Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Investigating Brain White Matter in Football Players with and without Concussion Using a Biophysical Model from Multishell Diffusion MRI

S. Chung, J. Chen, T. Li, Y. Wang and Y.W. Lui
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2022, 43 (6) 823-828; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7522
S. Chung
aFrom the Department of Radiology (S.C., Y.W.L.), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
bDepartment of Radiology (S.C.), Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Chung
J. Chen
cDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering (J.C., T.L., Y.W.), New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Chen
T. Li
cDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering (J.C., T.L., Y.W.), New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Li
Y. Wang
cDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering (J.C., T.L., Y.W.), New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Wang
Y.W. Lui
aFrom the Department of Radiology (S.C., Y.W.L.), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
bDepartment of Radiology (S.C.), Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y.W. Lui
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been growing concerns around potential risks related to sports-related concussion and contact sport exposure to repetitive head impacts in young athletes. Here we investigate WM microstructural differences between collegiate football players with and without sports-related concussion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 78 collegiate athletes (24 football players with sports-related concussion, 26 football players with repetitive head impacts, and 28 non-contact-sport control athletes), available through the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research registry. Diffusion metrics of diffusion tensor/kurtosis imaging and WM tract integrity were calculated. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics and post hoc ROI analyses were performed to test group differences.

RESULTS: Significantly increased axial kurtosis in those with sports-related concussion compared with controls was observed diffusely across the whole-brain WM, and some focal areas demonstrated significantly higher mean kurtosis and extra-axonal axial diffusivity in sports-related concussion. The extent of significantly different WM regions decreased across time points and remained present primarily in the corpus callosum. Similar differences in axial kurtosis were found between the repetitive head impact and control groups. Other significant differences were seen at unrestricted return-to-play with lower radial kurtosis and intra-axonal diffusivity in those with sports-related concussion compared with the controls, mainly restricted to the posterior callosum.

CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the fact that there are differences in diffusion microstructure measures that are present not only between football players with sports-related injuries and controls, but that there are also measurable differences between football players with repetitive head impacts and controls. This work reinforces previous work showing that the corpus callosum is specifically implicated in sports-related concussion and also suggests this to be true for repetitive head impacts.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AK
axial kurtosis
AWF
axonal water fraction
CC
corpus callosum
Daxon
intra-axonal diffusivity
De,‖
extra-axonal axial diffusivity
De,⊥
extra-axonal radial diffusivity
DKI
diffusional kurtosis imaging
FA
fractional anisotropy
HC
healthy controls
MD
mean diffusivity
MK
mean kurtosis
RHI
repetitive head impact
RK
radial kurtosis
SCAT3
Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3
SRC
sports-related concussion
TBSS
Tract-Based Spatial Statistics
WMTI
white matter tract integrity

Traumatic brain injury is a known risk factor for a host of neurodegenerative disorders,1 and in recent times, there have been growing concerns around potential risks related to sports-related concussion (SRC) and contact sport exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) in our young athletes. There is mounting evidence that concussion and RHI in contact-sport athletes may predispose to long-term consequences, including serious neurologic sequelae such as chronic traumatic encephalopathy despite the lack of macroscopic brain injuries.2,3 It is, thus, of increasing importance to understand the effects that SRC and RHI may have on brain tissue microstructure.

Advanced MR imaging provides one of the few windows into the human brain for detection of injury relating to concussion. In particular, investigators have used DTI to assess WM integrity in athletes with SRC, showing areas of abnormal WM fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD).4,5 While DTI assumes Gaussian diffusion in biological tissue, diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI)6 has been used to detect non-Gaussian diffusion behavior as a reflective marker for microstructural heterogeneity and complexity of tissue, providing improved sensitivity to tissue microstructure. Increased kurtosis has been shown after SRC compared with matched contact-sport control athletes without SRC.7 Given the inherently nonspecific nature of the empiric measures of DTI and DKI, more recent work has been done to study non-sports-related mild traumatic brain injury using compartment-specific WM models8 in an attempt to describe biophysically meaningful microstructure after injury.9,10 Specifically, WM tract integrity (WMTI) metrics, including axonal water fraction (AWF), intra-axonal diffusivity (Daxon) along axons, and extra-axonal axial (De,‖) and extra-axonal radial (De,⊥) diffusivities, can be derived from a straightforward, recently described standard model of multishell diffusion imaging to disentangle intra- and extra-axonal environments.8 Several studies including animal validation11 and in vivo human studies12⇓⇓-15 have shown that WMTI metrics add specificity regarding underlying tissue microstructure to the empiric diffusion measures such as FA.

In this study, we hypothesized that there are subtle changes due to SRC as well as RHI exposure detectable with advanced diffusion imaging. Specifically, we sought to determine what, if any, effects there may be from SRC as well as RHI exposure encountered through routine collegiate-level contact-sport participation on brain microstructure. The data are available through the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research registry from the National Collegiate Athletic Association–Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium.16

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population

Available data through the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research registry from the National Collegiate Athletic Association-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium study were used in this study.16 Participant school-level institutional review board approval and participant consent were obtained. Athletes with SRC within 48 hours and those without SRC during the 2016 to 2018 football seasons were studied. Inclusion criteria for this study were male football players as well as asymptomatic, non-contact-sport control athletes who had available multishell diffusion MR imaging data obtained on a 3T Magnetom Prisma scanner (Siemens). Scanner type was restricted to minimize data variability attributable to scanner hardware and software.

We studied a total of 78 collegiate athletes: 1) 24 football players within 48 hours of SRC (19.7 [SD, 1.1] years of age), 2) twenty-six football players with RHI exposure without a history of SRC during the study period (19.3 [SD, 1.2] years of age), and 3) twenty-eight non-contact-sport control athletes without RHI or a history of SRC (healthy controls [HC]; 19.7 [SD, 1.4] years of age). For all groups, symptom severity was assessed using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 (SCAT3). The non-contact-sport control group comprised asymptomatic (SCAT317 < 10)18 non-contact-sport control male athletes. Non-contact-sport controls were members of the baseball (n = 17), field event (n = 2), and cross-country (n = 9) teams. Longitudinal recovery trajectories for the SRC group were studied using the following 4 time points: 1) 24–48 hours after injury, 2) asymptomatic and after passing initial clearance to begin the return-to-play protocol (asymptomatic), 3) seven days following unrestricted return-to-play, and 4) six months after injury. For comparison, the RHI and HC groups underwent MR imaging at similar time intervals matched with the subjects with SRC.

MR Imaging Acquisition

Details of the MR imaging parameters can be found in Broglio et al.16 In brief, MR images included here were all acquired on 3T Magnetom Prisma scanners. Diffusion imaging was performed with the following parameters: b-values = 1000, 2000 s/mm2, 30 diffusion directions, 8 b=0 images, FOV = 243 × 243 mm, matrix = 90 × 90, slices = 64, isotropic resolution = 2.7 mm, TR/TE = 7900/98 ms.

Image Analyses

Diffusion Image Processing.

Preprocessing steps included Marchenki-Pastur principal component analysis (MP-PCA) denoising,19 Gibbs correction,20 eddy current distortion, and motion correction21 and outlier detection.22 In-house image-processing software developed in Matlab R2019b (MathWorks) was used to generate parameter maps of DTI (FA, mean/axial/radial diffusivities), DKI (mean/axial/radial kurtosis [MK/AK/RK]), and WMTI metrics (AWF, Daxon, De,‖, De,⊥).

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) was used for voxelwise analyses.23 Briefly, individual FA maps were affine-transformed to the FA template (Montreal Neurological Institute 152 space), and voxelwise statistics were performed on maximum FA values projected onto the WM skeleton. All parametric maps underwent unified transformations and processes. The WM skeleton was thresholded at FA = 0.2 for DTI and DKI metrics. For WMTI metrics, we restricted analysis to WM regions consisting primarily of single-fiber orientations (FA threshold = 0.4), as recommended.8

ROI Analyses.

Post hoc subanalyses were performed in an attempt to separate the effects of SRC from RHI. Specifically, the corpus callosum (CC) was studied to understand the temporal evolution of SRC changes. ROIs of the genu, body, and splenium were generated on the basis of the ICBM-DTI-81 WM atlas labels24 by nonlinearly registering each subject's FA map to the FA template.21 A reversed warping procedure was performed to assign the atlas labels to each subject's space.21 All ROIs were manually reviewed and edited if needed. For each ROI, the mean value was obtained only in voxels with FA ≥ 0.2 for DTI and DKI metrics and with FA ≥ 0.4 for WMTI metrics, as recommended.8

Statistical Analyses

ANOVA was used to test group differences of SCAT3 total symptom severity scores as well as mean values within the ROIs at each time point with a Tukey post hoc pair-wise test for multiple comparisons using SPSS, Version 25 (IBM). Results were considered significant for P < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons. For TBSS, statistical tests were conducted with 5000 random permutations to identify statistically significant effects among groups.25 The statistical significance level was set at P < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons by controlling the family-wise error rate with the threshold-free cluster enhancement option.26

RESULTS

The Online Supplemental Data summarize the characteristics of the study cohorts across time points. Briefly, the average time since injury was 8.1 (SD, 5.6) days to an asymptomatic state (time point 2) and 27 (SD, 12.5) days to unrestricted return-to-play (time point 3). Subjects with SRC had significantly higher SCAT3 total symptom severity scores than both the RHI and HC groups at time point 1 (Tukey test, P < .001), but there were no significant differences at other time points. No gross intracranial abnormalities were detected. We found no significant differences between the SRC and RHI groups from both TBSS and ROI analyses.

Football Players with SRC versus Non-Contact-Sport Healthy Controls

TBSS analysis revealed diffusely higher AK in athletes with SRC compared with the HC group at time point 1 (Fig 1). Additionally, there were some focal areas that demonstrated significantly higher MK and De,‖ in the SRC group: namely, the middle-posterior WM regions including the external capsule, posterior limb of the internal capsule, cerebral peduncle, uncinate fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, posterior thalamic radiation, retrolenticular part of internal capsule, and splenium of the CC. The extent of WM regions that showed significant differences in AK between the SRC and HC groups decreased by the fourth time point (6-month follow-up) (Fig 2), though remains present, located almost entirely within the CC (Fig 2A). In addition, significantly different WM regions in MK and De,‖ observed at time point 1 (Fig 1) were not seen at later time points. The other significant between-group differences were seen at unrestricted return-to-play (time point 3) with lower RK and Daxon in the SRC group compared with the HC group, mainly restricted to the posterior callosum (Online Supplemental Data). The results of the ROI analyses in the CC regions were consistent with the TBSS results, showing significantly higher AK across time points (Tukey test, P < .05). Moreover, significantly lower RK (Tukey test, P = .022) in the body of the CC and significantly lower Daxon (Tukey test, P = .045) in the body and splenium of the CC in the SRC group were present only at time point 3 compared with the HC group, supporting the TBSS results (Online Supplemental Data).

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

TBSS results comparing SRC and HC groups at time point 1 (24–48 hours postinjury for SRC; baseline for HC). Top, significant voxels (blue) demonstrating increased AK in the SRC group are present diffusely throughout the WM. Increased MK (middle) and De,‖ (bottom) in the SRC group are also seen in more focal areas of middle posterior WM regions including the external capsule, posterior limb of the internal capsule, cerebral peduncle, uncinate fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, posterior thalamic radiation, retrolenticular part of internal capsule, and splenium of the corpus callosum. The significance level was P < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons by controlling the family-wise error rate. Significant voxels were enlarged using TBSS fill (FSL command; https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TBSS/UserGuide#Displaying_TBSS_Results) for illustrative purposes and were overlapped onto the mean FA skeleton (green).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Evolution of differences in AK between the SRC and HC groups across 4 time points. A, Maps show regions along the WM skeleton that demonstrate a significant difference (blue) in AK between the SRC and HC groups across 4 time points (T1–T4). B, Corresponding bar graphs show the percentage of significantly different voxels on the skeleton across time points. The extent of significantly different WM regions decreases across time points, remaining present primarily within the corpus callosum at time point 4.

Nonconcussed Football Players versus Non-Contact-Sport Healthy Controls

We found widespread differences in AK between the RHI and HC groups as well as diffuse differences in MK, with higher kurtosis measures in RHI (Fig 3). In addition, focal areas demonstrated higher De,‖ and AWF in the RHI group compared with the HC group, including the CC, superior/anterior/posterior corona radiata, superior longitudinal fasciculus, posterior limb of the internal capsule, retrolenticular part of the internal capsule, posterior thalamic radiation, and cerebral peduncle. The ROI analysis results were also in accordance with the TBSS results, showing significantly higher MK (Tukey test, P = .047) as well as a trend toward higher AK in the genu (Tukey test, P = .098) and splenium (Tukey test, P = .053). Significantly higher De,‖ in the body of the CC (Tukey test, P = .016) and a trend toward higher AWF in the splenium (Tukey test, P = .067) were also observed in the RHI group compared with the HC groups.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

TBSS results comparing the RHI and HC groups (time point 1): Clusters of voxels (blue) demonstrating significantly higher AK and MK in the RHI group compared with the HC group are also present diffusely across the entire WM. Additionally, increased De,‖ and AWF in the RHI group are seen in focal areas of WM regions including the corpus callosum, corona radiata, superior longitudinal fasciculus, posterior limb of the internal capsule, retrolenticular part of the internal capsule, posterior thalamic radiation, and cerebral peduncle. The significance level was P < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons by controlling the family-wise error rate.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrate extensive and diffuse WM differences in diffusion metrics, particularly AK, not only between concussed football athletes within 48 hours of injury (SRC) and baseline non-contact-sport control subjects (HC), but also related and widespread differences between nonconcussed football athletes (RHI) and HC subjects. The findings suggest that some of the diffuse measurable microstructural changes observed in the SRC group may relate not to sports-related concussion but to a background of exposure to repeat subconcussive head impacts. Similar changes of kurtosis have been reported previously in nonconcussed young football players with cumulative head impact exposure.27 In addition, the affected WM regions in the SRC group compared with non-contact-sport controls decreased across time points, suggesting partial recovery of microstructural changes during the study period (Fig 2B). Most interesting, persistent higher AK in the SRC group was observed compared with the non-contact-sport controls mainly in the CC on 6-month follow-up scans (Fig 2A), suggesting longer-term persistence of microstructural changes associated with SRC. Although AK is not specific, it reflects tissue microstructural complexity along the long axis of the axon and has been previously associated with changes such as reactive astrogliosis28 as well as frank axon damage.13

We observed few scattered, focal areas of higher De,‖ in the SRC group compared with the non-contact-sport controls only at the acute stage (Fig 1); however, in the RHI group, higher De,‖ was persistently observed across all time points compared with the non-contact-sport controls (Online Supplemental Data). Previous studies have reported De,‖ to be sensitive to changes along the axons in the extra-axial space due to gliosis, loss of oligodendrocytes, extracellular inflammation, and vasogenic edema.15 Of note, these individuals with RHI, unlike the players with SRC who were taken out of active play, were exposed to repeat head impacts throughout the study period. Our findings of the elevated De,‖ accompanied by the increases in AK and MK in these individuals indicate the presence of complex microstructural alterations, localizing to the extracellular space, that seem to relate to exposure to repeat head impacts. While similar findings were present at the initial time point in the SRC group, these were no longer present at later time points after a recuperation period without RHI exposure, suggesting that at least some of the white matter microstructural changes associated with RHI exposure may be reversible early on.

We also observed decreased RK and Daxon and increased AK in the SRC group compared with non-contact-sport controls, present only at time point 3 when the players with SRC were cleared to return to play. These observations were present mainly in the midposterior CC (Online Supplemental Data). Both increased AK and decreased RK have previously been reported by Zhuo et al28 in a controlled compact injury rat model, similarly in the subacute stage after injury (7 days postinjury). These findings support the notion that some changes may become apparent in the subacute phase after the initial insult and that diffusion characteristics relating to the intra-axonal compartment itself are affected. Changes in Daxon have been attributed to a range of pathologies, including axonal disruption as well as axonal injuries such as beading, varicosity, undulation, and swelling.29⇓-31 Decreases in Daxon have previously been observed in the setting of ischemic brain injury13 as well as in subacute civilian, non-sports-related mild traumatic brain injury.9

From biomedical modeling of torsional and stretch forces after head impact, it is known that the CC is an at-risk structure.32,33 Our findings are in keeping with prior evidence that the CC is one of the most affected WM regions after SRC, and this result was also the case in our group exposed to RHI.5,9,34,35 The CC is the largest transhemispheric WM structure, composed of several important anatomically and functionally distinct WM tracts. Our results reinforce the idea that WM injury, particularly affecting the CC, is mechanistically important in SRC and also suggest that this is important in RHI as well.

Our findings add to previously published results from a larger cohort from the National Collegiate Athletic Association-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium study.4,5,36 The current study focuses on diffusion MR imaging microstructural changes; specifically here, we study the subset of the total cohort who underwent multishell diffusion MR imaging accommodating compartment diffusion modeling as discussed in the Materials and Methods section. We also restricted our study by scanner type and sport to minimize data variability relating to these factors.37,38 Moreover, the main difference between the current study and previous studies4,5,36 is that we have used compartment-specific diffusion parameters to try to understand potential changes in the underlying tissue microstructure. Of note, in this restricted cohort, we found no significant differences in conventional DTI metrics such as FA or MD that were present in previous studies, possibly due to use of a smaller subset of the cohort.39

There are several limitations to this study. First, study time points were based on symptomatology and clinical status rather than a predefined follow-up interval, prohibiting parsing of the precise temporal evolution of diffusion MR imaging changes relating to injury and/or exposure. The range in the length of the symptomatic period after injury is, however, reflective of the natural history of SRC. Second, the study includes relatively small sample sizes, which can reduce statistical power, particularly at later time points (time points 3 and 4). The smaller cohort size may have also explained why we did not see changes in FA and MD, which others have previously shown.4,5,36 Finally, we used standard TBSS methods that are well-documented, but TBSS is sensitive to maximal deviations in diffusion metrics because of the use of maximum values projected onto the white matter skeleton. The benefit of such an approach is that it reduces the need for image smoothing and alleviates any residual misalignment.40 In this study, we used both TBSS and post hoc ROI analyses to assess WM changes to look for consistencies between the methods.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences not only in concussed football athletes but also in nonconcussed football athletes compared with non-contact-sport control athletes in terms of diffusion microstructure measures. These findings reinforce previous work showing that the corpus callosum is specifically implicated in football athletes with SRC and also suggest this to be true for football athletes with RHI. Further study on the effect of RHI across time may provide insight into the temporal dynamics of injury in both SRC and athletes who may be exposed to RHI.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant Nos. NIH R01 NS119767-01A1, R01 NS039135-11, R21 NS090349, R56 NS119767, P41 EB017183; the Department of Defense, grant No. DoD PT190013; and the Leon Lowenstein Foundation.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chauhan NB
    . Chronic neurodegenerative consequences of traumatic brain injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2014;32:337–65 doi:10.3233/RNN-130354 pmid:24398724
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Graham R,
    2. Rivara FP,
    3. Ford MA, et al
    Committee on Sports-Related Concussions in Youth; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Institute of Medicine; National Research Council. Consequences of repetitive head impacts and multiple concussions. In: Graham R, Rivara FP, Ford MA, et al; Sports-Related Concussions in Youth: Improving the Science, Changing the Culture. National Academies Press (US); 2014
  3. 3.↵
    1. Alosco ML,
    2. Stern RA
    . The long-term consequences of repetitive head impacts: chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Handb Clin Neurol 2019;167:337–55 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-804766-8.00018-2 pmid:31753141
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mustafi SM,
    2. Harezlak J,
    3. Koch KM, et al
    . Acute white-matter abnormalities in sports-related concussion: a diffusion tensor imaging study from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium. J Neurotrauma 2018;35:2653–64 doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5158 pmid:29065805
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wu YC,
    2. Harezlak J,
    3. Elsaid NM, et al
    . Longitudinal white-matter abnormalities in sports-related concussion: a diffusion MRI study. Neurology 2020;95:e781–92 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009930 pmid:32641518
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jensen JH,
    2. Helpern JA,
    3. Ramani A, et al
    . Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1432–40 doi:10.1002/mrm.20508 pmid:15906300
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lancaster MA,
    2. Olson DV,
    3. McCrea MA, et al
    . Acute white matter changes following sport-related concussion: a serial diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis tensor imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp 2016;37:3821–34 doi:10.1002/hbm.23278 pmid:27237455
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Fieremans E,
    2. Jensen JH,
    3. Helpern JA
    . White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage 2011;58:177–88 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006 pmid:21699989
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Chung S,
    2. Fieremans E,
    3. Wang X, et al
    . White matter tract integrity: an indicator of axonal pathology after mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2018;35:1015–20 doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5320 pmid:29239261
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Grossman EJ,
    2. Kirov II,
    3. Gonen O, et al
    . N-acetyl-aspartate levels correlate with intra-axonal compartment parameters from diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2015;118:334–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.061 pmid:26037050
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jelescu IO,
    2. Zurek M,
    3. Winters KV, et al
    . In vivo quantification of demyelination and recovery using compartment-specific diffusion MRI metrics validated by electron microscopy. Neuroimage 2016;132:104–14 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.004 pmid:26876473
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Jelescu IO,
    2. Veraart J,
    3. Adisetiyo V, et al
    . One diffusion acquisition and different white matter models: how does microstructure change in human early development based on WMTI and NODDI? Neuroimage 2015;107:242–56 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.009 pmid:25498427
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hui ES,
    2. Fieremans E,
    3. Jensen JH, et al
    . Stroke assessment with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Stroke 2012;43:2968–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.657742 pmid:22933581
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. de Kouchkovsky I,
    2. Fieremans E,
    3. Fleysher L, et al
    . Quantification of normal-appearing white matter tract integrity in multiple sclerosis: a diffusion kurtosis imaging study. J Neurol 2016;263:1146–55 doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8118-z pmid:27094571
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fieremans E,
    2. Benitez A,
    3. Jensen JH, et al
    . Novel white matter tract integrity metrics sensitive to Alzheimer disease progression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2105–12 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3553 pmid:23764722
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Broglio SP,
    2. McCrea M,
    3. McAllister T, et al
    ; CARE Consortium Investigators. A national study on the effects of concussion in collegiate athletes and US military service academy members: the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium structure and methods. Sports Med 2017;47:1437–51 doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0707-1 pmid:28281095
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Guskiewicz KM,
    2. Register-Mihalik J,
    3. McCrory P, et al
    . Evidence-based approach to revising the SCAT2: introducing the SCAT3. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:289–93 doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092225 pmid:23479486
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Chen JK,
    2. Johnston KM,
    3. Collie A, et al
    . A validation of the post concussion symptom scale in the assessment of complex concussion using cognitive testing and functional MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:1231–38 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.110395 pmid:17371902
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Veraart J,
    2. Fieremans E,
    3. Novikov DS
    . Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:1582–93 doi:10.1002/mrm.26059 pmid:26599599
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kellner E,
    2. Dhital B,
    3. Kiselev VG, et al
    . Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:1574–81 doi:10.1002/mrm.26054 pmid:26745823
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Woolrich MW, et al
    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23(Suppl 1):S208–19 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 pmid:15501092
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Collier Q,
    2. Veraart J,
    3. Jeurissen B, et al
    . Iterative reweighted linear least squares for accurate, fast, and robust estimation of diffusion magnetic resonance parameters. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:2174–84 doi:10.1002/mrm.25351 pmid:24986440
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Johansen-Berg H, et al
    . Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487–1505 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 pmid:16624579
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Mori S,
    2. Oishi K,
    3. Jiang H, et al
    . Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage 2008;40:570–82 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.035 pmid:18255316
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Winkler AM,
    2. Ridgway GR,
    3. Webster MA, et al
    . Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage 2014;92:381–97 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060 pmid:24530839
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Nichols TE
    . Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009;44:83–98 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 pmid:18501637
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Davenport EM,
    2. Apkarian K,
    3. Whitlow CT, et al
    . Abnormalities in diffusional kurtosis metrics related to head impact exposure in a season of high school varsity football. J Neurotrauma 2016;33:2133–46 doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4267 pmid:27042763
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Zhuo J,
    2. Xu S,
    3. Proctor JL, et al
    . Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage 2012;59:467–77 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.050 pmid:21835250
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Budde MD,
    2. Frank JA
    . Neurite beading is sufficient to decrease the apparent diffusion coefficient after ischemic stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:14472–77 doi:10.1073/pnas.1004841107 pmid:20660718
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hill CS,
    2. Coleman MP,
    3. Menon DK
    . Traumatic axonal injury: mechanisms and translational opportunities. Trends Neurosci 2016;39:311–24 doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.03.002 pmid:27040729
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Tang-Schomer MD,
    2. Johnson VE,
    3. Baas PW, et al
    . Partial interruption of axonal transport due to microtubule breakage accounts for the formation of periodic varicosities after traumatic axonal injury. Exp Neurol 2012;233:364–72 doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.10.030 pmid:22079153
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. McAllister TW,
    2. Ford JC,
    3. Ji S, et al
    . Maximum principal strain and strain rate associated with concussion diagnosis correlates with changes in corpus callosum white matter indices. Ann Biomed Eng 2012;40:127–40 doi:10.1007/s10439-011-0402-6 pmid:21994062
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Patton DA,
    2. McIntosh AS,
    3. Kleiven S
    . The biomechanical determinants of concussion: finite element simulations to investigate tissue-level predictors of injury during sporting impacts to the unprotected head. J Appl Biomech 2015;31:264–68 doi:10.1123/jab.2014-0223 pmid:25781376
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Lancaster MA,
    2. Meier TB,
    3. Olson DV, et al
    . Chronic differences in white matter integrity following sport-related concussion as measured by diffusion MRI: 6-month follow-up. Hum Brain Mapp 2018;39:4276–89 doi:10.1002/hbm.24245 pmid:29964356
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Rutgers DR,
    2. Fillard P,
    3. Paradot G, et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging characteristics of the corpus callosum in mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1730–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1213 pmid:18617586
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Brett BL,
    2. Wu YC,
    3. Mustafi SM, et al
    . The association between persistent white-matter abnormalities and repeat injury after sport-related concussion. Front Neurol 2019;10:1345 doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.01345 pmid:32038451
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Shokouhi M,
    2. Barnes A,
    3. Suckling J, et al
    . Assessment of the impact of the scanner-related factors on brain morphom-etry analysis with Brainvisa. BMC Med Imaging 2011;11:23 doi:10.1186/1471-2342-11-23 pmid:22189342
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Selassie AW,
    2. Wilson DA,
    3. Pickelsimer EE, et al
    . Incidence of sport-related traumatic brain injury and risk factors of severity: a population-based epidemiologic study. Ann Epidemiol 2013;23:750–56 doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.07.022 pmid:24060276
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Jelescu IO,
    2. Budde MD
    . Design and validation of diffusion MRI models of white matter. Front Phys 2017;28:61 doi:10.3389/fphy.2017.00061 pmid:29755979
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Bach M,
    2. Laun FB,
    3. Leemans A, et al
    . Methodological considerations on tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). Neuroimage 2014;100:358–69 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.021 pmid:24945661
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received January 6, 2022.
  • Accepted after revision April 4, 2022.
  • © 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 43 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 43, Issue 6
1 Jun 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Investigating Brain White Matter in Football Players with and without Concussion Using a Biophysical Model from Multishell Diffusion MRI
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Chung, J. Chen, T. Li, Y. Wang, Y.W. Lui
Investigating Brain White Matter in Football Players with and without Concussion Using a Biophysical Model from Multishell Diffusion MRI
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2022, 43 (6) 823-828; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7522

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
White Matter in Football Players: MRI Study
S. Chung, J. Chen, T. Li, Y. Wang, Y.W. Lui
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2022, 43 (6) 823-828; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7522
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Neuroimaging correlates of symptom burden and functional recovery following mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review
  • LONGITUDINAL CHANGES IN WHITE MATTER MICROSTRUCTURAL STATUS FOLLOWING QUANTIFIED HEAD-BALL IMPACTS IN SOCCER: A PRELIMINARY, PROSPECTIVE STUDY
  • Macro- and Microstructural White Matter Differences in Neurologic Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
  • Cognitive and Salience Network Connectivity Changes following a Single Season of Repetitive Head Impact Exposure in High School Football
  • Callosal Interhemispheric Communication in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Mediation Analysis on WM Microstructure Effects
  • Crossref (9)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Associations of prior concussion severity with brain microstructure using mean apparent propagator magnetic resonance imaging
    Bryna D. Goeckner, Benjamin L. Brett, Andrew R. Mayer, Lezlie Y. España, Anjishnu Banerjee, L. Tugan Muftuler, Timothy B. Meier
    Human Brain Mapping 2024 45 1
  • Subtle impairments of perceptual-motor function and well-being are detectable among military cadets and college athletes with self-reported history of concussion
    Gary B. Wilkerson, Marisa A. Colston, Shellie N. Acocello, Jennifer A. Hogg, Lynette M. Carlson
    Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 2023 5
  • Identifying relevant diffusion MRI microstructure biomarkers relating to exposure to repeated head impacts in contact sport athletes
    Junbo Chen, Sohae Chung, Tianhao Li, Els Fieremans, Dmitry S Novikov, Yao Wang, Yvonne W Lui
    The Neuroradiology Journal 2023 36 6
  • Deep learning with diffusion MRI as in vivo microscope reveals sex-related differences in human white matter microstructure
    Junbo Chen, Vara Lakshmi Bayanagari, Sohae Chung, Yao Wang, Yvonne W. Lui
    Scientific Reports 2024 14 1
  • Cognitive and Salience Network Connectivity Changes following a Single Season of Repetitive Head Impact Exposure in High School Football
    Mohammad I. Kawas, Kyle M. Atcheson, William C. Flood, Christopher A. Sheridan, Richard A. Barcus, Laura A. Flashman, Thomas W. McAllister, Megan E. Lipford, Jeongchul Kim, Jillian E. Urban, Elizabeth M. Davenport, Christopher G. Vaughan, Kiran K. Solingapuram Sai, Joel D. Stitzel, Joseph A. Maldjian, Christopher T. Whitlow
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2024 45 8
  • Macro- and Microstructural White Matter Differences in Neurologic Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
    Erin E. O’Connor, Rosangela Salerno-Goncalves, Nikita Rednam, Rory O’Brien, Peter Rock, Andrea R. Levine, Thomas A. Zeffiro
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2024 45 12
  • Callosal Interhemispheric Communication in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Mediation Analysis on WM Microstructure Effects
    Sohae Chung, Tamar Bacon, Joseph F. Rath, Alaleh Alivar, Santiago Coelho, Prin Amorapanth, Els Fieremans, Dmitry S. Novikov, Steven R. Flanagan, Joshua H. Bacon, Yvonne W. Lui
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2024 45 6
  • Correlating Magnetoencephalography, Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging, Biomechanics, and Neuropsychology in American Youth Football
    Natalie M. Bell, Fang F. Yu, Yin Xi, Amy L. Proskovec, James M. Holcomb, Sahil Chilukuri, Jillian E. Urban, Christopher Vaughan, Jesse C. DeSimone, Ben Wagner, Mark A. Espeland, Alexander K. Powers, Christopher T. Whitlow, Joel D. Stitzel, Joseph A. Maldjian, Elizabeth M. Davenport
    Journal of Neurotrauma 2025
  • Evidence for Altered White Matter Organization After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review on the Use of Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Blood-Based Biomarkers to Investigate Acute Pathology and Relationship to Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms
    Melissa G. Papini, André N. Avila, Melinda Fitzgerald, Sarah C. Hellewell
    Journal of Neurotrauma 2025 42 7-8

More in this TOC Section

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Functional

  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Multiparametric MRI in PEDS Pontine Glioma
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire