.B. S.P., S.D.B., J.M., A.J.d.P., C.L.), Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.K. Basu
S. Pradhan
bDeveloping Brain Institute (S.K.B., S.P., S.D.B., K.J.K., J.L.Q., C.A.L., C.L.)
eGeorge Washington University School of Medicine (S.K.B. S.P., S.D.B., J.M., A.J.d.P., C.L.), Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Pradhan
S.D. Barnett
bDeveloping Brain Institute (S.K.B., S.P., S.D.B., K.J.K., J.L.Q., C.A.L., C.L.)
eGeorge Washington University School of Medicine (S.K.B. S.P., S.D.B., J.M., A.J.d.P., C.L.), Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.D. Barnett
M. Mikkelsen
fDepartment of Radiology (M.M., J.M.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Mikkelsen
K.J. Kapse
bDeveloping Brain Institute (S.K.B., S.P., S.D.B., K.J.K., J.L.Q., C.A.L., C.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K.J. Kapse
J. Murnick
eGeorge Washington University School of Medicine (S.K.B. S.P., S.D.B., J.M., A.J.d.P., C.L.), Washington, DC
fDepartment of Radiology (M.M., J.M.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Murnick
J.L. Quistorff
bDeveloping Brain Institute (S.K.B., S.P., S.D.B., K.J.K., J.L.Q., C.A.L., C.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.L. Quistorff
C.A. Lopez
bDeveloping Brain Institute (S.K.B., S.P., S.D.B., K.J.K., J.L.Q., C.A.L., C.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.A. Lopez
A.J. du Plessis
dFetal Medicine Institute (A.J.d.P.), Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC
eGeorge Washington University School of Medicine (S.K.B. S.P., S.D.B., J.M., A.J.d.P., C.L.), Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.J. du Plessis
C. Limperopoulos
bDeveloping Brain Institute (S.K.B., S.P., S.D.B., K.J.K., J.L.Q., C.A.L., C.L.)
cDivision of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology (C.L.)
eGeorge Washington University School of Medicine (S.K.B. S.P., S.D.B., J.M., A.J.d.P., C.L.), Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Limperopoulos
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate system disruptions may underlie neonatal brain injury. However, in vivo investigations are challenged by the need for special 1H-MR spectroscopy sequences for the reliable measurement of the neurotransmitters in this population. We used J-edited 1H-MR spectroscopy (Mescher-Garwood point-resolved spectroscopy) to quantify regional in vivo gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate concentrations during the early postnatal period in healthy neonates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled healthy neonates and acquired Mescher-Garwood point-resolved spectroscopy spectra on a 3T MR imaging scanner from voxels located in the cerebellum, the right basal ganglia, and the right frontal lobe. CSF-corrected metabolite concentrations were compared for regional variations and cross-sectional temporal trends with advancing age.

RESULTS: Fifty-eight neonates with acceptable spectra acquired at postmenstrual age of 39.1 (SD, 1.3) weeks were included for analysis. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (+ macromolecule) (2.56 [SD, 0.1]) i.u., glutamate (3.80 [SD, 0.2]), Cho, and mIns concentrations were highest in the cerebellum, whereas NAA (6.72 [SD, 0.2]), NAA/Cho, Cr/Cho, and Glx/Cho were highest in the basal ganglia. Frontal gamma-aminobutyric acid (1.63 [SD, 0.1]), Glx (4.33 [SD, 0.3]), Cr (3.64 [SD, 0.2]), and Cho concentrations were the lowest among the ROIs. Glx, NAA, and Cr demonstrated a significant adjusted increase with postmenstrual age (β = 0.2–0.35), whereas gamma-aminobutyric acid and Cho did not.

CONCLUSIONS: We report normative regional variations and temporal trends of in vivo gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate concentrations reflecting the functional and maturational status of 3 distinct brain regions of the neonate. These measures will serve as important normative values to allow early detection of subtle neurometabolic alterations in high-risk neonates.

ABBREVIATIONS:

J-DIFF
J-edited difference spectrum
GABA
gamma-aminobutyric acid
GABA+
GABA with macromolecules
Glu
glutamate
GSH
glutathione
MEGA-PRESS
Mescher-Garwood point-resolved spectroscopy
NDI
neurodevelopmental impairment
NS
not significant
PMA
postmenstrual age
TEA
term-equivalent age

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate (Glu) are principal neurotransmitters and play a critical role in fetal and neonatal brain development.1 Microstructural disruptions of neurotransmitter systems have been reported following preterm birth in animal and ex vivo human studies.2,3 Subtle disruptions may play a role in neurodevelopmental impairments (NDIs) observed in surviving premature infants even without structural brain injury on conventional neuroimaging at term-equivalent age (TEA).4 Recent advances in 1H-MR spectroscopy, including J-edited Mescher-Garwood point-resolved spectroscopy (MEGA-PRESS), have allowed detection of the otherwise overlapped GABA and glutamate signals.5,6 However, the application of these techniques to the neonate has been limited by technical challenges, including motion during nonsedated scans, suboptimal tissue segmentation and correction using adult algorithms, and a lower SNR from a limited voxel volume in the small neonatal brain, to name a few.7⇓⇓⇓-11

Important knowledge gaps remain in our understanding of the normal temporal trajectory of in vivo GABA and glutamate concentrations during the critical perinatal transition and early postnatal maturation, which, in turn, limit the ability to detect abnormalities following premature birth.11 Animal and adult human studies have characterized the temporal trajectories of brain metabolites, their regional and sex-based variations, and the influence of mode of delivery; early postnatal studies, however, are currently limited.12⇓⇓⇓-16 Conventional neonatal 1H-MR spectroscopy allows measurement of NAA and Cr (markers of neuronal integrity and metabolic activity), Cho (lipid membrane component), and mIns (cytoplasmic osmotic agent). Neonatal brain injury has been associated with lower NAA,17,18 and simultaneous GABA and glutamate measurements would allow in vivo neurotransmitter-specific interrogation of the developing brain.7⇓⇓-10,19

To fill these critical knowledge gaps, we measured in vivo GABA+ and Glx concentrations from MEGA-PRESS spectra acquired from voxels placed in 3 ROIs: namely, the cerebellum, the right basal ganglia, and the right frontal lobe in healthy neonates. The cerebellum is known to play a regulatory-inhibitory role and accounts for most GABA and glutamatergic neurons in the human brain. The cerebellum matures rapidly during late gestation, with extended neurogenesis through infancy; and its parenchymal injury is associated with NDI in preterm infants.1 The basal ganglia are involved in sensorimotor organization and include an array of nuclei with glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons, and due to their high metabolic activity, they are vulnerable to the hypoxia-ischemia associated with premature birth.1 Finally, the frontal lobe is evolutionarily recent, mediates cognitive and executive function, but is relatively less mature in neonates.1

We hypothesized that these 3 critical brain ROIs would have distinct profiles of GABA+ and Glx as well as other metabolite concentrations in healthy neonates. We also hypothesized that NAA, Cr, and Glx would increase with advancing age (postmenstrual age [PMA]), whereas Cho (and GABA+) would remain relatively stable.10,16,19,20 We sought to investigate the influence of postnatal age (weeks of life), sex, and mode of delivery on the neurometabolic profile of the neonatal brain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

Healthy neonates born after 36 completed weeks of gestational age were prospectively enrolled between 2018 and 2020 in observational multimodal neuroimaging cohort studies. Neonates with known genetic syndromes, central nervous system anomalies, brain injury on MR imaging, or congenital infections were excluded. Clinical data were collected through medical record review and parental questionnaires. All studies were approved by the Children’s National Hospital review board and conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of each study participant.

MR Imaging and 1H-MRS Acquisition

Enrolled infants underwent a TEA MR imaging during natural sleep using the feed and swaddle technique on a 3T Discovery MR750 MR imaging scanner (GE Healthcare). Anatomic images were acquired using a T2-weighted 3D Cube (GE Healthcare; 3D FSE) sequence with the following parameters: section thickness = 1 mm, section spacing = 0 mm, TR = 2500 ms, TE = 64.7–89.9 ms, flip angle = 90°, orientation = superior/inferior, number of slices = 120, matrix = 160 × 160. 1H-MR spectroscopy data were acquired from voxels placed in 3 ROIs: a 20 × 15 × 15 mm3 voxel centered on the white matter of the right frontal lobe, a 20 × 20 × 20 mm3 voxel centered on right basal ganglia, and a 25 × 15 × 10 mm3 voxel placed in the middle of the cerebellum (Fig 1). The MEGA-PRESS sequence was acquired using TE = 68 ms, TR = 2000 ms, spectral width = 5000 Hz, 4096 points, and 256 signal averages. Frequency-selective editing pulses (16-ms duration) were placed at 1.9 ppm during ON and 7.5 ppm during OFF acquisitions, respectively. J-edited difference (J-DIFF) spectra were generated by subtracting the OFF spectrum from the ON spectrum (composite J-DIFF and OFF spectra are shown in Fig 2) for each acquisition. Eight unsuppressed water averages were acquired for concentration referencing.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Voxel locations of ROIs: cerebellum (A), right basal ganglia (B), and right frontal lobe (C).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Composite 1H-MR spectroscopy PRESS OFF and J-DIFF spectra for all 3 ROIs. Composite spectra from the 3 ROI voxels show the mean (solid line) and SD (shaded area) of all spectra included in the analysis. The spectra were acquired on a 3T scanner with TE = 68 ms, TR = 2000 ms, number of signal averages = 256, and the editing pulses at 1.9  and 7.5 ppm. RBG indicates right basal ganglia; RF, right frontal lobe.

1H-MR Spectroscopy Data Pre- and Postprocessing

The pre- and postprocessing methods detailed previously7 included frequency and phase correction21 using the OFF and ON spectra to generate the J-DIFF spectrum. Each OFF and J-DIFF spectrum was analyzed using LCModel (http://www.lcmodel.com/) to measure metabolite concentrations using the unsuppressed water signal as an internal reference.22 The LCModel outputs were visually screened for artifacts, and only those with a full width at half maximum of ≤15 Hz and an SNR of ≥3 for the OFF spectra and an SNR of ≥2 for the DIFF spectra were included for further analysis.

GABA measurements from MEGA-PRESS spectra included contribution from coedited resonances from unspecified macromolecule resonances at 3 ppm and hence are represented as GABA+.6 Analysis in the LCModel was performed using SPTYPE = MEGA-PRESS-3 without inclusion of quantification of the macromolecule peak in the analysis. Hence, the GABA+ results reported correspond 1:1 to the GABA basis function scaled to the water peak.

Concentrations of Glu, glutamine, Glx, NAA, Cho, Cr, glutathione (GSH), and mIns were measured from the OFF spectra LCModel output. All metabolite concentrations are reported in international units. We accepted Cramer-Rao lower bound confidence intervals up to 50% for NAA, Cho, and Cr and up to 100% for other metabolites due to their lower concentrations, an a priori decision consistent with previous publications.7,19,23,24

Tissue Segmentation and Correction for Voxel Composition

The 3D T2 Cube images were automatically segmented using Draw-EM (https://github.com/MIRTK/DrawEM) and manually corrected in ITK-SNAP (www.itksnap.org) to measure global and regional brain volumes. The Gannet code (https://github.com/richardedden/Gannet3.1) with modifications to use segmented images exported from ITK-SNAP was used to generate voxel masks and was coregistered with segmented structural images to measure the voxel tissue fractions of CSF, GM, and WM.25 Due to the intricate cerebellar folia, we segmented the cerebellar voxel into either GM + WM or CSF (ie, 2 tissue classes). Because intrinsic differences in metabolite levels between the GM and WM remain undetermined in the neonatal population,8 we used a composite GM + WM tissue fraction for CSF correction using the following equation: Embedded Image

This approach assumes that there are negligible metabolite levels in the CSF and that GM and WM contribute equally to the metabolite signal in the spectra,8 effectively a CSF correction.

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics of the cohort are presented as mean (SD) or frequency (percentage). Descriptive analyses of 1H-MR spectroscopy acquisition parameters and metabolite measurements, group (sex and mode of delivery), and regional comparisons were performed using nonparametric tests (ie, median, inter-quartile range, Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test, and Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, respectively). Spearman correlations were performed to investigate the relationships between metabolites and gestational age at birth, PMA, and postnatal age on the day of MR imaging. Linear mixed models were used to examine differences in metabolite concentrations among the 3 ROIs, adjusted for PMA. Post hoc ROI tests were conducted using contrasts. Potential confounding from clinical variables with previously reported (sex)7 or biologically plausible (mode of delivery)11 associations with brain metabolites or neonatal outcomes was examined. Separate mixed-regression models were used to investigate the influence of PMA (model 1, adjusted for sex and mode of delivery) and postnatal age (model 2, adjusted for gestational age, sex, and mode of delivery) on metabolites on the day of MR imaging. Analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute). P values ≤ .05, two-tailed, were statistically significant. Sample size calculation and adjustment for multiple comparisons were not performed due to the descriptive nature of the study.

RESULTS

Descriptive Characteristics of the Cohort

Fifty-eight term control neonates born at a mean gestational age of 39.1 (SD, 1.3) weeks and birth weight of 3278 (SD, 464) g were included. Neonates underwent nonsedated MR imaging between 38.6 and 48.7 weeks’ PMA, and their postnatal age ranged from 0.7 to 8.9 weeks. Baseline characteristics of the cohort are detailed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Baseline clinical parameters (n = 58)a

Voxel Characteristics

The median voxel volume was largest for the cerebellum (8.0 cm3). All ROI voxels were composed <10% by CSF proportion on average, with the highest gray matter proportion (99%) in the right basal ganglia (Online Supplemental Data).

Measured Raw and CSF-Corrected Metabolite Concentrations

Of the 58 neonates included, 51 cerebellar, 36 right basal ganglia, and 48 right frontal spectra met quality inclusion criteria and raw (_r) metabolite concentration, and ratios are reported for them (Online Supplemental Data). We were able to determine tissue composition for 38/51 cerebellar, 30/36 basal ganglia, and 38/48 frontal lobe voxels and report CSF-corrected metabolite concentrations for them (Online Supplemental Data). Raw metabolite concentrations were not used for subsequent analyses (Tables 2 and 3). However, all metabolite ratios (from 51 cerebellar, 36 basal ganglia, and 48 frontal voxels) were included for regression analysis because CSF-correction factors cancel out for the ratios.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Regional difference in metabolite concentrations adjusted for PMAa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Association of PMA and postnatal age with metabolites adjusted for clinical factorsa

Adjusted for PMA (Table 2), cerebellar GABA+, Glu, glutamine, Cho, mIns, and GSH concentrations were the highest among the 3 ROIs, whereas NAA and Glx/Cho were the lowest. NAA concentrations and the ratio of NAA/Cho, Cr/Cho, and Glx/Cho were highest in the basal ganglia. The frontal lobe had the lowest GABA+, Glx, Cr, Cho, and GSH concentrations.

Association of Sex, Race, and Mode of Delivery with Metabolite Concentrations

Sex, race, and mode of delivery were not associated with significant differences in metabolite concentrations. Female neonates had lower right frontal lobe GABA+ (mean, 1.57 [SD, 0.4] i.u. versus 1.74 [SD, 0.5]) i.u. concentrations compared with males, but they were not statistically significant (NS).

Correlation of Metabolite Concentrations with Age

Spearman correlations of GABA+ concentrations with PMA, gestational age at birth, and postnatal age did not demonstrate significant correlations (Spearman ρ < 0.2, P = NS), except for positive trends in the frontal lobe with PMA (ρ = 0.34, P = .08) and postnatal age (ρ = 0.35, P = .07) (Fig 3). NAA, Cr, Glu, NAA/Cho, and Cr/Cho positively correlated with PMA (Spearman ρ = 0.5–0.7, P < .01) across all ROIs. Glx and Glx/Cho correlated positively with PMA (ρ = 0.4–0.5, P <.01) and postnatal age (ρ = 0.3–0.4, P < .01) in the basal ganglia and the frontal voxels, but not in the cerebellum. Cho concentrations in the cerebellum and frontal lobe increased with PMA with a lower slope (ρ ∼ 0.3–0.5, P < .03), but not in the basal ganglia. Cho concentrations did not increase with advancing postnatal age (<.3, NS).

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Temporal trajectories of metabolites with postmenstrual age. R indicates right.

Relationship between Brain Metabolites and PMA and Postnatal Age

Multivariable regression analyses did not show any significant changes in GABA+ concentrations or ratios with age (Table 3). Basal ganglia Glx/Cho and NAA/Cho increased with PMA as well as postnatal age. Glx concentrations increased with PMA (NS for the cerebellum). NAA and NAA/Cho increased with PMA across all ROIs. Cho concentrations in the frontal lobe increased with PMA, but not with postnatal age in any of the ROIs.

DISCUSSION

We report, for the first time, normative data on regional in vivo variations of GABA and glutamate concentrations and their cross-sectional temporal trajectory during the early postnatal period. We observed distinct regional metabolic profiles in relationship to PMA and postnatal age, which may reflect differential maturational states and postnatal stimulation in the healthy neonate brain.

Our normative data from 3 ROIs of 58 healthy neonates are the largest cohort reported to date and will provide references for future investigations of alterations in neonates at risk of brain injury. The previous largest study, including 25 term neonates, reported higher right frontal GABA+ concentrations compared with preterm neonates.9 Temporal increases in basal ganglia Glx and stable GABA+ concentrations during infancy were reported in preterm neonates, without data from term controls.19 One study including both term and preterm neonates reported higher GABA+ and Glx concentrations in the thalamus compared with anterior cingulate cortex, which lost statistical significance after tissue correction.8

We demonstrated that all metabolites except GABA+ positively correlated with advancing PMA, which likely reflects increasing metabolic activity of maturing neurons, dendrites, synapses, and glial cells (Fig 3). The stable GABA+ concentrations observed are consistent with those in previous animal 12,16 and clinical studies in preterm infants.7,19 Consistent with previous studies,16,19 Cr concentrations increased significantly with PMA, whereas Cho remained relatively stable; hence, metabolite/Cho ratios are preferable markers of metabolic changes during early postnatal life. The duration of extrauterine exposure (postnatal age) demonstrated a significant positive correlation with basal ganglia Glx/Cho, perhaps indicating neuronal stimulation.

We found that NAA, NAA/Cho, Cr/Cho, and Glx/Cho (markers of neuronal integrity and metabolic activity) were highest in the basal ganglia, reflecting their relatively higher functional activity (Table 2). Also, the significant increase in Cr and Glx/Cho (NAA increase NS) within the basal ganglia with postnatal age (Table 3) indicates their metabolic and functional activity in response to extrauterine motor-sensory stimulation. Conversely, right frontal GABA+, Glx, and Cr concentrations were the lowest, consistent with their relative developmental immaturity in neonates. Cerebellar GABA+ and Glx concentrations were the highest, reflecting their dense neuronal composition. Cho, a marker of cell membrane turnover, was also highest in the cerebellum, perhaps inferring exuberant dendritic maturation as well as ongoing postnatal neurogenesis, as previously described in the human cerebellum. Glu, GSH (a cellular redox substrate), and mIns (cytoplasmic osmotic agent) were highest in the cell-dense cerebellum. The observed regional differences remained consistent for both raw and CSF-corrected metabolite concentrations. This finding may be due to the low CSF fraction of the voxels and that differences in gray-versus-white matter contributions to the metabolites could not be segregated.

Although not statistically significant, the lower right frontal GABA+ concentration in female neonates (Table 3) agrees with findings in a recent report in preterm infants.7 We did not observe any significant relationship of mode of delivery with regional metabolite concentrations, perhaps due to the delay in scan time (median, 4 weeks) after birth.

Although our study findings are strengthened by nonsedated scans in a modest size cohort of healthy neonates during early postnatal life, there are several limitations. The observed correlation of metabolite concentrations with PMA or postnatal age is cross-sectional and not longitudinal. Our tissue-correction strategy was limited to the CSF content of the voxel and assumed equal gray and white matter metabolite contributions. Neonatal algorithms and segmentation maps are needed for metabolite measurements adjusted for gray matter proportion from a neonatal brain voxel because adult algorithms may not reflect the many structural and maturational changes in the neonatal brain. Our data meet the quality parameters recommended in recent expert consensus statements,24,26,27 though one-fifth of the spectra had to be excluded due to motion or low SNR, inherent challenges with neonatal acquisitions.11

Regional differences in 1H-MR spectroscopy acquisition parameters like voxel size and SNR (Online Supplemental Data) may also influence these measurements, though if contributing, they would affect all metabolite measurements and would be nullified for metabolite ratios. The metabolite concentrations are expressed in international units due to their dependence on acquisition parameters and are not generalizable in terms of absolute concentrations across studies using different parameters. Interpretations need to consider that GABA+ has contributions from various macromolecules, whereas Glx has contributions from glutamine. Similarly, Glu, glutamine, and GSH measurements are not optimal from an unedited PRESS acquisition at 3T due to poor spectral resolution, and adult studies have used higher magnetic field strengths, STEAM, or dedicated J-editing sequences. Despite these limitations, our study provides normative data and highlights regional differences and the influence of age on the metabolic milieu of the neonatal brain, which will aid in identification of alterations in disease states like neonatal encephalopathy or prematurity.

CONCLUSIONS

We report regional profiles of in vivo GABA+ and glutamate concentrations consistent with maturation and metabolic activity in the healthy neonatal brain. We also report increasing Glx, NAA, and Cr concentrations, but stable GABA and Cho concentrations during the neonatal period. The normative metabolic references may provide important, currently unavailable data that will allow detection of early metabolic and neurotransmitter alterations in neonates at high risk of NDI, even without significant structural brain injury.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the contribution of the research nurses and assistants, MR imaging technicians, and other study staff whose relentless effort have made this study successful. Above all, we would like to thank all parents who have voluntarily allowed their children to undergo the MR imaging evaluations, without which this study would not have been possible.

Footnotes

  • The study was supported by grant funding from the National Institutes of Health–National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute award No. 1R01HL116585; Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center award No. 1U54HD090257; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences award Nos. UL1TR001876 and KL2TR001877; and the A. James and Alice B. Clark Foundation award. Additional support was received from internal departmental funds of Children’s National Hospital in Washington, DC.

  • The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, or the National Institutes of Health.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Volpe JJ
    . Volpe’s Neurology of the Newborn. Elsevier; 2018
  2. 2.↵
    1. Robinson S,
    2. Li Q,
    3. Dechant A, et al
    . Neonatal loss of gamma-aminobutyric acid pathway expression after human perinatal brain injury. J Neurosurg 2006;104(6 Suppl):396–408 doi:10.3171/ped.2006.104.6.396 pmid:16776375
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Shaw JC,
    2. Palliser HK,
    3. Dyson RM, et al
    . Disruptions to the cerebellar GABAergic system in juvenile guinea pigs following preterm birth. Int J Dev Neurosci 2018;65:1–10 doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2017.10.002 pmid:29024720
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Laptook AR,
    2. O'Shea TM,
    3. Shankaran S, et al
    . Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants with a normal head ultrasound: prevalence and antecedents. Pediatrics 2005;115:673–80 doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0667 pmid:15741371
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Harris AD,
    2. Saleh MG,
    3. Edden RA
    . Edited 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vivo: methods and metabolites. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:1377–89 doi:10.1002/mrm.26619 pmid:28150876
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mullins PG,
    2. McGonigle DJ,
    3. O’Gorman RL, et al
    .; Cardiff Symposium on MRS of GABA. Current practice in the use of MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA. Neuroimage 2014;86:43–52 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.004 pmid:23246994
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Basu SK,
    2. Pradhan S,
    3. Jacobs MB, et al
    . Age and sex influences gamma-aminobutyric acid concentrations in the developing brain of very premature infants. Sci Rep 2020;10:10549 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67188-y pmid:32601466
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Maria YL,
    2. Price AN,
    3. Puts NA, et al
    . Simultaneous quantification of GABA, Glx and GSH in the neonatal human brain using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroimage 2021;233:117930 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117930 pmid:33711485
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kwon SH,
    2. Scheinost D,
    3. Lacadie C, et al
    . GABA, resting-state connectivity and the developing brain. Neonatology 2014;106:149–55 doi:10.1159/000362433 pmid:24970028
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Tomiyasu M,
    2. Aida N,
    3. Shibasaki J, et al
    . In vivo estimation of gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in the neonatal brain. NMR Biomed 2017;30:e3666 doi:10.1002/nbm.3666 pmid:27859844
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Basu SK,
    2. Pradhan S,
    3. Du Plessis AJ, et al
    . GABA and glutamate in the preterm neonatal brain: in-vivo measurement by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroimage 2021;238:118215 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118215 pmid:34058332
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Xu G,
    2. Broadbelt KG,
    3. Haynes RL, et al
    . Late development of the GABAergic system in the human cerebral cortex and white matter. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2011;70:841–58 doi:10.1097/NEN.0b013e31822f471c pmid:21937910
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Tkac I,
    2. Rao R,
    3. Georgieff MK, et al
    . Developmental and regional changes in the neurochemical profile of the rat brain determined by in vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:24–32 doi:10.1002/mrm.10497 pmid:12815675
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. O'Gorman RL,
    2. Michels L,
    3. Edden RA, et al
    . In vivo detection of GABA and glutamate with MEGA-PRESS: reproducibility and gender effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:1262–67 doi:10.1002/jmri.22520 pmid:21509888
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Castillo-Ruiz A,
    2. Mosley M,
    3. Jacobs AJ, et al
    . Birth delivery mode alters perinatal cell death in the mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:11826–31 doi:10.1073/pnas.1811962115 pmid:30322936
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ramu J,
    2. Konak T,
    3. Liachenko S
    . Magnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis of neurometabolite changes in the developing rat brain at 7T. Brain Res 2016;1651:114–20 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.09.028 pmid:27663970
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Koob M,
    2. Viola A,
    3. Le Fur Y, et al
    . Creatine, glutamine plus glutamate, and macromolecules are decreased in the central white matter of premature neonates around term. PLoS One 2016;11:e0160990 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160990 pmid:27547969
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Basu SK,
    2. Pradhan S,
    3. Kapse K, et al
    . Third trimester cerebellar metabolite concentrations are decreased in very premature infants with structural brain injury. Sci Rep 2019;9:1212–14 doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37203-4 pmid:30718546
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Tanifuji S,
    2. Akasaka M,
    3. Kamei A, et al
    . Temporal brain metabolite changes in preterm infants with normal development. Brain Dev 2017;39:196–202 doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2016.10.006 pmid:27838187
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Craddock RC,
    2. James GA,
    3. Holtzheimer PE, et al
    . A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:1914–28 doi:10.1002/hbm.21333 pmid:21769991
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Evangelou IE,
    2. Noeske R,
    3. Limperopoulos C
    . Retrospective correction of motion induced artifacts in 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fetal brain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Brooklyn, New York, USA. April 16–19, 2015:853–57
  22. 22.↵
    1. Provencher SW
    . Automatic quantitation of localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR Biomed 2001;14:260–64 doi:10.1002/nbm.698 pmid:11410943
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kreis R
    . The trouble with quality filtering based on relative Cramer-Rao lower bounds. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:15–18 doi:10.1002/mrm.25568 pmid:25753153
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wilson M,
    2. Andronesi O,
    3. Barker PB, et al
    . Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: review and recommendations. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:527–50 doi:10.1002/mrm.27742 pmid:30919510
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Edden RA,
    2. Puts NA,
    3. Harris AD, et al
    . Gannet: a batch-processing tool for the quantitative analysis of gamma-aminobutyric acid-edited MR spectroscopy spectra. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:1445–52 doi:10.1002/jmri.24478 pmid:25548816
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lin A,
    2. Andronesi O,
    3. Bogner W, et al
    ; Experts’ Working Group on Reporting Standards for MR Spectroscopy. Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): experts’ consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed 2021;34;e4484 doi:10.1002/nbm.4484 pmid:33559967
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Choi IY,
    2. Andronesi OC,
    3. Barker P, et al
    . Spectral editing in 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy: experts’ consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed 2021;34:e4411 doi:10.1002/nbm.4411 pmid:32946145
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received June 14, 2021.
  • Accepted after revision September 10, 2021.
  • © 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 43 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 43, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regional Differences in Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid and Glutamate Concentrations in the Healthy Newborn Brain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Regional Differences in Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid and Glutamate Concentrations in the Healthy Newborn Brain
S.K. Basu, S. Pradhan, S.D. Barnett, M. Mikkelsen, K.J. Kapse, J. Murnick, J.L. Quistorff, C.A. Lopez, A.J. du Plessis, C. Limperopoulos
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2022, 43 (1) 125-131; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7336

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Regional Differences in Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid and Glutamate Concentrations in the Healthy Newborn Brain
S.K. Basu, S. Pradhan, S.D. Barnett, M. Mikkelsen, K.J. Kapse, J. Murnick, J.L. Quistorff, C.A. Lopez, A.J. du Plessis, C. Limperopoulos
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2022, 43 (1) 125-131; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7336
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

Pediatrics

  • Neuroimaging Features of Biotinidase Deficiency
  • Medullary Tegmental Cap Dysplasia: Fetal and Postnatal Presentations of a Unique Brainstem Malformation
  • Diagnostic Utility of 3D Gradient-Echo MR Imaging Sequences through the Filum Compared with Spin-Echo T1 in Children with Concern for Tethered Cord
Show more Pediatrics

Functional

  • Phenotyping Superagers Using Resting-State fMRI
  • Validity Assessment of an Automated Brain Morphometry Tool for Patients with De Novo Memory Symptoms
  • Identification of the Language Network from Resting-State fMRI in Patients with Brain Tumors: How Accurate Are Experts?
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire